Re: [Nanog-futures] MLC transparency issues
On Apr 7, 2009, at 8:12 PM, Gadi Evron wrote: Is it possible to form a basic policy to preface thread moderation? Example would be: 1. Email mailing list on the thread, asking for people to respond only if there is an operational content they wish to share, or refrain from doing so. 2. Moderate thread (with a waiting period between step #1 and step #2?) and email the list on the thread mentioning it was moderated. Then, if anyone has any issues with a specific case, they can discuss it on nanog-futures. Your example is similar to what the MLC has discussed internally. Once worked out we'll bounce it off nanog-futures. Until there is a policy in place, we're open to hearing ideas on nanog- futures about moderation. Kris MLC Chair ___ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
Re: [Nanog-futures] MLC transparency issues
kris foster wrote: Hi everyone I am going to preface this by saying that the MLC appreciates that transparency is of the most importance to the community, and that we have not lived up to this as completely as we should have. We have recently been experimenting with thread moderation. The first thread to be moderated was the Cogent haiku thread which I mentioned during the NANOG 45 community meeting. For trivially off topic threads nothing was missed. So the community can see exactly what we have applied moderation to, the following is a complete list of regular expressions used: Thank you for your response. I appreciate the MLC taking this so seriously. I also appreciate that the job of a nanog admin is volunteer based, and thank-less. Question: Is it possible to form a basic policy to preface thread moderation? Example would be: 1. Email mailing list on the thread, asking for people to respond only if there is an operational content they wish to share, or refrain from doing so. 2. Moderate thread (with a waiting period between step #1 and step #2?) and email the list on the thread mentioning it was moderated. Then, if anyone has any issues with a specific case, they can discuss it on nanog-futures. Thoughts? Gadi. ___ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
