Re: Youtube Outage

[Charles Mills]

The reports I've seen showing it as a worldwide outage.

On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:14 PM Nathan Brookfield <
nathan.brookfi...@simtronic.com.au> wrote:

> Australia too….
>
>
>
> *From:* NANOG  *On Behalf Of *Oliver O'Boyle
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:08 PM
> *To:* marshall.euba...@gmail.com
> *Cc:* North American Network Operators' Group 
> *Subject:* Re: Youtube Outage
>
>
>
> Same in Montreal.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:52 PM Marshall Eubanks <
> marshall.euba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Reports (and humor) are flooding twitter.
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:44 PM Ross Tajvar  wrote:
> >
> > You beat my email by seconds. Yes, it is widespread.
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Kenneth McRae via NANOG <
> nanog@nanog.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is this widespread?
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> :o@>
>
>
>

Re: Gmail down

[Charles Mills]

saw it down as well.   came back for me in < 5 minutes.

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> Web interface is broken, downdetector sure sees activity.  This attempt is
> from mobile.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>

Re: Comcast thinks it ok to install public wifi in your house

[Charles Mills]

In the US at least you have to authenticate with your Comcast credentials
and not like a traditional open wifi where you can just make up an email
and accept the terms of service.  I also understand that it is a different
IP than the subscriber.  Based on this the subscriber should be protected
from anyone doing anything illegal and causing the SWAT team to pay a
visit.  I haven't upgraded my gear though.

Now..they are doing this on your electric bill and taking up space (albeit
a small amount of it) in your home.

Chuck



On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net wrote:

 Why am I not surprised?

 Whose fault would it be if your comcast installed public wifi would be
 abused to download illegal material or launch a botnet, to name some random
 fun one could have on your behalf. :-/

 (apologies if this was posted already, couldn't find an email about it on
 the list)

 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/12/10/disgruntled_
 customers_lob_sueball_at_comcast_over_public_wifi/

 A mother and daughter are suing Comcast claiming the cable giant's router
 in their home was offering public Wi-Fi without their permission.

 Comcast-supplied routers broadcast an encrypted, private wireless network
 for people at home, plus a non-encrypted network called XfinityWiFi that
 can be used by nearby subscribers. So if you're passing by a fellow user's
 home, you can lock onto their public Wi-Fi, log in using your Comcast
 username and password, and use that home's bandwidth.

 However, Toyer Grear, 39, and daughter Joycelyn Harris – who live together
 in Alameda County, California – say they never gave Comcast permission to
 run a public network from their home cable connection.

 In a lawsuit [PDF] filed in the northern district of the golden state, the
 pair accuse the ISP of breaking the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and two
 other laws.

 Grear – a paralegal – and her daughter claim the Xfinity hotspot is an
 unauthorized intrusion into their private home, places a vast burden on
 electricity bills, opens them up to attacks by hackers, and degrades
 their bandwidth.

 Comcast does not, however, obtain the customer's authorization prior to
 engaging in this use of the customer's equipment and internet service for
 public, non-household use, the suit claims.

 Indeed, without obtaining its customers' authorization for this
 additional use of their equipment and resources, over which the customer
 has no control, Comcast has externalized the costs of its national Wi-Fi
 network onto its customers.

 The plaintiffs are seeking monetary damages for themselves and on behalf
 of all Comcast customers nation-wide in their class-action case – the
 service was rolled out to 20 million customers this year.

 --
 Earthquake Magnitude: 4.8
 Date: 2014-12-10  22:10:36.800 UTC
 Date Local: 2014-12-10 13:10:36 PST
 Location: 120km W of Panguna, Papua New Guinea
 Latitude: -6.265; Longitude: 154.4004
 Depth: 35 km | e-quake.org

Re: Craigslist hacked?

[Charles Mills]

Not seeing that here  The local site and the general http;//
www.craigslist.org both look to be going to the correct site.

On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Brian Henson marin...@gmail.com wrote:

 Is anyone else seeing their local craigslist redirected to another site
 other than craigslist? I see it loading http://digitalgangster.com/5um.

