I had a very clueless ATT salesperson tell me yesterday that “Our company
policy is we don’t do BGP sessions.” I have a client wanting to use ATT as an
upstream and they won’t do BGP (mainly due to clueless sales). If this is the
level of comp tenancy then good luck. :-)
Justin Wilson
j...@mtin.net
---
http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO
xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth
http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman
Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric
> On Feb 8, 2017, at 9:05 AM, Van Dyk, Donovan via NANOG
> wrote:
>
> We’ve been running into a lot of problems lately with ATT peering lately.
> Level3 included.
>
> We have multiple carriers and most of them have run into this issue over the
> past couple months where there is congestion between ATT and our carriers, it
> appears there is a political issue on who should pay for the peering and
> bandwidth.
> My colleague says he heard on the grapevine (Horrible source I know) that ATT
> is playing super hardball and requesting big cash for peering with them.
>
> Anyways, that’s all I got.
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Donovan Van Dyk
>
>
>
>
> The information contained in this electronic mail transmission and its
> attachments may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure.
> If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient (or an individual
> responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you are strictly
> prohibited from copying, disseminating or distributing this communication. If
> you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender
> immediately and destroy all electronic, paper or other versions.
>
>
> On 2/5/17, 8:21 PM, "david peahi" wrote:
>
>We're seeing frequent dropped packets between ATT and Level 3 in Atlanta
>with traffic sourced from an ATT user destined for Microsoft Office 365,
>making Office 365 apps unusable during critical business hours. Anyone else
>have this problem with ATT?
>
>