RE: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-15 Thread Brandt, Ralph
Note the EATON Press release.  Maybe the burn on the bench is the way
they get to the California energy reduction Standards?  If it isn't
working it isn't using power.


Date: 23 October 2012

Latest Eaton Thought Leadership White Paper Provides Technical Analysis
of Eaton's Energy Saver System

Eaton today announced the release of its latest white paper,
Understanding Eaton Energy Saver System. In the paper, George Navarro,
an Eaton technical solutions engineering specialist, explains how
Eaton's Energy Saver System (ESS) enables large uninterruptible power
systems (UPSs) to operate at up to 99 percent efficiency without
sacrificing reliability.

Though ESS is rapidly gaining support in the UPS industry for its
ability to build on the strengths of traditional double-conversion
architectures, many consultants and end users have questions about how
ESS works and what enables it to lower power consumption while
maintaining high levels of availability. In the paper, Navarro answers
these questions by providing in-depth technical information about ESS's
architecture, reliability characteristics, computational infrastructure
and surge suppression attributes.

Ralph Brandt

-Original Message-
From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:se...@rollernet.us] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 2:59 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
they've worked out for you.

I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does some
high efficiency thing where it normally stays on bypass, but the first
thing it did on the bench was have the inverter/rectifier or bypass
section catch on fire and destroy itself.

~Seth




RE: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-15 Thread Tom Morris
Yeah, that's about right. When I had one fail that was not set in power
saver mode, it just shut off intermittently before letting out the genie.
When I had one go out while it was in energy saver mode, it continued to
operate but put out a weak ~80Vrms with heavy distortion that caused
equipment damage.

Foul.

Also in regards to OutBack - the Radian GS8048 is beautiful. I'd highly
recommend it. It is basically two inverter/charger  modules paralleled in
one chassis, each being 4Kw. I was playing with one and yoinked the control
cable to one module -- the power stayed on without incident and the MATE3
control unit (which is fun and Ethernet equipped) reported the error. If
you use the 8048 in half capacity it's redundant.

It gives 120/240 (l1, neutral, l2) out of the box and is pure sine. I
recommend getting the matching GS load center with it because it makes the
install super easy and includes the requisite breakers.

Tom Morris, KG4CYX
Chairman, South Florida Tropical Hamboree
Mad Scientist, Miami Children's Museum

This message sent from a mobile device. Silly typos provided free of charge.
On Nov 15, 2012 9:29 AM, Brandt, Ralph ralph.bra...@pateam.com wrote:

 Note the EATON Press release.  Maybe the burn on the bench is the way
 they get to the California energy reduction Standards?  If it isn't
 working it isn't using power.


 Date: 23 October 2012

 Latest Eaton Thought Leadership White Paper Provides Technical Analysis
 of Eaton's Energy Saver System

 Eaton today announced the release of its latest white paper,
 Understanding Eaton Energy Saver System. In the paper, George Navarro,
 an Eaton technical solutions engineering specialist, explains how
 Eaton's Energy Saver System (ESS) enables large uninterruptible power
 systems (UPSs) to operate at up to 99 percent efficiency without
 sacrificing reliability.

 Though ESS is rapidly gaining support in the UPS industry for its
 ability to build on the strengths of traditional double-conversion
 architectures, many consultants and end users have questions about how
 ESS works and what enables it to lower power consumption while
 maintaining high levels of availability. In the paper, Navarro answers
 these questions by providing in-depth technical information about ESS's
 architecture, reliability characteristics, computational infrastructure
 and surge suppression attributes.

 Ralph Brandt

 -Original Message-
 From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:se...@rollernet.us]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 2:59 PM
 To: nanog@nanog.org
 Subject: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

 Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
 they've worked out for you.

 I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
 since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does some
 high efficiency thing where it normally stays on bypass, but the first
 thing it did on the bench was have the inverter/rectifier or bypass
 section catch on fire and destroy itself.

 ~Seth





RE: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-14 Thread Erik Amundson
I've had issues and experience with many types of UPSes, including HP (probably 
OEM'd from someone else), APC, EATON/Powerware, and Liebert/Emerson.  I keep 
coming back to APC.  Solid units, and are always slightly 'ahead' in 
technology.  Sure, I've seen each model have failures and even faults (big boom 
style), but APC provides a solid product and supports their customers the best 
if you ask me.  That being said, a very close second choice would be 
EATON/Powerware.

- Erik


-Original Message-
From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:se...@rollernet.us] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 1:59 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
they've worked out for you.

I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does some
high efficiency thing where it normally stays on bypass, but the first
thing it did on the bench was have the inverter/rectifier or bypass
section catch on fire and destroy itself.

