RE: rsvp-te admission control - i don't see it
That’s it! Thanks dip Using “signalled-bandwidth 5000” on headend te-tunnel int RP/0/0/CPU0:r20#sh run int tt1 Fri Sep 4 13:27:14.833 CST interface tunnel-te1 bandwidth 20 ipv4 unnumbered Loopback0 signalled-name r20--->r22 signalled-bandwidth 5000 autoroute announce ! destination 10.20.0.22 path-option 10 dynamic ! On HE… RP/0/0/CPU0:r20#sh mpls traffic-eng tunnels name r20--->r22 | in and Fri Sep 4 13:28:28.918 CST Name: tunnel-te1 Destination: 10.20.0.22 Ifhandle:0x1d0 Bandwidth Requested: 5000 kbps CT0 Bandwidth: 5000 kbps (CT0) Priority: 7 7 Affinity: 0x0/0x RP/0/0/CPU0:r20#sh rsvp reservation detail | in ate Fri Sep 4 13:25:51.509 CST Rate: 0 bits/sec. Burst: 1K bytes. Peak: 0 bits/sec. State expires in 0.000 sec. Rate: 500 bits/sec. Burst: 1K bytes. Peak: 5M bits/sec. State expires in 358.630 sec. RP/0/0/CPU0:r20#sh rsvp int Fri Sep 4 13:26:03.738 CST *: RDM: Default I/F B/W % : 75% [default] (max resv/bc0), 0% [default] (bc1) Interface MaxBW (bps) MaxFlow (bps) Allocated (bps) MaxSub (bps) - - - GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0 750M* 750M 0 ( 0%) 0* GigabitEthernet0/0/0/1 750M* 750M5M ( 0%) 0* On transit lsr in core… RP/0/0/CPU0:r24#sh rsvp session detail | in ate Fri Sep 4 13:18:25.258 CST Tspec: avg rate=0, burst=1K, peak rate=0 Fspec: avg rate=0, burst=1K, peak rate=0 Tspec: avg rate=5M, burst=1K, peak rate=5M Fspec: avg rate=5M, burst=1K, peak rate=5M RP/0/0/CPU0:r24#sh rsvp int Fri Sep 4 13:18:33.508 CST *: RDM: Default I/F B/W % : 75% [default] (max resv/bc0), 0% [default] (bc1) Interface MaxBW (bps) MaxFlow (bps) Allocated (bps) MaxSub (bps) - - - GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0 750M* 750M 0 ( 0%) 0* GigabitEthernet0/0/0/1 750M* 750M5M ( 0%) 0*
Re: rsvp-te admission control - i don't see it
can you try this https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios_xr_sw/iosxr_r3-7/mpls/command/reference/gr37mpte.html#wp2134470 On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 10:26 AM wrote: > Thanks dip, let me know what you think. > > r20 is headend and r22 is tailend r20>r22 > > r22 is headed and r20 is tailend r22>r20 > > RP/0/0/CPU0:r20#sh run int tt1 > > Fri Sep 4 12:25:09.198 CST > > interface tunnel-te1 > > bandwidth 20 > > ipv4 unnumbered Loopback0 > > signalled-name r20--->r22 > > autoroute announce > > ! > > destination 10.20.0.22 > > path-option 10 dynamic > > > > > > RP/0/0/CPU0:r22#sh run int tt1 > > Fri Sep 4 11:50:01.581 CST > > interface tunnel-te1 > > bandwidth 20 > > ipv4 unnumbered Loopback0 > > signalled-name r22--->r20 > > autoroute announce > > ! > > destination 10.20.0.20 > > path-option 10 dynamic > > > > > > > > > > *From:* dip > *Sent:* Friday, September 4, 2020 11:15 AM > *To:* Aaron > *Cc:* Mark Tinka ; NANOG > *Subject:* Re: rsvp-te admission control - i don't see it > > > > What's the signalled bandwidth being