RE: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-25 Thread Voll, Toivo
At least for the FCX line we were told when trying to open a support case that 
the limited lifetime warranty only applies to hardware and does not make you 
eligible for any kind of support or software beyond getting hardware replaced.


-Original Message-
From: George Bonser [mailto:gbon...@seven.com] 
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 15:59
To: Florian Weimer; Ryan Finnesey
Cc: nanog@nanog.org; John Macleod
Subject: RE: SmartNet Alternatives

 * Ryan Finnesey:
 
  This is one of the reasons we are starting to look at Juniper for a
  new network build.  It is my understanding we set software updates
  for life for free.
 
 My understanding is that it's free for customers who have a service
 contract in place.  Most downloads are not self-service, and I haven't
 tested if you can get JTAC to provide images for devices you don't
 own.

Brocade is now offering 5 years (what they consider lifetime) support to
the original purchaser of the equipment on some product lines:

FastIron SX800, SX1600, CX, WS, and TurboIron that includes software
updates.

We use a lot of the FCX units.





RE: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-25 Thread George Bonser
 
 At least for the FCX line we were told when trying to open a support
 case that the limited lifetime warranty only applies to hardware and
 does not make you eligible for any kind of support or software beyond
 getting hardware replaced.
 

Yeah, you need to buy phone support if you want that.  It is the lowest level 
of support and still pretty inexpensive compared to other vendors.  In other 
words, 5 years of free hardware support and 5 years of Remote phone support 
(under $300/year I think) isn't bad when compared to annual support costs for 
other gear in that class.



RE: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-22 Thread Richey
I've used them as well and they have been pretty good with gear that's common 
place.  Just be careful if you get off the beaten path and are using gear like 
an IAD-2431-16FXS.   They can help you with the hardware side on that kind of 
stuff but not so much with the software.

Richey

-Original Message-
From: Neil J. McRae [mailto:n...@domino.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 4:56 AM
To: gbon...@seven.com; tbran...@gmail.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: SmartNet Alternatives

I've used NHR for a number of deployments over the past couple of years and 
they are a fantastic organisation to work with. I've used them for maintenance 
support in the US for replacement of parts - highly recommended.



- Original Message -
From: tbran...@gmail.com
Sent: Tue, February 15, 2011, 11:04 PM
Subject: Re: SmartNet Alternatives

I know NHR has a alternative that looks to be comparable.
http://www.networkhardware.com/Maintenance/

-tb




Re: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-16 Thread Christian de Larrinaga
Can anybody point to dependable analysis of the performance credentials on 
green (CO2/carbon neutral, recycling, etc) and financial cost recovery of the 
Internet vendors such Juniper and Cisco et al? 

The story emerging here is not looking very encouraging. 


Christian 



On 13 Feb 2011, at 21:54, Randy Carpenter wrote:

 How does Juniper feel about used hardware?
 
 ~Seth
 
 I love Juniper's hardware and software, and support. However, the way they 
 deal with used or second hand hardware is terrible. It is not possible to 
 transfer ownership at all. You can not resell anything, and hope to get any 
 software updates or support. The challenge is that Cisco refurb with SmartNet 
 is generally considerably cheaper than new Juniper. It makes it tough to sell 
 Juniper in many situations. We have the same problem with NetApp. It seems 
 that these companies would rather see their equipment end up in a landfill, 
 and have the secondary market turn to a different vendor, rather than being 
 responsible, and making it possible for equipment to be reused instead of 
 trashed. It really annoys me.
 
 Disclaimer: I am a Juniper and NetApp partner/reseller, and love their stuff. 
 I just hate their policies.
 
 -Randy
 




Re: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-16 Thread Neil J. McRae
I've used NHR for a number of deployments over the past couple of years and 
they are a fantastic organisation to work with. I've used them for maintenance 
support in the US for replacement of parts - highly recommended.