Re: Facebook down?

[Charles Mills]

W. PA. too.  Looks pretty widespread.


On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:46 PM, aUser au...@mind.net wrote:

 Appears to be in Oregon, Southern Oregon.  Mobile too.

 Sent from my iPhone 5S.

  On Sep 3, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Marshall Eubanks 
 marshall.euba...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  This message has no content.

Re: 100G wave pricing in Pennsylvania

[Charles Mills]

It's a big state.  Which part?  Pittsburgh, Philadelphia or some point in
between?


On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Edward Roels edwardro...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm looking for rough pricing or even carriers that can provide a 100G wave
 in Pennsylvania.

 If you have some insight into how pricing scales between 10G and 100G
 offerings (e.g. 100G is usually 5-6x the cost of a 10G),  I'm also
 interested.

 Off-list replies are welcome.


 Thanks,

 Ed

Re: Spam from Telx

[Charles Mills]

I didn't even respond.  I think many of these
high-pressure-aggressive-types always have an answer like that conveniently
vague enough as to give them an out.

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org
 wrote:

 On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:

  \o/ i got one too, i'll put a bunch of sales droids on this George from
 telx right away to make him an offer in return *grin*


 I did respond directly to him, and got a somewhat indignant response back,
 stating that he had no idea what I was talking about and that my contact
 information had come from an opt in email broker.  It's going to be one
 of those days

 jms

Re: Spam from Telx

[Charles Mills]

I've been getting voicemails from someone, leaving a first name only saying
they have question that only I can answer.  Dangling bait like that is a
big red flag so they don't get a callback.

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Justin M. Streiner 
strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote:

 On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, Mark Andrews wrote:

  I did respond directly to him, and got a somewhat indignant response back,
 stating that he had no idea what I was talking about and that my contact
 information had come from an opt in email broker.  It's going to be one
 of those days


 It's a little hard to says that with a straight face when it has a copy
 of the message posted to nanog attached.
 It's even more amusing when your company is already listed in the pdf.


 The message I got was a bit more sanitized.  Guess I was lucky ;)

 jms

Re: Common operational misconceptions

[Charles Mills]

Original poster who started thread said he would.

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:51 AM, -Hammer- bhmc...@gmail.com wrote:

 If you do, please share it. Thank you.


 -Hammer-

 I was a normal American nerd
 -Jack Herer



 On 2/17/2012 9:36 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:

 On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:29 AM, -Hammer- wrote:

  This list is awesome. Is anyone consolidating it? I'm still catching up
 on the thread


 I was thinking of making a checklist out of it.

 - Jared

Re: Common operational misconceptions

[Charles Mills]

Not understanding RFC1918.  Actually got read the riot act by someone
because I worked for an organization that used 10.0.0.0/8 and that was
their network and they owned it.

Chuck

2012/2/15 Masataka Ohta mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp

 Mark Andrews wrote:

  This doesn't prove that IPv6 is not operational.  All it proves is
  people can misconfigure things.

 How do operators configure their equipments to treat
 ICMP packet too big generated against multicast and
 unicast?

 Note that, even if they do not enable inter-subnet
 multicast in their domains, the ICMP packets may
 still transit over or implode within their domains.

 Note also that some network processors can't efficiently
 distinguish ICMP packets generated against multicast and
 unicast.

Masataka Ohta

Re: First real-world SCADA attack in US

[Charles Mills]

Having worked on plenty of industrial and other control systems I can
safely say security on the systems is generally very poor.   The
vulnerabilities have existed for years but are just now getting attention.
   This is a problem that doesn't really need a bunch of new legislation.
It's an education / resource issue.   The existing methods that have been
used for years with reasonable success in the IT industry can 'fix' this
problem.


 Industrial Controls systems are normally only replaced when they are so
 old that parts can no longer be obtained.   PC's started to be widely used
 as operator interfaces about the time Windows 95 came out.   A lot of those
 Win95 boxes are still running and have been connected to the network over
 the years.