reserved by the headend "R20" in your > example? it's a hunch that you may not have that defined and it becomes > Zero bandwidth LSPs. > > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 9:09 AM wrote: > > Thanks Mark, I have a tunnel traversing those interfaces. Customer > routers (r10, r30) can ping end to end via tunnel. > > > > Not sure if I’m missing something here. I wonder if I’m not signaling for > the rsvp bandwidth correctly. I just don’t see any allocated bandwidth in > the rsvp interfaces anywhere. > > > > Here’s one of the transit routers… r24…. Should I see “allocated (bps)” > here ? > > > > RP/0/0/CPU0:r24#sh rsvp int > > Fri Sep 4 10:54:16.451 CST > > > > *: RDM: Default I/F B/W % : 75% [default] (max resv/bc0), 0% [default] > (bc1) > > > > Interface MaxBW (bps) MaxFlow (bps) Allocated (bps) > MaxSub (bps) > > - - > - > > GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0 750M* 750M 0 ( > 0%)0* > > GigabitEthernet0/0/0/1 750M* 750M 0 ( > 0%)0* > > > > > > Details…. > > > > LSP/TE-tunnel has dynamic path option, but I disallow it to flow via r21… > so tunnel takes the southbound path via r20-24-r25-r23-r22 > > > > (2) unidirectional te-tunnels > > > > r20 is headend and r22 is tailend r20>r22 > > r22 is headed and r20 is tailend r22>r20 > > > > > > R10 R30 > > | | > > | | > > r20-r21-r22 > > | | > > | | > > | | > > r24-r25-r23 > > > > r20’s tunnel… > > > > RP/0/0/CPU0:r20#sh mpls traffic-eng tun br > > Fri Sep 4 10:59:51.509 CST > > > > TUNNEL NAME DESTINATION STATUS STATE > > tunnel-te1 10.20.0.22 up up > > r22--->r20 10.20.0.20 up up > > Displayed 1 (of 1) heads, 0 (of 0) midpoints, 1 (of 1) tails > > Displayed 1 up, 0 down, 0 recovering, 0 recovered heads > > > > RP/0/0/CPU0:r20#sh mpls traffic-eng tun name tunnel-te1 | be count > > Fri Sep 4 10:59:54.309 CST > > Node hop count: 4 > > Hop0: 10.20.1.21 > > Hop1: 10.20.1.18 > > Hop2: 10.20.1.17 > > Hop3: 10.20.1.14 > > Hop4: 10.20.1.13 > > Hop5: 10.20.1.10 > > Hop6: 10.20.1.9 > > Hop7: 10.20.0.22 > > Displayed 1 (of 1) heads, 0 (of 0) midpoints, 0 (of 1) tails > > Displayed 1 up, 0 down, 0 recovering, 0 recovered heads > > > > r22’s tunnel…. > > > > RP/0/0/CPU0:r22#sh mpl tr tun br > > Fri Sep 4 10:25:32.668 CST > > > > TUNNEL NAME DESTINATION STATUS STATE > > tunnel-te1 10.20.0.20 up up > > r20--->r22 10.20.0.22 up up > > Displayed 1 (of 1) heads, 0 (of 0) midpoints, 1 (of 1) tails > > Displayed 1 up, 0 down, 0 recovering, 0 recovered heads > > > RP/0/0/CPU0:r22#sh mpl tr tun name tunnel-te1 | be count > > Fri Sep 4 10:25:35.858 CST > > Node hop count: 4 > > Hop0: 10.20.1.10 > > Hop1: 10.20.1.13
RE: rsvp-te admission control - i don't see it
