XO routing issue?
I am looking for an XO contact, I appear to be having a routing issue with my traffic going through their network. Velocity Online 850-205-4638
Looking for XO routing engineer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Can someone from XO please contact me about this hijacked prefix: 72.44.152.0/24 I see it coming from AS35909 through AS2828. No luck getting anyone on the phone. Thanks George Carey -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.11 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk2x0jcACgkQJdlqYKAmD6FO2gCeJd6uToUghlKdjNd38JpAP2VZ SnwAoLQbpi9ygjIkCPDCU6TrnPOFc98r =OkTz -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: XO Routing
On Sep 16, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Stefan Molnar wrote: > My sales director said it was their peering. First problem with a statement talking about technical problems: "My sales director said" Second problem: "Peering" does not cause internal routing loops. Er, should not. Third problem: "Was". -- TTFN, patrick > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Chris Woodfield wrote: > >> The unconfirmed chatter I'm hearing is that they were leaking peering routes >> to other peers. Can anyone check and confirm this? Renesys? >> >> -C >> >> On Sep 16, 2010, at 9:09 12AM, William Byrd wrote: >> >>> XO Engineers are telling us that they are aware of packet loss across their >>> network and are looking into it. We're experiencing slow/degraded >>> connectivity out of St. Louis and Nashville but Atlanta and Dallas are >>> problem free. >>> >>> William Collier-Byrd >>> w...@collier-byrd.net >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore >>> wrote: >>> >>>> This should probably be on outages@, but XO is definitely having problems >>>> to places like speedtest.com & RCN from Boston. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> TTFN, >>>> patrick >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sep 16, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Charles Mills wrote: >>>> >>>>> The internet health report is showing high latency to most of their >>>> peers. >>>>> >>>>> Chuck. >>>>> >>>>> On Sep 16, 2010 11:57 AM, "Stefan Molnar" wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyone know the impact on the XO Routing/Peering that is happening right >>>>>> now? We have had spotty connectivity for the last hour. >>>>>> >>>>>> Stefan >>>> >> >> >> >> >
Re: XO Routing
On 9/16/10 9:35 AM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote: > Hopefully they don't treat this the same way they treat their billing, > otherwise you all will be degraded for months or even years. It is > absolutely amazing that this company is still in business. > The "big guys" will always remain in business, or be absorbed into another equal or larger entity to form an even bigger one, regardless of their practices. (A fringe exception would be AT&T's court ordered breakup.) The larger they get the much more spectacular the faults tend to be. Whereas with smaller providers like myself, how I treat my customers factors in as a major aspect to whether or not they stick around. I can't compete strictly on price with the big guys, but I do absorb their BS and shield my customers from it as much as possible. If I treated my customers like the big guys do, I wouldn't have any. ~Seth
Re: XO Routing
My sales director said it was their peering. On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Chris Woodfield wrote: The unconfirmed chatter I'm hearing is that they were leaking peering routes to other peers. Can anyone check and confirm this? Renesys? -C On Sep 16, 2010, at 9:09 12AM, William Byrd wrote: XO Engineers are telling us that they are aware of packet loss across their network and are looking into it. We're experiencing slow/degraded connectivity out of St. Louis and Nashville but Atlanta and Dallas are problem free. William Collier-Byrd w...@collier-byrd.net On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: This should probably be on outages@, but XO is definitely having problems to places like speedtest.com & RCN from Boston. -- TTFN, patrick On Sep 16, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Charles Mills wrote: The internet health report is showing high latency to most of their peers. Chuck. On Sep 16, 2010 11:57 AM, "Stefan Molnar" wrote: Anyone know the impact on the XO Routing/Peering that is happening right now? We have had spotty connectivity for the last hour. Stefan
Re: XO Routing
The unconfirmed chatter I'm hearing is that they were leaking peering routes to other peers. Can anyone check and confirm this? Renesys? -C On Sep 16, 2010, at 9:09 12AM, William Byrd wrote: > XO Engineers are telling us that they are aware of packet loss across their > network and are looking into it. We're experiencing slow/degraded > connectivity out of St. Louis and Nashville but Atlanta and Dallas are > problem free. > > William Collier-Byrd > w...@collier-byrd.net > > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > >> This should probably be on outages@, but XO is definitely having problems >> to places like speedtest.com & RCN from Boston. >> >> -- >> TTFN, >> patrick >> >> >> On Sep 16, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Charles Mills wrote: >> >>> The internet health report is showing high latency to most of their >> peers. >>> >>> Chuck. >>> >>> On Sep 16, 2010 11:57 AM, "Stefan Molnar" wrote: >>>> >>>> Anyone know the impact on the XO Routing/Peering that is happening right >>>> now? We have had spotty connectivity for the last hour. >>>> >>>> Stefan >>
Re: XO Routing