 And... if you can destroy a pump by turning it off and on too often then
 somebody engineered the control and drive system incorrectly.  Operators
 (and processes) do stupid things all the time.  As the control systems
 engineer your supposed to deal with that so that things don't go boom.



 --
 Mark Radabaugh
 Amplex

 m...@amplex.net  419.837.5015

 ===

There are still industrial control machines out there running MS-DOS.

As you said not replaced until you can't get parts anymore.
Chuck

Re: Severe Packet loss

[Charles Mills]

Cogent had some planned maintenance during the 2-4a timeframe.

Furthermore there was some sluggishness and packet loss for some of my
customers that *seemed* to be centered around Ashburn, VA around 9-9:30 but
cleared up before I could get a good look at it or even before where it was
situated.


Chuck

On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Justin M. Streiner
strei...@cluebyfour.orgwrote:

 On Sat, 5 Nov 2011, Gary Steers wrote:

  Is anyone else having major issue's tonight/this morning?

 We our having issue's and our upstream provider is reporting route
 flaps, the say its affecting quite a few networks but just checking if
 anyone else is having issue's???


 You'll generally get more helpful responses from NANOG and other forums if
 you provide more detail than major issue's[sic] and route flaps. People
 will be more inclined to help or offer suggestions if you provide details
 and have done some research into the problem already.

 For example:
 What major issues were you seeing?  Can those issues be defined with
 traceroutes, snapshots of BGP route views, reproducible difficulties in
 reaching a particular site, etc?  What other carriers were reporting
 problems?  Can you provide a source and destination address that is having
 connectivity issues?

 When you say our upstream provider, are you single-homed or multi-homed?

 Speaking from my own little corner of the world, I haven't seen any major
 connectivity problems here in the past 24 hours.

 jms

Re: [outages] News item: Blackberry services down worldwide, Egypt affected (not N.A.)

[Charles Mills]

+1
On Oct 12, 2011 11:51 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:

 On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:52:02 CDT, -Hammer- said:
  What kills me is what they have told the public. The lost a core
  switch. I don't know if they actually mean network switch or not but
  I'm pretty sure any of us that work on an enterprise environment know
  how to factor N+1 just for these types of days. And then the backup
  solution failed? I'm not buying it either.

 Yeah, and that extra comma in the one config file that didn't make a
 difference
 when you tested the failover in the lab *never* makes a difference when it
 hits
 in the production network, right?  Or they changed the config of the
 primary and
 it didn't get propogated just right to the backup, or they had mismatched
 firmware
 levels on blades in the blades on the primary and backup switches, so
 traffic that
 didn't tickle a bug on the primary blades caused the blade to crash on the
 backup,
 or...

 Anybody on this list who's been around long enough probably has enough We
 should have had N+2 because the N+1'th device failed too stories to drain
 *several* pitchers of beer at a good pub... I've even had one case where my
 butt got *saved* from a ohnosecond-class whoops because the N+1'th device
 *was*
 crashed (stomped a config file, it replicated, was able to salvage a copy
 from
 a device that didn't replicate because it was down at the time).

Re: 365x24x7

[Charles Mills]

I've had it done in places where I work where you'll have 3 rotations
working 12 hour shifts.

In a 2 week pay period they get their 80 hours in a blend 36 one week
and 44 the next.  It gives some nice consecutive days off time which
also doubles as a retention tool for some employees.  You might have
to get creative to have all the days work out but it can be done.

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:14 AM, harbor235 harbor...@gmail.com wrote:
 If I were going to provide a 365x24x7 NOC, how many teams of personnel do I
 need
 to fully cover operations? I assume minimally you need 3 teams to cover the
 required
 24 hr coverage, but there is off time and schedule rotation?

 thoughts, experience?

 Mike




-- 
=
Charles L. Mills
Email: w3y...@gmail.com
=
Need server hosting, DR or colocation services?  See me!

Cleveland or Columbus Colocation?

[Charles Mills]

Can anyone from these areas recommend someone?  I know Expedient is in
Cleveland but would like others to look at as well.

Feel free to contact me off list.

Chuck

Re: RIP Justification

[Charles Mills]

Loss of using VLSM's is a big thing to give up.

