Re: BGP route-map options

2011-01-14 Thread ryanL
1) this is probably better posed over at cisco-nsp instead of NANOG.
2) i really hope you aren't using the canadian version of 'neighbor'

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Greg Whynott greg.whyn...@oicr.on.cawrote:

 Following a few documents on how to use route-maps to set preference of
 routes (related to my last thread regarding asymmetrical routing) all the
 ones I have looked at today (about 6or so) use the below method to apply the
 route map under the router section:

 router bgp YOURAS#
 neighbour x.x.x.x remote-as AS#
 neighbour x.x.x.x route-map MAPNAME in

 yet in the last line,  route-map  is not an option on my router,  which
 is an ASR1004 running the version 15 line of code.

 is there a new way to do this?

 don't you love Cisco's consistency?

 thanks much for your time again,
 greg




 --

 This message and any attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged
 information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or
 distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally
 intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
 please contact the sender and delete all copies. Opinions, conclusions or
 other information contained in this message may not be that of the
 organization.




RE: BGP route-map options

2011-01-14 Thread Thomas Magill
Try doing it under the 'address-family ipv4'?

I've never seen any version of IOS not take it.

-Original Message-
From: Greg Whynott [mailto:greg.whyn...@oicr.on.ca] 
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 9:00 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org list
Subject: BGP route-map options

Following a few documents on how to use route-maps to set preference of routes 
(related to my last thread regarding asymmetrical routing) all the ones I have 
looked at today (about 6or so) use the below method to apply the route map 
under the router section:

router bgp YOURAS#
neighbour x.x.x.x remote-as AS#
neighbour x.x.x.x route-map MAPNAME in

yet in the last line,  route-map  is not an option on my router,  which is an 
ASR1004 running the version 15 line of code.

is there a new way to do this?

don't you love Cisco's consistency?

thanks much for your time again,
greg




--

This message and any attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or 
distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally 
intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, 
please contact the sender and delete all copies. Opinions, conclusions or other 
information contained in this message may not be that of the organization.




RE: BGP route-map options

2011-01-14 Thread Thomas Magill
Wait... 

Does the router even accept 'neighbour' instead of ' neighbor'?


-Original Message-
From: Greg Whynott [mailto:greg.whyn...@oicr.on.ca] 
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 9:00 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org list
Subject: BGP route-map options

Following a few documents on how to use route-maps to set preference of routes 
(related to my last thread regarding asymmetrical routing) all the ones I have 
looked at today (about 6or so) use the below method to apply the route map 
under the router section:

router bgp YOURAS#
neighbour x.x.x.x remote-as AS#
neighbour x.x.x.x route-map MAPNAME in

yet in the last line,  route-map  is not an option on my router,  which is an 
ASR1004 running the version 15 line of code.

is there a new way to do this?

don't you love Cisco's consistency?

thanks much for your time again,
greg




--

This message and any attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or 
distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally 
intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, 
please contact the sender and delete all copies. Opinions, conclusions or other 
information contained in this message may not be that of the organization.




Re: BGP route-map options

2011-01-14 Thread Greg Whynott
thanks Thomas,  I opened a ticket with Cisco and am pestering other lists so 
i'm not bothering anyone with my operational issues.

it does accept it under address-family,  and doing a show bgp indicates 
something is going on:

ASR1004#show bgp | inc \ \ 150\
* 132.248.13.0/24  205.211.94.145150  0 549 26677 6509 
18592 278 i

but the selected path is still going out via the other provider,  not 549.

if your intrested it'll let you know the outcome.

thanks for taking the time to respond,

greg






On Jan 14, 2011, at 12:51 PM, Thomas Magill wrote:

 Try doing it under the 'address-family ipv4'?

 I've never seen any version of IOS not take it.

 -Original Message-
 From: Greg Whynott [mailto:greg.whyn...@oicr.on.ca]
 Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 9:00 AM
 To: nanog@nanog.org list
 Subject: BGP route-map options

 Following a few documents on how to use route-maps to set preference of 
 routes (related to my last thread regarding asymmetrical routing) all the 
 ones I have looked at today (about 6or so) use the below method to apply the 
 route map under the router section:

 router bgp YOURAS#
 neighbour x.x.x.x remote-as AS#
 neighbour x.x.x.x route-map MAPNAME in

 yet in the last line,  route-map  is not an option on my router,  which is 
 an ASR1004 running the version 15 line of code.

 is there a new way to do this?

 don't you love Cisco's consistency?

 thanks much for your time again,
 greg




 --

 This message and any attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged 
 information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or 
 distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally 
 intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, 
 please contact the sender and delete all copies. Opinions, conclusions or 
 other information contained in this message may not be that of the 
 organization.



--

This message and any attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or 
distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally 
intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, 
please contact the sender and delete all copies. Opinions, conclusions or other 
information contained in this message may not be that of the organization.



Re: BGP route-map options

2011-01-14 Thread Greg Whynott
haha…  yeah that is not a copy and paste but rather me just typing that out.

the proper spelling in the config is being used,  or the american spelling…  
english is the worse language…

thanks again,
greg

On Jan 14, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Thomas Magill wrote:

 Wait...

 Does the router even accept 'neighbour' instead of ' neighbor'?


 -Original Message-
 From: Greg Whynott [mailto:greg.whyn...@oicr.on.ca]
 Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 9:00 AM
 To: nanog@nanog.org list
 Subject: BGP route-map options

 Following a few documents on how to use route-maps to set preference of 
 routes (related to my last thread regarding asymmetrical routing) all the 
 ones I have looked at today (about 6or so) use the below method to apply the 
 route map under the router section:

 router bgp YOURAS#
 neighbour x.x.x.x remote-as AS#
 neighbour x.x.x.x route-map MAPNAME in

 yet in the last line,  route-map  is not an option on my router,  which is 
 an ASR1004 running the version 15 line of code.

 is there a new way to do this?

 don't you love Cisco's consistency?

 thanks much for your time again,
 greg




 --

 This message and any attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged 
 information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or 
 distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally 
 intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, 
 please contact the sender and delete all copies. Opinions, conclusions or 
 other information contained in this message may not be that of the 
 organization.



--

This message and any attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or 
distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally 
intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, 
please contact the sender and delete all copies. Opinions, conclusions or other 
information contained in this message may not be that of the organization.