Re: Looking for VPS providers with BGP session

[Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin]

Hi,

you might find useful to see Nat Morris's presentation on "Anycast on a
shoe string".
He lists several VPS providers that do BGP for his project.

Here is one link:
http://www.slideshare.net/natmorris/anycast-on-a-shoe-string

Regards,
Felipe


On 7 December 2015 at 12:40, Philippe Bonvin via NANOG 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
> I'm looking for providers around the world who are able to provide VPS
> with a BGP session but it seems to be rather difficult to find. I have
> already found a few with WHT/bgp.he.net/google but a little help would be
> appreciated.
>
>
> Does anyone have contact or know people who can offer such services ?
>
> If yes, please contact me off list.
>
>
> Our budget is quite low: around 50$/month/node +/- 50$ depending the
> transit providers for a server with 1-2 CPU cores, 20 Go SSD or SAS and 1-2
> Go RAM.
>
>
> I'll be happy to share my provider list we use with anyone who needs it.
>
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Philippe
>
> [EDSI-Tech Sarl]
> Philippe Bonvin, Directeur
> EDSI-Tech S?rl
> EPFL Innovation Park, Batiment C, 1015 Lausanne, Suisse | T?l?phone: +41
> (0) 21 566 14 15
> Savoie Technolac, 17 Avenue du Lac L?man, 73375 Le Bourget-du-Lac, France
> | T?l?phone: +33 (0)4 86 15 44 78
>

Fw: new message

[Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin]

Hey!

 

New message, please read <http://magazinemuzic.com/leaving.php?7n1>

 

Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin

Fw: new message

[Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin]

Hey!

 

New message, please read <http://blueappledistributionhub.com/exclaimed.php?3io>

 

Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin

Re: Whats so difficult about ISSU

[Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin]

On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net wrote:
 If you're on supported CPU's, the BSD's are likely to be a better
 choice if you want to avoid legal entanglements.  Otherwise, if you
 don't mind code disclosure, Linux supports more platforms.  Both
 are relatively mature, feature-full operating systems when used for
 embedded applications.

If your silicon vendor supports BSD's, of course.
From my (little) experience most vendors SDK will be available to
Linux and vxWorks but not BSD.
This limits companies that are building equipments based on third
parties ASIC to use anything but Linux.

My 0.02...
Felipe

Re: ifHighSpeed for 10 Gb/s port-channels

[Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin]

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin 
fel...@starbyte.net wrote:

 Hello,

 can anyone confirm why IF-MIB::ifHighSpeed should return 0 for aggregates
 of 10 Gbit/s ports?


just to confirm what all those helpful souls told me off-list: most vendors
(Cisco, Juniper, NetScalar) returns ifHighSpeed as sum of current link
aggregate
members speed.

Something like:

IF-MIB::ifHighSpeed.369098752 = Gauge32: 2

or maybe, depends on your equipment configuration or model

IF-MIB::ifHighSpeed.14 = Gauge32: 2




 My google-foo led me to several topics on use ifHighSpeed to 10 Gbit/s,
 but none is clear on 10 Gbit/s aggregated.

 So far I could only find references pointing to IEEE Std 802.1AX-2008
 clause 6.3.1.1.16 (aAggDataRate),
 mapping to IF-MIB::ifSpeed, which is locked in 4,294,967,295 (Gauge32). In
 this same standard it is very specific
 about ifHighSpeed: Set to zero..

 Or, more directly: how can one find current speed of a 10Gb/s+ link
 aggregate port?



Looks like it's a vendor thing, so blame them if it's different for you. :)




 Please, answer me off-list and I promise to summarize an answer... :)


Wish to thank you all once more, this data helped me a lot!

Kindly,
Felipe

ifHighSpeed for 10 Gb/s port-channels

[Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin]

Hello,

can anyone confirm why IF-MIB::ifHighSpeed should return 0 for aggregates
of 10 Gbit/s ports?

My google-foo led me to several topics on use ifHighSpeed to 10 Gbit/s,
but none is clear on 10 Gbit/s aggregated.

So far I could only find references pointing to IEEE Std 802.1AX-2008
clause 6.3.1.1.16 (aAggDataRate),
mapping to IF-MIB::ifSpeed, which is locked in 4,294,967,295 (Gauge32). In
this same standard it is very specific
about ifHighSpeed: Set to zero..

Or, more directly: how can one find current speed of a 10Gb/s+ link
aggregate port?

Please, answer me off-list and I promise to summarize an answer... :)

Thanks in advance.
Felipe

Re: How do you do rDNS for IPv6 ?

[Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin]

Hi John,

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:

 I've been pondering IPv6 setups, and I don't understand how IPv6 rDNS
 is supposed to work.  It's clear enough how you look up any particular
 address, but it's not at all clear to me what you put into an rDNS
 zone and how you put it there.


We've already discussed this in April, and answers came to a line of use
dynamic
updates to not necessary.

Problems lay around table sizes, unnecessary PTR records created, and large
end-user blocks.

There are other useful tips too, including ideas for PowerDNS and Bind.

Thread starts here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/nanog@nanog.org/msg22908.html




 Signed,
 Confused


Kindly,
Felipe

Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

[Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin]

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 6:54 PM, David Conrad d...@virtualized.org wrote:

 On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Carl Rosevear wrote:
  I don't understand why anyone thinks NAT should be a fundamental part of
 the v6 internet

 Perhaps the ability to change service providers without having to renumber?


Couldn't we use link scope (or other local) addresses to local networks, and
have gateways that do 1:1 translation between those addresses and PA space ?
Call it NATv6, whatever.

Nobody is going to remember addresses by hand, name servers (DNS or local
scope as avahi) will be the rule. And DHCPv6 (or router advertisement) is
how you provide your hosts access.

Maybe internal servers, such as smbfs or NFS, could be only at link scope
addresses? No need to renumerate, and full protection from outsiders.



 Regards,
 -drc



Seriously,
Felipe

IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done?

[Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin]

Hi list,

this is my first post, so be nice. :)

Wondering about IPv6 deployments to end-users, imagine we deploy a full /48
address to each client.
How is the reverse DNS for each possible IPv6 address going to be?

Nowadays I'm used to do IPv4 reverse using old Class C, which has (up to)
256 entries. Are we really going to make reverse DNS entries for each of
those 2^80 addresses? Or going to deploy rDNS only at the PtP links and
relevant servers?

Kind regards,
Felipe

Re: [Nanog] Re: IPv6 rDNS - how will it be done?

[Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin]

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:13 PM, David Conrad d...@virtualized.org wrote:

 On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:46 PM, John Levine wrote:

  For spoof resistance, how about doing a forward lookup on the
  purported name and only installing it if it gets a matching 
  record?

 Sounds like a reasonable DDNS filtering approach.


On controlled environments it might work. Don't know how larger ISPs would
set  records before for bazillion possible combinations of
computer.subnet.customer.isp.tld.

If going dynamic, are you willing to lower your DNS TTL to handle that?

Maybe doing wildchar evatulation for /64 subnets? Everything under this
subnet is my-subnet.customer.isp.tld.


 Regards,
 -drc



Kindly,
Felipe