You can go to RIPv2 and get that however.  Would work for small networks to
stay under the hop-count limit as it is still distance-vector.



On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.netwrote:

 On Sep 29, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Jesse Loggins wrote:

  A group of engineers and I were having a design discussion about routing
  protocols including RIP and static routing and the justifications of use
 for
  each protocol. One very interesting discussion was surrounding RIP and
 its
  use versus a protocol like OSPF. It seems that many Network Engineers
  consider RIP an old antiquated protocol that should be thrown in back of
 a
  closet never to be seen or heard from again. Some even preferred using
 a
  more complex protocol like OSPF instead of RIP. I am of the opinion that
  every protocol has its place, which seems to be contrary to some
 engineers
  way of thinking. This leads to my question. What are your views of when
 and
  where the RIP protocol is useful? Please excuse me if this is the
 incorrect
  forum for such questions.

 RIP has one property no modern protocol has.  It works on simplex links
 (e.g. high-speed satellite downlink with low-speed terrestrial uplink).

 Is that useful?  I don't know, but it is still a fact.

 --
 TTFN,
 patrick





-- 
=
Charles L. Mills
Westmoreland Co. ARES EC
Amateur Radio Callsign W3YNI
Email: w3y...@gmail.com

Re: XO Routing

[Charles Mills]

The internet health report is showing high latency to most of their peers.

Chuck.

On Sep 16, 2010 11:57 AM, Stefan Molnar ste...@csudsu.com wrote:

 Anyone know the impact on the XO Routing/Peering that is happening right
 now? We have had spotty connectivity for the last hour.

 Stefan

Re: Cogent issues

[Charles Mills]

A lot of our traffic hits VZ as well and goes either to DC or points in
NY.

Been happening off and on since Labor Day weekend.

CM

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Bret Clark bcl...@spectraaccess.com wrote:

 We've been noticing high latency for some time with Verizon (UUNET)
 connections at least through the NY area.



 On 09/08/2010 10:34 PM, Charles Mills wrote:

 Anyone notice any issues with Cogent?

 Internet Health Report showing some high latency to Verizon and a couple
 of
 other carriers.

Cogent issues

[Charles Mills]

Anyone notice any issues with Cogent?

Internet Health Report showing some high latency to Verizon and a couple of
other carriers.

Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

[Charles Mills]

I think he was actually quoting the movie.  They always called Harvey
Korman's character Hedy and he'd always correct them with That's
Hedley in a most disapproving tone.

You had to have watched that movie way too many times (much to my
wife's chagrin) to catch the subtle joke.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Matthew Huff mh...@ox.com wrote:
 Actually, no.

 Not from the Mel Brooks movie.

 Hedy Lamarr

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedy_Lamarr

 Hedy Lamarr (November 9, 1914 - January 19, 2000) was an Austrian-born 
 American actress and engineer. Though known primarily for her film career as 
 a major contract star of MGM's Golden Age, she also co-invented an early 
 form of spread spectrum communications technology, a key to modern wireless 
 communication.[1]


 
 Matthew Huff   | One Manhattanville Rd
 OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577
 http://www.ox.com  | Phone: 914-460-4039
 aim: matthewbhuff  | Fax:   914-460-4139



 -Original Message-
 From: John Lightfoot [mailto:jlightf...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:05 AM
 To: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com; 'Simon Perreault'
 Cc: nanog@nanog.org
 Subject: RE: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

 That's Hedley.

 -Original Message-
 From: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com [mailto:bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com]
 Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:34 AM
 To: Simon Perreault
 Cc: nanog@nanog.org
 Subject: Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

 On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:34:20AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
  On 2010-04-22 07:18, William Herrin wrote:
  On the other hand, I could swear I've seen a draft where the PC picks
  up random unused addresses in the lower 64 for each new outbound
  connection for anonymity purposes.
 
  That's probably RFC 4941. It's available in pretty much all operating
  systems. I don't think there's any IPR issue to be afraid of.

       not RFC4941... think abt applying Heddy Lamars
       patents on spread-spectrum to source address selection.

