Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions

[Joel Esler via NANOG]

> On Dec 16, 2022, at 12:04 PM, ic  wrote:
> 
> Hi there,
> 
>> On 16 Dec 2022, at 17:13, William Herrin > > wrote:
>> 
>> Most email clients assume that a change to the subject line (other
>> than adding "Re:" to the front) indicates that the sender wants to
>> discuss a new topic related to but meaningly different from the last.
> 
> Although I generally agree that changing the Subject line without reason is 
> an annoyance, I didn’t notice any issue with it until I came across this 
> thread, which wasn’t broken in my mail client (Apple’s Mail.app).

As a user of Mail.app as well, it is not broken for me either.  However, reason 
being — Mail does not use just the subject to thread.  I used to nerd out about 
email (top + bottom posting, etc) so the details of how Apple Mail threads have 
been lost in my ADHD riddled brain, but — that’s why.

> 
> This led me to a few tests, and FWIW even Mutt seems happy with the Subject 
> changing and still threads the emails appropriately.
> 
> In my experience, threading is done by clients looking for the In-Reply-To: 
> header, not subject. Subject is a heuristic fallback, in case In-Reply-To is 
> absent.
> 
> Some email clients (although I don’t remember which ones) remove In-Reply-To: 
> when the Subject: is changed (that might go as far back as my Gnus Oort days).
> 

…. and now that I wrote the above email response, I think you’re right.  
In-Reply-To:  I believe, is how Mail.app does it. (And several others)

Re: What say you, nanog re: Starlink vs 5G?

[Joel Esler via NANOG]

> On Jun 24, 2022, at 3:38 PM, Owen DeLong via NANOG  wrote:
> 
> It’s not entirely clear, without knowing the technical details of the 
> Starlink modulation scheme whether or not they could successfully share the 
> 12Ghz spectrum.
> 
> I have no reason to disbelieve their claims.


Exactly.  Why would they lie?

Re: Flow collection and analysis

[Joel Esler via NANOG]

Are you asking for commercial solutions?  Free solutions?  Open Source?

> On Jan 25, 2022, at 10:46 AM, David Bass  wrote:
> 
> Wondering what others in the small to medium sized networks out there are 
> using these days for netflow data collection, and your opinion on the tool?
> 
> Thanks!

Re: OpenDNS contact

[Joel Esler via NANOG]

Tell your friend to head over to talosintelligence.com/support and file a 
dispute.  


— 
Sent from my  iPad

> On Nov 19, 2021, at 08:41, Mark Costlow  wrote:
> 
> Does anyone have a contact within OpenDNS?  A friend's business is in
> extreme pain because a false-positive blacklisting and he hasn't been
> able to find a human to appeal to.
> 
> The source of the bad initial report has retracted it and the usual "remove
> me from this blacklist" form has been filled out, but they're still hurting.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mark
> -- 
> Mark Costlow| Southwest Cyberport | Fax:   +1-505-232-7975
> che...@swcp.com | Web:   www.swcp.com | Voice: +1-505-232-7992