RE: Outdoor Wireless Access Point
Hi...How do I do it! I'm utterly amazed how many people give away free consultant work. We need to keep people working... not giving it away. Ethics... Security... etc... Does the university give away free diploma's? I don't think so. Must be another copy paste e^%$#?r too! Google is your friend... ;^) Cheers! Ephesians 4:32Cheers!!! A password is like a... toothbrush ;^) Choose a good one, change it regularly and don't share it. -Original Message- From: Shahab Vahabzadeh [mailto:sh.vahabza...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 2:39 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Outdoor Wireless Access Point Hi there, I asked for a wireless solution for a university, in which they want indoor wireless solution for more than 5 building (at least two floor) and outdoor wireless solution for near 160m*280m garden. As I look for maps we need at least 3 or 4 outdoor radio, I think in these networks the best solution is to have only one SSID in whole network to give mobility for the network, is this called ad-hoc? or it has an other name? I do not know if I could ask question clearly or not, suppose we have 4 radio but only one SSID is broadcasting and when you are near the radio is near to you you will get service from that one, as this solution must be implement for indoor ones too. And if there is any good company which can both indoor and outdoor solution and they have shipping to Iran too or reseller in Iran please give me the url. Thanks -- Regards, Shahab Vahabzadeh, Network Engineer and System Administrator Cell Phone: +1 (415) 871 0742 PGP Key Fingerprint = 8E34 B335 D702 0CA7 5A81 C2EE 76A2 46C2 5367 BF90
RE: Whois 172/12
quoteJesus. 172.16/12 fine .. that's rfc1918. The rest of 172/8 is mostly unallocated./quote What's with the language? Ephesians 4:32Cheers!!! -Original Message- From: Suresh Ramasubramanian [mailto:ops.li...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:35 AM To: Patrick W. Gilmore Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: Whois 172/12 Jesus. 172.16/12 fine .. that's rfc1918. The rest of 172/8 is mostly unallocated. On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote: Read RFC1918. Likely a machine on his local network (i.e. behind the same NAT box) is hitting him. But that is not guaranteed. A packet with a source address of 172.0.x.x -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.li...@gmail.com)
RE: enterprise 802.11
Meraki... ;^) http://www.meraki.com/ Ephesians 4:32Cheers!!! -Original Message- From: Ken King [mailto:kk...@yammer-inc.com] Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 11:31 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: enterprise 802.11 I need to choose a wireless solution for a new office. up to 600 devices will connect. most devices are mac books and mobile phones. we can see hundreds of access points in close proximity to our new office space. what are the thoughts these days on the best enterprise solution/vendor? Thanks for your replies. Ken King
RE: In search of uplink vendor
QUOTE I know of a half dozen DDoS Protection ISP's that block all UDP and ICMP Isn't this Internet censorship? Ephesians 4:32Cheers!!! -Original Message- From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bickn...@ufp.org] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 9:50 AM To: NANOG Subject: Re: In search of uplink vendor In a message written on Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 05:43:08PM +, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: ndeed. and now i am curious.. what business plan/product/service could make money w/o ICMP or UDP access.. ??? Turn the OP's e-mail into a URL: http://www.impletec.com/ Impletec Traffic Laboratory was established with the aim to develop and provide high-load solutions for Network Engineering, CDN, DDoS Protection and other high-level network services. At the highest possible standards, with minimum hassle and lowest expense to you - our valued customer. I know of a half dozen DDoS Protection ISP's that block all UDP and ICMP. It also fits with his desire to have a blackhole community by the /32 with his upstream. I don't know if this sort of filter all ICMP behavior is more a symtom of the providers or their customer bases, but regardless of the source it makes most of the sites behind these services very slow and/or unreachable from some locations. I'm not sure posting I'm a DDoS magnet on NANOG will get a lot of people jumping up to offer service, or good rates! :) -- Leo Bicknell - bickn...@ufp.org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
[sort of off topic] An Open Letter From Internet Engineers to the U.S. Congress
I wonder how this will go in the USA and what trickle effect it might have on us if Senator Conroy gets wind of it. An Open Letter From Internet Engineers to the U.S. Congress. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/12/internet-inventors-warn-against-sopa-a nd-pipa Ephesians 4:32 Cheers!!! Andy
RE: Inaccessible network from Verizon, accessible elsewhere.