Thanks dip, let me know what you think. r20 is headend and r22 is tailend r20>r22 r22 is headed and r20 is tailend r22>r20 RP/0/0/CPU0:r20#sh run int tt1 Fri Sep 4 12:25:09.198 CST interface tunnel-te1 bandwidth 20 ipv4 unnumbered Loopback0 signalled-name r20--->r22 autoroute announce ! destination 10.20.0.22 path-option 10 dynamic RP/0/0/CPU0:r22#sh run int tt1 Fri Sep 4 11:50:01.581 CST interface tunnel-te1 bandwidth 20 ipv4 unnumbered Loopback0 signalled-name r22--->r20 autoroute announce ! destination 10.20.0.20 path-option 10 dynamic From: dip Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 11:15 AM To: Aaron Cc: Mark Tinka ; NANOG Subject: Re: rsvp-te admission control - i don't see it What's the signalled bandwidth being reserved by the headend "R20" in your example? it's a hunch that you may not have that defined and it becomes Zero bandwidth LSPs. On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 9:09 AM mailto:aar...@gvtc.com> > wrote: Thanks Mark, I have a tunnel traversing those interfaces. Customer routers (r10, r30) can ping end to end via tunnel. Not sure if I’m missing something here. I wonder if I’m not signaling for the rsvp bandwidth correctly. I just don’t see any allocated bandwidth in the rsvp interfaces anywhere. Here’s one of the transit routers… r24…. Should I see “allocated (bps)” here ? RP/0/0/CPU0:r24#sh rsvp int Fri Sep 4 10:54:16.451 CST *: RDM: Default I/F B/W % : 75% [default] (max resv/bc0), 0% [default] (bc1) Interface MaxBW (bps) MaxFlow (bps) Allocated (bps) MaxSub (bps) - - - GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0 750M* 750M 0 ( 0%) 0* GigabitEthernet0/0/0/1 750M* 750M 0 ( 0%) 0* Details…. LSP/TE-tunnel has dynamic path option, but I disallow it to flow via r21… so tunnel takes the southbound path via r20-24-r25-r23-r22 (2) unidirectional te-tunnels r20 is headend and r22 is tailend r20>r22 r22 is headed and r20 is tailend r22>r20 R10 R30 | | | | r20-r21-r22 | | | | | | r24-r25-r23 r20’s tunnel… RP/0/0/CPU0:r20#sh mpls traffic-eng tun br Fri Sep 4 10:59:51.509 CST TUNNEL NAME DESTINATION STATUS STATE tunnel-te1 10.20.0.22 up up r22--->r20 10.20.0.20 up up Displayed 1 (of 1) heads, 0 (of 0) midpoints, 1 (of 1) tails Displayed 1 up, 0 down, 0 recovering, 0 recovered heads RP/0/0/CPU0:r20#sh mpls traffic-eng tun name tunnel-te1 | be count Fri Sep 4 10:59:54.309 CST Node hop count: 4 Hop0: 10.20.1.21 Hop1: 10.20.1.18 Hop2: 10.20.1.17 Hop3: 10.20.1.14 Hop4: 10.20.1.13 Hop5: 10.20.1.10 Hop6: 10.20.1.9 Hop7: 10.20.0.22 Displayed 1 (of 1) heads, 0 (of 0) midpoints, 0 (of 1) tails Displayed 1 up, 0 down, 0 recovering, 0 recovered heads r22’s tunnel…. RP/0/0/CPU0:r22#sh mpl tr tun br Fri Sep 4 10:25:32.668 CST TUNNEL NAME DESTINATION STATUS STATE tunnel-te1 10.20.0.20 up up r20--->r22 10.20.0.22 up up Displayed 1 (of 1) heads, 0 (of 0) midpoints, 1 (of 1) tails Displayed 1 up, 0 down, 0 recovering, 0 recovered heads RP/0/0/CPU0:r22#sh mpl tr tun name tunnel-te1 | be count Fri Sep 4 10:25:35.858 CST Node hop count: 4 Hop0: 10.20.1.10 Hop1: 10.20.1.13 Hop2: 10.20.1.14 Hop3: 10.20.1.17 Hop4: 10.20.1.18 Hop5: 10.20.1.21 Hop6: 10.20.1.22 Hop7: 