Announcing a reserved ASN?

2013-02-03 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
AS23456 is currently announcing a good few netblocks (which don't have a
very good smtp reputation, by the way).

Funny thing is, that's a special use ASN as per rfc4893, something about
two octet ASNs that don't have a four octet representation.

Only one upstream (airtelbroadband-as-ap, as24560) that I can see

  103.7.204.0/22
  103.14.208.0/22
  103.23.124.0/22
  103.30.12.0/22
  103.245.112.0/22
  111.235.148.0/22
  177.55.249.0/24
  186.251.192.0/21

--srs (htc one x)


Announcing a reserved ASN?

2013-02-03 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
At least the 103.x which are announced by airtel. The other netblocks (one
Indian and two brazilian) appear unrelated though also showing as23456

--srs (htc one x)
On 03-Feb-2013 6:12 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.li...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'ops.li...@gmail.com');
wrote:

 AS23456 is currently announcing a good few netblocks (which don't have a
 very good smtp reputation, by the way).

 Funny thing is, that's a special use ASN as per rfc4893, something about
 two octet ASNs that don't have a four octet representation.

 Only one upstream (airtelbroadband-as-ap, as24560) that I can see

   103.7.204.0/22
   103.14.208.0/22
   103.23.124.0/22
   103.30.12.0/22
   103.245.112.0/22
   111.235.148.0/22
   177.55.249.0/24
   186.251.192.0/21

 --srs (htc one x)



-- 
--srs (iPad)


Re: Announcing a reserved ASN?

2013-02-03 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 06:12:32PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
 AS23456 is currently announcing a good few netblocks (which don't have a
 very good smtp reputation, by the way).

To say the least.  A quick rDNS scan reveals that those netblocks include:

8448  addresses
6932  return nxdomain
512   return servfail
1004  with rDNS entries

Those 1004 hosts with rDNS account for 36 domains:

ainoutserver.net
alphainfonet.com
boxmatter.org
clickcabin.com
cloud-core.com
contrymail.com
coremail4you.org
dealatmail.org
deliver8mail.org
deliverbox.org
deliveryalive.org
deliveryaverage.org
emailadvisir.org
emailpacts.com
emailservercore.com
emailvalue.co.in
emailvalue.in
fairmail4you.org
financeofferpros.com
globalmaildelivery.org
inboxdelivery.org
livemailservices.in
nayasa.net
newwaygain.com
paydayloanforyou.net
payloantoyou.com
quickpaydaytoyou.net
ready4deal.org
realemail.org
realemaildelivery.org
sandeshdelivery.org
sandeshfour.com
sandeshone.com
sandeshonline.org
truemaildelivery.org
warmmailcampaign.com

I'm sure they're all perfectly legitimate businesses.

---rsk



Re: Announcing a reserved ASN?

2013-02-03 Thread Dave Pooser
On 2/3/13 9:04 AM, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:

On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 06:12:32PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
 AS23456 is currently announcing a good few netblocks (which don't have a
 very good smtp reputation, by the way).

To say the least.  A quick rDNS scan reveals that those netblocks include:

   8448  addresses
   6932  return nxdomain
   512   return servfail
   1004  with rDNS entries

Those 1004 hosts with rDNS account for 36 domains:

snip long list of spammy domains

Just as another data point, the domain names you listed hit on enough URL
blacklists that Spamassassin quarantined the message for me (and would
have rejected it during the SMTP transaction had the NANOG server not been
listed on DNSWL-High). Spam hosts plus fake ASN = paging the Spamhaus DROP
maintainers to the white courtesy phone
-- 
Dave Pooser
Manager of Information Services
Alford Media  http://www.alfordmedia.com





Re: Announcing a reserved ASN?

2013-02-03 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
I do believe, as has been pointed out to me elsewhere that this is what
shows up when there's a 64 bit ASN and router software that doesn't grok 64
bit ASNs

So, completely by chance that one such as belongs to what looks like a bulk
mailer

--srs (htc one x)
On 03-Feb-2013 9:02 PM, Dave Pooser dave.na...@alfordmedia.com wrote:

 On 2/3/13 9:04 AM, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:

 On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 06:12:32PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
  AS23456 is currently announcing a good few netblocks (which don't have a
  very good smtp reputation, by the way).
 
 To say the least.  A quick rDNS scan reveals that those netblocks include:
 
8448  addresses
6932  return nxdomain
512   return servfail
1004  with rDNS entries
 
 Those 1004 hosts with rDNS account for 36 domains:

 snip long list of spammy domains

 Just as another data point, the domain names you listed hit on enough URL
 blacklists that Spamassassin quarantined the message for me (and would
 have rejected it during the SMTP transaction had the NANOG server not been
 listed on DNSWL-High). Spam hosts plus fake ASN = paging the Spamhaus DROP
 maintainers to the white courtesy phone
 --
 Dave Pooser
 Manager of Information Services
 Alford Media  http://www.alfordmedia.com






Re: Announcing a reserved ASN?

2013-02-03 Thread Brandon Ross
I strongly recommend that you read about and fully understand how 4-byte 
ASNs work, and their use of AS23456 before you continue this thread.


On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:


I do believe, as has been pointed out to me elsewhere that this is what
shows up when there's a 64 bit ASN and router software that doesn't grok 64
bit ASNs

So, completely by chance that one such as belongs to what looks like a bulk
mailer

--srs (htc one x)
On 03-Feb-2013 9:02 PM, Dave Pooser dave.na...@alfordmedia.com wrote:


On 2/3/13 9:04 AM, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:


On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 06:12:32PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:

AS23456 is currently announcing a good few netblocks (which don't have a
very good smtp reputation, by the way).


