Weekly Routing Table Report

[Routing Analysis Role Account]

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.

The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG, IRNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.

Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net

For historical data, please see http://thyme.rand.apnic.net.

If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith .

Routing Table Report   04:00 +10GMT Sat 08 Sep, 2018

Report Website: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net
Detailed Analysis:  http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/

Analysis Summary


BGP routing table entries examined:  714282
Prefixes after maximum aggregation (per Origin AS):  274250
Deaggregation factor:  2.60
Unique aggregates announced (without unneeded subnets):  343136
Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 61743
Prefixes per ASN: 11.57
Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:   53330
Origin ASes announcing only one prefix:   23274
Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:8413
Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:260
Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table:   4.0
Max AS path length visible:  34
Max AS path prepend of ASN ( 30873)  32
Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table:70
Number of instances of unregistered ASNs:70
Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs:  23997
Number of 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:   19338
Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table:   80928
Number of bogon 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:30
Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table:2
Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space:309
Number of addresses announced to Internet:   2854496324
Equivalent to 170 /8s, 36 /16s and 40 /24s
Percentage of available address space announced:   77.1
Percentage of allocated address space announced:   77.1
Percentage of available address space allocated:  100.0
Percentage of address space in use by end-sites:   99.0
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  238728

APNIC Region Analysis Summary
-

Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes:   194899
Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation:   55458
APNIC Deaggregation factor:3.51
Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks:  193038
Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks:79417
APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:9064
APNIC Prefixes per ASN:   21.30
APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:   2553
APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:   1359
Average APNIC Region AS path length visible:4.0
Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 31
Number of APNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:   4025
Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet:  767575043
Equivalent to 45 /8s, 192 /16s and 68 /24s
APNIC AS Blocks4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431
(pre-ERX allocations)  23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079, 55296-56319,
   58368-59391, 63488-64098, 64297-64395, 131072-139577
APNIC Address Blocks 1/8,  14/8,  27/8,  36/8,  39/8,  42/8,  43/8,
49/8,  58/8,  59/8,  60/8,  61/8, 101/8, 103/8,
   106/8, 110/8, 111/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8,
   116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8,
   123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 133/8, 150/8, 153/8,
   163/8, 171/8, 175/8, 180/8, 182/8, 183/8, 202/8,
   203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8, 219/8, 220/8, 221/8,
   222/8, 223/8,

ARIN Region Analysis Summary


Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes:212189
Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation:   100504
ARIN Deaggregation factor: 2.11
Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks:   211894
Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks:100633
ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:18243
ARIN Prefixes per ASN:11.62

RE: Study on configuration change practices

[Aaron Gould]

Hi Aaron, interesting …making routers do what you intend…hmmm… Sounds like 
SDN J   …how does what you are doing differ from the intent-based-controller 
driven sdn concepts that I hear so much about these days.

 

BTW, I did the survey.

 

- Aaron

 

From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Gember-Jacobson
Sent: Friday, September 7, 2018 8:52 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Study on configuration change practices

 

We are a team of networking researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison 
and Colgate University investigating methods for automatically synthesizing 
router configurations from high-level requirements (or intents). To guide our 
research, we seek to better understand the configuration change practices used 
in production networks.

We would appreciate if you could take 3 minutes to complete our brief, 
anonymous survey: https://colgate.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3ee26xayy70jP3D

To learn more about our research, visit  
 
http://aaron.gember-jacobson.com/research/repair

Thanks,
Aaron Gember-Jacobson

Assistant Professor of Computer Science

Colgate University

Study on configuration change practices

[Aaron Gember-Jacobson]

We are a team of networking researchers at the University of
Wisconsin-Madison and Colgate University investigating methods for
automatically synthesizing router configurations from high-level
requirements (or intents). To guide our research, we seek to better
understand the configuration change practices used in production networks.

We would appreciate if you could take 3 minutes to complete our brief,
anonymous
survey: https://colgate.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3ee26xayy70jP3D

To learn more about our research, visit
http://aaron.gember-jacobson.com/research/repair

Thanks,
Aaron Gember-Jacobson
*Assistant Professor of Computer Science*
*Colgate University*

Re: Vultr contact

[Alistair Mackenzie]

Have you tried choopa? They own and/or operate vultr.

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 2:09 PM Mehmet Akcin  wrote:

> I got no response really. people were more like sharing their experience.
> i guess there isn't anyone.
>
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 7:03 AM Niels Bakker 
> wrote:
>
>> * meh...@akcin.net (Mehmet Akcin) [Fri 07 Sep 2018, 14:51 CEST]:
>> >I have been looking for a contact in Vultr for awhile now. Can
>> >anyone help me contact with them?
>> >
>> >(i need help beyond their sales/support channels)
>>
>> You posted the same thing on 29 August.  I suggest you look for
>> replies to that email.
>>
>>
>> -- Niels.
>>
>

Re: Vultr contact

[Mehmet Akcin]

I got no response really. people were more like sharing their experience. i
guess there isn't anyone.

