Comcast/Xfinity blocking my domain
Anyone here have some contact emails where I can reach out to them and appeal it? They're falsely blocking my website. I've done a lot of research and it proves that it is almost impossible to get in touch with them, many companies have been heavily affected by the false-positive blocks. Really appreciate any responses! :-)
PTP/Syncronized Ethernet maturity
Hello everybody, We have deployed PTP in our mobile NW since late 2019 as a part of the 4G/5G, however we are seeing a lots of instabilities and interop issues, a lot of the issues have ended up with SW bugs in the OS, I have no specific question, however I got the impression that the technology/protocol is not yet mature, anybody here got his hands dirty with PTP? Thanks, MP
Re: Centurylink having a bad morning?
On 5/Sep/20 18:46, Randy Bush via NANOG wrote: > fracking dmark illegal header hacking :( > > apologies No worries :-). Mark.
Re: Centurylink having a bad morning?
On 5/Sep/20 17:58, Randy Bush via NANOG wrote: > spoken like a tier two Even "Tier 1's" aren't present everywhere :-)... Although I'm not sure whether having presence in every city means you are a Tier-anything either... Mark.
Re: sr - spring - what's the deal with 2 names
Aaron, Out of curiosity - if you are interested in SR, where are you getting your information from if not IETF (SPRING)? As for history - we (at Redback) have published 1st draft describing SR-MPLS data plane in 2003 (LDP control plane). Regards, Jeff > On Sep 6, 2020, at 09:53, Saku Ytti via NANOG wrote: > > Hey, > > >> On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 at 04:26, Aaron Gould via NANOG wrote: >> >> Does anyone know the scope on why we have 2 names for this ? Seriously, was >> it one of those things where a vendor started doing it first (pre-standard) >> as sr, and then ietf started standardizing it as spring ? …or was it always >> being standardized pre-vendor implementation and there was a disagreement >> within ietf or elsewhere ? or… was there a conscious decision amongst the >> inventors to actually call it both sr and spring ? or is their actually >> something different about each one and I’m wrong in thinking they are 2 >> names for the same technology. > > If you don't like the names, I have others. > > SPRING is the IETF working group name - Source Packet Routing in Networking > Segment Routing is under SPRING > > -- > ++ytti
Re: sr - spring - what's the deal with 2 names
Hey, On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 at 04:26, Aaron Gould via NANOG wrote: > Does anyone know the scope on why we have 2 names for this ? Seriously, was > it one of those things where a vendor started doing it first (pre-standard) > as sr, and then ietf started standardizing it as spring ? …or was it always > being standardized pre-vendor implementation and there was a disagreement > within ietf or elsewhere ? or… was there a conscious decision amongst the > inventors to actually call it both sr and spring ? or is their actually > something different about each one and I’m wrong in thinking they are 2 names > for the same technology. If you don't like the names, I have others. SPRING is the IETF working group name - Source Packet Routing in Networking Segment Routing is under SPRING -- ++ytti
