Re: How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?

2011-04-15 Thread Geoff Huston

On 14/04/2011, at 10:47 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

 On 14 apr 2011, at 13:50, Tore Anderson wrote:
 
 This is address space that's now marked as delegated and removed from
 the pile of unused address space for no obvious reason.
 
 I believe they are using those prefixes for research.
 
 and the delegated-extended file, it appears that these prefixes do count
 as assigned space like any other assignment. I would assume that when
 the research project is over, they will be returned to the free pool and
 assigned under the last /8 policy
 
 That is extremely curious. How can they justify taking 4 million addresses 
 for research two days before running out of regularly allocatable address 
 space? They could have taken that /10 out of the final /8 rather than taking 
 it from the last scraps of regular space if they really need a /10 for 
 research, which is already dubious in and of itself.
 
 Of course they didn't bother to respond to my request for information about 
 all of this.
 
 


The addresses were in flight to the recipient and got caught up in a set of 
scripted processes that inappropriately assigned them into the debogon project 
for a couple of days while some related administrative processes were underway.

Our apologies for the temporary confusion --  and we promise do better next 
time! :-)

And yes, APNIC is indeed  down to the last /8   - 
http://www.apnic.net/publications/news/2011/final-8 contains the announcement

Also, our apologies for not getting back to Iljitsch's request for information 
sooner - we have been somewhat busy in the last few days!

thanks,

 Geoff


Re: How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?

2011-04-15 Thread Iljitsch van Beijnum
On 15 apr 2011, at 12:21, Geoff Huston wrote:

 The addresses were in flight to the recipient and got caught up in a set of 
 scripted processes that inappropriately assigned them into the debogon 
 project for a couple of days while some related administrative processes were 
 underway.

 Our apologies for the temporary confusion --  and we promise do better next 
 time! :-)

Thanks for the clarification. But I hope you're not planning on running out of 
IPv6 anytime soon... Or maybe you're getting at 16-bit AS numbers?

 And yes, APNIC is indeed  down to the last /8

Hm, I still see 2.27 million legacy addresses as free, mostly 43.224.0.0/11 
except 43.244 and 43.253, as well as 0.34 million non-legacy. Why don't these 
count and/or what will happen to them?

Iljitsch




How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?

2011-04-14 Thread Graham Beneke

Only 0.3 of a /8 left[1] before the rationing policy kicks in.

I hope everyone is ready :-)

[1] http://www.apnic.net/community/ipv4-exhaustion/graphical-information

--
Graham Beneke



Re: How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?

2011-04-14 Thread Tore Anderson
* Graham Beneke

 Only 0.3 of a /8 left[1] before the rationing policy kicks in.

Hi,

Actually, they're already empty. Chinanet Fujian Province Network
allocated 498432 addresses today, spread out over 1102(!) individual
prefixes in the range /21-/24.

Unless any resources has been returned to the free pool today, there's
nothing left in the APNIC pool outside of the 103/8 block, which is the
one set aside for the final /8 policy.

Best regards,
-- 
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com
Tel: +47 21 54 41 27



Re: How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?

2011-04-14 Thread Iljitsch van Beijnum
On 14 apr 2011, at 8:33, Tore Anderson wrote:

 Actually, they're already empty. Chinanet Fujian Province Network
 allocated 498432 addresses today, spread out over 1102(!) individual
 prefixes in the range /21-/24.

Where do you see this? On ftp.apnic.net I see delegated-apnic-20110414 which 
only contains info upto the 13th and has a timestamp of Apr 13 15:15.

Based on that file, APNIC still has 17.57 million regular + 2.27 M legacy = 
19.84 M total address space, so another 0.5 M wouldn't deplete what's left.

I also don't get what they did two days ago:

inetnum:39.192.0.0 - 39.255.255.255
netname:Debogon-prefix
descr:  APNIC Debogon Project

This is address space that's now marked as delegated and removed from the pile 
of unused address space for no obvious reason.


Re: How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?

2011-04-14 Thread Tore Anderson
* Iljitsch van Beijnum

 On 14 apr 2011, at 8:33, Tore Anderson wrote:
 
 Actually, they're already empty. Chinanet Fujian Province Network 
 allocated 498432 addresses today, spread out over 1102(!)
 individual prefixes in the range /21-/24.
 
 Where do you see this? On ftp.apnic.net I see
 delegated-apnic-20110414 which only contains info upto the 13th and
 has a timestamp of Apr 13 15:15.
 
 Based on that file, APNIC still has 17.57 million regular + 2.27 M
 legacy = 19.84 M total address space, so another 0.5 M wouldn't
 deplete what's left.