~Seth




Re: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-14 Thread Greg Ihnen
Are these UPS units going inside the racks? Would it not be better to do
something in the power room with an inverter on the circuits that feed the
racks, such as a large Outback unit with sufficient battery capacity?
http://www.amazon.com/OutBack-Inverter-3600-Watts-Volt/dp/B002MWAAYU

With one device acting as your UPS you'd have only one point of failure
(that may be a plus or minus), only one set of batteries to worry about,
and those inverters are very well made.

They have 120v and 240v units. There are other brands you could use but my
experience with various brands is that Outback is the best in their class.


Greg

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Erik Amundson erik.amund...@oati.netwrote:

 I've had issues and experience with many types of UPSes, including HP
 (probably OEM'd from someone else), APC, EATON/Powerware, and
 Liebert/Emerson.  I keep coming back to APC.  Solid units, and are always
 slightly 'ahead' in technology.  Sure, I've seen each model have failures
 and even faults (big boom style), but APC provides a solid product and
 supports their customers the best if you ask me.  That being said, a very
 close second choice would be EATON/Powerware.

 - Erik


 -Original Message-
 From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:se...@rollernet.us]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 1:59 PM
 To: nanog@nanog.org
 Subject: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

 Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
 they've worked out for you.

 I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
 since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does some
 high efficiency thing where it normally stays on bypass, but the first
 thing it did on the bench was have the inverter/rectifier or bypass
 section catch on fire and destroy itself.

 ~Seth





Re: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-13 Thread Berry Mobley

At 02:59 PM 11/13/2012, Seth Mattinen wrote:

Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
they've worked out for you.

I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does some
high efficiency thing where it normally stays on bypass, but the first
thing it did on the bench was have the inverter/rectifier or bypass
section catch on fire and destroy itself.


My basic rule is that if the first one I buy catches fire, I don't 
buy any more.


Berry 





Re: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-13 Thread Mike A
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:59:18AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
 Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
 they've worked out for you.
 
 I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
 since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does some
 high efficiency thing where it normally stays on bypass, but the first
 thing it did on the bench was have the inverter/rectifier or bypass
 section catch on fire and destroy itself.

Was this the 2U rackmount form factor, or the tower? 

Either way, I hope that you will pursue this with APC tech support. That's
a pricey piece of gear, and it shouldn't toast itself at any time.

-- 
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
mi...@mikea.ath.cx
Tired old sysadmin 



Re: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-13 Thread Blake Dunlap
As a side note, how do you call a UPS online if it stays on bypass most
of the time, and throws out of bypass to go to battery?


On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Mike A mi...@mikea.ath.cx wrote:

 On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:59:18AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
  Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
  they've worked out for you.
 
  I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
  since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does some
  high efficiency thing where it normally stays on bypass, but the first
  thing it did on the bench was have the inverter/rectifier or bypass
  section catch on fire and destroy itself.

 Was this the 2U rackmount form factor, or the tower?

 Either way, I hope that you will pursue this with APC tech support. That's
 a pricey piece of gear, and it shouldn't toast itself at any time.

 --
 Mike Andrews, W5EGO
 mi...@mikea.ath.cx
 Tired old sysadmin




Re: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-13 Thread Robert Bonomi

 From: Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com
 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20:35 -0600
_
 On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Mike A mi...@mikea.ath.cx wrote:

  On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:59:18AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
   Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
   they've worked out for you.
  
   I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
   since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does some
   high efficiency thing where it normally stays on bypass, but the first
   thing it did on the bench was have the inverter/rectifier or bypass
   section catch on fire and destroy itself.
 
  Was this the 2U rackmount form factor, or the tower?
 
  Either way, I hope that you will pursue this with APC tech support. That's
  a pricey piece of gear, and it shouldn't toast itself at any time.
 

 As a side note, how do you call a UPS online if it stays on bypass most
 of the time, and throws out of bypass to go to battery?

Reading the specs, it _is_ 'true online' normally, has a bypass mode if 
internal failure detected, or manually commanded.  UPS totally disabled
in bypass -- if utility power fails while on bypass, downstream devices
lose power.   In bypass, device provides 'passive' filtering of utility
power ONLY.






Re: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-13 Thread Daniel Griggs
Hi Seth,

A previous employer we looked at a few UPS.

We used Emerson GXT2/3 3Kva UPSs and they worked a treat.
We also tried the Eaton 9130 and we never had any problems with them, but the 
SNMP monitoring was only good for telling you if there was a problem, not what 
the problem was. So we eventually went back to the Emersons.

On 14/11/2012, at 8:59 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:

 Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
 they've worked out for you.
 
 I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
 since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does some
 high efficiency thing where it normally stays on bypass, but the first
 thing it did on the bench was have the inverter/rectifier or bypass
 section catch on fire and destroy itself.
 