10.20.0.20 Displayed 1 (of 1) heads, 0 (of 0) midpoints, 0 (of 1) tails Displayed 1 up, 0 down, 0 recovering, 0 recovered heads X = router number 10.20.0.0/16 <http://10.20.0.0/16> 10.20.0.X/24 - loopbacks 10.20.1.0/24 <http://10.20.1.0/24> – /30’s between routers (numbered clockwise, lowest to highest, start at r20) (r20 is .1 , r21 is .2 , r21 is .5 , etc) 10.20.1.0/30 <http://10.20.1.0/30> – r20---r21 10.20.1.4/30 <http://10.20.1.4/30> – r21---r22 10.20.1.8/30 <http://10.20.1.8/30> – r22---r23 10.20.1.12/30 <http://10.20.1.12/30> – r23---r25 10.20.1.16/30 <http://10.20.1.16/30> – r25---r24 10.20.1.20/30 <http://10.20.1.20/30> – r24---r20 r10#sh ip int br | in up GigabitEthernet3 1.0.0.2 YES manual upup RP/0/0/CPU0:r30#sh ip int br | in Up GigabitEthernet0/0/0/2 1.1.1.2 Up Up default r10#trace 1.1.1.2
Re: rsvp-te admission control - i don't see it
> 2 10.20.1.21 [MPLS: Labels 24000/24010 Exp 0] 43 msec 50 msec 40 msec > > 3 10.20.1.17 [MPLS: Labels 19/24010 Exp 0] 49 msec 42 msec 41 msec > > 4 10.20.1.13 [MPLS: Labels 24001/24010 Exp 0] 42 msec 46 msec 46 msec > > 5 10.20.1.9 42 msec 38 msec 34 msec > > 6 1.1.1.2 55 msec * 44 msec > > > > RP/0/0/CPU0:r30#traceroute 1.0.0.2 > > Fri Sep 4 15:25:10.129 UTC > > > > Type escape sequence to abort. > > Tracing the route to 1.0.0.2 > > > > 1 1.1.1.1 29 msec 0 msec 0 msec > > 2 10.20.1.10 [MPLS: Labels 24000/24009 Exp 0] 49 msec 49 msec 49 msec > > 3 10.20.1.14 [MPLS: Labels 20/24009 Exp 0] 39 msec 49 msec 39 msec > > 4 10.20.1.18 [MPLS: Labels 24001/24009 Exp 0] 49 msec 39 msec 49 msec > > 5 10.20.1.22 49 msec 49 msec 39 msec > > 6 1.0.0.2 69 msec * 49 msec > > RP/0/0/CPU0:r30# > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* NANOG *On Behalf Of *Mark > Tinka > *Sent:* Thursday, September 3, 2020 10:58 PM > *To:* nanog@nanog.org > *Subject:* Re: rsvp-te admission control - i don't see it > > > > > > On 3/Sep/20 22:20, aar...@gvtc.com wrote: > > Thanks, how do I see the control plane reservation? I don’t seem to be > seeing anything getting allocated > > > > RP/0/0/CPU0:r20#sh rsvp interface g0/0/0/1 > > Thu Sep 3 15:15:55.825 CST > > > > *: RDM: Default I/F B/W % : 75% [default] (max resv/bc0), 0% [default] > (bc1) > > > > Interface MaxBW (bps) MaxFlow (bps) Allocated (bps) > MaxSub (bps) > > - - > - > > GigabitEthernet0/0/0/1 1M 1M 0 ( > 0%)0 > > > > RP/0/0/CPU0:r20#sh rsvp interface summary > > Thu Sep 3 15:16:57.131 CST > > > > Interface MaxBW (bps) Allocated (bps) Path In Path Out Resv In > Resv Out > > -- --- --- --- --- > > > Gi0/0/0/000 ( 0%) 10 > 01 > > Gi0/0/0/11000K0 ( 0%) 01 > 10 > > > You will only see allocations once you have TE tunnels (sessions) actually > setup. > > Without tunnels setup, but RSVP-TE enabled on the interfaces, all you will > see the maximum bandwidth that RSVP-TE can allocate across said interfaces. > > Remember that RSVP-TE is purely control plane. So it doesn't matter if you > signal an LSP with 10Mbps or 10Gbps. It will not determine whether a link > (or LSP) will actually pass 10Mbps or 10Gbps worth of traffic. It's just a > reference. > > Back when I used to RSVP-TE, I'd signal 10Gbps links as 10Mbps. That gave > me plenty of granularity to scale up without having an unwieldy > configuration. > > Mark. >