- Original Message -
From: tbran...@gmail.com
Sent: Tue, February 15, 2011, 11:04 PM
Subject: Re: SmartNet Alternatives

I know NHR has a alternative that looks to be comparable.
http://www.networkhardware.com/Maintenance/

-tb

Re: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-15 Thread Todd Braning
I know NHR has a alternative that looks to be comparable.
http://www.networkhardware.com/Maintenance/

-tb


Re: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-13 Thread Florian Weimer
* Ryan Finnesey:

 This is one of the reasons we are starting to look at Juniper for a
 new network build.  It is my understanding we set software updates
 for life for free.

My understanding is that it's free for customers who have a service
contract in place.  Most downloads are not self-service, and I haven't
tested if you can get JTAC to provide images for devices you don't
own.



Re: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-13 Thread Randy Carpenter
 How does Juniper feel about used hardware?
 
 ~Seth

I love Juniper's hardware and software, and support. However, the way they deal 
with used or second hand hardware is terrible. It is not possible to transfer 
ownership at all. You can not resell anything, and hope to get any software 
updates or support. The challenge is that Cisco refurb with SmartNet is 
generally considerably cheaper than new Juniper. It makes it tough to sell 
Juniper in many situations. We have the same problem with NetApp. It seems that 
these companies would rather see their equipment end up in a landfill, and have 
the secondary market turn to a different vendor, rather than being responsible, 
and making it possible for equipment to be reused instead of trashed. It really 
annoys me.

Disclaimer: I am a Juniper and NetApp partner/reseller, and love their stuff. I 
just hate their policies.

-Randy



RE: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-13 Thread George Bonser
 * Ryan Finnesey:
 
  This is one of the reasons we are starting to look at Juniper for a
  new network build.  It is my understanding we set software updates
  for life for free.
 
 My understanding is that it's free for customers who have a service
 contract in place.  Most downloads are not self-service, and I haven't
 tested if you can get JTAC to provide images for devices you don't
 own.

Brocade is now offering 5 years (what they consider lifetime) support to
the original purchaser of the equipment on some product lines:

FastIron SX800, SX1600, CX, WS, and TurboIron that includes software
updates.

We use a lot of the FCX units.





RE: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-12 Thread Brandon Kim

Sometimes you have to pick your battles. 

I'm sure there's a number cruncher somewhere telling Cisco this is a good idea.
Let's see how the real world reacts though



 Subject: RE: SmartNet Alternatives
 Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:33:32 -0800
 From: ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com
 To: nanog@nanog.org
 CC: jmacl...@alentus.com
 
 This is one of the reasons we are starting to look at Juniper for a new 
 network build.  It is my understanding we set software updates for life for 
 free.
 Cheers
 Ryan
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Michael Loftis [mailto:mlof...@wgops.com] 
 Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 4:27 PM
 To: John Macleod
 Cc: nanog@nanog.org
 Subject: Re: SmartNet Alternatives
 
 Cisco is making noises that they'll eventually be restricting software access 
 to ONLY those devices which have an active SmartNet contract associated to 
 your CCO account.  I don't know where this currently stands, and it sure will 
 be a huge pain in my rear if/when it happens.
 
 On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:41 PM, John Macleod jmacl...@alentus.com wrote:
  Just interested in other peoples experience to companies offering 
  alternatives to SmartNet?
 
  Pros/Cons/Tradeoffs?
 
  We currently have a mix of SmartNet and internal parts supply.
 
  John
 
 
  __
  John Macleod
  Alentus UK Limited
  Seymour House
  South Street
  Bromley
  BR1 1RH
   +44 (0)208 315 5800
   +44 (0)208 315 5801 fax
  alentus.co.uk  |  alentus.com
 
  Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
 
  This e-mail (and/or any attachment) contains information, which is 
  confidential and intended solely for the attention and use of the named 
  addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, 
  distribute or use it for any purpose or disclose the contents to any 
  person. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately 
  notify the sender. The information contained in this e-mail (and any 
  attachments) is supplied in good faith, but the sender shall not be under 
  any liability in damages or otherwise for any reliance that may be placed 
  upon it by the recipient, nor does it constitute a contract in any way. Any 
  comments or opinions expressed are those of the originator not of Alentus 
  Corporation unless otherwise expressly stated.
 