Hopefully they don't treat this the same way they treat their billing, otherwise you all will be degraded for months or even years. It is absolutely amazing that this company is still in business. Jeff On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Calkins, Mark wrote: > XO began advertising way too many prefixes, a few hours ago. Most > likely tripping most of their peers max-prefix limits. Filters are your > friends. > ~mark > > -Original Message- > From: William Byrd [mailto:w...@collier-byrd.net] > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 10:09 AM > To: Patrick W. Gilmore > Cc: NANOG list > Subject: Re: XO Routing > > XO Engineers are telling us that they are aware of packet loss across > their network and are looking into it. We're experiencing slow/degraded > connectivity out of St. Louis and Nashville but Atlanta and Dallas are > problem free. > > William Collier-Byrd > w...@collier-byrd.net > > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore > wrote: > >> This should probably be on outages@, but XO is definitely having >> problems to places like speedtest.com & RCN from Boston. >> >> -- >> TTFN, >> patrick >> >> >> On Sep 16, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Charles Mills wrote: >> >> > The internet health report is showing high latency to most of their >> peers. >> > >> > Chuck. >> > >> > On Sep 16, 2010 11:57 AM, "Stefan Molnar" wrote: >> >> >> >> Anyone know the impact on the XO Routing/Peering that is happening >> >> right now? We have had spotty connectivity for the last hour. >> >> >> >> Stefan >> > > > --- > > > The content contained in this electronic message is not intended to constitute > formation of a contract binding tw telecom. tw telecom will be contractually > bound only upon execution, by an authorized officer, of a contract including > agreed terms and conditions or by express application of its tariffs. This > message > is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is > addressed. If > the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or > agent > responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are > hereby > notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is > strictly > prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us > immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail or by telephone. > > -- Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net Black Lotus Communications - AS32421 First and Leading in DDoS Protection Solutions
RE: XO Routing
Looks like XO has stopped advertising its peer's prefixes. Sessions coming back up and stable. -Original Message- From: Calkins, Mark [mailto:mark.calk...@twtelecom.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 10:18 AM To: William Byrd Cc: NANOG list Subject: RE: XO Routing XO began advertising way too many prefixes, a few hours ago. Most likely tripping most of their peers max-prefix limits. Filters are your friends. ~mark -Original Message- From: William Byrd [mailto:w...@collier-byrd.net] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 10:09 AM To: Patrick W. Gilmore Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: XO Routing XO Engineers are telling us that they are aware of packet loss across their network and are looking into it. We're experiencing slow/degraded connectivity out of St. Louis and Nashville but Atlanta and Dallas are problem free. William Collier-Byrd w...@collier-byrd.net On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > This should probably be on outages@, but XO is definitely having > problems to places like speedtest.com & RCN from Boston. > > -- > TTFN, > patrick > > > On Sep 16, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Charles Mills wrote: > > > The internet health report is showing high latency to most of their > peers. > > > > Chuck. > > > > On Sep 16, 2010 11:57 AM, "Stefan Molnar" wrote: > >> > >> Anyone know the impact on the XO Routing/Peering that is happening > >> right now? We have had spotty connectivity for the last hour. > >> > >> Stefan > --- The content contained in this electronic message is not intended to constitute formation of a contract binding tw telecom. tw telecom will be contractually bound only upon execution, by an authorized officer, of a contract including agreed terms and conditions or by express application of its tariffs. This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail or by telephone. --- The content contained in this electronic message is not intended to constitute formation of a contract binding tw telecom. tw telecom will be contractually bound only upon execution, by an authorized officer, of a contract including agreed terms and conditions or by express application of its tariffs. This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail or by telephone.
RE: XO Routing
XO began advertising way too many prefixes, a few hours ago. Most likely tripping most of their peers max-prefix limits. Filters are your friends. ~mark -Original Message- From: William Byrd [mailto:w...@collier-byrd.net] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 10:09 AM To: Patrick W. Gilmore Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: XO Routing XO Engineers are telling us that they are aware of packet loss across their network and are looking into it. We're experiencing slow/degraded connectivity out of St. Louis and Nashville but Atlanta and Dallas are problem free. William Collier-Byrd w...@collier-byrd.net On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > This should probably be on outages@, but XO is definitely having > problems to places like speedtest.com & RCN from Boston. > > -- > TTFN, > patrick > > > On Sep 16, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Charles Mills wrote: > > > The internet health report is showing high latency to most of their > peers. > > > > Chuck. > > > > On Sep 16, 2010 11:57 AM, "Stefan Molnar" wrote: > >> > >> Anyone know the impact on the XO Routing/Peering that is happening > >> right now? We have had spotty connectivity for the last hour. > >> > >> Stefan > --- The content contained in this electronic message is not intended to constitute formation of a contract binding tw telecom. tw telecom will be contractually bound only upon execution, by an authorized officer, of a contract including agreed terms and conditions or by express application of its tariffs. This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail or by telephone.