Hi,

APNIC has for some time now made available an extended version of the
delegated file that explicitly says which blocks are available:

ftp://ftp.apnic.net/apnic/stats/apnic/delegated-apnic-extended-latest

Disregarding 103/8, there were 1104 remaining available prefixes before
APNIC's offices opened today. Now they're closed, and by looking in
whois.apnic.net I can tell that every single one of the prefixes that
were marked in the delegated-extended file as available is now allocated
- 1102 of them to Chinanet Fujian Province Network, and two
(106.0.32.0/19 and 116.90.0.0/18) to the APNIC Debogon Project.

So unless some new blocks (for example returned space) has made it into
the free pool today, they are down to their last /8. Actually, they're a
bit under one /8, as there's been some assignments made to the Debogon
Project in 103/8 already.

 I also don't get what they did two days ago:
 
 inetnum:39.192.0.0 - 39.255.255.255
 netname:Debogon-prefix
 descr:  APNIC Debogon Project
 
 This is address space that's now marked as delegated and removed from
 the pile of unused address space for no obvious reason.

I believe they are using those prefixes for research. According to the
APNIC whois database, 53 individual assignments have been made to the
Debogon Project (including the three we've mentioned). In any case, when
looking at the graph at

http://www.apnic.net/community/ipv4-exhaustion/graphical-information

and the delegated-extended file, it appears that these prefixes do count
as assigned space like any other assignment. I would assume that when
the research project is over, they will be returned to the free pool and
assigned under the last /8 policy just like any other space that enters
the pool after the last /8 policy has been implemented.

Best regards,
-- 
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Tel: +47 21 54 41 27



Re: How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?

2011-04-14 Thread Iljitsch van Beijnum
On 14 apr 2011, at 13:50, Tore Anderson wrote:

 This is address space that's now marked as delegated and removed from
 the pile of unused address space for no obvious reason.

 I believe they are using those prefixes for research.

 and the delegated-extended file, it appears that these prefixes do count
 as assigned space like any other assignment. I would assume that when
 the research project is over, they will be returned to the free pool and
 assigned under the last /8 policy

That is extremely curious. How can they justify taking 4 million addresses for 
research two days before running out of regularly allocatable address space? 
They could have taken that /10 out of the final /8 rather than taking it from 
the last scraps of regular space if they really need a /10 for research, which 
is already dubious in and of itself.

Of course they didn't bother to respond to my request for information about all 
of this.




Re: How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?

2011-04-14 Thread Rubens Kuhl
 That is extremely curious. How can they justify taking 4 million addresses 
 for research two days before running out of regularly allocatable address 
 space? They could have taken that /10 out of the final /8 rather than taking 
 it from the last scraps of regular space if they really need a /10 for 
 research, which is already dubious in and of itself.

Debogon usually means they will establish beacons to detect networks
that will incorrectly filter that block, and is an indication that
such block will soon start being distributed to LIRs.


Rubens



Re: How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?

2011-04-14 Thread Owen DeLong

On Apr 14, 2011, at 5:47 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

 On 14 apr 2011, at 13:50, Tore Anderson wrote:
 
 This is address space that's now marked as delegated and removed from
 the pile of unused address space for no obvious reason.
 
 I believe they are using those prefixes for research.
 
 and the delegated-extended file, it appears that these prefixes do count
 as assigned space like any other assignment. I would assume that when
 the research project is over, they will be returned to the free pool and
 assigned under the last /8 policy
 
 That is extremely curious. How can they justify taking 4 million addresses 
 for research two days before running out of regularly allocatable address 
 space? They could have taken that /10 out of the final /8 rather than taking 
 it from the last scraps of regular space if they really need a /10 for 
 research, which is already dubious in and of itself.
 
 Of course they didn't bother to respond to my request for information about 
 all of this.
 

I believe that rather than research, those are prefixes which are particularly 
dirty and
they have allocated them to the project to try and get them cleaned up so that 
they can
be subsequently issued.

Owen




Re: How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?

2011-04-14 Thread Iljitsch van Beijnum
On 14 apr 2011, at 13:02, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

 Based on that file, APNIC still has 17.57 million regular + 2.27 M legacy = 
 19.84 M total address space, so another 0.5 M wouldn't deplete what's left.

I just got the 15 apr file which has the info for 14 apr (sigh...) and indeed 
1100 blocks adding up to 0.52 million addresses were given out today. And that 
still leaves 2.27 million legacy addresses available, including all of 
43.224.0.0/11 except 43.244 and 43.253, as well as 0.34 million non-legacy, 
non-103/8 addresses.

103/8 is apparently going to be the special final /8. It's still wide open 
except a /16, a /22 and a /24 that are registered to the debogon project (as of 
a week and a half ago).


Re: How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?

2011-04-14 Thread Franck Martin
Recently, Microsoft Australia has been refused a temp allocation (like
they had every year) for one of their conferences.

On 4/15/11 9:01 , Iljitsch van Beijnum iljit...@muada.com wrote:

On 14 apr 2011, at 13:02, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

 Based on that file, APNIC still has 17.57 million regular + 2.27 M
legacy = 19.84 M total address space, so another 0.5 M wouldn't deplete
what's left.

