Re: AWS EC2 us-west-2 reboot
Bash related? On Sep 24, 2014, at 4:47 PM, Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com wrote: As an FYI, it looks like Amazon is doing a mass reboot of the physical hosts in us-west-2 across all AZ's and it is scheduled to start tomorrow and take a couple days. Go to *https://console.aws.amazon.com/ec2/v2/home?region=us-west-2#Events https://console.aws.amazon.com/ec2/v2/home?region=us-west-2#Events:* to see what instances are affected when. -Grant
RE: Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion)
6rd is in my opinion a band-aid solution, I don't see the point of offering IPv6 if it requires IPv4. native IPv6 should be offered where possible. We offer native IPv6 to all our DSL customers but only on an opt-in basis, we're although unfortunately unable to offer IPv6 over Cable since we still depend on a certain incumbent... -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of jean-francois.d...@videotron.com Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 10:13 AM To: li...@sadiqs.com Cc: nanog@nanog.org; NANOG Subject: RE: Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion) Videotron (AS5769) is offering 6RD (RFC5969) to all residential customers, if their gear supports it. (DHCP option 212) (But our MGMT still calls it beta for now.) JF Jean-François Dubé Technicien, Opérations Réseau IP Ingénierie Exploitation des Réseaux Vidéotron NANOG nanog-boun...@nanog.org a écrit sur 2014-06-18 20:16:01 : De : Sadiq Saif li...@sadiqs.com A : nanog@nanog.org, Date : 2014-06-19 12:43 Objet : Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion) Envoyé par : NANOG nanog-boun...@nanog.org On 6/18/2014 14:25, Lee Howard wrote: Canada is way behind, just 0.4% deployment. Any Canadian ISP folk in here want to shine a light on this dearth of residential IPv6 connectivity? Is there any progress being made on this front? -- Sadiq Saif
Re: Canada and IPv6
On 14-06-19 01:45 PM, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Sadiq Saif wrote: On 6/18/2014 14:25, Lee Howard wrote: Canada is way behind, just 0.4% deployment. Any Canadian ISP folk in here want to shine a light on this dearth of residential IPv6 connectivity? Is there any progress being made on this front? Teksavvy does it (tunnel I believe) if you ask. We offer IPv6 over DSL and it's native, but it's opt-in at the moment. I have the ability to enable it for all our DSL users but we're holding off due to training issues more than anything. -Gabe
60 Hudson Equinix
Apologies for asking on this list but we're looking for a very minimal amount of space in Equinix @ 60 Hudson. 2U worth of space tops with only 1A worth of power. Is there anyone here willing to sub-lease space that would be interested? Email me off-list. -Gabe
Re: Google causes 40% drop in traffic?
On 14-01-24 03:40 PM, Shrdlu wrote: On 1/24/2014 12:31 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: - Original Message - From: Jay Ashworthj...@baylink.com http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/down-goes-google-down-goes-internet It's just been pointed out to me that, even though Marketplace just posted the link to that piece, the dateline is from August. My apologies for not noticing. You sure? I think that there is an actual outage, unrelated to the article you'd posted. http://techcrunch.com/2014/01/24/gmail-glitch-is-causing-thousands-of-emails-to-be-sent-to-one-mans-hotmail-account/ Of course, I could be wrong. I've been wrong before. Actual source http://www.google.com/appsstatus#hl=env=status -Gabe
Re: BRAS
On 13-12-11 10:10 AM, Clayton Zekelman wrote: At 09:30 AM 11/12/2013, Dan White wrote: On 12/10/13 19:51 +0530, Nilesh Kahar wrote: Which is a good BRAS product, to handle 15000 subscribers sessions with full QoS other features? Juniper MX (480). -- Dan White I heard there were some issues with the LAC/LNS functionality on the MX series vs. JUNOSe on the E series. Is that still the case? Well I'm being told by my Juniper sales reps to stay away from LAC/LNS on the MX for now...so I have. Still rocking E320s -Gabe
Re: iOS 7 update traffic
On 13-09-19 02:46 PM, Warren Bailey wrote: A line, is a line, is a line, is a line. There's no difference. Updates are available to all devices on a download day, and providers networks are drastically reduced in capacity as a result. Apple does not cut them checks to serve it up, why should that traffic be more important than anything else? I'd DSCP updates to best effort hell and tell Apple I'd like a small share of the revenue they've gained from all the devices *I* am responsible for updating. They're not getting these updates OTA often, they actually advocate (shocking, ATT wanting to save bandwidth) using your home Wi-Fi to download it. Providers can handle peaks, but SURGES begin to cause problems quickly. On narrowband pipes, we actually KILL updates.. They screw us that hard. You fail at internet, please try again later.
Re: How big is the Internet?
Iz this big *spreads arms wide open* On 13-08-14 11:10 AM, Alex wrote: Current size is HUGE and growing at a phenomenal speed. Public IP networks...just look at ARIN, RIPE,etc and see how many IPs there are left. Private networks and private IPs...well that is anyone's guess. There are no estimates because everything changes rather fast and noone can keep up with all this stuff. The only thing you could have a really good estimate are the resources used by your company and thats about it. On 8/14/2013 5:32 PM, Sean Donelan wrote: Researchers have complained for years about the lack of good statistics about the internet for a couple fo decades, since the end of NSFNET statistics. What are the current estimates about the size of the Internet, all IP networks including managed IP and private IP, and all telecommunications including analog voice, video, sensor data, etc? CAIDA, ITU, Telegeography and some vendors like Cisco have released forecasts and estimates. There are occasional pieces of information stated by companies in their investor documents (SEC 10-K, etc).
Re: High throughput bgp links using gentoo + stipped kernel
On 13-05-24 03:17 PM, Ryan Gard wrote: Do you have a source on this? Reason I ask is because any recent documentation I've come across indicates that polling is recommended to reduce chances of livelock on a running system. This depends a *ton* of what NIC you are using. Polling IMO should not be enabled on modern NICs. They use MSI-X to distribute interrupts to each core through the PCI bus to the APIC. As well as various methods to reduce the number of interrupts generated per second. This polling thing only worked well 10years ago. (Or if you still have 10 year old gear) -Gabe
Re: Dear Linkedin,
On Jun 11, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Simon Perreault wrote: On 2012-06-11 15:05, Owen DeLong wrote: OK, someone shows you a Quebec driver's license. You ask for a passport, she says, I don't have one, and points at the blue word Plus after the words Permis de Conduire at the top of the license. Now what? To the best of my knowledge, ICE stopped accepting DL for admission from Canada several years ago. Your knowledge needs an update! ;) http://www.saaq.gouv.qc.ca/en/driver_licence/licence_plus/licence_plus.php How the heck did this conversation go from Linkedin to a Quebec drivers license? I'm not sure how relevant this is to NANOG. Both subject matters that is. -Gabe
Re: ISPs and full packet inspection
might I suggest you consider replacing your legal team. On 05/24/12 09:13, not common wrote: Thanks guys, I am looking for stuff to bring to my legal team (which is one guy, that can't spell IP) and VPs. There has to be some thing out there or is this really a hands of topic? On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:58 AM, -Hammer- bhmc...@gmail.com wrote: You should be discussing this with inside counsel. Not NANOG. -Hammer- I was a normal American nerd -Jack Herer On 5/24/2012 7:50 AM, not common wrote: Hello, I am looking for some guidance on full packet inspection at the ISP level. Is there any regulations that prohibit or provide guidance on this? .