Re: XO Routing
Stefan Molnar wrote: > > > > Anyone know the impact on the XO Routing/Peering that is happening > > right now? We have had spotty connectivity for the last hour. > > > > Stefan > > > > > I don't know the exact impact but I've had my Covad and AT&T customers ready to hang me because of what's going on. As of right this moment, my Covad connections are slowly coming back but have been acting spotty, I haven't heard complaints about the AT&T side for about 30-40 minutes. My POV, Covad is shaky because of their peering to XO. AT&T might have corrected itself. David Hubbard wrote: > > I know their own phone systems went down, or perhaps > > were overloaded; we lost our office connection to them > > but our phones remained online. I called their tech > > line by cell, was told thanks for calling XO, we are > > experiencing technical difficulties and then it hung > > up on me. :-) This seems to happen about once a month > > with them though so I'm used to it. > > > > David > > > Their own phone systems... I have a lot of clients whose providers peer with XO whose phone systems went kaput (one way audio, resolved, nope, resolved, nope). This is one of the downsides of working an ITSP. Trying to explain to clients why another provider they've never heard of is impacting their business. Oy VoIP, how I loathe you. -- =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ J. Oquendo SGFA, SGFE, C|EH, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP, CPT "It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things differently." - Warren Buffett 227C 5D35 7DCB 0893 95AA 4771 1DCE 1FD1 5CCD 6B5E http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5CCD6B5E -- =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ J. Oquendo SGFA, SGFE, C|EH, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP, CPT "It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things differently." - Warren Buffett 227C 5D35 7DCB 0893 95AA 4771 1DCE 1FD1 5CCD 6B5E http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5CCD6B5E
Re: XO Routing
XO Engineers are telling us that they are aware of packet loss across their network and are looking into it. We're experiencing slow/degraded connectivity out of St. Louis and Nashville but Atlanta and Dallas are problem free. William Collier-Byrd w...@collier-byrd.net On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > This should probably be on outages@, but XO is definitely having problems > to places like speedtest.com & RCN from Boston. > > -- > TTFN, > patrick > > > On Sep 16, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Charles Mills wrote: > > > The internet health report is showing high latency to most of their > peers. > > > > Chuck. > > > > On Sep 16, 2010 11:57 AM, "Stefan Molnar" wrote: > >> > >> Anyone know the impact on the XO Routing/Peering that is happening right > >> now? We have had spotty connectivity for the last hour. > >> > >> Stefan >
RE: XO Routing
I get the same hang up message, but did get in queue. The PSTN side is working fine from what I can see as our phones at a few locations are fine, but it is a shot in the dark for anything IP. On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, David Hubbard wrote: I know their own phone systems went down, or perhaps were overloaded; we lost our office connection to them but our phones remained online. I called their tech line by cell, was told thanks for calling XO, we are experiencing technical difficulties and then it hung up on me. :-) This seems to happen about once a month with them though so I'm used to it. David -Original Message- From: Stefan Molnar [mailto:ste...@csudsu.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:55 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: XO Routing Anyone know the impact on the XO Routing/Peering that is happening right now? We have had spotty connectivity for the last hour. Stefan
Re: XO Routing
This should probably be on outages@, but XO is definitely having problems to places like speedtest.com & RCN from Boston. -- TTFN, patrick On Sep 16, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Charles Mills wrote: > The internet health report is showing high latency to most of their peers. > > Chuck. > > On Sep 16, 2010 11:57 AM, "Stefan Molnar" wrote: >> >> Anyone know the impact on the XO Routing/Peering that is happening right >> now? We have had spotty connectivity for the last hour. >> >> Stefan >> >
RE: XO Routing
I know their own phone systems went down, or perhaps were overloaded; we lost our office connection to them but our phones remained online. I called their tech line by cell, was told thanks for calling XO, we are experiencing technical difficulties and then it hung up on me. :-) This seems to happen about once a month with them though so I'm used to it. David > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Molnar [mailto:ste...@csudsu.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:55 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: XO Routing > > > Anyone know the impact on the XO Routing/Peering that is > happening right > now? We have had spotty connectivity for the last hour. > > Stefan > > >
Re: XO Routing
The internet health report is showing high latency to most of their peers. Chuck. On Sep 16, 2010 11:57 AM, "Stefan Molnar" wrote: > > Anyone know the impact on the XO Routing/Peering that is happening right > now? We have had spotty connectivity for the last hour. > > Stefan >
XO Routing
Anyone know the impact on the XO Routing/Peering that is happening right now? We have had spotty connectivity for the last hour. Stefan