 --bill

Re: Posting from freebie E-mail Accounts

[Charles Mills]

We are not allowed to post from work email accounts to lists such as
these as well.

The CISO's reasoning (and he may have a point...) is that we might ask
the list Hey...I can't figure out why my Cisco $MODEL router is doing
this when I upgrade to $VERSION of IOS.

Then someone trolling to hack you knows you have one of them in your
network running that version of code.  It still may be easy enough to
extrapolate where you work from your personal email using other
publicly available methods but

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Jorge Amodio jmamo...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm betting more then a few of use free mail accts to keep this
 separate from our work mail.  If your really having that much issue,
 config your mail server to drop it yourself or unsub

 Seriously

 -jim   yes posted from gmail acct.


 Ditto.

 - - ferg

 +1  (posting from gmail account)

 +2 (also from gmail)

 free anti spam, no need for antivirus, free storage, spam don't go to
 my official address, don't have to make backups, can read from
 anywhere, mostly used for email lists.

 The problem is the source not what service he/she uses, trolls will be
 trolls regardless of what freebie fqdn they use.

 Jorge

Re: Using private APNIC range in US

[Charles Mills]

I love war stories.  I once got chewed out by a colleague ? from
another organization because we were using their address space.

We were using 10.0.0.0/8.  Explanation of NAT and RFC1918 was met with
a deer in the headlights look.

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Matt Shadbolt matt.shadb...@gmail.com wrote:
 I once had a customer who for some reason had all their printers on public
 addresses they didn't own. Not advertising them outside, but internally
 whenever a user browsed to a external site that happened to be one of the
 addresses used, they would just receive a HP or Konica login page :)

 They didn't mind though. No idea if they've changed it since.


 On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net wrote:

 On 3/18/2010 14:30, William Allen Simpson wrote:
  On 3/18/10 2:35 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
  Does anyone know if the University of Michigan or Cisco are going be
 updating their systems and documentation to no longer use 1.2.3.4 ?
 
  http://www.google.com/search?q=1.2.3.4+site%3Acisco.com
 
  I know that the University of Michigan utilize 1.2.3.4 for their captive
 portal login/logout pages as recently as monday when I was on the medical
 campus.
 
  Dunno about cisco.
 
  med.umich.edu seems to run their own stuff, separately from umich.edu,
 and
  quite badly.  I've complained about their setup repeatedly over the past
  several years.  No traction.

 Is it something about Medical Schools?

 When we were first putting together the campus network, Surgery was
 running a Token Ring (I thought Vampire Tap was a fitting item for
 their inventory) running in Class D space as I recall.

  Should we try again, jointly?  ;-)

 Towards the end, there were people who insisted I must rout their net to
 the Internets.

 I declined.
 --
 Democracy: Three wolves and a sheep voting on the dinner menu.
 (A republic, using parliamentary law, protects the minority.)

 Requiescas in pace o email
 Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
 Eppure si rinfresca

 ICBM Targeting Information:  http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
 http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml








-- 
=
Charles L. Mills
Westmoreland Co. ARES EC
Amateur Radio Callsign W3YNI
Email: w3y...@gmail.com

Re: Latency quesstion

[Charles Mills]

That could be a lot of things.  Without a network drawing and access
to the devices to dig further it is difficult to say.



On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Dennis Dayman
dennis-li...@thenose.net wrote:
 have a friend who has 21 floors of a building in DFW, multiple switches, etc 
 and they started to have latency issues this weekend where half if not all 
 packet are being dropped to folder shares, printers, etc. Suggestions on how 
 they can troubleshoot that? call in a company to help identify it?

 -Dennis

IPv6 enabled carriers?

[Charles Mills]

Does anyone have a list of carriers who are IPv6 capable today?

I would assume this would be rolled out in larger cities first but
anything outside of testbed environments and trials as in
Comcast's recent announcement seems to be all that is available.

I'm being tasked with coming up with an IPv6 migration plan for a data center.

Mostly interested in if ATT, Level3, GLBX, Saavis, Verizon Business
and Qwest are capable as those are the typical ones I deal with.