RE: rsvp-te admission control - i don't see it
Thanks Mark, I have a tunnel traversing those interfaces. Customer routers (r10, r30) can ping end to end via tunnel. Not sure if I’m missing something here. I wonder if I’m not signaling for the rsvp bandwidth correctly. I just don’t see any allocated bandwidth in the rsvp interfaces anywhere. Here’s one of the transit routers… r24…. Should I see “allocated (bps)” here ? RP/0/0/CPU0:r24#sh rsvp int Fri Sep 4 10:54:16.451 CST *: RDM: Default I/F B/W % : 75% [default] (max resv/bc0), 0% [default] (bc1) Interface MaxBW (bps) MaxFlow (bps) Allocated (bps) MaxSub (bps) - - - GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0 750M* 750M 0 ( 0%) 0* GigabitEthernet0/0/0/1 750M* 750M 0 ( 0%) 0* Details…. LSP/TE-tunnel has dynamic path option, but I disallow it to flow via r21… so tunnel takes the southbound path via r20-24-r25-r23-r22 (2) unidirectional te-tunnels r20 is headend and r22 is tailend r20>r22 r22 is headed and r20 is tailend r22>r20 R10 R30 | | | | r20-r21-r22 | | | | | | r24-r25-r23 r20’s tunnel… RP/0/0/CPU0:r20#sh mpls traffic-eng tun br Fri Sep 4 10:59:51.509 CST TUNNEL NAME DESTINATION STATUS STATE tunnel-te1 10.20.0.22 up up r22--->r20 10.20.0.20 up up Displayed 1 (of 1) heads, 0 (of 0) midpoints, 1 (of 1) tails Displayed 1 up, 0 down, 0 recovering, 0 recovered heads RP/0/0/CPU0:r20#sh mpls traffic-eng tun name tunnel-te1 | be count Fri Sep 4 10:59:54.309 CST Node hop count: 4 Hop0: 10.20.1.21 Hop1: 10.20.1.18 Hop2: 10.20.1.17 Hop3: 10.20.1.14 Hop4: 10.20.1.13 Hop5: 10.20.1.10 Hop6: 10.20.1.9 Hop7: 10.20.0.22 Displayed 1 (of 1) heads, 0 (of 0) midpoints, 0 (of 1) tails Displayed 1 up, 0 down, 0 recovering, 0 recovered heads r22’s tunnel…. RP/0/0/CPU0:r22#sh mpl tr tun br Fri Sep 4 10:25:32.668 CST TUNNEL NAME DESTINATION STATUS STATE tunnel-te1 10.20.0.20 up up r20--->r22 10.20.0.22 up up Displayed 1 (of 1) heads, 0 (of 0) midpoints, 1 (of 1) tails Displayed 1 up, 0 down, 0 recovering, 0 recovered heads RP/0/0/CPU0:r22#sh mpl tr tun name tunnel-te1 | be count Fri Sep 4 10:25:35.858 CST Node hop count: 4 Hop0: 10.20.1.10 Hop1: 10.20.1.13 Hop2: 10.20.1.14 Hop3: 10.20.1.17 Hop4: 10.20.1.18 Hop5: 10.20.1.21 Hop6: 10.20.1.22 Hop7: 10.20.0.20 Displayed 1 (of 1) heads, 0 (of 0) midpoints, 0 (of 1) tails Displayed 1 up, 0 down, 0 recovering, 0 recovered heads X = router number 10.20.0.0/16 10.20.0.X/24 - loopbacks 10.20.1.0/24 – /30’s between routers (numbered clockwise, lowest to highest, start at r20) (r20 is .1 , r21 is .2 , r21 is .5 , etc) 10.20.1.0/30 – r20---r21 10.20.1.4/30 – r21---r22 10.20.1.8/30 – r22---r23 10.20.1.12/30 – r23---r25 10.20.1.16/30 – r25---r24 10.20.1.20/30 – r24---r20 r10#sh ip int br | in up GigabitEthernet3 1.0.0.2 YES manual upup RP/0/0/CPU0:r30#sh ip int br | in Up GigabitEthernet0/0/0/2 1.1.1.2 Up Up default r10#trace 1.1.1.2 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 1.1.1.2 VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id) 1 1.0.0.1 23 msec 5 msec 7 msec 2 10.20.1.21 [MPLS: Labels 24000/24010 Exp 0] 43 msec 50 msec 40 msec 3 10.20.1.17 [MPLS: Labels 19/24010 Exp 0] 49 msec 42 msec 41 msec 4 10.20.1.13 [MPLS: Labels 24001/24010 Exp 0] 42 msec 46 msec 46 msec 5 10.20.1.9 42 msec 38 msec 34 msec 6 1.1.1.2 55 msec * 44 msec RP/0/0/CPU0:r30#traceroute 1.0.0.2 Fri Sep 4 15:25:10.129 UTC Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 1.0.0.2 1 1.1.1.1 29 msec 0 msec 0 msec 2 10.20.1.10 [MPLS: Labels 24000/24009 Exp 0] 49 msec 49 msec 49 msec 3 10.20.1.14 [MPLS: Labels 20/24009 Exp 0] 39 msec 49 msec 39 msec 4 10.20.1.18 [MPLS: Labels 24001/24009 Exp 0] 49 msec 39 msec 49 msec 5 10.20.1.22 49 msec 49 msec 39 msec 6 1.0.0.2 69 msec * 49 msec RP/0/0/CPU0:r30# From: NANOG On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2020 10:58 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: rsvp-te admission control - i don't see it On 3/Sep/20 22:20, aar...@gvtc.com <mailto:aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: Thanks, how do I see the control plane reservation? I don’t seem to be seeing
Re: rsvp-te admission control - i don't see it
On 3/Sep/20 22:20, aar...@gvtc.com wrote: > Thanks, how do I see the control plane reservation? I don’t seem to > be seeing anything getting allocated > > > > RP/0/0/CPU0:r20#sh rsvp interface g0/0/0/1 > > Thu Sep 3 15:15:55.825 CST > > > > *: RDM: Default I/F B/W % : 75% [default] (max resv/bc0), 0% [default] > (bc1) > > > > Interface MaxBW (bps) MaxFlow (bps) Allocated > (bps) MaxSub (bps) > > - - > - > > GigabitEthernet0/0/0/1 1M 1M 0 ( > 0%) 0 > > > > RP/0/0/CPU0:r20#sh rsvp interface summary > > Thu Sep 3 15:16:57.131 CST > > > > Interface MaxBW (bps) Allocated (bps) Path In Path Out Resv > In Resv Out > > -- --- --- --- > --- > > Gi0/0/0/0 0 0 ( 0%) 1 0 > 0 1 > > Gi0/0/0/1 1000K 0 ( 0%) 0 1 > 1 0 > You will only see allocations once you have TE tunnels (sessions) actually setup. Without tunnels setup, but RSVP-TE enabled on the interfaces, all you will see the maximum bandwidth that RSVP-TE can allocate across said interfaces. Remember that RSVP-TE is purely control plane. So it doesn't matter if you signal an LSP with 10Mbps or 10Gbps. It will not determine whether a link (or LSP) will actually pass 10Mbps or 10Gbps worth of traffic. It's just a reference. Back when I used to RSVP-TE, I'd signal 10Gbps links as 10Mbps. That gave me plenty of granularity to scale up without having an unwieldy configuration. Mark.
