RE: Who uses ARIN's IRR?
-Original Message- From: Jason Lixfeld [mailto:ja...@lixfeld.ca] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 10:07 To: NANOG Subject: Who uses ARIN's IRR? I don't need to use it much, but when I do, it's an ever-increasing royal pain in the ass. My current plight revolves around not being able to get full dumps of objects. Certain mandatory fields in objects are 'filtered' and/or replaced with dummy data. This poses a problem because one can no longer simply cut and paste the output, change the necessary bits and fire it off to r...@arin.net for processing. WhoisRWS doesn't seem to have hooks into the IRR database like RIPE seems to have gotten right. So how do people tend to get around this? Is there something that I'm missing or do people just throw their hands up and move their IRR data to RADB or something? You will notice right at the top of the output there is a hint on getting an unfiltered object. Try using the -B flag on your query to get around this. [elm:usrako]: whois -h rr.arin.net 64.50.224.0 % This is the ARIN Routing Registry. % Note: this output has been filtered. % To receive output for a database update, use the -B flag. % Information related to '64.50.224.0/19AS4181' route: 64.50.224.0/19 descr: TDS Telecom origin: AS4181 mnt-by: MNT-TDST source: ARIN # Filtered [elm:usrako]: whois -h rr.arin.net -B 64.50.224.0 % This is the ARIN Routing Registry. % Information related to '64.50.224.0/19AS4181' route: 64.50.224.0/19 descr: TDS Telecom origin: AS4181 mnt-by: MNT-TDST changed:andrew.k...@tdstelecom.com 20100526 source: ARIN HTH, Andy Koch TDS Telecom - IP Network Operations andrew.k...@tdstelecom.com
RE: TWT 24.55.0.0/18 blacklisted by Team Cymru 38.229.66.20
On June 14, 2013 15:22 Paul Zugnoni [mailto:paul.zugn...@jivesoftware.com] wrote: Have at least one user, a TWT broadband customer, reporting his IP as being within 24.55.0.0/18, which I'm receiving from Team Cymru 38.229.66.20 Bogon peer. Anyone from TWT aware? show route receive-protocol bgp 38.229.66.20 24.55.0.0/18 terse inet.0: 458306 destinations, 2258530 routes (458303 active, 2 holddown, 2 hidden) Restart Complete Prefix Nexthop MED LclprefAS path * 24.55.0.0/1838.229.66.2065332 I From all my transit providers, it's origin is 11427. That prefix does not show on the HTTP version http://www.team-ymru.org/Services/Bogons/fullbogons-ipv4.txt (# last updated 1371214084 (Fri Jun 14 12:48:04 2013 GMT). It appears this prefix was allocated by ARIN a couple weeks ago. NetRange: 24.55.0.0 - 24.55.63.255 CIDR: 24.55.0.0/18 OriginAS: AS11427 NetName:RRSW NetHandle: NET-24-55-0-0-1 Parent: NET-24-0-0-0-0 NetType:Direct Allocation RegDate:2013-05-28 Updated:2013-05-28 Ref:http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-24-55-0-0-1 I reported the mismatch between the BGP and HTTP feeds to support@cymru, but have not received a response yet. You may need to filter the announcement out from Team Cymru until they figure out why the BGP feed is not updated. Andy Koch TDS Telecom - IP Network Operations andrew.k...@tdstelecom.com
RE: TWT 24.55.0.0/18 blacklisted by Team Cymru 38.229.66.20
On June 14, 2013 15:42, Koch, Andrew [mailto:andrew.k...@tdstelecom.com] wrote: On June 14, 2013 15:22 Paul Zugnoni [mailto:paul.zugn...@jivesoftware.com] wrote: Have at least one user, a TWT broadband customer, reporting his IP as being within 24.55.0.0/18, which I'm receiving from Team Cymru 38.229.66.20 Bogon peer. I reported the mismatch between the BGP and HTTP feeds to support@cymru, but have not received a response yet. You may need to filter the announcement out from Team Cymru until they figure out why the BGP feed is not updated. Team Cymru contacted me that this should now be resolved. I have confirmed that this prefix is no longer received via the full-bogons BGP feed. Andy Koch TDS Telecom - IP Network Operations andrew.k...@tdstelecom.com
RE: What's really needed is a routing slot market (was: Using IPv6 withprefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN)
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Owen DeLong That's as close as I think I can get to an IPv6 CIDR report for the moment. Looks like Geoff has you already setup. http://www.cidr-report.org/v6/as2.0/ Andy Koch
RE: AltDB?
On Jan 11, 2011 at 8:14AM, John Curran wrote: It's perfectly understandable, and doesn't distract from your main point that the circumstances (ARIN effectively mandating MAIL-FROM for authentication) is patently unacceptable and shouldn't require any more effort than pointing such out in email. I did not perceive the situation initially, and hence sent Jeff Wheeler off to said suggestion form. As noted, we're now looking into how to fix the IRR authentication situation and will report back asap. As you are checking out authentication, can you also check out the notify fields as well. I was informed in July 2010 that neither mnt-nfy nor notify fields were operational. I submitted suggestion 2011.2 requesting these be activated. Regards, Andrew Koch TDS Telecom - IP Network Operations andrew.k...@tdstelecom.com
