Re: NDAA passed: Internet and Online Streaming Services Emergency Alert Study
I am impressed that this thread made it to the drain in less than a day, so here are my few cents on the topic. First, the NDAA does not prescribe port numbers, or any other technology, as no policy document EVER should. It's plain and simple. Mark Foster covered it well, but here is a slightly different point - if the government needs to insert _high priority programming_ whatever you are operating it needs to be able to do that. Now think about your deer grandma (on the one you hate but the dear one), who is sitting on her couch immersed in YouTube jumping cats videos, while there is a tornado in the area. Wouldn't you be happy that YouTube implemented the alert system so grandma now knows she needs to go in the shelter? It is impressive how everyone got worked up on the veto and didn't pay attention to what was written in the NDAA but I'll let people read through it as I don't think this list is suitable for political discussions. Also a PSA: Amber alerts, Emergency alerts, and Public Safety alerts all go over cell broadcast. Think of it as a broadcast message on a LAN where the LAN is the local mobile phone cell. The reason you get that message 600 miles away for an amber alert is because in most civilized societies children's lives are immensely valued. And a 5-6 hour driving distance is not much knowing the lifecycle of reporting of such things and activation of the system, and also the time it takes for some of those kidnappings to be discovered before it can even be reported. Cheers, On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 2:00 AM Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 1/2/21 22:40, Sabri Berisha wrote: > > > Aliens always invade New York, so I'm safe up here :) > > I thought that was Roswell :-). > > Mark. >
Re: NANOG Security Track: Route Security
Here they are on the main site: https://pc.nanog.org/static/published/meetings/NANOG74/agenda.html On Tue, Oct 2, 2018, 9:30 PM Christopher Morrow wrote: > > > My slides are: > http://tiny.cc/8rnmzy > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 10:44 PM Krassimir Tzvetanov > wrote: > >> Hello Everyone, >> >> Here is the copy of the combined slide deck. >> >> Thanks everyone. >> >> Regards, >> Krassimir >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:54 PM Krassimir T. Tzvetanov >> wrote: >> >>> Hello Everyone, >>> >>> I wanted to attract your attention to the Security Track this coming >>> NANOG. We'll be meeting on Tuesday morning and the line up looks like this: >>> * Andre Toonk - examples of hijacks, other ideas >>> * Alexander Azimov - State of BGP Security >>> * David Wishnick - ARIN TAL >>> * Job Snijders - Routing security roadmap >>> * Chris Morrow - So I need to start filtering routes from peers...' and >>> 'hey guess who needs to update their IRR data?' >>> >>> Time permitting at the end of the time slot we'll have a panel and time >>> for duscussion as well. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Krassi >>> >>> >>> >>>
Re: NANOG Security Track: Route Security
Hello Everyone, Here is the copy of the combined slide deck. Thanks everyone. Regards, Krassimir On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:54 PM Krassimir T. Tzvetanov wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I wanted to attract your attention to the Security Track this coming > NANOG. We'll be meeting on Tuesday morning and the line up looks like this: > * Andre Toonk - examples of hijacks, other ideas > * Alexander Azimov - State of BGP Security > * David Wishnick - ARIN TAL > * Job Snijders - Routing security roadmap > * Chris Morrow - So I need to start filtering routes from peers...' and > 'hey guess who needs to update their IRR data?' > > Time permitting at the end of the time slot we'll have a panel and time > for duscussion as well. > > Regards, > Krassi > > > >
Re: NANOG Security Track: Route Security
Sam, To ensure unimpeded information sharing and discussion, the Security Track will not be broadcast or recorded. I apologise for the inconvenience. Regards, Krassimir On Sun, Sep 30, 2018, 1:05 PM Sam Oduor wrote: > Hi > > Any online link available for remote participation or viewing ? > > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 7:46 PM Krassimir Tzvetanov > wrote: > >> Hello Everyone, >> >> I wanted to attract your attention to the Security Track this coming >> NANOG. We'll be meeting on Tuesday morning and the line up looks like this: >> * Andre Toonk - examples of hijacks, other ideas >> * Alexander Azimov - State of BGP Security >> * David Wishnick - ARIN TAL >> * Job Snijders - Routing security roadmap >> * Chris Morrow - So I need to start filtering routes from peers...' and >> 'hey guess who needs to update their IRR data?' >> >> Time permitting at the end of the time slot we'll have a panel and time >> for duscussion as well. >> >> Regards, >> Krassi >> >> > > -- > Samson Oduor >
Re: NANOG Security Track: Route Security
Hello Everyone, I wanted to attract your attention to the Security Track this coming NANOG. We'll be meeting on Tuesday morning and the line up looks like this: * Andre Toonk - examples of hijacks, other ideas * Alexander Azimov - State of BGP Security * David Wishnick - ARIN TAL * Job Snijders - Routing security roadmap * Chris Morrow - So I need to start filtering routes from peers...' and 'hey guess who needs to update their IRR data?' Time permitting at the end of the time slot we'll have a panel and time for duscussion as well. Regards, Krassi
