Intro and Invitation to SANOG
Hail NANOGers! As I must assume you are all aware, NANOG is one of many NOGs & NOFs around the world these days. One of the oldest of those NOGs that many of you may not have heard of is SANOG - the South Asian Network Operators Group. SANOG has been running strong since 2003. And their community has done amazing work in their region, from the jungles of Sri Lanka to the mountaintops of Nepal and a whole lot more. Learn more about SANOG here: https://sanog.org/ But why am I telling you this? Well, I'm on the PC for their next meeting (SANOG 37), which will be held virtually from Colombo. "Virtually" means you have an opportunity to share your knowledge with an international audience, without getting on a plane! Present on a topic that will support the SANOG community with your expertise and experience from the comfort of your own home/office! Call for Papers is open: https://sanog.org/sanog37/ Feel free to hit me with questions. Cheers, ~Chris -- @ChrisGrundemann http://chrisgrundemann.com
1950 Stemmons Meet me rooms?
Who knows about the meet me rooms at 1950 Stemmons in Dallas? I need to get from the cologix meet me room to someone inside Equinix. Our Equnix rep has been less than helpful. I was told "We really don’t have a building meet me room there anymore since we bought the building. Also, I don’t think we have connectivity to Cologix but I will check on this.” Can anyone shed some light on this? Anyone on list that has some dark fiber between Cologix and Equinix? Replies off list are fine so I am not cluttering up the list. Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net — https://j2sw.com - All things jsw (AS209109) https://blog.j2sw.com - Podcast and Blog
Re: Contact from Verisign J root
Hernan, I will contact you off-list. DW > On May 25, 2021, at 1:17 PM, Hernan Moguilevsky wrote: > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > > Hi, > > Can someone from Verisign J root contact me off list please? > noc@ is not answering owr mails. > > Thanks. > Regards. > > -- > Saludos > HM > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
RE: MPLS/MEF Switches and NIDs
7210-sas-s or 7210-sas-sx is the low cost 24/48x1 4x10G option. These are very affordable and reliable MPLS transport devices. You’ll need to contact your local Nokia rep for pricing. regards From: Colton Conor Sent: Thursday, 27 May 2021 5:03 am To: Tony Wicks Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: MPLS/MEF Switches and NIDs Tony, Thanks, I wasn't aware of this model. This would compete with the ACX710 based on the specs (actually have a bit more ports). I guess I will have to reach out, but price wise where does this box come in? What is Nokia's low cost NID that has at least 4 10G ports? On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 11:49 AM Tony Wicks mailto:t...@wicks.co.nz> > wrote: The Nokia 7250-ixr-e covers exactly the port density and price range you are looking for. 24x1/10, 8x10/25 and 2x100G with 300G total capacity. From: NANOG mailto:wicks.co...@nanog.org> > On Behalf Of Colton Conor Sent: Thursday, 27 May 2021 4:39 am To: NANOG mailto:nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: MPLS/MEF Switches and NIDs We have used Juniper's ACX line primarily, but there is a big gap in their product line. The ACX2200 has only two 10G ports. The next jump up from there is the ACX710 with 24 10G ports. They have nothing in between that has 4-12 10G ports. Not to mention, Juniper is very proud price wise. We are looking for cost efficient 10G NIDs with at least 4 10G ports on them and aggregation boxes with at least 12 10G ports on them with 25g/100G uplinks.
