Looking for AT internal routing contact

[Al]

If someone knows a good AT routing problem contact, please let me know 
offline.
Apparently in some cases the AT system routers in the business fiber 
division stop routing IPv6 to customers.
I suspect some mid-level DHCPv6 larger block lease expiration issue, but 
all I know for sure is that AT mid-level routers start returning 
"address unreachable" errors for blocks of IPv6 addresses.


As expected there is no working customer service infrastructure at AT 
to deal with anything other than customer modem issues and they're not 
allowed to escalate.


If anyone has a contact, please let me know.

thanks,

Al Whaley
Sunnyside Computing, Inc.

[NANOG-announce] NANOG 88 Keynote, First ABQNOG a Success + Standard Rates Ending Sunday

[Nanog News]

*Len Bosack Takes NANOG 88 Keynote Stage*
*"From Data Links to Internets: A Quick Tour"*

>From concept to equipment needs to various attempts to today—Bosack
provides insight into the path of getting from the initial data links
before the Internet to the commercial Internet the world has come to know.

*REGISTER NOW *

*Standard Rates for NANOG 88 Ending Sunday, 28 May*
*Register Now for NANOG 88 Virtually or In-Person —12-14, June in Seattle*

*REGISTER NOW
*

*First ABQNOG a Success*
*“Every NOG Has Left Me with New Info, New Business Contacts, and New
Friends”*

We caught up with John Osmon, a seasoned industry pro and organizer of
ABQNOG to talk about the new regional NOG meeting.

*"This event drove home the fact that local events can be highly
beneficial. National conferences are one of many ways to open your eyes to
what is happening in the industry. It's also important to look around at
your neighbors!"*

*READ MORE *


*Join our Whiskey Connoisseurs Affinity Group!*
*Find Community in our Online Discussion Threads*

The NANOG Affinity Groups are part of the Community Forum and allow our
members to connect over shared interests.

We need your voice! Connect with others in the tech industry and find
mentorship and support while sharing your experiences.

*JOIN NOW * 
___
NANOG-announce mailing list
NANOG-announce@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce

NANOG 88 Keynote, First ABQNOG a Success + Standard Rates Ending Sunday

[Nanog News]

*Len Bosack Takes NANOG 88 Keynote Stage*
*"From Data Links to Internets: A Quick Tour"*

>From concept to equipment needs to various attempts to today—Bosack
provides insight into the path of getting from the initial data links
before the Internet to the commercial Internet the world has come to know.

*REGISTER NOW *

*Standard Rates for NANOG 88 Ending Sunday, 28 May*
*Register Now for NANOG 88 Virtually or In-Person —12-14, June in Seattle*

*REGISTER NOW
*

*First ABQNOG a Success*
*“Every NOG Has Left Me with New Info, New Business Contacts, and New
Friends”*

We caught up with John Osmon, a seasoned industry pro and organizer of
ABQNOG to talk about the new regional NOG meeting.

*"This event drove home the fact that local events can be highly
beneficial. National conferences are one of many ways to open your eyes to
what is happening in the industry. It's also important to look around at
your neighbors!"*

*READ MORE *


*Join our Whiskey Connoisseurs Affinity Group!*
*Find Community in our Online Discussion Threads*

The NANOG Affinity Groups are part of the Community Forum and allow our
members to connect over shared interests.

We need your voice! Connect with others in the tech industry and find
mentorship and support while sharing your experiences.

*JOIN NOW * 

Re: AS37468 (Angola Cables) - Route Leak?

[Phil Lavin via NANOG]