 ~Seth
 

--
Daniel



Re: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-13 Thread George Herbert
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:

 From: Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com
 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20:35 -0600
_
 On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Mike A mi...@mikea.ath.cx wrote:

  On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:59:18AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
   Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
   they've worked out for you.
  
   I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
   since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does some
   high efficiency thing where it normally stays on bypass, but the first
   thing it did on the bench was have the inverter/rectifier or bypass
   section catch on fire and destroy itself.
 
  Was this the 2U rackmount form factor, or the tower?
 
  Either way, I hope that you will pursue this with APC tech support. That's
  a pricey piece of gear, and it shouldn't toast itself at any time.
 

 As a side note, how do you call a UPS online if it stays on bypass most
 of the time, and throws out of bypass to go to battery?

 Reading the specs, it _is_ 'true online' normally, has a bypass mode if
 internal failure detected, or manually commanded.  UPS totally disabled
 in bypass -- if utility power fails while on bypass, downstream devices
 lose power.   In bypass, device provides 'passive' filtering of utility
 power ONLY.


Reading the users manual... pp 33, Setting Power Strategy, it
indicates that normal operation is true online (as above) and that you
can change it to high efficiency mode, which is not online per se
(default bypass, 10 ms cutover if it detects a fail or spike).  So it
has 3 modes; default/normal (online), high efficiency (bypass
w/cutback), and partially failed (bypass only, UPS functions
disabled).


-- 
-george william herbert
george.herb...@gmail.com



Re: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-13 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 11/13/12 1:20 PM, Blake Dunlap wrote:
 As a side note, how do you call a UPS online if it stays on bypass most
 of the time, and throws out of bypass to go to battery?
 

It's a selectable feature. I was probably going to set it to true online
mode, but play with the other mode for curiosity's sake.

~Seth



Re: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-13 Thread Adrian
On Tuesday 13 November 2012 12:59, Seth Mattinen wrote:
 Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
 they've worked out for you.

 I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
 since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does some
 high efficiency thing where it normally stays on bypass, but the first
 thing it did on the bench was have the inverter/rectifier or bypass
 section catch on fire and destroy itself.

 ~Seth


We have several 5130 and 9125 models (2kVA rackmount), never given us a 
problem in years of service... Well, one network management card that lost 
its mind, reset the configuration and went on with life, but the UPS just 
chugged along. Biggest plus has been that they don't cook their batteries 
like APCs do.


Adrian




Re: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-13 Thread Tom Morris
Sorry to say, I've used them and had them eat themselves. They just
die mysteriously and let out lots of smoke when they do. When they do,
however, they leave behind a perfectly good set of batteries. I'd
recommend looking elsewhere... Does Eaton/PowerWare still make the
FerrUPS series? Those were *solid*.

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Adrian chopr...@dakotacom.net wrote:
 On Tuesday 13 November 2012 12:59, Seth Mattinen wrote:
 Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
 they've worked out for you.

 I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
 since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does some
 high efficiency thing where it normally stays on bypass, but the first
 thing it did on the bench was have the inverter/rectifier or bypass
 section catch on fire and destroy itself.

 ~Seth


 We have several 5130 and 9125 models (2kVA rackmount), never given us a
 problem in years of service... Well, one network management card that lost
 its mind, reset the configuration and went on with life, but the UPS just
 chugged along. Biggest plus has been that they don't cook their batteries
 like APCs do.


 Adrian





-- 
--
Tom Morris, KG4CYX
Mad Scientist For Hire
Chairman, South Florida Tropical Hamboree / Miami Hamfest
Engineer, WRGP Radiate FM, Florida International University
786-228-7087
151.820 Megacycles



Re: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-13 Thread Michael Painter

Adrian wrote:

We have several 5130 and 9125 models (2kVA rackmount), never given us a
problem in years of service... Well, one network management card that lost
its mind, reset the configuration and went on with life, but the UPS just
chugged along. Biggest plus has been that they don't cook their batteries
like APCs do.


Adrian


Now *that's* good to know...thanks!



Re: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-13 Thread Alex

We have quite alot of Eaton UPS's in our network, all sorts of models.
There have been no problems from what I've seen, except when you add 
water from a broken pipe or bad roof.


We've had the once in a blue moon management card reset as Adrian said 
but it didn't interrupt our equipment.


On 11/14/2012 2:04 AM, Michael Painter wrote:

Adrian wrote:

We have several 5130 and 9125 models (2kVA rackmount), never given us a
problem in years of service... Well, one network management card that 
lost
its mind, reset the configuration and went on with life, but the UPS 
just
chugged along. Biggest plus has been that they don't cook their 
batteries

like APCs do.


Adrian


Now *that's* good to know...thanks!






Re: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-13 Thread Michael Painter

Alex wrote:

We have quite alot of Eaton UPS's in our network, all sorts of models.
There have been no problems from what I've seen, except when you add
water from a broken pipe or bad roof.

