Re: 1299 capacity constraints

2023-07-16 Thread Ross Tajvar
Someone else made this joke via direct email. Old minds think alike?

On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 7:39 PM Matthew Petach 
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023, 15:27 Ross Tajvar  wrote:
>
>> It extremely depends on who you're trying to reach and from what
>> location. We've seen lots of T1s have congested peering lately.
>>
>
> Whoa.
>
> I thought I was the only one old-school enough to still be using a T1 for
> connectivity.  Are people seriously actually trying to use T1s for peering
> in this day and age?  ^_^;
>
> Matt
>
>
>


RE: 1299 capacity constraints

2023-07-16 Thread Jerry Cloe
Tier1..  likely via fiber, not old fashioned telco based T1 circuits.

 
Whoa.
 I thought I was the only one old-school enough to still be using a T1 for 
connectivity.  Are people seriously actually trying to use T1s for peering in 
this day and age?  ^_^;
  

 



Re: 1299 capacity constraints

2023-07-16 Thread Matthew Petach
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023, 15:27 Ross Tajvar  wrote:

> It extremely depends on who you're trying to reach and from what location.
> We've seen lots of T1s have congested peering lately.
>

Whoa.

I thought I was the only one old-school enough to still be using a T1 for
connectivity.  Are people seriously actually trying to use T1s for peering
in this day and age?  ^_^;

Matt


Re: My first ARIN Experience but probably not the last, unfortunately..

2023-07-16 Thread Randy Bush
> #define SOAPBOX
> 
> Please remember ARIN covers more than just the relatively prosperous
> United States.  There are places like Jamaica, which are also in the
> ARIN region, where the average annual income is $2,337.

indeed

i find this thread to be depressing.  the economics you mention, of
course.

but also folk being rude, judgemental, and blaming the user for being
confused by the complex and jargon-infested bureaucrazy we have created
in the rirs.

and yes, props to the rirs for trying to document rules and processes.
but that often seems to create even more documents.  and, of course, if
you have to deal with multiple rirs, expect no parallelism, similar
nomenclature, etc.

it is very easy for a new rir user to get confused by corner cases,
terminology, quirks of history, and the detritus of our amateur policy
wonkage.

give 'em a break.  and see if we can round off the rough edges where
they got caught.

randy

---

note that i use the first person plural


Re: My first ARIN Experience but probably not the last, unfortunately..

2023-07-16 Thread Matthew Petach
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 2:09 PM Darin Steffl 
wrote:

> This screams of entitlement. If you can't afford $250 a year for ARIN, you
> probably shouldn't be starting a new business. Sorry
>

#define SOAPBOX

Darin,

Please remember ARIN covers more than just the relatively prosperous United
States.
There are places like Jamaica, which are also in the ARIN region, where the
average
annual income is $2,337.

Having to put aside 11% of your annual income for ARIN registry fees to
start a business
is a big decision.
I don't think you'd like it if we called you "entitled" for not wanting to
shell out 11% of your
annual income for ARIN fees to start a business.

While NANOG by name does narrow the focus to just "North America", we
should all remember
that even in North America, wealth is not distributed equally.  There are
communities that very
much need the economic development that new businesses can bring, where a
$250/year annual
fee represents a significant headwind.  Rather than pooh-pooh their
concerns, we should instead
strive to see the world through that entrepreneur's eyes, and address their
concerns, rather than
brush them aside.

 Thanks!

Matt

#undef SOAPBOX


Re: My first ARIN Experience but probably not the last, unfortunately..

2023-07-16 Thread William Herrin
On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 8:57 PM Tom Beecher  wrote:
> There is no possible way that anyone should interpret
> the current wording of the asterisk'd text as ALL IPv6
> fees are waived until 2026. None. If that's your take
> away, I'm not sure what to say.

Hi Tom,

I think the point is that "waiver" is the wrong word. It's not a
waiver, it's a discount.

You go calling things waivers that aren't, someone's gonna miss the
asterisk and get rudely surprised.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William Herrin
b...@herrin.us
https://bill.herrin.us/