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 7:03 AM Niels Bakker  wrote:

> * meh...@akcin.net (Mehmet Akcin) [Fri 07 Sep 2018, 14:51 CEST]:
> >I have been looking for a contact in Vultr for awhile now. Can
> >anyone help me contact with them?
> >
> >(i need help beyond their sales/support channels)
>
> You posted the same thing on 29 August.  I suggest you look for
> replies to that email.
>
>
> -- Niels.
>

Re: Vultr contact

[Niels Bakker]

* meh...@akcin.net (Mehmet Akcin) [Fri 07 Sep 2018, 14:51 CEST]:
I have been looking for a contact in Vultr for awhile now. Can 
anyone help me contact with them?


(i need help beyond their sales/support channels)


You posted the same thing on 29 August.  I suggest you look for 
replies to that email.



-- Niels.

Vultr contact

[Mehmet Akcin]

Hello,

I have been looking for a contact in Vultr for awhile now. Can anyone help
me contact with them?

(i need help beyond their sales/support channels)

mehmet

Last call for presentations and Draft programme for RIPE 77

[Benno Overeinder]

Colleagues,

A list of currently accepted RIPE 77 presentations is now published at:

https://ripe77.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/plenary/

There are still plenary, BoF, tutorial and workshop slots remaining for
the final RIPE 77 programme and RIPE Programme Committee will accept new
proposals until *21 September 2018*.

This is our last call for you to submit your proposals.

You can find the CFP for RIPE 77 below or at
https://ripe77.ripe.net/submit-topic/cfp/, for your proposals for
plenary session presentations, tutorials, workshops, BoFs (Birds of a
Feather sessions) and lightning talks.

Please also note that speakers do not receive any extra reduction or
funding towards the meeting fee at the RIPE Meetings, see the "Speakers"
paragraph in CFP for more information.

Kind regards,

Benno Overeinder
RIPE PC Chair
https://ripe77.ripe.net/ripe-pc/


>>><<<

Call for Presentations

A RIPE Meeting is an open event where Internet Service Providers,
network operators and other interested parties get together.  Although
the meeting is mostly technical, it is also a chance for people to meet
and network with others in their field.

*RIPE 77 will take place from 15-19 October in Amsterdam, The Netherlands*

The RIPE Programme Committee (PC) is now seeking content proposals from
the RIPE community for the plenary sessions, BoFs (Birds of a Feather
sessions), panels, workshops, tutorials and lightning talks at RIPE 77.
See the full descriptions of the different presentation formats:

https://ripe77.ripe.net/submit-topic/presentation-formats/

Proposals for plenary sessions, BoFs, panels, workshops and tutorials
must be submitted for full consideration no later than *21 September 2018*.
Proposals submitted after this date will be considered depending on the
slots still available in the programme.

The PC is looking for presentations covering the topics of network
engineering and operations, including but not limited to:

- IPv6 deployment
- Managing IPv4 scarcity
- Data centre technologies
- Network and DNS operations
- Internet governance and regulatory practices
- Network and routing security
- Content delivery
- Internet peering and mobile data exchange
- Connected Things (aka. Internet of Things - IoT)


Speakers

Presenters, RIPE Working Group Chairs and the RIPE Programme Committee
are required to cover their own costs to attend a RIPE Meeting (meeting
ticket, travel and accommodation).  We have various ticket options
available depending on your needs.

In extraordinary circumstances, the RIPE Chair can waive the meeting fee
for presenters.  These requests are dealt with on a case-by-case basis
via p...@ripe.net.  Also note that, on an individual basis, participants
can apply for a RIPE Fellowship or RACI to develop their professional or
academic career.  For more information, please visit:

https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/ripe-fellowship
https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/raci


Submissions

Presenters should be clear on whether they wish to submit a presentation
for a plenary or working group (WG) session.  At present, most working
groups will solicit policy proposals, discussion points or other content
directly via their mailing lists.  If you’re not sure what kind of
session you should be presenting at, please visit:
https://ripe77.ripe.net/plenary-or-wg/

RIPE Meeting attendees are quite sensitive to keeping presentations
non-commercial, and product marketing talks are strongly discouraged.
Repeated audience feedback shows that the most successful talks focus on
operational experience, research results, or case studies.  For example,
presenters wishing to describe a commercial solution should focus on the
underlying technology and should not attempt a product demonstration.

Presenters should indicate how much time they will require.  In general,
the time allocated for the different presentation formats is as follows:

- Plenary presentations: 20-25 minutes presentation with 5-10 minutes
  discussion
- Tutorials: up to two hours (Monday morning)
- Workshops: one hour (during evening sessions) to two hours (Monday
  morning)
- BoFs: approximately one hour (during evening sessions)
- Lightning talks: 10 minutes in total for both the presentation and any
  discussion

The following general requirements apply:

- Proposals must be submitted using the meeting submission system,
  https://ripe77.ripe.net/submit-topic/

- Lightning talks should also be submitted using the meeting submission
  system (https://ripe77.ripe.net/submit-topic/) and can be submitted
  any time up to and including the meeting week.  The allocation of
  lightning talks will be announced on short notice, in some cases on
  the same day but often one day prior to the time slot allocated.

- Presenters who propose a panel or BoF are encouraged to include
  speakers from several (perhaps even competing) companies and/or a
  neutral facilitator.

- All presentation