Re: MPLS/MEF Switches and NIDs
Tony, Thanks, I wasn't aware of this model. This would compete with the ACX710 based on the specs (actually have a bit more ports). I guess I will have to reach out, but price wise where does this box come in? What is Nokia's low cost NID that has at least 4 10G ports? On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 11:49 AM Tony Wicks wrote: > The Nokia 7250-ixr-e covers exactly the port density and price range you > are looking for. 24x1/10, 8x10/25 and 2x100G with 300G total capacity. > > > > *From:* NANOG *On Behalf Of *Colton > Conor > *Sent:* Thursday, 27 May 2021 4:39 am > *To:* NANOG > *Subject:* MPLS/MEF Switches and NIDs > > > > > > We have used Juniper's ACX line primarily, but there is a big gap in their > product line. The ACX2200 has only two 10G ports. The next jump up from > there is the ACX710 with 24 10G ports. They have nothing in between that > has 4-12 10G ports. Not to mention, Juniper is very proud price wise. We > are looking for cost efficient 10G NIDs with at least 4 10G ports on them > and aggregation boxes with at least 12 10G ports on them with 25g/100G > uplinks. >
RE: MPLS/MEF Switches and NIDs
The Nokia 7250-ixr-e covers exactly the port density and price range you are looking for. 24x1/10, 8x10/25 and 2x100G with 300G total capacity. From: NANOG On Behalf Of Colton Conor Sent: Thursday, 27 May 2021 4:39 am To: NANOG Subject: MPLS/MEF Switches and NIDs We have used Juniper's ACX line primarily, but there is a big gap in their product line. The ACX2200 has only two 10G ports. The next jump up from there is the ACX710 with 24 10G ports. They have nothing in between that has 4-12 10G ports. Not to mention, Juniper is very proud price wise. We are looking for cost efficient 10G NIDs with at least 4 10G ports on them and aggregation boxes with at least 12 10G ports on them with 25g/100G uplinks.
MPLS/MEF Switches and NIDs
For MPLS and MEF switches, I know Juniper, Cisco, and Nokia are commonly talked about on this list. However, I was wondering if anyone has evaluated other brands? We are not interested in looking at chinese based vendors, so ZTE and Huawei are not an option. Anyone else worth looking into? We have used Juniper's ACX line primarily, but there is a big gap in their product line. The ACX2200 has only two 10G ports. The next jump up from there is the ACX710 with 24 10G ports. They have nothing in between that has 4-12 10G ports. Not to mention, Juniper is very proud price wise. We are looking for cost efficient 10G NIDs with at least 4 10G ports on them and aggregation boxes with at least 12 10G ports on them with 25g/100G uplinks. Ciena seems to have multiple options available with Segment Routing, MPLS, and streaming telemetry support. I am probably most interested in what Ciena has to offer. Has anyone deployed the 3000 or 5000 product line of Ciena? How does it compare to Juniper? The Ciena 3924 is sub $1000 for example, and has 4 10G ports on it. Adva has quite a few options as well, but I don't think their routing stack is as strong as Ciena's. Tejas was an unknown player to me, but they seem to have a couple of options that fit the bill. Price wise, I have heard the run circles around everyone. RAD has some options, but their pricing looks much higher than Ciena. Accedian looked interesting, but it seems they don't make aggregation switches, only NIDs. ECI Telecom / Ribbon seems to have some options, but I have not talked to them. What does Nokia and Cisco have in this space, and price wise is it going to compare to these less known vendors?
Re: Flowspec IPv6
Turns out the apply-group isn't working for v6 rules. ATAC made me replicate the same rule directly under routing-options and inet6flow.0 appeared and I can see my rule populated now. FYI I'm running vRR 20.4R1-S1.2 On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 4:55 AM Zbyněk Pospíchal wrote: > Hi Eric, > > with no v6 fs rules, the table inet6flow.0 stay hidden. Try to make any. > > -- > S pozdravem/Best Regards, > Zbyněk > > > > Dne 21.05.21 v 20:10 Eric Dugas via NANOG napsal(a): > > Hello, > > > > I've been fiddling with JunOS to enable Flowspec IPv6. According to the > > docs, it was implemented in 16.x. I've tried to set it up in vRR and vMX > > in the 20.x train. Everything commit just fine, I get the inetflow.0 for > > IPv4 but inet6flow.0 is not appearing. > > > > I already have a JTAC case (now escalated to ATAC) but I am looking for > > plan B. > > > > Has anyone implemented Flowspec v6? I was thinking about FRRouting but I > > wanted to get some feedback from the community before spending more > > hours into this. > > > > Thanks > > Eric > >
