Re: MGMIX (Montgomery, AL) - contact me please

[Reid Fishler via NANOG]

I am on the board of MGMIX, if anyone needs anything, please reach out to
me and I will make sure it's addressed. I will of course look into the
email problem as well.

Reid


On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 8:30 AM Elmar K. Bins  wrote:

> Hi Walt, folks,
>
> > Holt, Marcus 
> > Has been and is a good contact
>
> Thank you - unfortunately, my emails seem to land in his spam folder (sent
> half
> a dozen over the last year, never heard a peep). Marcus - you reading this?
>
> Elmar.
>
>

Re: Subsea availability

[Reid Fishler]

Not to mention:
https://www.cablemap.info/

Reid


On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:46 AM james jones  wrote:

> Not interactive but cool animation:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlAJJI-qG2k
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:37 AM, Mehmet Akcin  wrote:
>
> > yeah, I know and already reached out to my friends at Telegeography on
> how
> > to make www.submarinecablemap.com interactive
> >
> > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:35 PM, Martin Hepworth 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'll put this as a starter
> > >
> > > http://submarine-cable-map-2018.telegeography.com/
> > >
> > > There's probably better by now
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On Tue, 22 May 2018 at 06:13, Mehmet Akcin  wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello there,
> > >>
> > >> I am working on a masters project idea to create an interactive map of
> > the
> > >> world’s subsea cables (cls to cla without local loops from cls to dc)
> > >>
> > >> I would like to know if anyone have worked with something like this in
> > the
> > >> past, and whether you think it would be cool to have a map where you
> can
> > >> see subsea cable availability.
> > >>
> > >> I am also going to be at nanog denver to talk about this project with
> > >> people. Let me know if you are available and interested in talking on
> > ways
> > >> to collaborate.
> > >>
> > >> I have few ideas on how to make this work with using ripe atlas probe
> > like
> > >> devices installed in strategic locations.
> > >>
> > >> Mehmet
> > >>
> > > --
> > > --
> > > Martin Hepworth, CISSP
> > > Oxford, UK
> > >
> >

Re: Hurricane Electric packet loss

[Reid Fishler]

Wolfgang-
   Our NOC is always ready and willing to help you with any problems you
may have. I do not see any tickets opened recently for you. We have more
than enough capacity transatlantically and transpacifically so I do not
know what problem you may be seeing. The next time you see it please open a
ticket with our NOC, and we will be happy to try to debug it. Posting to
Nanog without first opening a ticket isn't a great method of debugging.

Reid Fishler



On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry) 
wolfgang.nag...@ausregistry.com.au wrote:

 Hi,

 Two different thins. Once they were affected by the cable fault
 cross-Atlantic.

 All the other times the problem was acknowledged and then disappeared. No
 further detail given. :(

 Cheers,
 Wolfgang

 On 7/22/14, 9:03 PM, Mehmet Akcin meh...@akcin.netmailto:
 meh...@akcin.net wrote:

 And what did HE say when you asked them?

 Mehmet

 On Jul 22, 2014, at 5:48, Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry) 
 wolfgang.nag...@ausregistry.com.aumailto:
 wolfgang.nag...@ausregistry.com.au wrote:
 Hi,
 We’ve been customers of Hurricane Electric for a number of years now and
 always been happy with their service.
 In recent months packet loss on some of their major routes has become a
 very common (every few days) occurrence. Without knowledge of their network
 I am unsure what’s the cause of it but we’ve seen it on the Tokyo - US
 routes as well as the London - US routes. It reminds me of the Cogent
 expansion which was carried out by unsustainable oversubscription which
 eventually resulted in unusable service for a number of years. Having seen
 some of the rates that HE has been selling for I can’t help but wonder if
 they made the same mistake ...
 Here is an example of what’s going on again atm.
 HOST: prolocation01.ring.nlnog.ne Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst
 StDev
   1.|-- 2a00:d00:ff:136::253   0.0%110.3   0.3   0.3   0.4
 0.0
   2.|-- 2a00:d00:1:12::1   0.0%100.7   0.8   0.7   1.1
 0.1
   3.|-- hurricane-electric.nikhef  0.0%100.7   3.1   0.7   8.3
 2.9
   4.|-- 100ge9-1.core1.lon2.he.ne  0.0%109.8  12.6   8.0  19.2
 4.1
   5.|-- 100ge1-1.core1.nyc4.he.ne 10.0%10   74.7  74.6  73.7  80.8
 2.3
   6.|-- 10ge10-3.core1.lax1.he.ne 30.0%10  133.4 138.0 133.4 145.1
 4.8
   7.|-- 10ge1-3.core1.lax2.he.net 20.0%10  135.7 139.1 133.4 145.1
 4.5
   8.|-- 2001:504:13::3b   40.0%10  143.2 143.1 142.1 144.4
 0.8
   9.|-- 2402:7800:100:1::55   50.0%10  144.4 144.1 143.8 144.4
 0.2
 10.|-- 2402:7800:0:1::f6 60.0%10  298.7 298.4 298.2 298.7   0.2
 11.|-- ge-0-1-4.cor02.syd03.nsw. 10.0%10  299.3 298.9 298.3 299.5   0.5
 12.|-- 2402:7800:0:2::18a20.0%10  299.7 299.4 298.9 300.1   0.4
 13.|-- 2001:dcd:12::10   30.0%10  299.8 299.5 298.8 300.0   0.5
 Is anybody else observing this as well?
 Cheers,
 Wolfgang

Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix

[Reid Fishler]

https://www.peeringdb.com/private/exchange_view.php?id=254 is the correct
exchange for the old RMIX.

Reid


On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:

  The RMIX is alive and well.

 cool.  web site?  traffic?  members?