Re: [nant-dev] SLiNgshoT request
Ah, good point. I'll try that today and see if it meets my needs. Not sure if there is a nantcontrib list or not. I signed up for one, but haven't gotten any mail from it since I signed up. And it appears that SF is going through some issues with their mail archives, as sometimes I can get to them, but often it just errors. Thx D Quoting Jason Diamond [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You're more than welcome to add both of these features if you think you'll need them. I, personally, have no problem redirecting the output to a file. And by outputting to stdout you can always pipe that into some other tool. For your transform idea, you can pipe the output into MSXSL.exe or any other XSLT processor that can read the source document from stdin. This is the most flexible solution to me because it gives you a chance to pass custom parameters to your XSLT processor including the kind that can then get passed into your stylesheet. But don't let my opinion stop you from implementing something you need. Is there a nantcontrib list? Maybe I goofed, too. Jason - Original Message - From: Dave Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 2:25 PM Subject: [nant-dev] SLiNgshoT request (not going to quote my previous email, since it was so long, but the long and the short of it is that I got it sort of working right now.) However, I see what you mean about the SLN files not being XML. Go figure - I just assumed they were since everything ELSE is XML. Ah well. But, an idea (or if it already exists in SLiNgshoT, let me know) would be for an optional -style param to be passed into slingshot that specifies an XSL file to run slingshot's output against. This would give folks the ability to quickly tweak some things, or adjust paths, etc, after Slingshot does the bulk of the work. Would be easy enough to do, just style the output before it leaves. Speaking of which, it'd be nice too to have an -output flag too. Instead of piping it to a text file. Or is that by design? Both would be easy enough to add I think - and I could probably throw them in there if I'm not way off base with other plans. Also, I just realized, but should this message be going to nantcontrib list instead? Sorry if I goofed. thx D --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers -- SteelSphere.com - Meandering Through the Information Age --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
[nant-dev] Next release
Are you any closer to releasing a new version 'proper'? The 0.7.9 release is dated 11-jun-2002 - nearly 8 months ago. Is there anything in particular that is holding the release up? Anything that I could lend a hand to? Cheers -MG --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
RE: [nant-dev] Next release
I am willing to pitch in as well. I would like to get a new release of Nant and NAntContrib so that when they are downloaded, both will build properly without hand-holding. Regards, Jay Turpin Intel Corporation The only difference between a problem and a solution is that people understand the solution. - Charles Kettering -Original Message- From: Mark Griffiths [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [nant-dev] Next release Are you any closer to releasing a new version 'proper'? The 0.7.9 release is dated 11-jun-2002 - nearly 8 months ago. Is there anything in particular that is holding the release up? Anything that I could lend a hand to? Cheers -MG --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Next release
Docs, Docs, Docs... Okay, here is what I see. The code is very stable. 1.) I've got to make some quick changes so that we don't force the 1.0 framework, but that is pretty small. 2.) ChangeLog (We need to build this by hand from the cvs changes. This is not a very attractive option, but I don't know of another way). If anyone knows how to get a list of changes from cvs since the last release (by tag or date) please let me know. Right now the I can do it, but it is about 90% duplicate text and very hard to read. 3.) Readme and installation docs. There have been a lot of changes since the last release. I want users to see that and not flood the list with questions we can answer upfront. :) 4.) The website, userdocs, and references; these can wait as we are still a pre-1.0 release. We have a MSI task in NAntContrib that I want to use, but for now we will continue to distribute as a Zip file. Maybe after we release NAntContrib we can do a combined MSI distributions with tools and all. - Original Message - From: Mark Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 8:15 AM Subject: [nant-dev] Next release Are you any closer to releasing a new version 'proper'? The 0.7.9 release is dated 11-jun-2002 - nearly 8 months ago. Is there anything in particular that is holding the release up? Anything that I could lend a hand to? Cheers -MG --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
[nant-dev] RE: [nunit-developer] Nunit 2.0 and Nant
