best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations

2012-06-14 Thread Philip Lavine
 Is there any best practices documentation on how to run BGP multihoming 
accross two phyiscally seperated sites.


Re: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations

2012-06-14 Thread Chad Gietzen
I found the following helpful, presented by Philip Smith at NANOG 41

http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog41/presentations/BGPMultihoming.pdf


Chad


On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Philip Lavine source_ro...@yahoo.com wrote:
  Is there any best practices documentation on how to run BGP multihoming 
 accross two phyiscally seperated sites.



Re: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations

2012-06-14 Thread Philip Lavine
Does this include Multi Site + Multi Homed

 


 From: Chad Gietzen giet...@gmail.com
To: Philip Lavine source_ro...@yahoo.com 
Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org 
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations
  
I found the following helpful, presented by Philip Smith at NANOG 41

http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog41/presentations/BGPMultihoming.pdf


Chad


On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Philip Lavine source_ro...@yahoo.com wrote:
  Is there any best practices documentation on how to run BGP multihoming 
 accross two phyiscally seperated sites.


Re: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations

2012-06-14 Thread Philip Lavine
Easy part:
I need to provide my users acces to the internet from my HQ site via a local 
Internet connection or via a colo.  
 
Hard part:
I also need to provide incoming access to hosted apps (HTTP, FTP, SMTP) from 
either location, so if the colo internet connection goes down the traffic can 
re-route to the HQ server farm and visa versa.
I am in the process of purchasing an AS and ip space. Is it advisable to use 
the same IP space at both locations and run iBGP over a dedicated L2 connection 
between the sites.
 
P
  


 From: Mick O'Rourke mkorou...@gmail.com
To: Philip Lavine source_ro...@yahoo.com 
Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org 
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 2:48 PM
Subject: Re: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations
  

As in 
- use of multi or single AS?
- private, vpn or other dci?
- etc 
What's the purpose of the site? Or what end result are you trying to achieve?
 
On Jun 15, 2012 6:04 AM, Philip Lavine source_ro...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Is there any best practices documentation on how to run BGP multihoming 
accross two phyiscally seperated sites.



Re: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations

2012-06-14 Thread Randy
so, say you end up with a /24 and your ASN

split up your /24 into hq-/25 and colo-/25
 
from colo:
1) announce /24 as a standard adv
2) announce colo-/25 with *no-export* community set

from hq:
1) announce /24 as a standard adv
2) announce hq-/25 with *no-export* community set

Run iBGP over a dedicated link b/w colo and hq (I don't like allow-as in! but 
it is another option)

./Randy



--- On Thu, 6/14/12, Philip Lavine source_ro...@yahoo.com wrote:

 From: Philip Lavine source_ro...@yahoo.com
 Subject: Re: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations
 To: Mick O'Rourke mkorou...@gmail.com
 Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
 Date: Thursday, June 14, 2012, 3:33 PM
 Easy part:
 I need to provide my users acces to the internet from my HQ
 site via a local Internet connection or via a colo.  
  
 Hard part:
 I also need to provide incoming access to hosted apps
 (HTTP, FTP, SMTP) from either location, so if the colo
 internet connection goes down the traffic can re-route to
 the HQ server farm and visa versa.
 I am in the process of purchasing an AS and ip space. Is it
 advisable to use the same IP space at both locations and run
 iBGP over a dedicated L2 connection between the sites.
  
 P
   
 
 
  From: Mick O'Rourke mkorou...@gmail.com
 To: Philip Lavine source_ro...@yahoo.com
 
 Cc: nanog@nanog.org
 nanog@nanog.org
 
 Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 2:48 PM
 Subject: Re: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical
 locations
   
 
 As in 
 - use of multi or single AS?
 - private, vpn or other dci?
 - etc 
 What's the purpose of the site? Or what end result are you
 trying to achieve?
  
 On Jun 15, 2012 6:04 AM, Philip Lavine source_ro...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
 
  Is there any best practices documentation on how to run
 BGP multihoming accross two phyiscally seperated sites.
 




Re: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations

2012-06-14 Thread david peahi
I'm fortunate to have a /16, and advertise 2 /18s from the primary, and 4
/17s from the backup collo, /16 from both with AS Prepend on backup /16,
and depend on BGP longest prefix route selection to create symmetric
Internet routing back to my locations. I run IBGP between geographically
diverse locations internally, over an L2 VLAN extended over a GiGE dot1q
trunk. Internet-facing load-balancers select the best server from
distributed server farms spread across the 2 sites.
I think this is a fairly standard configuration.



On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Philip Lavine source_ro...@yahoo.comwrote:

 Easy part:
 I need to provide my users acces to the internet from my HQ site via a
 local Internet connection or via a colo.

 Hard part:
 I also need to provide incoming access to hosted apps (HTTP, FTP, SMTP)
 from either location, so if the colo internet connection goes down the
 traffic can re-route to the HQ server farm and visa versa.
 I am in the process of purchasing an AS and ip space. Is it advisable to
 use the same IP space at both locations and run iBGP over a dedicated L2
 connection between the sites.

 P


 
  From: Mick O'Rourke mkorou...@gmail.com
 To: Philip Lavine source_ro...@yahoo.com
 Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
 Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 2:48 PM
 Subject: Re: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations


 As in
 - use of multi or single AS?
 - private, vpn or other dci?
 - etc
 What's the purpose of the site? Or what end result are you trying to
 achieve?

 On Jun 15, 2012 6:04 AM, Philip Lavine source_ro...@yahoo.com wrote:

  Is there any best practices documentation on how to run BGP multihoming
 accross two phyiscally seperated sites.