I just got the 15 apr file which has the info for 14 apr (sigh...) and
indeed 1100 blocks adding up to 0.52 million addresses were given out
today. And that still leaves 2.27 million legacy addresses available,
including all of 43.224.0.0/11 except 43.244 and 43.253, as well as 0.34
million non-legacy, non-103/8 addresses.

103/8 is apparently going to be the special final /8. It's still wide
open except a /16, a /22 and a /24 that are registered to the debogon
project (as of a week and a half ago).




Re: How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?

2011-04-14 Thread Skeeve Stevens
All… as of early this morning, APNIC is empty.

Last /8 Policy is now in effect.


...Skeeve



--

Skeeve Stevens, CEO - eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists

ske...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net

Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954

Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/eintellego or eintell...@facebook.com

twitter.com/networkceoau ; www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve

PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia


--

eintellego - The Experts that the Experts call

- Juniper - HP Networking - Cisco - Brocade - Arista - Allied Telesis

On 15/04/11 7:01 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum 
iljit...@muada.commailto:iljit...@muada.com wrote:

On 14 apr 2011, at 13:02, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

Based on that file, APNIC still has 17.57 million regular + 2.27 M legacy = 
19.84 M total address space, so another 0.5 M wouldn't deplete what's left.

I just got the 15 apr file which has the info for 14 apr (sigh...) and indeed 
1100 blocks adding up to 0.52 million addresses were given out today. And that 
still leaves 2.27 million legacy addresses available, including all of 
43.224.0.0/11 except 43.244 and 43.253, as well as 0.34 million non-legacy, 
non-103/8 addresses.

103/8 is apparently going to be the special final /8. It's still wide open 
except a /16, a /22 and a /24 that are registered to the debogon project (as of 
a week and a half ago).



Re: How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?

2011-04-14 Thread Iljitsch van Beijnum
On 15 apr 2011, at 0:04, Skeeve Stevens wrote:

 All… as of early this morning, APNIC is empty.

Why do you say that? Do you have information that contradicts my numbers?


Re: How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?

2011-04-14 Thread Skeeve Stevens
Just an email from APNIC 3 hours ago to all regional mailing lists.

Kinda authoritative I would say.

---

On 15/04/11 6:25 AM, APNIC Secretariat 
apnic-no-re...@apnic.netmailto:apnic-no-re...@apnic.net wrote:


___

APNIC IPv4 Address Pool Reaches Final /8
___


Dear APNIC community

We are writing to inform you that as of Friday, 15 April 2011, the APNIC
pool reached the Final /8 IPv4 address block, bringing us to Stage Three
of IPv4 exhaustion in the Asia Pacific. For more information about Stage
Three, please refer to:

http://www.apnic.net/ipv4-exhaustion/stages


Last /8 address policy
--

IPv4 requests will now be assessed under section 9.10 in Policies
for IPv4 address space management in the Asia Pacific region:

 http://www.apnic.net/policy/add-manage-policy#9.10

APNIC's objective during Stage Three is to provide IPv4 address space
for new entrants to the market and for those deploying IPv6.

 http://www.apnic.net/ipv4-stage3-faq

From now, all new and existing APNIC account holders will be entitled
to receive a maximum allocation of a /22 from the Final /8 address
space.

For more details on the eligibility criteria according to the Final /8
policy, please refer to:

http://www.apnic.net/criteria


Act NOW on IPv6
---

We encourage Asia Pacific Internet community members to deploy IPv6
within their organizations. You can refer to APNIC for information
regarding IPv6 deployment, statistics, training, and related regional
policies at:

http://www.apnic.net/ipv6

To apply for IPv6 addresses now, please visit:

http://www.apnic.net/kickstart


___

APNIC Secretariat 
secretar...@apnic.netmailto:secretar...@apnic.net
Asia Pacific NetworkInformation Centre (APNIC)   Tel: +61 7 3858 3100
PO Box 3646 South Brisbane, QLD 4101 AustraliaFax: +61 7 3858 3199
6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD
http://www.apnic.nethttp://www.apnic.net/
___
* Sent by email to save paper. Print only if necessary.


---



...Skeeve



--

Skeeve Stevens, CEO - eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists

ske...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net

Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954

Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/eintellego or eintell...@facebook.com

twitter.com/networkceoau ; www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve

PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia


--

eintellego - The Experts that the Experts call

- Juniper - HP Networking - Cisco - Brocade - Arista - Allied Telesis

On 15/04/11 8:09 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum 
iljit...@muada.commailto:iljit...@muada.com wrote:

On 15 apr 2011, at 0:04, Skeeve Stevens wrote:

All… as of early this morning, APNIC is empty.

Why do you say that? Do you have information that contradicts my numbers?