Re: DNS Reliability
On 09/13/13 03:53, Larry Sheldon wrote: On 9/12/2013 3:25 PM, Phil Fagan wrote: Its a good point about the anycast; 99.999% should be expected. A small choice of attitude-reflecting language. I expect 100.000% I'll accept 99.999% or better. It depends... define 'lost queries'. For example; is RRL included here or not (sometimes you want to deliberatly 'loose' queries). -- Marco
Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
On 11/26/12 15:53, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: Again, where're the compelling IPv6-only content/apps/services? To answer your rhetorical question, http://www.kame.net/ has a dancing kame. To my knowledge, that's the most compelling IPv6-only content. Don't forget http://loopsofzen.co.uk/ - that's definitely the most compelling IPv6-only content I've found. http:///thepiratebay/.se./ipv6/.sixxs.org was popular for a while, when major ISP's in the Netherlands where forced to block 'The Piratebay' overhere in the Netherlands, I believe... -- Marco
DNS issues with tools.ietf.org
Hi, Something seems wrong with the DNS of 'tools.ietf.org'. Can anyone conform? -- Marco
Re: DNS issues with tools.ietf.org
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Matt Ryanczak wrote: On 04/04/2012 04:28 PM, Craig Van Tassle wrote: It works for me. works for me too but there do appear to be some problems: And what about this: dig tools.ietf.org @merlot.levkowetz.com. ; DiG 9.7.0-P1 tools.ietf.org @merlot.levkowetz.com. ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 33101
Re: DNS issues with tools.ietf.org
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: And what about this: But two name servers, gamay and shiraz still work. So the domain works Actually it didn't resolve at all. Even an 'unbound-host -v -d' failed. But... things seem to be working fine again, at least to the extend that I can reach the website. -- Marco
RE: root zone stats
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012, Frank Bulk wrote: Some nice info here, too: http://bgp.he.net/report/dns Nice, but... not 100% up to date? .cw seems to be missing. -- Marco Frank -Original Message- From: Doug Barton [mailto:do...@dougbarton.us] Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 5:14 PM Cc: APNIC Mailing List; nanog@nanog.org Subject: root zone stats Since there was a question about this, some numbers: Serial: 2012031001 Statistics == Number of root servers: 13 Roots with IPv6 glue: 9 Number of gTLDs: 22 Number of ccTLDs:249 Number of IDN TLDs: 42 Total number of TLDs:313 Number of IPv4 hosts: 1176 Number of IPv4 addresses: 1145 Number of IPv6 hosts:427 Number of IPv6 addresses:412 TLDs with IPv6 glue: 258 Total name server hosts:1177 Total NS addresses: 1557 Number of DS records:141 Number of TLDs with DS: 85 Enjoy, Doug -- If you're never wrong, you're not trying hard enough
RE: root zone stats
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Marco Davids (Prive) wrote: Some nice info here, too: http://bgp.he.net/report/dns .cw seems to be missing. Oops, it isn't... it's just not wehere I expected it. -- Marco
Paging OpenDNS
Hi, Can someone responsible for 'malware-bl...@opendns.com' please contact me offline? Thank you. -- Marco
DNSSEC on the resolver-side?
Hi, I wonder... How many people here have activated DNSSEC validation on their resolvers? Please let me know off-list when the page below results in a green tick: http://dnssectest.sidn.nl/ Additional details are welcome, like: - The IP-address of the resolver(s) you used (if you know) - Whether this is an 'official' resolver at an ISP or not - You current IP-address, or the ISP you are at (http://ip.sidn.nl might be helpful). Maybe some of you DNS-gurus are even able to tell why DNSSEC validation failed, even when using DNSSEC-enabled resolvers. For example because of some old-school DNS-forwarder in your ADSL modem or something. That would be great information also. The reason for this post is just for me to get a rough understanding of the level of DNSSEC adoption on the resolver-side and the problems that might still exist with DNSSEC validation. The NANOG wiki (http://nanog.cluepon.net) has nothing about DNSSEC yet. Would it be an idea to add something about DNSSEC? I am more than willing to do the kick-off for that. Regards, -- Marco
Looking for 'websitewelcome.com' contact
Hi, Could anyone responsible for ns[12].websitewelcome.com please contact me off-list? Or, can anyone give me a good pointer on how to contact the technical staff of websitewelcome.com? Thank you so much, -- Marco Davids
