ISPs/Carriers in LATA 138

2015-08-03 Thread kb3ien+nanog


I'm looking for a solution to provide one-weekend per year access in a 
rural area 20 km outside Binghamton NY, LATA 138



Can anyone provide any recomendations?

Robin

kb3ien



[no subject]

2009-02-19 Thread kb3ien+nanog



protect users from victimisation by the likes of this :

http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/topic204619.html

For years (decades?) I've been DNS hijacking to criple worm ridden 
machines associating with my wifi nodes etc. That only deals with a 
few threats. I'd like to feel confident in using blackhole routes to 
combat maleware proliferation too. Any tools available to age out 
male-routes after a given period of time?


Robin David Hammond KB3IEN
n.y.c. ares






Re: On the subject of multihoming

2008-11-06 Thread kb3ien+nanog


Yes bgp multihop is a GREAT* way to figure out if a cablemodem** is even 
/really/ online.


Alas, I've not see much on the traffic engineering side either.


* Read the only way i've found to do this with cisco's ios

** or any other pipe for that matter.

On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Charles Wyble wrote:


Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 12:32:11 -0800
From: Charles Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Subject: On the subject of multihoming

I'm working on a small experiment which utilizes multiple outbound links (in 
the experiments case multiple consumer 3G connections [to 2 Sprint/2 
Verizon/1 ATT], Time Warner Cable Modem and an SBC Global DSL connection.


What is the best way to do outbound traffic engineering? I would like to be 
able to determine the best path possible and send traffic out the appropriate 
link.


Could this be done with a copy of the BGP tables?

Obviously as they are consumer connections, I wouldn't get a BGP feed so 
would need to download a copy, which has the risk of stale data. Perhaps some 
sort of multihop BGP setup?


I have done some research and found a lot of references to small site 
multihoming without BGP for link redundancy but not for traffic engineering.



Thanks.

Charles