Thanks, Mark



> On 25 May 2023, at 13:34, Mark Tinka  wrote:
> 
> I've reached out to some known folk at Angola Cables. Will let you know if I 
> hear back.
> 
> Mark.
> 
> On 5/25/23 14:01, Phil Lavin via NANOG wrote:
>> Cross-posting from outages list:
>> 
>> Hey Folks,
>> 
>> Seeing massive packet loss on routes from AWS to Hetzner today. First was 
>> AWS USW2 -> Hetzner (e.g. 88.99.88.69).
>> 
>> Traffic was transiting via AS37468 (Angola Cables) in Coresite IX.
>> 
>> Now got loss from AWS apse1/apse2. Traffic transiting via AS37468 on Equinix 
>> IX.
>> 
>> I e-mailed Hetzner NOC but they don’t seem entirely bothered, currently.
>> 
>>My traceroute  [v0.94]
>> jcasc-rtc01 (10.36.21.252) -> phil.lavin.me.uk   
>> 2023-05-25T11:50:13+
>> Keys:  Help   Display mode   Restart statistics   Order of fields   quit
>> Packets   Pings
>>  Host Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
>>  1. ip-10-36-17-199.ap-southeast-  0.0%180.1   0.6   0.1   7.7   1.8
>>  2. ec2-18-141-171-15.ap-southeas  0.0%184.3  17.5   0.9  95.7  24.0
>> ec2-18-141-171-1.ap-southeast-1.compute.amazonaws.com 
>> 
>>  3. (waiting for reply)
>>  4. (waiting for reply)
>>  5. (waiting for reply)
>>  6. (waiting for reply)
>>  7. (waiting for reply)
>>  8. 100.65.10.161  0.0%170.6   1.4   0.3   9.6   2.4
>> 100.65.11.65
>>  9. 150.222.108.75 0.0%172.1   3.0   1.0  13.1   3.3
>> 52.93.10.74
>> 10. 150.222.108.82 0.0%172.2   2.4   1.3  10.2   2.1
>> 11. 52.93.11.115   0.0%175.8   2.4   1.2   9.7   2.5
>> 52.93.10.185
>> 12. 37468-sg1-ix.equinix.com   68.8%   
>>  17  268.6 279.0 262.4 312.8  19.8
>> 13. 102.219.127.3 93.8%17  420.0 420.0 420.0 420.0   0.0
>> 14. (waiting for reply)
>> 15. 195.66.227.20962.5%17  467.9 456.9 440.3 488.2  18.5
>> 16. core6.par.hetzner.com  75.0%
>> 17  455.6 464.1 455.6 486.3  14.8
>> 17. core11.nbg1.hetzner.com    75.0%
>> 17  459.5 467.5 445.9 497.3  21.8
>> 18. core23.fsn1.hetzner.com    68.8%
>> 17  478.4 441.0 390.0 478.4  32.0
>> 19. ex9k1.dc1.fsn1.hetzner.com 87.5% 
>>17  460.4 454.2 448.1 460.4   8.7
>> 20. vmh02.lavin.me.uk  75.0%17  
>> 433.3 424.2 382.7 441.9  27.9
>> 21. (waiting for reply)
>> 22. http-lb-01.lavin.me.uk 75.0%
>> 17  436.8 438.6 385.0 493.3  44.2
>> 
>> I’ve been out of the BGP game for a few years now. Anybody have visibility 
>> of the extent of the leaks?
>> 
>> 
>> Phil
>> 
> 

Re: AS37468 (Angola Cables) - Route Leak?

[Mark Tinka]

I've reached out to some known folk at Angola Cables. Will let you know 
if I hear back.


Mark.

On 5/25/23 14:01, Phil Lavin via NANOG wrote:

Cross-posting from outages list:

Hey Folks,

Seeing massive packet loss on routes from AWS to Hetzner today. First 
was AWS USW2 -> Hetzner (e.g. 88.99.88.69).


Traffic was transiting via AS37468 (Angola Cables) in Coresite IX.

Now got loss from AWS apse1/apse2. Traffic transiting via AS37468 on 
Equinix IX.


I e-mailed Hetzner NOC but they don’t seem entirely bothered, currently.

My traceroute  [v0.94]
jcasc-rtc01 (10.36.21.252) ->phil.lavin.me.uk     
2023-05-25T11:50:13+
Keys:  Help   Display mode   Restart statistics   Order of fields   quit
 Packets   Pings
  Host Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1. ip-10-36-17-199.ap-southeast-  0.0%180.1   0.6   0.1   7.7   1.8
  2. ec2-18-141-171-15.ap-southeas  0.0%184.3  17.5   0.9  95.7  24.0
 ec2-18-141-171-1.ap-southeast-1.compute.amazonaws.com  

