GTT Contact

2020-03-17 Thread Brandon Wade via NANOG
We're facing an issue we've been trying to resolve with GTT, but are unable to 
get them to respond beyond opening a ticket regarding this issue. What is going 
on is GTT has two maintenance windows, the first tonight with the backup window 
tomorrow night. Our issue is our other carrier is also performing maintenance 
tonight, and if they're both performing maintenance during the same time 
windows, we'll be left without connectivity.
Is there anyone from GTT on this list that could get in touch with the 
appropriate team to request they utilize their backup window instead? 
Brandon WadeiCastCenter

Re: Phoenix IX down/gone?

2019-08-01 Thread Brandon Wade via NANOG
>> Corrected URL:
>> https://peeringdb.com/ix/662
>> 
>> Anyone know what happened to Phoenix IX? https://peeringdb.com/ix/66 They
>> seem off the air including website and phones.. permanently?
>> 
>> -PeterK at 32354We (AS53767) are passing traffic on Phoenix IX. The person 
>> who operates the exchange (Paul Emmons) is frequently traveling for 
>> business. I suspect something is simply wrong with the website. 
I'll reach out to him through a private channel and make sure he's aware the 
website is down.
Best regards,Brandon WadeiCastCenter.com / AS53767

GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge

2018-12-02 Thread Brandon Wade via NANOG
We've been a GTT customer for several years and on our latest bill we now have 
a "Regulatory Recovery Surcharge" of almost 10% tacked on. We only purchase IP 
Transit services from them, nothing else, and have never had any fees tacked on 
top of our contracted agreed upon amount. Has anyone else ran into this? If 
this is a legit "surcharge" any idea of why we were never charged for that 
before? I figured I'd reach out to the community on this prior to jumping to 
further conclusions. 
-Brandon

Re: Internap route optimization

2015-11-05 Thread Brandon Wade via NANOG
> Does anyone know or have any experience with Internap's route
> optimization? Is it any good?
>
> I've heard of competing solutions as well, such as the one 
> provided by Noction.
>
> Thanks for your input,
> Paras

We currently utilize the Border6 solution on our network and are very happy 
with it. It optimizes our outbound traffic by injecting more specifics into our 
border router to influence the outbound traffic. To assure we don't 
re-advertise these more specifics to our downstream/peers we tag those routes 
with a community.

The Border6 solution optimizes traffic based upon performance and also allows 
us to keep our traffic levels within our commits. It has saved us on bursting 
costs, as well as technical support costs since it has virtually eliminated 
packet loss complaints.

As far as price, the Border6 solution is by far way more cost effective verses 
the quotes we have received from Internap and Noction. The technical support 
staff have always gone above and beyond to tweak the solution as needed as 
well. Overall we are very impressed and would recommend the Border6 solution. 
It more than pays for itself with customer satisfaction and not needing to 
staff someone around the clock to manually route around packet loss, blackholed 
traffic, etc.

In fact a few weeks ago our appliance died (for reasons not related to the 
Border6 solution) and it took a few days for us to provide a replacement box 
and we did notice complaints come in for packet loss, etc. A pretty good 
indication that it is doing it's job as expected.

Feel free to contact me off list if you have any questions about the Border6 
solution.

Brandon Wade - AS53767
http://as53767.net