Re: [v6ops] Question about "Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers"

2020-07-29 Thread Fernando Gont

Hi, Fred,

On 29/7/20 05:15, Fred Baker wrote:

Fernando, I asked a specific question, not "send me all of your comments". 
General discussion of your draft still belongs on the v6...@ietf.org list. Please don't 
confuse the issue.


Apologies if I may have lead to confusion. I just meant to forward your 
request, and let folks know what the email alias for the chairs is 
(sometimes I get it wrong myself e.g. @ietf.org vs. @tools.ietf.org).


I just didn't say "send your support comments" because I didn't want to 
bias the request.


My apologies,
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint:  31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492






Re: [v6ops] Question about "Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers"

2020-07-29 Thread Fred Baker
Fernando, I asked a specific question, not "send me all of your comments". 
General discussion of your draft still belongs on the v6...@ietf.org list. 
Please don't confuse the issue.

> On Jul 28, 2020, at 11:44 PM, Fernando Gont  wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> FYI. You can send your comments to  if you wish.
> 
> Thanks,
> Fernando
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---- Forwarded Message ----
> Subject: [v6ops] Question about "Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets 
> with Extension Headers"
> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 22:55:45 -0700
> From: Fred Baker 
> Reply-To: V6Ops-Chairs 
> To: IPv6 Operations 
> 
> It looks like Fernando (et al) revised this and posted draft -04 on Saturday, 
> and there has been a flurry of discussion. I haven't been through the 
> document or the entire thread yet, but I do observe that a number of people 
> have comments, and several people have expressed interest in the document.
> 
> Let me ask the obvious question: you we want to adopt this as a working group 
> draft? I won't ask you to hum; whether you wish to say "yes", "no", or 
> "abstain", please reply to this email *privately* (which is to say, to 
> v6ops-chairs) with that word prepended on the subject line. I'll give us 48 
> hours, which is to say that I will evaluate and state the result Thursday 
> evening Pacific time.
> 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?qdr=a=%22draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops%22
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?qdr=a=%22Operational Implications 
> of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers%22
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops
>  "Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers", Fernando 
> Gont, Nick Hilliard, Gert Doering, Warren Kumari, Geoff Huston, 2020-07-25,
> 
> ___
> v6ops mailing list
> v6...@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 



Fwd: [v6ops] Question about "Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers"

2020-07-29 Thread Fernando Gont

Folks,

FYI. You can send your comments to  if you wish.

Thanks,
Fernando




 Forwarded Message 
Subject: [v6ops] Question about "Operational Implications of IPv6 
Packets with Extension Headers"

Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 22:55:45 -0700
From: Fred Baker 
Reply-To: V6Ops-Chairs 
To: IPv6 Operations 

It looks like Fernando (et al) revised this and posted draft -04 on 
Saturday, and there has been a flurry of discussion. I haven't been 
through the document or the entire thread yet, but I do observe that a 
number of people have comments, and several people have expressed 
interest in the document.


Let me ask the obvious question: you we want to adopt this as a working 
group draft? I won't ask you to hum; whether you wish to say "yes", 
"no", or "abstain", please reply to this email *privately* (which is to 
say, to v6ops-chairs) with that word prepended on the subject line. I'll 
give us 48 hours, which is to say that I will evaluate and state the 
result Thursday evening Pacific time.


https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?qdr=a=%22draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops%22
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?qdr=a=%22Operational 
Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers%22

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops
  "Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers", 
Fernando Gont, Nick Hilliard, Gert Doering, Warren Kumari, Geoff Huston, 
2020-07-25,


___
v6ops mailing list
v6...@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops