Re: Access to raw network data
On Mon, 06 May 2019 03:59:18 -, lobna gouda said: > Does anyone know if there is public sources for network data that can be use > to train model? What data, and what model? What problem are you trying to solve by training a model? Hint: A model trained on data from Comcast's network is probably going to explode when you try to apply it to Google's internal network, because network design and conditions will be vastly different. pgpZsRmL4Scep.pgp Description: PGP signature
Access to raw network data
Hello, Does anyone know if there is public sources for network data that can be use to train model? If not public, can someone provide access for research and all data confidentially rights will be preserved. Brgds, LG
Re: any interesting/useful resources available to IPv6 only?
On 5/3/19 1:33 PM, Mohammad Khalil wrote: Hello all I have prepared something in the past you might find useful (hopefully). First, it's considered rude to send attachments of any size to a mailing list, never mind one that's almost 2 megs in size. Much better to put it on a web site somewhere and send a URL. Second, I normally wouldn't respond to something like this, except that there are so many errors and bad ideas in your document that I felt compelled to respond lest someone find it in the archives and rely on it. I will assume that your intentions were good here, however your results are dangerous, in the sense that someone reading your document would be worse off than if they had not read it. Taking one tidbit from one of your early paragraphs, "The IPv6 protocol creates a 128-bit address, four times the size of the 32-bit IPv4 standard." There is, sort of, a sense in which you could say that the addresses themselves are four times the size, but it creates a dangerous impression that the total address space of IPv6 is only four times the size of IPv4; and it's the address space that is the thing actually worth talking about. Many of your other errors also involve math, which suggests a lack of understanding of basic networking concepts, binary math, etc. For example, "With 264 available addresses per segment, it is highly unlikely to see prefix lengths shorter than /64 for segments that host end systems." A /64 segment in IPv6 has 2^64 address, or the entire IPv4 address range, squared. Maybe you meant to say 2^64 and forgot the exponent indicator? Given that you correctly identify exponents in other sections, it's hard to tell. The document is also out of date in regards to the latest protocol changes, deprecations, etc.; and further out of date in regards to how operators are actually implementing IPv6. Again, sorry to pile on ... If anyone is looking for a pretty good introduction to the basics of IPv6 the Wikipedia article is a good start. hope this helps, Doug
Re: any interesting/useful resources available to IPv6 only?
I've found a VPS provider (https://www.vultr.com/pricing/) that offers cheaper instances with IPv6 only. I suspect that there might be others, as ultimately those sort of services can't really escape the issue by using NAT. kind regards Pshem On Sat, 4 May 2019 at 03:15, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to make a case (to old fuddy-duddies, which is why I even > need to actually make a case) for IPv6 for my own selfish reasons. :-) > > I wonder if anyone has any references to interesting/useful/otherwise > resources on are only available to IPv6 users that they can forward to > me. > > Cheers, > b. > >
Re: any interesting/useful resources available to IPv6 only?
Op 03-05-19 om 17:14 schreef Brian J. Murrell: I wonder if anyone has any references to interesting/useful/otherwise resources on are only available to IPv6 users that they can forward to me. Most of my personals websites are IPv6-only, but they are neither interesting nor useful. Although, perhaps https://dnslabs.nl/ is of any use, because I made every attempt to make it entirely IPv6-only, including it's authoritative name servers. That sometimes leads to interesting results. And furthermore I'd like to recommend a site that is not mine, but that I appreciate a lot: https://42.be/ -- Marco
