advice dealing with clean-mx

2015-08-11 Thread Michael Bubb
hello

I've lurked on this list for a while - I have an issue that I need help
with.

I work for a company that does fraud detection we host our servers on
physica hardware in managed hosting datacenters (softlayer, hertzer,
coresites, etc).

Recently we were flagged for malware buy clean-mx. It was the IP of an
haproxy loadbalancer.

I followed up by following the link to clean-mx. It looked as if the score
was based upon information from the following sites:

http://www.malwaredomainlist.com
https://www.virustotal.com
http://urlquery.net

When I checked the ip in question against these sites all the checks passed
exceptfor one -  fortinet. And fortinet indicated that it was an unknown
signature - not specifically malware.

So it appeared clean.

I am hesitant to deal directly with clean-mx as we do not have any existing
relationship and frankly a google search turns up many horror stories.

I am mindful that these may be the 'stories' of frustrated fraudsters.

I honestly do not know how to evaluate this situation. If clean-mx is legit
then it would make sense to have a relationship with them .  If they are
not then how does one deal with them?

thank you

Michael

-- 
Michael Bubb   +1.646.783.8769 | KD2DTY
Resume - http://mbubb.devio.us/res/resume.html

 *noli timere*


Re: OT - Small DNS appliances for remote offices.

2015-02-18 Thread Michael Bubb
What is your desired cost per unit?

Reminds me of needing small pfsense based boxes a few years back. Used this
company's hardware:

http://www.logicsupply.com/computers/solutions/firewall-networking/

I bet you could get something fairly rugged and low maintenance for $400 or
so.

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Ray Van Dolson rvandol...@esri.com wrote:

 Hopefully not too far off topic for this list.

 Am looking for options to deploy DNS caching resolvers at remote
 locations where there may only be minimal infrastructure (FW and Cisco
 equipment) and limited options for installing a noisier, more power
 hugnry  servers or appliances from a vendor.  Stuff like Infoblox is
 too expensive.

 We're BIND-based and leaning to stick that way, but open to other
 options if they present themselves.

 Am considering the Soekris net6501-50.  I can dump a Linux image on
 there with our DNS config, indudstrial grade design, and OK
 performance.  If the thing fails, clients will hopefully not notice due
 to anycast which will just hit another DNS server somewhere else on the
 network albeit with additional latency.  We ship out a replacement
 device rather than mucking with trying to repair.

 There's also stuff like this[1] which probably gives me more horsepower
 on my CPU, but maybe not as reliable.

 Maybe I'm overengineering this.  What do others do at smaller remote
 sites?  Also considering putting resolvers only at hub locations in
 our MPLS network based on some latency-based radius.

 Ray

 [1] http://www.newegg.com/Mini-Booksize-Barebone-PCs/SubCategory/ID-309




-- 
Michael Bubb   +1.646.783.8769 | KD2DTY
Resume - http://mbubb.devio.us/res/resume.html

 *noli timere*


RE: Cogent outage?

2012-12-06 Thread Michael Bubb
We got a notice from Internap a few hours ago:


At approximately 12:10 EST Internap shut down the BGP session with Cogent
as we were widespread packet loss issues through their network out of our
New York (NYM) PNAP.

We are contacting Cogent to see if they are aware of what the issue is. 


They have not as yet updated this

yrs

Michael

-- 
Michael Bubb   +1.646.783.8769
https://www.google.com/profiles/michael.bubb

The first principle is that you must not fool yourself--and you are the
easiest person to fool. - Richard Feynman

All things are a flowing,
Sage Heraclitus says;
But a tawdry cheapness
Shall reign throughout our days. - Pound


Re: Cogent outage?

2012-12-06 Thread Michael Bubb
Internap just updated:

Cogent has said that the issue they were having has been resolved.
Internap's BGP session was turned back up at approximately 15:45 EST and
traffic has been stable since that time.


On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.comwrote:

 We've seen BGP resets on our servers in Tampa...with Cogent no longer
 being the preferred route for outgoing traffic.  The preferred path from
 out DC is now through Hurricane (AS6939).

 Blair Trosper
 Updraft Networks  LEARN (North Texas GigaPOP)


 On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Michael Bubb michael.b...@gmail.comwrote:

 We got a notice from Internap a few hours ago:


 At approximately 12:10 EST Internap shut down the BGP session with Cogent
 as we were widespread packet loss issues through their network out of our
 New York (NYM) PNAP.

 We are contacting Cogent to see if they are aware of what the issue is. 


 They have not as yet updated this

 yrs

 Michael

 --
 Michael Bubb   +1.646.783.8769
 https://www.google.com/profiles/michael.bubb

 The first principle is that you must not fool yourself--and you are the
 easiest person to fool. - Richard Feynman

 All things are a flowing,
 Sage Heraclitus says;
 But a tawdry cheapness
 Shall reign throughout our days. - Pound





-- 
Michael Bubb   +1.646.783.8769
https://www.google.com/profiles/michael.bubb

The first principle is that you must not fool yourself--and you are the
easiest person to fool. - Richard Feynman

All things are a flowing,
Sage Heraclitus says;
But a tawdry cheapness
Shall reign throughout our days. - Pound