To say the least.  A quick rDNS scan reveals that those netblocks include:

  8448  addresses
  6932  return nxdomain
  512   return servfail
  1004  with rDNS entries

Those 1004 hosts with rDNS account for 36 domains:


snip long list of spammy domains

Just as another data point, the domain names you listed hit on enough URL
blacklists that Spamassassin quarantined the message for me (and would
have rejected it during the SMTP transaction had the NANOG server not been
listed on DNSWL-High). Spam hosts plus fake ASN = paging the Spamhaus DROP
maintainers to the white courtesy phone
--
Dave Pooser
Manager of Information Services
Alford Media  http://www.alfordmedia.com








--
Brandon Ross  Yahoo  AIM:  BrandonNRoss
+1-404-635-6667ICQ:  2269442
Schedule a meeting:  https://doodle.com/brossSkype:  brandonross



Re: Announcing a reserved ASN?

2013-02-03 Thread Richard Barnes
Some links:
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog45/presentations/Tuesday/Hankins_4byteASN_N45.pdf
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6793


On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Brandon Ross br...@pobox.com wrote:

 I strongly recommend that you read about and fully understand how 4-byte
 ASNs work, and their use of AS23456 before you continue this thread.


 On Sun, 3 Feb 2013, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:

  I do believe, as has been pointed out to me elsewhere that this is what
 shows up when there's a 64 bit ASN and router software that doesn't grok
 64
 bit ASNs

 So, completely by chance that one such as belongs to what looks like a
 bulk
 mailer

 --srs (htc one x)
 On 03-Feb-2013 9:02 PM, Dave Pooser dave.na...@alfordmedia.com wrote:

  On 2/3/13 9:04 AM, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:

  On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 06:12:32PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:

 AS23456 is currently announcing a good few netblocks (which don't have
 a
 very good smtp reputation, by the way).


 To say the least.  A quick rDNS scan reveals that those netblocks
 include:

   8448  addresses
   6932  return nxdomain
   512   return servfail
   1004  with rDNS entries

 Those 1004 hosts with rDNS account for 36 domains:


 snip long list of spammy domains

 Just as another data point, the domain names you listed hit on enough URL
 blacklists that Spamassassin quarantined the message for me (and would
 have rejected it during the SMTP transaction had the NANOG server not
 been
 listed on DNSWL-High). Spam hosts plus fake ASN = paging the Spamhaus
 DROP
 maintainers to the white courtesy phone
 --
 Dave Pooser
 Manager of Information Services
 Alford Media  http://www.alfordmedia.com






 --
 Brandon Ross  Yahoo  AIM:
  BrandonNRoss
 +1-404-635-6667ICQ:
  2269442
 Schedule a meeting:  https://doodle.com/brossSkype:
  brandonross




Re: Announcing a reserved ASN?

2013-02-03 Thread Owen DeLong
AS23456 is what you get if your system doesn't properly support 32-bit ASNs
and an AS-PATH (or peer) uses a 32-bit ASN.

There should be an extended attribute on the route that contains the full
32-bit AS-PATH called AS4_PATH associated with any such routes.

Arguably any route containing AS23456 without an AS4_PATH attribute is
invalid and could be filtered.

Unfortunately, routers that would display AS23456 instead of restoring the
full 32-bit AS_PATH may not be able to identify this.

A properly transmitted route from a 4-byte ASN will be recovered as follows:

91.217.86.0/23 *[BGP/170] 1w5d 09:11:37, MED 101, localpref 100
  AS path: 8121 1299 3209 197269 I
 to 192.124.40.129 via ge-0/0/0.0

OTOH, you may occasionally see artifacts like this (I don't know why):

91.217.87.0/24 *[BGP/170] 1w5d 09:10:16, MED 101, localpref 100
  AS path: 8121 1299 174 23456 197269 I
 to 192.124.40.129 via ge-0/0/0.0

But if you are seeing 23456 on an AS4 capable router without at least some
indication of a 4-byte ASN in the path, it's probably fishy.

On Feb 3, 2013, at 4:57 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian ops.li...@gmail.com wrote:

 At least the 103.x which are announced by airtel. The other netblocks (one
 Indian and two brazilian) appear unrelated though also showing as23456
 
 --srs (htc one x)
 On 03-Feb-2013 6:12 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
 ops.li...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
 'ops.li...@gmail.com');
 wrote:
 
 AS23456 is currently announcing a good few netblocks (which don't have a
 very good smtp reputation, by the way).
 
 Funny thing is, that's a special use ASN as per rfc4893, something about
 two octet ASNs that don't have a four octet representation.
 
 Only one upstream (airtelbroadband-as-ap, as24560) that I can see
 
 103.7.204.0/22

Missing AS4_PATH -- Probably a spoofed/hijacked route

 103.14.208.0/22

Missing AS4_PATH -- Probably a spoofed/hijacked route

 103.23.124.0/22

Missing AS4_PATH -- Probably a spoofed/hijacked route

 103.30.12.0/22

Missing AS4_PATH -- Probably a spoofed/hijacked route

 103.245.112.0/22

Missing AS4_PATH -- Probably a spoofed/hijacked route

 111.235.148.0/22

Missing AS4_PATH -- Probably a spoofed/hijacked route

 177.55.249.0/24

Missing AS4_PATH -- Probably a spoofed/hijacked route

 186.251.192.0/21

Missing AS4_PATH -- Probably a spoofed/hijacked route

If you're motivated to pursue this, the best thing to do is probably to contact 
the last legitimate AS before 23456 in the AS-PATH and inquire.

Owen