Re: NANOG Move - Moved back
On 7/12/2011 6:59 AM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: Hello All: We're back on the old configuration for now. I will send an update later this afternoon once I speak with AMS about the issues we experienced over night. Please explain WHY we can't just stay on Mailman? I know you explained it privately to me already, but none of those reasons are seeming very good right now. Mailman was working, just fine. You are making me very sad, and I haven't had enough coffee to be polite. -- Requiescat in Pacem, Len http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Len_Sassaman
Re: NANOG Move - Moved back
On 2011-07-12 15:59 , Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: > Hello All: > > We're back on the old configuration for now. I will send an update later > this afternoon once I speak with AMS about the issues we experienced over > night. What is the reason for dropping mailman btw? The IETF, which is also taking secretarial services and hosting etc from AMSL still have it... Greets, Jeroen
NANOG Move - Moved back
Hello All: We're back on the old configuration for now. I will send an update later this afternoon once I speak with AMS about the issues we experienced over night. Regards, Mike
