Re: Voip faxing

2016-11-03 Thread Carlos Alcantar
That link shared right there is pretty much gold when it comes to faxing / 
modems over voip.  Thats pretty much what you will get out of any discussion.  
We have successfully been able to get it to work but we also control the 
network a-z including the outside plant down to the house.  What we have 
started to notice even when we are passing the calls down into the PSTN through 
the local interconnect tandems ect people down the line are converting it down 
to voip.



Carlos Alcantar

Race Communications / Race Team Member

1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010

Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com<mailto:car...@race.com> / 
http://www.race.com<http://www.race.com/>


From: NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> on behalf of John Osmon 
<jos...@rigozsaurus.com>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 9:27:59 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Voip faxing

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 04:52:46AM +, Carlos Alcantar wrote:
> Hey Samual,
>
>
> you might want to check out the voice ops mailing list, might be a bit more 
> relevant over there.
>
>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Aside from voiceops, here's decade (or more?) old web page that I point
people to when they want to deal with Fax over VoIP:
http://www.soft-switch.org/foip.html





Re: Voip faxing

2016-10-31 Thread John Osmon
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 04:52:46AM +, Carlos Alcantar wrote:
> Hey Samual,
> 
> 
> you might want to check out the voice ops mailing list, might be a bit more 
> relevant over there.
> 
> 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Aside from voiceops, here's decade (or more?) old web page that I point
people to when they want to deal with Fax over VoIP:
http://www.soft-switch.org/foip.html




Re: Voip faxing

2016-10-30 Thread Carlos Alcantar
Hey Samual,


you might want to check out the voice ops mailing list, might be a bit more 
relevant over there.


https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

VoiceOps Info Page - Welcome to 
puck.nether.net<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops>
puck.nether.net
This is the VoiceOps Mailing list. This list is for discussions related to 
managing voice networks, both traditional and IP. The VOIP Operators' Group 
(VOG) charter ...







Carlos Alcantar

Race Communications / Race Team Member

1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010

Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com<mailto:car...@race.com> / 
http://www.race.com<http://www.race.com/>


From: NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> on behalf of Samual Carman 
<starwars1...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 9:45:52 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Voip faxing

Hello if this is not allowed please ignore and inform me that it not allowed 
however I could think of no better place for this
I would like to know why there has not been more wide support of the V.38 or 
v.17 v.34 or the old style g.711 protocols for faxing over voip
Based on my understanding it is an difficult in an IP based environment for 
faxing to work reliably however based on my understanding V.38 was suppose to 
fix that however the research I have conducted in regards to the support of 
these protocols is that there not widely implimted and besides G.711 which was 
designed for voice that proviso is somewhat implored on a wider scale
However I understand faxing is archaic but in some fields it is necessary
Thanks Sam Please excuse spelling and grammar as this was typed on my phone

Get Outlook for iOS



Voip faxing

2016-10-30 Thread Samual Carman
Hello if this is not allowed please ignore and inform me that it not allowed 
however I could think of no better place for this 
I would like to know why there has not been more wide support of the V.38 or 
v.17 v.34 or the old style g.711 protocols for faxing over voip 
Based on my understanding it is an difficult in an IP based environment for 
faxing to work reliably however based on my understanding V.38 was suppose to 
fix that however the research I have conducted in regards to the support of 
these protocols is that there not widely implimted and besides G.711 which was 
designed for voice that proviso is somewhat implored on a wider scale 
However I understand faxing is archaic but in some fields it is necessary 
Thanks Sam Please excuse spelling and grammar as this was typed on my phone 

Get Outlook for iOS