 
 
 
  

Re: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-12 Thread Daniel Roesen
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 04:49:55PM -0500, Andrey Khomyakov wrote:
 If only Cisco would sell software only support.

They do. You might have to make your sales droid know that YOU know
about it thought. :-)

Order items were CON-SW-... in the past, not sure about today.


Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: d...@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0



RE: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-12 Thread Ryan Finnesey
This is one of the reasons we are starting to look at Juniper for a new network 
build.  It is my understanding we set software updates for life for free.
Cheers
Ryan


-Original Message-
From: Michael Loftis [mailto:mlof...@wgops.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 4:27 PM
To: John Macleod
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: SmartNet Alternatives

Cisco is making noises that they'll eventually be restricting software access 
to ONLY those devices which have an active SmartNet contract associated to your 
CCO account.  I don't know where this currently stands, and it sure will be a 
huge pain in my rear if/when it happens.

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:41 PM, John Macleod jmacl...@alentus.com wrote:
 Just interested in other peoples experience to companies offering 
 alternatives to SmartNet?

 Pros/Cons/Tradeoffs?

 We currently have a mix of SmartNet and internal parts supply.

 John


 __
 John Macleod
 Alentus UK Limited
 Seymour House
 South Street
 Bromley
 BR1 1RH
  +44 (0)208 315 5800
  +44 (0)208 315 5801 fax
 alentus.co.uk  |  alentus.com

 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

 This e-mail (and/or any attachment) contains information, which is 
 confidential and intended solely for the attention and use of the named 
 addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, 
 distribute or use it for any purpose or disclose the contents to any person. 
 If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the 
 sender. The information contained in this e-mail (and any attachments) is 
 supplied in good faith, but the sender shall not be under any liability in 
 damages or otherwise for any reliance that may be placed upon it by the 
 recipient, nor does it constitute a contract in any way. Any comments or 
 opinions expressed are those of the originator not of Alentus Corporation 
 unless otherwise expressly stated.






RE: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-12 Thread Alejandro Acosta
Right, pretty good idea to look for other altermatives, few years ago I 
wouldn't agree, however my feeling says that Cisco competetitors have grown a 
lot,

AAA-,

-Mensaje original-
De: Ryan Finnesey
Enviados:  12/02/2011 17:03:32
Para: nanog@nanog.org
Cc: John Macleod
Asunto:  RE: SmartNet Alternatives

This is one of the reasons we are starting to look at Juniper for a new network 
build.  It is my understanding we set software updates for life for free.
Cheers
Ryan


-Original Message-
From: Michael Loftis [mailto:mlof...@wgops.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 4:27 PM
To: John Macleod
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: SmartNet Alternatives

Cisco is making noises that they'll eventually be restricting software access 
to ONLY those devices which have an active SmartNet contract associated to your 
CCO account.  I don't know where this currently stands, and it sure will be a 
huge pain in my rear if/when it happens.

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:41 PM, John Macleod jmacl...@alentus.com wrote:
 Just interested in other peoples experience to companies offering 
 alternatives to SmartNet?

 Pros/Cons/Tradeoffs?

 We currently have a mix of SmartNet and internal parts supply.

 John


 __
 John Macleod
 Alentus UK Limited
 Seymour House
 South Street
 Bromley
 BR1 1RH
  +44 (0)208 315 5800
  +44 (0)208 315 5801 fax
 alentus.co.uk  |  alentus.com

 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

 This e-mail (and/or any attachment) contains information, which is 
 confidential and intended solely for the attention and use of the named 
 addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, 
 distribute or use it for any purpose or disclose the contents to any person. 
 If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the 
 sender. The information contained in this e-mail (and any attachments) is 
 supplied in good faith, but the sender shall not be under any liability in 
 damages or otherwise for any reliance that may be placed upon it by the 
 recipient, nor does it constitute a contract in any way. Any comments or 
 opinions expressed are those of the originator not of Alentus Corporation 
 unless otherwise expressly stated.








Re: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-12 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 2/12/2011 13:33, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
 This is one of the reasons we are starting to look at Juniper for a new 
 network build.  It is my understanding we set software updates for life for 
 free.
 Cheers
 Ryan
 


How does Juniper feel about used hardware?

