Re: Juniper SSL VPN
Could be related to this? http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=contentid=TSB16290 On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Sharma, Kapeel kapeel.sha...@mckesson.com wrote: Any one heard of a host checker issue with Juniper VPN today ? Thanks Kapeel
RE: Juniper SSL VPN
This is it thanks. Kapeel From: Jamie Gwatkin [mailto:jgwat...@magmic.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 7:43 AM To: Sharma, Kapeel Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Juniper SSL VPN Could be related to this? http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=contentid=TSB16290 On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Sharma, Kapeel kapeel.sha...@mckesson.commailto:kapeel.sha...@mckesson.com wrote: Any one heard of a host checker issue with Juniper VPN today ? Thanks Kapeel
Re: Juniper SSL VPN
Wow. Thanks for posting this. I thought we were just going crazy yesterday. On Dec 31, 2013 7:45 AM, Jamie Gwatkin jgwat...@magmic.com wrote: Could be related to this? http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=contentid=TSB16290 On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Sharma, Kapeel kapeel.sha...@mckesson.com wrote: Any one heard of a host checker issue with Juniper VPN today ? Thanks Kapeel
Re: Juniper SSL VPN
On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 10:43:02 -0500, Jamie Gwatkin said: Could be related to this? http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=contentid=TSB16290 Do I want to ask why *THIS*? Estimated Fix Date: Juniper engineering has root caused this issue is working to build and release a ESAP fix as soon as possible. The initial estimated release date for the fix is between 12/31/2013 (PST) and 1/3/2014 (PST). We will update this message regularly with the current status until we resolve this issue. We need an emergency fix because a piece of software unexpectedly hit an end-of-life date? Didn't we learn anything 14 years ago??!? pgpbFl8yrGV6S.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Juniper SSL VPN
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 7:31 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 10:43:02 -0500, Jamie Gwatkin said: Could be related to this? http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=contentid=TSB16290 Do I want to ask why *THIS*? Estimated Fix Date: Juniper engineering has root caused this issue is working to build and release a ESAP fix as soon as possible. The initial estimated release date for the fix is between 12/31/2013 (PST) and 1/3/2014 (PST). We will update this message regularly with the current status until we resolve this issue. We need an emergency fix because a piece of software unexpectedly hit an end-of-life date? Didn't we learn anything 14 years ago??!? Juniper just posted a technical note saying the issue is fixed and a new ESAP package is out.
Re: Juniper SSL VPN
On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 23:09:58 +0200, Eugeniu Patrascu said: We need an emergency fix because a piece of software unexpectedly hit an end-of-life date? Didn't we learn anything 14 years ago??!? Juniper just posted a technical note saying the issue is fixed and a new ESAP package is out. Right. The question is why it's coming out on the last day of December, rather than the last day of November, or even October... pgp29mBNo_SlB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Juniper SSL VPN
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 04:19:24PM -0500, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 23:09:58 +0200, Eugeniu Patrascu said: We need an emergency fix because a piece of software unexpectedly hit an end-of-life date? Didn't we learn anything 14 years ago??!? Juniper just posted a technical note saying the issue is fixed and a new ESAP package is out. Right. The question is why it's coming out on the last day of December, rather than the last day of November, or even October... To punish you for having the gall to think you could celebrate the new year like a normal human being, instead of doing what you *should* be doing, tending to the machines. (At the risk of crossing the streams, I'll observe that I've not spent a new year's eve or day patching my Linux-based VPN servers...) - Matt -- You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. -- Inigo, The Princess Bride
Re: Juniper SSL VPN
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:19 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 23:09:58 +0200, Eugeniu Patrascu said: We need an emergency fix because a piece of software unexpectedly hit an end-of-life date? Didn't we learn anything 14 years ago??!? Juniper just posted a technical note saying the issue is fixed and a new ESAP package is out. Right. The question is why it's coming out on the last day of December, rather than the last day of November, or even October... From what I understood from the tech note, they had no clue this would happen on the 31st of December :)
Re: Juniper SSL VPN
Had no clue? Didn't they build it? On Dec 31, 2013 7:46 PM, Eugeniu Patrascu eu...@imacandi.net wrote: On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:19 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 23:09:58 +0200, Eugeniu Patrascu said: We need an emergency fix because a piece of software unexpectedly hit an end-of-life date? Didn't we learn anything 14 years ago??!? Juniper just posted a technical note saying the issue is fixed and a new ESAP package is out. Right. The question is why it's coming out on the last day of December, rather than the last day of November, or even October... From what I understood from the tech note, they had no clue this would happen on the 31st of December :)
Re: Juniper SSL VPN
At 20:55 31/12/2013 -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote: Had no clue? Didn't they build it? From what I understood from the tech note, they had no clue this would happen on the 31st of December :) Perhaps it is a left over somehow from their Netscreen purchase (April 2004)? -Hank
Re: Juniper SSL VPN
and in ~10 yrs no one did a code review? or refactor? or dependency check? On Wed Jan 01 2014 at 12:42:09 AM, Hank Nussbacher h...@efes.iucc.ac.il wrote: At 20:55 31/12/2013 -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote: Had no clue? Didn't they build it? From what I understood from the tech note, they had no clue this would happen on the 31st of December :) Perhaps it is a left over somehow from their Netscreen purchase (April 2004)? -Hank