From 90701 - Artesia, CA. FIOS No Go here too!!! C:\WINDOWS\system32tracert 106.187.34.1 Tracing route to gw-li377.linode.com [106.187.34.1] over a maximum of 30 hops: 122 ms34 ms1 ms Tomato [192.168.100.1] 249 ms 1 ms 1 ms Verizon [192.168.1.1] 336 ms 6 ms 6 ms L100.LSANCA-VFTTP-114.verizon-gni.net [173.58.21 1.1] 424 ms 9 ms 9 ms G0-9-1-4.LSANCA-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net [130.81.1 85.72] 524 ms 9 ms 8 ms so-4-1-0-0.LAX01-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81 .151.246] 624 ms 9 ms 8 ms 0.ae1.BR3.LAX15.ALTER.NET [152.63.2.129] 738 ms 8 ms 8 ms ae6.edge1.LosAngeles9.level3.net [4.68.62.169] 825 ms10 ms10 ms 63.146.26.70 924 ms 9 ms 8 ms lajbb001.kddnet.ad.jp [59.128.2.173] 1024 ms 9 ms 8 ms lajbb001.kddnet.ad.jp [59.128.2.181] 11 140 ms 110 ms 108 ms otejbb203.kddnet.ad.jp [203.181.100.9] 12 140 ms 124 ms 111 ms cm-fcu203.kddnet.ad.jp [124.215.194.164] 13 *** Request timed out. 14 *** Request timed out. 15 *** Request timed out. 16 *** Request timed out. 17 *** Request timed out. 18 *** Request timed out. 19 *** Request timed out. 20 *** Request timed out. 21 *** Request timed out. 22 *** Request timed out. 23 *** Request timed out. 24 * ^C C:\WINDOWS\system32tracert 106.187.34.33 Tracing route to li377-33.members.linode.com [106.187.34.33] over a maximum of 30 hops: 122 ms 1 ms1 ms Tomato [192.168.100.1] 231 ms 1 ms 1 ms Verizon [192.168.1.1] 351 ms10 ms11 ms L100.LSANCA-VFTTP-114.verizon-gni.net [173.58.21 1.1] 442 ms 9 ms33 ms G0-9-1-4.LSANCA-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net [130.81.1 85.72] 540 ms15 ms 9 ms so-4-1-0-0.LAX01-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81 .151.246] 631 ms 8 ms 8 ms 0.ae1.BR3.LAX15.ALTER.NET [152.63.2.129] 761 ms10 ms16 ms lap-brdr-03.inet.qwest.net [63.146.26.209] 831 ms10 ms10 ms 63.146.26.70 931 ms 9 ms 9 ms lajbb001.kddnet.ad.jp [59.128.2.173] 1031 ms 9 ms 8 ms lajbb001.kddnet.ad.jp [59.128.2.181] 11 125 ms 118 ms 109 ms otejbb203.kddnet.ad.jp [203.181.100.9] 12 156 ms 111 ms 143 ms 124.215.199.122 13 126 ms 112 ms 137 ms 124.215.199.122 14 *** Request timed out. 15 *** Request timed out. 16 *** Request timed out. 17 ** ^C C:\WINDOWS\system32 E = 4:32Cheers!!! -Original Message- From: Lee [mailto:ler...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 6:44 AM To: NetSecGuy Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Inaccessible network from Verizon, accessible elsewhere. On 12/10/11, NetSecGuy netsec...@gmail.com wrote: I have a Linode VPS in Japan that I can't access from Verizon FIOS, but can access from other locations. I'm not sure who to blame. I can't get to 106.187.34.33 or 106.187.34.1 using Verizon FIOS C:\tracert 106.187.34.33 Tracing route to li377-33.members.linode.com [106.187.34.33] over a maximum of 30 hops: [.. snip ..] 523 ms 4 ms 4 ms so-14-0-0-0.RES-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net [130.81.22.56] 673 ms 6 ms 7 ms 0.ae2.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET [152.63.34.73] 7 8 ms 6 ms 7 ms dcp-brdr-03.inet.qwest.net [63.146.26.105] 8 8 ms 9 ms 9 ms sl-crs1-dc-0-1-0-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.19.229] 928 ms26 ms44 ms sl-crs1-dc-0-5-3-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.24.37] 10 177 ms 176 ms 177 ms lajbb001.kddnet.ad.jp [59.128.2.173] 1143 ms41 ms42 ms sl-crs1-oma-0-9-2-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.2.177] 12 291 ms * 301 ms cm-fcu203.kddnet.ad.jp [124.215.194.164] 13 286 ms 279 ms 282 ms 124.215.199.122 1481 ms81 ms82 ms sl-crs1-sj-0-5-3-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.99] 1588 ms86 ms87 ms sl-st20-pa-9-0-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.8.108] 16 405 ms 406 ms 399 ms 144.223.243.126 17 364 ms 386 ms 406 ms pajbb001.kddnet.ad.jp [111.87.3.41] 18 *** Request timed out. 19 *** Request timed out. 20 *** Request timed out. 21 *** Request timed out. 22 *** Request timed out. 23 ** ^C C:\tracert 106.187.34.1 Tracing route to gw-li377.linode.com [106.187.34.1] over a maximum of 30 hops: [.. snip ..] 5 5 ms24 ms24 ms so-3-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net [130.81.151.232] 6 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 0.ae2.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET [152.63.34.73] 7 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms dcp-brdr-03.inet.qwest.net
Copper not dead for super-fast broadband, says BT | Networking | ZDNet UK
http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/networking/2011/11/11/copper-not-dead-for-super- fast-broadband-says-bt-40094401/?ps=twitter
RE: Enterprise Wi-Fi list recommendations?
MERAKI... http://www.meraki.com E = 4:32Cheers!!! -Original Message- From: Charles N Wyble [mailto:char...@knownelement.com] Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 1:12 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Enterprise WiFi list recommendations? On 10/10/2011 10:04 AM, James M Keller wrote: On 10/10/2011 11:01 AM, James M Keller wrote: All, I'm looking for some mailing list recommendations for wifi operations community, any commendations? Checkout wispa.org Let us know what you decide to subscribe to.
Microsoft deems all DigiNotar certificates untrustworthy, releases updates
FYI!!! http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/microsoftpri0/2016132391_microsoft_dee ms_all_diginotar_certificates_untrust.html Google and Mozilla have also updated their browsers to block all DigiNotar certificates, while Apple has been silent on the issue, a emblematic zombie response! Cheers.