~Seth



Re: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-12 Thread Skeeve Stevens
Interesting Question... And do they consider the JUNOS included a separate
item? Or can it happily be sold with the hardware.

Juniper will have a couple of years before it has to worry about a refurb
market like Cisco has - especially in volume.

...Skeeve
 
--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO
eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
ske...@eintellego.net / www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve ; facebook.com/eintellego
--
eintellego - The Experts that the Experts call
- Juniper - HP Networking - Cisco - Brocade - Arista - Allied Telesis
 





-Original Message-
From: Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 12:49:24 +1100
To: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: SmartNet Alternatives

On 2/12/2011 13:33, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
 This is one of the reasons we are starting to look at Juniper for a new
network build.  It is my understanding we set software updates for life
for free.
 Cheers
 Ryan
 


How does Juniper feel about used hardware?

~Seth





Re: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-12 Thread Skeeve Stevens
Different rules for different countries.

Can't buy CON-SW from Australian distributors (I've tried 3), but I can
buy it from the UK with support for Australia.

...Skeeve
 
--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO
eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
ske...@eintellego.net / www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve ; facebook.com/eintellego
--
eintellego - The Experts that the Experts call
- Juniper - HP Networking - Cisco - Brocade - Arista - Allied Telesis
 





-Original Message-
From: Daniel Roesen d...@cluenet.de
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 07:46:36 +1100
To: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: SmartNet Alternatives

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 04:49:55PM -0500, Andrey Khomyakov wrote:
 If only Cisco would sell software only support.

They do. You might have to make your sales droid know that YOU know
about it thought. :-)

Order items were CON-SW-... in the past, not sure about today.


Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: d...@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0





Re: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-12 Thread Skeeve Stevens
Started a few weeks ago for us.

...Skeeve
 
--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO
eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
ske...@eintellego.net / www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve ; facebook.com/eintellego
--
eintellego - The Experts that the Experts call
- Juniper - HP Networking - Cisco - Brocade - Arista - Allied Telesis
 





-Original Message-
From: Michael Loftis mlof...@wgops.com
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 08:26:56 +1100
To: John Macleod jmacl...@alentus.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: SmartNet Alternatives

Cisco is making noises that they'll eventually be restricting software
access to ONLY those devices which have an active SmartNet contract
associated to your CCO account.  I don't know where this currently
stands, and it sure will be a huge pain in my rear if/when it happens.

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:41 PM, John Macleod jmacl...@alentus.com
wrote:
 Just interested in other peoples experience to companies offering
alternatives to SmartNet?

 Pros/Cons/Tradeoffs?

 We currently have a mix of SmartNet and internal parts supply.

 John


 __
 John Macleod
 Alentus UK Limited
 Seymour House
 South Street
 Bromley
 BR1 1RH
  +44 (0)208 315 5800
  +44 (0)208 315 5801 fax
 alentus.co.uk  |  alentus.com

 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

 This e-mail (and/or any attachment) contains information, which is
confidential and intended solely for the attention and use of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,
distribute or use it for any purpose or disclose the contents to any
person. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
notify the sender. The information contained in this e-mail (and any
attachments) is supplied in good faith, but the sender shall not be
under any liability in damages or otherwise for any reliance that may be
placed upon it by the recipient, nor does it constitute a contract in
any way. Any comments or opinions expressed are those of the originator
not of Alentus Corporation unless otherwise expressly stated.







SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-11 Thread John Macleod
Just interested in other peoples experience to companies offering alternatives 
to SmartNet?

Pros/Cons/Tradeoffs?

We currently have a mix of SmartNet and internal parts supply.

John


__
John Macleod
Alentus UK Limited
Seymour House
South Street
Bromley
BR1 1RH
  +44 (0)208 315 5800
  +44 (0)208 315 5801 fax
alentus.co.uk  |  alentus.com

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

This e-mail (and/or any attachment) contains information, which is confidential 
and intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you 
are not the intended recipient you must not copy, distribute or use it for any 
purpose or disclose the contents to any person. If you have received this 
e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender. The information 
contained in this e-mail (and any attachments) is supplied in good faith, but 
the sender shall not be under any liability in damages or otherwise for any 
reliance that may be placed upon it by the recipient, nor does it constitute a 
contract in any way. Any comments or opinions expressed are those of the 
originator not of Alentus Corporation unless otherwise expressly stated.