Thanks...Chuck

Re: Network Ring

[Charles Mills]

The power of google

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_Automatic_Protection_Switching

 Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no

 What is EAPS?

XO - a Tier 1 or not?

[Charles Mills]

Trying to sort through the marketecture and salesman speak and get a
definitive answer.

I figure the NANOGers would be able to give me some input.

Is XO Communications a Tier 1 ISP?

I'd say no based on all research and googling that I've done but they
seem to meet some of the criteria (some != all and therefore not Tier
1).

Any help here?  Thanks as always.

Chuck

Re: Level3 funkiness

[Charles Mills]

Can't get to level3.net 63.211.236.36 or www.level3.net 4.68.95.28 from
Pittsburgh either and I peer directly with level3 with a full BGP feed.



On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 3:35 PM, J. Oquendo s...@infiltrated.net wrote:


 Anyone else experience sporadic funkiness via
 Level3? I can't even reach the main website from who
 knows how many networks I've tried. Also friends
 and former colleagues have tried to reach the site
 to no avail.

 One of my machines on ATT:
 # traceroute level3.net
 traceroute to level3.net (63.211.236.36), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets

  4  cr1.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.105.58)  11.285 ms  21.702 ms  21.477 ms
  5  ggr2.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.131.141)  12.712 ms  10.194 ms  16.393
 ms
  6  so-8-0-0.car3.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.68.127.149)  9.975 ms  10.019 ms
  10.833 ms
  7  vlan79.csw2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.68.16.126)  10.162 ms  10.189 ms
  14.474 ms
  8  ae-71-71.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.69)  15.763 ms  11.166 ms
  9.725 ms
  9  ae-3-3.ebr4.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.132.93)  16.139 ms  30.616 ms
  16.275 ms
 10  ae-64-64.csw1.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.178)  15.684 ms
 ae-74-74.csw2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.182)  21.870 ms
 ae-84-84.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.186)  28.729 ms
 11  ae-92-92.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.157)  17.035 ms
 ae-62-62.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.145)  17.041 ms
 ae-72-72.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.149)  21.940 ms
 12  ae-2-2.ebr2.Chicago2.Level3.net (4.69.132.69)  31.671 ms  42.407 ms
  45.774 ms
 13  ae-1-100.ebr1.Chicago2.Level3.net (4.69.132.113)  31.922 ms  32.115 ms
  38.135 ms
 14  ae-3.ebr2.Denver1.Level3.net (4.69.132.61)  75.265 ms  67.528 ms
  67.937 ms
 15  ge-9-0.hsa1.Denver1.Level3.net (4.68.107.35)  62.587 ms !H
 ge-9-1.hsa1.Denver1.Level3.net (4.68.107.99)  62.543 ms !H
 ge-9-2.hsa1.Denver1.Level3.net (4.68.107.163)  75.797 ms !H


 (From Texas through Above.net)
 $ traceroute level3.net|tail -n 1
 traceroute to level3.net (63.211.236.36), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
 11  ge-6-2.hsa1.Denver1.Level3.net (4.68.107.131)  21.473 ms !H *
 ge-6-0.hsa1.Denver1.Level3.net (4.68.107.3)  21.547 ms !H

 Confirmed it can't be reached from Travelers Ins, The
 Hartford, none of my connections. Anyone else seeing
 issues? I'm seeing drop off from clients going through
 their Atlanta interconnects with Charter and two other
 providers, which I can't make sense of. I DO KNOW they
 experienced some sort of issue with a TDM switch or so
 they said... Very broad statements: We know teh
 interwebs are down please stand by

 I know websites are one thing, but the chances of the
 website going down, a TDM switch being wacky and now
 clients traversing their networks complaining all at
 once seems a little out of the ordinary.

 =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
 J. Oquendo
 SGFA, SGFE, C|EH, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP

 It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to
 ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things
 differently. - Warren Buffett

 227C 5D35 7DCB 0893 95AA  4771 1DCE 1FD1 5CCD 6B5E
 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x5CCD6B5E





--