Re: Assistance for Eavesdropping Legally on Avian Carriers (AELAC)

2013-06-25 Thread Jason Hellenthal
Lol

-- 
 Jason Hellenthal
 Inbox: jhellent...@dataix.net
 Voice: +1 (616) 953-0176
 JJH48-ARIN


On Jun 26, 2013, at 0:04, Lyndon Nerenberg  wrote:

> 
> On 2013-06-25, at 8:54 PM, Jason Hellenthal  wrote:
> 
>> Anyone got a pentagram packet and a weje board ?
> 
> Be careful, when you pull out the chalk to draw a pentaGRAM around your data 
> centre, that you don't – accidentally – draw a pentaGONE.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Assistance for Eavesdropping Legally on Avian Carriers (AELAC)

2013-06-25 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg

On 2013-06-25, at 8:54 PM, Jason Hellenthal  wrote:

> Anyone got a pentagram packet and a weje board ?

Be careful, when you pull out the chalk to draw a pentaGRAM around your data 
centre, that you don't – accidentally – draw a pentaGONE.


Re: Assistance for Eavesdropping Legally on Avian Carriers (AELAC)

2013-06-25 Thread Jason Hellenthal
Matter of fact the sky is full of lightening right now...

Anyone got a pentagram packet and a weje board ?

-- 
 Jason Hellenthal
 Inbox: jhellent...@dataix.net
 Voice: +1 (616) 953-0176
 JJH48-ARIN


On Jun 25, 2013, at 22:58, Sean Donelan  wrote:

> 
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> We are however trying to conform to RFC standards as pointed out by
>> Jev. You guys really need to look at this. It's easily implementable:
>> 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1149
> 
> That remind me I need to finish my April 1 submission to the RFC editor
> for next year. This has been sitting in my todo pile for several
> years.
> 
> 
> RFCxxxx for publication on April 1, 
> 
> Assistance for Eavesdropping Legally on Avian Carriers (AELAC)
> 
> Abstract
> 
> The memo provides an overview and principles regarding Lawful Intercept(LI) 
> of networks using RFC 1149, "A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams 
> on Avian Carriers."  National requirements are not addressed.
> 
> Overview and Rational
> 
> Avian Carriers have not provided law enforcement with advanced capabilities 
> to conduct covert surveillance of a subject's communications. When approached 
> by law enforcement, Avian Carriers take flight leaving behind difficult to 
> decode droppings of their activities. Identifying a specific packet stream 
> within a large flock of carriers is difficult. Due to the 3D ether space 
> available to carriers and their intrinsic collision avoidance systems, 
> although sometimes poorly implemented with windows, performing full content 
> communications interceptions can be hit or miss.
> 
> This memo does not address specific national requirements for eavesdropping. 
> Nevertheless, it may be important to public safety that carriers never use 
> any communication technology which could hinder law enforcement.s access to 
> the communications of a subject of a lawful order authorizing surveillance.
> 
> Avian Carriers have a long and distinguished history in communications. For 
> thousands of years they have been used to carry important messages to 
> military and business leaders.  However, they have also been used for 
> nefarious purposes ranging from possible financial market manipulation after 
> Napoleo's defeat at Waterloo to reports of enemy pigeons operating in England 
> during World War II.
> 
> 


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Assistance for Eavesdropping Legally on Avian Carriers (AELAC)

2013-06-25 Thread Jason Hellenthal
Wow I can't believe this is still going around.

All you apparently need for this is a .gov spook possessed by evil entity X and 
all these avians will come crashing right into their federal widows like a DDoS.