  3. (waiting for reply)
  4. (waiting for reply)
  5. (waiting for reply)
  6. (waiting for reply)
  7. (waiting for reply)
  8. 100.65.10.161  0.0%170.6   1.4   0.3   9.6   2.4
 100.65.11.65
  9. 150.222.108.75 0.0%172.1   3.0   1.0  13.1   3.3
 52.93.10.74
10. 150.222.108.82 0.0%172.2   2.4   1.3  10.2   2.1
11. 52.93.11.115   0.0%175.8   2.4   1.2   9.7   2.5
 52.93.10.185
12.37468-sg1-ix.equinix.com     68.8%
17  268.6 279.0 262.4 312.8  19.8
13. 102.219.127.3 93.8%17  420.0 420.0 420.0 420.0   0.0
14. (waiting for reply)
15. 195.66.227.20962.5%17  467.9 456.9 440.3 488.2  18.5
16.core6.par.hetzner.com    75.0%17  
455.6 464.1 455.6 486.3  14.8
17.core11.nbg1.hetzner.com  75.0%17 
 459.5 467.5 445.9 497.3  21.8
18.core23.fsn1.hetzner.com  68.8%17 
 478.4 441.0 390.0 478.4  32.0
19.ex9k1.dc1.fsn1.hetzner.com   87.5%
17  460.4 454.2 448.1 460.4   8.7
20.vmh02.lavin.me.uk    75.0%17  
433.3 424.2 382.7 441.9  27.9
21. (waiting for reply)
22.http-lb-01.lavin.me.uk   75.0%17  
436.8 438.6 385.0 493.3  44.2

I’ve been out of the BGP game for a few years now. Anybody have 
visibility of the extent of the leaks?



Phil

AS37468 (Angola Cables) - Route Leak?

[Phil Lavin via NANOG]

Cross-posting from outages list:

Hey Folks,

Seeing massive packet loss on routes from AWS to Hetzner today. First was AWS 
USW2 -> Hetzner (e.g. 88.99.88.69).

Traffic was transiting via AS37468 (Angola Cables) in Coresite IX.

Now got loss from AWS apse1/apse2. Traffic transiting via AS37468 on Equinix IX.

I e-mailed Hetzner NOC but they don’t seem entirely bothered, currently.

   My traceroute  [v0.94]
jcasc-rtc01 (10.36.21.252) -> phil.lavin.me.uk   
2023-05-25T11:50:13+
Keys:  Help   Display mode   Restart statistics   Order of fields   quit
Packets   Pings
 Host Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
 1. ip-10-36-17-199.ap-southeast-  0.0%180.1   0.6   0.1   7.7   1.8
 2. ec2-18-141-171-15.ap-southeas  0.0%184.3  17.5   0.9  95.7  24.0
ec2-18-141-171-1.ap-southeast-1.compute.amazonaws.com 

 3. (waiting for reply)
 4. (waiting for reply)
 5. (waiting for reply)
 6. (waiting for reply)
 7. (waiting for reply)
 8. 100.65.10.161  0.0%170.6   1.4   0.3   9.6   2.4
100.65.11.65
 9. 150.222.108.75 0.0%172.1   3.0   1.0  13.1   3.3
52.93.10.74
10. 150.222.108.82 0.0%172.2   2.4   1.3  10.2   2.1
11. 52.93.11.115   0.0%175.8   2.4   1.2   9.7   2.5
52.93.10.185
12. 37468-sg1-ix.equinix.com   68.8%
17  268.6 279.0 262.4 312.8  19.8
13. 102.219.127.3 93.8%17  420.0 420.0 420.0 420.0   0.0
14. (waiting for reply)
15. 195.66.227.20962.5%17  467.9 456.9 440.3 488.2  18.5
16. core6.par.hetzner.com  75.0%17  
455.6 464.1 455.6 486.3  14.8
17. core11.nbg1.hetzner.com    75.0%17 
 459.5 467.5 445.9 497.3  21.8
18. core23.fsn1.hetzner.com    68.8%17 
 478.4 441.0 390.0 478.4  32.0
19. ex9k1.dc1.fsn1.hetzner.com 87.5%
17  460.4 454.2 448.1 460.4   8.7
20. vmh02.lavin.me.uk  75.0%17  
433.3 424.2 382.7 441.9  27.9
21. (waiting for reply)
22. http-lb-01.lavin.me.uk 75.0%17  
436.8 438.6 385.0 493.3  44.2

I’ve been out of the BGP game for a few years now. Anybody have visibility of 
the extent of the leaks?


Phil

Flowspec Implementation on Cisco ASR

[Pascal Masha]

Hi Folks,

Has anyone implemented flowspec on Cisco ASR terminating PPPoE users.
Flowspec rules should apply to the addresses assigned to PPPoE customers.
If yes, kindly share configuration samples..


Regards

Paschal Masha