RE: rsvp-te admission control - i don't see it
Thanks, how do I see the control plane reservation? I don’t seem to be seeing anything getting allocated RP/0/0/CPU0:r20#sh rsvp interface g0/0/0/1 Thu Sep 3 15:15:55.825 CST *: RDM: Default I/F B/W % : 75% [default] (max resv/bc0), 0% [default] (bc1) Interface MaxBW (bps) MaxFlow (bps) Allocated (bps) MaxSub (bps) - - - GigabitEthernet0/0/0/1 1M 1M 0 ( 0%) 0 RP/0/0/CPU0:r20#sh rsvp interface summary Thu Sep 3 15:16:57.131 CST Interface MaxBW (bps) Allocated (bps) Path In Path Out Resv In Resv Out -- --- --- --- --- Gi0/0/0/000 ( 0%) 10 01 Gi0/0/0/11000K0 ( 0%) 01 10 -Aaron From: Łukasz Bromirski Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2020 2:45 PM To: aar...@gvtc.com Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: rsvp-te admission control - i don't see it Aaron, On 3 Sep 2020, at 20:05, aar...@gvtc.com <mailto:aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: I have a functional mpls-te test running, seems fine…but, question about bandwidth reservations please. At the Headend router, I set bandwidth on my mpls-te tunnel, but I can’t for the life of me, find where in the network is this bandwidth actually being admitted, or seen, or allocated or anything! I mean I look on rsvp interfaces, I look in wireshark at the tspec field of the path message, I look in the mpls te tunnels along the way, etc, etc, I can’t find where the network sees that bandwidth I’m asking for at the tunnel Head end. I’m not sure if I understand you, but RSVP only does control plane reservation. Then, once you have a tunnel to establish with specific bandwidth required, RSVP-TE will do CSPF based on link coloring, bandwidth available over interfaces and priority of tunnel to decide how to establish it. If the tunnel is setup over interface, bandwidth assigned to tunnel is taken out from bandwidth available on that interface. But this is purely control plane reservation. Nothing will be enforced in data plane. To enforce those values, you need to apply QoS policies to interfaces over which you expert to serve MPLS TE tunnels. — ./
Re: rsvp-te admission control - i don't see it
Aaron, > On 3 Sep 2020, at 20:05, aar...@gvtc.com wrote: > > I have a functional mpls-te test running, seems fine…but, question about > bandwidth reservations please. > > At the Headend router, I set bandwidth on my mpls-te tunnel, but I can’t for > the life of me, find where in the network is this bandwidth actually being > admitted, or seen, or allocated or anything! > > I mean I look on rsvp interfaces, I look in wireshark at the tspec field of > the path message, I look in the mpls te tunnels along the way, etc, etc, I > can’t find where the network sees that bandwidth I’m asking for at the tunnel > Head end. I’m not sure if I understand you, but RSVP only does control plane reservation. Then, once you have a tunnel to establish with specific bandwidth required, RSVP-TE will do CSPF based on link coloring, bandwidth available over interfaces and priority of tunnel to decide how to establish it. If the tunnel is setup over interface, bandwidth assigned to tunnel is taken out from bandwidth available on that interface. But this is purely control plane reservation. Nothing will be enforced in data plane. To enforce those values, you need to apply QoS policies to interfaces over which you expert to serve MPLS TE tunnels. — ./
rsvp-te admission control - i don't see it
I have a functional mpls-te test running, seems fine.but, question about bandwidth reservations please. At the Headend router, I set bandwidth on my mpls-te tunnel, but I can't for the life of me, find where in the network is this bandwidth actually being admitted, or seen, or allocated or anything! I mean I look on rsvp interfaces, I look in wireshark at the tspec field of the path message, I look in the mpls te tunnels along the way, etc, etc, I can't find where the network sees that bandwidth I'm asking for at the tunnel Head end. Using IOS-XR in EVE-NG for testing. XR 6.3.1 I'll give you other details if you want them. Aaron aar...@gvtc.com
