Re: Solutions for DoS & DDoS

2012-12-06 Thread Ahmed Maged
The most popular solution is Arbor Clean pipes. they have different ways
you can get this :
http://www.arbornetworks.com/




On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Erol Blakely  wrote:

> My experience with most providers has been that null routing is the
> "industry standard" when a DDoS hits their network.
>
> I would suggest approaching companies who specialize in DDoS mitigation -
> Prolexic and Blacklotus to name two I am familiar with. These outfits may
> have something that works for a non-profit from a pricing point of view.
>
> Ping me off list, I deal with a few providers and may be able to point you
> in the right direction.
>
> /e
>
>
> On 2012-12-06 3:53 PM, Steve wrote:
>
>> The ideal solution is a carrier that has its own true DDoS mitigation
>> platform, and does not rely on black hole routing . Have the carrier handle
>> the the large bulk flood attacks, then have your own prem base mitigation
>> platform take care of the more application specific attacks that get
>> through .
>>
>> This represents the best solution , and also the most expensive . So it
>> may not work for a non profit.
>>
>> This Email was sent from Steve's iPad
>>
>>> Message: 4
>>> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 09:51:21 -0800
>>> From: Mike Gatti 
>>> To: NANOG list 
>>> Subject: Solutions for DoS & DDoS
>>> Message-ID: 
>>> <0D89D80C-D288-402F-8723-**b837ea523...@gmail.com<0d89d80c-d288-402f-8723-b837ea523...@gmail.com>
>>> >
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>>
>>> Hello Everyone,
>>>
>>> I'm assisting a non-profit organization to research solutions to secure
>>> their network from DOS/DDOS attacks. So far we have gone the route of
>>> discussing with their ISP's to see what solutions they have to offer,
>>> believing that the carriers are better positioned to block the attack from
>>> the source.
>>>
>>> I wanted to get the lists thoughts on our approach going the carrier
>>> route and/or hear about successful implementation of other solutions.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> --
>>> Michael Gatti
>>> 949.371.5474
>>> (UTC -8)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> End of NANOG Digest, Vol 59, Issue 24
>>> ***
>>>
>>
>>
> --
> Erol Blakely
> easyDNS Technologies Inc.
>
>


Re: ouch..

2011-09-18 Thread Ahmed Maged
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1BfhRauFvw&feature=player_embedded

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:04 PM, David Swafford  wrote:
> I find it very amusing when viewing the statement regarding the Nexus
> product line, "announced 2008, delivered a few months later...",
> considering that it has significant QA issues that have made us regret
> our purchases of all Nexus gear.   We are primarily a Cat6509 shop and
> standard features, ones that have been around for decades, simply were
> left out of Nexus just so they could rush to market  (VTP comes to
> mind on the 5K line).
>
> David.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Martin Hepworth  wrote:
>> http://www.overpromisesunderdelivers.net/
>>
>>
>> --
>> Martin Hepworth
>> Oxford, UK
>>
>
>