Scary head spinning fun ;-)

-- 
 Jason Hellenthal
 Inbox: jhellent...@dataix.net
 Voice: +1 (616) 953-0176
 JJH48-ARIN


On Jun 25, 2013, at 22:58, Sean Donelan  wrote:

> 
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> We are however trying to conform to RFC standards as pointed out by
>> Jev. You guys really need to look at this. It's easily implementable:
>> 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1149
> 
> That remind me I need to finish my April 1 submission to the RFC editor
> for next year. This has been sitting in my todo pile for several
> years.
> 
> 
> RFC for publication on April 1, xxxx
> 
> Assistance for Eavesdropping Legally on Avian Carriers (AELAC)
> 
> Abstract
> 
> The memo provides an overview and principles regarding Lawful Intercept(LI) 
> of networks using RFC 1149, "A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams 
> on Avian Carriers."  National requirements are not addressed.
> 
> Overview and Rational
> 
> Avian Carriers have not provided law enforcement with advanced capabilities 
> to conduct covert surveillance of a subject's communications. When approached 
> by law enforcement, Avian Carriers take flight leaving behind difficult to 
> decode droppings of their activities. Identifying a specific packet stream 
> within a large flock of carriers is difficult. Due to the 3D ether space 
> available to carriers and their intrinsic collision avoidance systems, 
> although sometimes poorly implemented with windows, performing full content 
> communications interceptions can be hit or miss.
> 
> This memo does not address specific national requirements for eavesdropping. 
> Nevertheless, it may be important to public safety that carriers never use 
> any communication technology which could hinder law enforcement.s access to 
> the communications of a subject of a lawful order authorizing surveillance.
> 
> Avian Carriers have a long and distinguished history in communications. For 
> thousands of years they have been used to carry important messages to 
> military and business leaders.  However, they have also been used for 
> nefarious purposes ranging from possible financial market manipulation after 
> Napoleo's defeat at Waterloo to reports of enemy pigeons operating in England 
> during World War II.
> 
> 


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Assistance for Eavesdropping Legally on Avian Carriers (AELAC)

2013-06-25 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg

On 2013-06-25, at 8:24 PM, "Caruso, Anthony"  wrote:

> Yes, if you can identify the source of the grains, you know origin and flight 
> path prior to your lawn.  NSA approach's is getting the pigeon shit off of 
> everyone's lawn...

Then I am in favour of PRISM.  NSA: come vacuum all the pigeon shit off my 
boat!  Please!!!


Re: Assistance for Eavesdropping Legally on Avian Carriers (AELAC)

2013-06-25 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg

On 2013-06-25, at 7:58 PM, Sean Donelan  wrote:

> The memo provides an overview and principles regarding Lawful Intercept(LI) 
> of networks using RFC 1149, "A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams 
> on Avian Carriers."  National requirements are not addressed.

Is scooping pigeon shit off my front lawn considered meta-data collection?

--lyndon




Assistance for Eavesdropping Legally on Avian Carriers (AELAC)

2013-06-25 Thread Sean Donelan


On Tue, 25 Jun 2013, Nick Khamis wrote:

We are however trying to conform to RFC standards as pointed out by
Jev. You guys really need to look at this. It's easily implementable:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1149


That remind me I need to finish my April 1 submission to the RFC editor
for next year. This has been sitting in my todo pile for several
years.


RFC for publication on April 1, xxxx

Assistance for Eavesdropping Legally on Avian Carriers (AELAC)

Abstract

The memo provides an overview and principles regarding Lawful 
Intercept(LI) of networks using RFC 1149, "A Standard for the Transmission 
of IP Datagrams on Avian Carriers."  National requirements are not 
addressed.


Overview and Rational

Avian Carriers have not provided law enforcement with advanced 
capabilities to conduct covert surveillance of a subject's communications. 
When approached by law enforcement, Avian Carriers take flight leaving 
behind difficult to decode droppings of their activities. Identifying a 
specific packet stream within a large flock of carriers is difficult. Due 
to the 3D ether space available to carriers and their intrinsic collision 
avoidance systems, although sometimes poorly implemented with windows, 
performing full content communications interceptions can be hit or miss.


This memo does not address specific national requirements for 
eavesdropping. Nevertheless, it may be important to public safety that 
carriers never use any communication technology which could hinder law 
enforcement.s access to the communications of a subject of a lawful order 
authorizing surveillance.


Avian Carriers have a long and distinguished history in communications. 
For thousands of years they have been used to carry important messages to 
military and business leaders.  However, they have also been used for 
nefarious purposes ranging from possible financial market manipulation 
after Napoleo's defeat at Waterloo to reports of enemy pigeons operating 
in England during World War II.