We've had the once in a blue moon management card reset as Adrian said
but it didn't interrupt our equipment.


Thanks!  I've been very disappointed with APC.  I had a customer spend thousands on replacement batteries/freight for a 
Matrix 5000 only to have a $5 cooling fan crap out and no way to get a replacement.sigh 





Re: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-13 Thread Jeff Kell
On 11/13/2012 6:42 PM, Tom Morris wrote:
 Sorry to say, I've used them and had them eat themselves. They just
 die mysteriously and let out lots of smoke when they do. When they do,
 however, they leave behind a perfectly good set of batteries. I'd
 recommend looking elsewhere... Does Eaton/PowerWare still make the
 FerrUPS series? Those were *solid*.

Interesting.  So far the feedback sounds overwhelmingly negative.  Heard
some good points on Emerson (I'm assuming Liebert?).  We've had much
better luck overall with them, although a couple of incidents where they
don't care to come back online after they were drained.

We largely use the UPS to survive power glitches without dropping the
network for switch reboot times, we're not after long runs.  As such,
the occasional extended outages drain the UPS'es and there are always
the percentage of them that do not come back online and require manual
intervention.

We were formerly a big TrippLite user, but they seem to be incredibly
fault-intolerant with regard to the scenario above (coming back online
after draining), and to a lesser degree, going offline after a power glitch.

Never used an Eaton that I'm aware of however.

Would be interested in other recommendations for remote / IDF / MDF
environment UPS systems to just keep the stack up over power glitches.

Jeff




Re: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-13 Thread Tim Jackson
Just go -48vdc.

None of these pesky UPS problems :)

Unfortunately there's a serious lack of PoE switches that are -48.
On Nov 13, 2012 8:51 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:

 On 11/13/2012 6:42 PM, Tom Morris wrote:
  Sorry to say, I've used them and had them eat themselves. They just
  die mysteriously and let out lots of smoke when they do. When they do,
  however, they leave behind a perfectly good set of batteries. I'd
  recommend looking elsewhere... Does Eaton/PowerWare still make the
  FerrUPS series? Those were *solid*.

 Interesting.  So far the feedback sounds overwhelmingly negative.  Heard
 some good points on Emerson (I'm assuming Liebert?).  We've had much
 better luck overall with them, although a couple of incidents where they
 don't care to come back online after they were drained.

 We largely use the UPS to survive power glitches without dropping the
 network for switch reboot times, we're not after long runs.  As such,
 the occasional extended outages drain the UPS'es and there are always
 the percentage of them that do not come back online and require manual
 intervention.

 We were formerly a big TrippLite user, but they seem to be incredibly
 fault-intolerant with regard to the scenario above (coming back online
 after draining), and to a lesser degree, going offline after a power
 glitch.

 Never used an Eaton that I'm aware of however.

 Would be interested in other recommendations for remote / IDF / MDF
 environment UPS systems to just keep the stack up over power glitches.

 Jeff





Re: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-13 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 11/13/12 6:49 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:
 On 11/13/2012 6:42 PM, Tom Morris wrote:
 Sorry to say, I've used them and had them eat themselves. They just
 die mysteriously and let out lots of smoke when they do. When they do,
 however, they leave behind a perfectly good set of batteries. I'd
 recommend looking elsewhere... Does Eaton/PowerWare still make the
 FerrUPS series? Those were *solid*.
 
 Interesting.  So far the feedback sounds overwhelmingly negative.  Heard
 some good points on Emerson (I'm assuming Liebert?).  We've had much
 better luck overall with them, although a couple of incidents where they
 don't care to come back online after they were drained.
 
 We largely use the UPS to survive power glitches without dropping the
 network for switch reboot times, we're not after long runs.  As such,
 the occasional extended outages drain the UPS'es and there are always
 the percentage of them that do not come back online and require manual
 intervention.
 
 We were formerly a big TrippLite user, but they seem to be incredibly
 fault-intolerant with regard to the scenario above (coming back online
 after draining), and to a lesser degree, going offline after a power glitch.
 
 Never used an Eaton that I'm aware of however.
 
 Would be interested in other recommendations for remote / IDF / MDF
 environment UPS systems to just keep the stack up over power glitches.
 


I do have much larger Eaton units like the 9355 that haven't given me
anything to complain about yet. But they're of a wholly different
classes and I don't really expect one to represent the other. The 9130
that exploded was my first foray into their smaller side, destined to be
a telco room aux unit and replace an APC SmartUPS.

~Seth



RE: Eaton 9130 UPS feedback

2012-11-13 Thread Alex Rubenstein
 Just go -48vdc. None of these pesky UPS problems :)

Well, you still have 1/2 the UPS - the inverter section. It's not a silver 
bullet.