Re: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-11 Thread Michael Loftis
Cisco is making noises that they'll eventually be restricting software
access to ONLY those devices which have an active SmartNet contract
associated to your CCO account.  I don't know where this currently
stands, and it sure will be a huge pain in my rear if/when it happens.

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:41 PM, John Macleod jmacl...@alentus.com wrote:
 Just interested in other peoples experience to companies offering 
 alternatives to SmartNet?

 Pros/Cons/Tradeoffs?

 We currently have a mix of SmartNet and internal parts supply.

 John


 __
 John Macleod
 Alentus UK Limited
 Seymour House
 South Street
 Bromley
 BR1 1RH
  +44 (0)208 315 5800
  +44 (0)208 315 5801 fax
 alentus.co.uk  |  alentus.com

 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

 This e-mail (and/or any attachment) contains information, which is 
 confidential and intended solely for the attention and use of the named 
 addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, 
 distribute or use it for any purpose or disclose the contents to any person. 
 If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the 
 sender. The information contained in this e-mail (and any attachments) is 
 supplied in good faith, but the sender shall not be under any liability in 
 damages or otherwise for any reliance that may be placed upon it by the 
 recipient, nor does it constitute a contract in any way. Any comments or 
 opinions expressed are those of the originator not of Alentus Corporation 
 unless otherwise expressly stated.





Re: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-11 Thread Bryan Fields
On 2/11/2011 16:26, Michael Loftis wrote:
 Cisco is making noises that they'll eventually be restricting software
 access to ONLY those devices which have an active SmartNet contract
 associated to your CCO account.  I don't know where this currently
 stands, and it sure will be a huge pain in my rear if/when it happens.

They do this now.  Unless the device type is under listed smartnet, you can't
download software for it.
-- 
Bryan Fields

727-409-1194 - Voice
727-214-2508 - Fax
http://bryanfields.net



Re: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-11 Thread Andrey Khomyakov
If only Cisco would sell software only support. 3rd party smartNet
alternatives are nice for parts replacement. They suck for support, imho,
especially, when it comes down to declaring a problem to be a bug.
On quite a few occasions I found bugs in IOS and TAC submitted those as bugs
and fixed them reasonably fast.

Andrey

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:41 PM, John Macleod jmacl...@alentus.com wrote:

 Just interested in other peoples experience to companies offering
 alternatives to SmartNet?

 Pros/Cons/Tradeoffs?

 We currently have a mix of SmartNet and internal parts supply.

 John


 __
 John Macleod
 Alentus UK Limited
 Seymour House
 South Street
 Bromley
 BR1 1RH
  +44 (0)208 315 5800
  +44 (0)208 315 5801 fax
 alentus.co.uk  |  alentus.com

 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

 This e-mail (and/or any attachment) contains information, which is
 confidential and intended solely for the attention and use of the named
 addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,
 distribute or use it for any purpose or disclose the contents to any person.
 If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the
 sender. The information contained in this e-mail (and any attachments) is
 supplied in good faith, but the sender shall not be under any liability in
 damages or otherwise for any reliance that may be placed upon it by the
 recipient, nor does it constitute a contract in any way. Any comments or
 opinions expressed are those of the originator not of Alentus Corporation
 unless otherwise expressly stated.




-- 
Andrey Khomyakov
[khomyakov.and...@gmail.com]


Re: SmartNet Alternatives

2011-02-11 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 2/11/2011 13:49, Andrey Khomyakov wrote:
 If only Cisco would sell software only support. 3rd party smartNet
 alternatives are nice for parts replacement. They suck for support, imho,
 especially, when it comes down to declaring a problem to be a bug.
 On quite a few occasions I found bugs in IOS and TAC submitted those as bugs
 and fixed them reasonably fast.
 


I thought there already was a software-only smartnet option?

~Seth