Patrice, I don't know if this has been fixed in the latest build (I haven't looked at the issue), but I had to actually copy my library to the NAnt\bin directory (as an NAnt copy task) and then run the NUnit2 Tasks to make this work. Obviously this is not an optimal solution, but it's a workaround. HTH, Aaron Message: 4 -Original Message- From: Patrice Calv=E9 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [nunit-developer] Nunit 2.0 and Nant Hi everyone,=20 I'm new to Nunit and would like information on a particular point.=20 I have a tester.dll. =20 It works through the Nunit 2.0 GUI. =20 It works from the console.=20 It doesn't work with Nant. This must be a simple path/setting issue. = Here's the error:=20 INTERNAL ERROR=20 System.IO.FileLoadException: Unable to load file 'nunit.framework'=20 File name: nunit.framework=20 In Nant, the nunit is called this way:=20 nunit2=20 test assemblyname=3DHelloWorldCSLib_Tester.dll = outfile=3Dresults.xml/=20 /nunit2=20 --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Next release
What can we do as a community to ensure that this doesn't happen again? I would say the best solution is for people to jump on board and volunteer one of the tasks Scott outlined... I think part of the problem is that it seems Scott is the only one of the project admins that has been around for the past few weeks (months?) devoting any real time to nant, and he's the one in the best position to do anything (and probably the only one with permisions to actually do the final release). Personally, I'm a little busy now, so that's why I've only contributed marginally lately, but if I can do anything to speed up the process, let me know. Also, consider that last time the topic came up, I said the NUnit2 support stuff was a showstopper, and I've since fixed it (what could be fixed without changing NUnit itself). -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
[nant-dev] Changes...
Ian, I've included the diff -u at the end of this message (finally). Can you
review and commit this or give me access to the project? I would like to see
this in the next release. My sourceforge username is asansone.
Thanks,
-Aaron
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 11:43:46 +1100
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Sansone, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Nant-Developers (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Updates to ResGenTask.cs...
Aaron,
Can you please re-send this as a diff ? cvs diff -u. Its easier to
review and apply in that format.
Ian
All,
I made some changes to the ResGenTask.cs file that I would like reviewed and
committed. I was having difficulty using this and having the task create my
resource files with the appropriate namespace and in the correct todir. For
example:
resgen output=AMS.${project.client.assembly.name}.Controls.
todir=${project.basedir}\${build.dir}\resources compile=true
resources
includes
name=${project.basedir}\${project.controls.assembly.name}\**\*.resx /
/resources
/resgen
I needed the generated resource file from MyControl.resx to have the namespace
and created as: AMS.Client.Controls.MyControl.resource
I also needed to place the output in a build/resources directory (i.e. todir)
which was not happening.
If someone gives me developer access I can commit these changes...
--- ResGenTask.cs Fri Jan 17 19:59:06 2003
+++ .\Original\ResGenTask.csWed Feb 05 20:37:01 2003
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
/// /code
/// /example
[TaskName(resgen)]
-public class ResGenTask : ExternalProgramBase {
+public class ResGenTask : MsftFXSDKExternalProgramBase {
string _arguments;
string _input = null;
@@ -57,16 +57,7 @@
/// summaryName of the resource file to output./summary
[TaskAttribute(output, Required=false)]
-public string Output {
- get {
- if( _output == null ) {
- return ;
- } else {
- return _output;
- }
- }
- set {_output = value;}
- }
+public string Output { get { return _output; } set {_output = value;} }
/// summaryThe target type ( usually resources)./summary
[TaskAttribute(target, Required=false)]
@@ -74,20 +65,11 @@
/// summaryThe directory to which outputs will be stored./summary
[TaskAttribute(todir, Required=false)]
-public string ToDirectory {
- get {
- if( _toDir == null ) {
- return BaseDirectory;
- } else {
- return _toDir;
- }
- }
- set {_toDir = value;}
- }
+public string ToDirectory { get { return _toDir; } set {_toDir =
value;} }
/// summaryTakes a list of .resX or .txt files to convert to
.resources files./summary
[FileSet(resources)]
- public FileSet Resources { get { return _resources; } set {
_resources = value; } }
+public FileSet Resources { get { return _resources; } set { _resources
= value; } }
public override string ProgramFileName { get { return Name; } }
@@ -125,8 +107,7 @@
_arguments = ;
if (Resources.FileNames.Count 0) {
foreach ( string filename in Resources.FileNames ) {
- string outputFile =
getOutputFile(filename);
-
+string outputFile = Path.ChangeExtension( filename,
TargetExt );
if (NeedsCompiling (filename, outputFile)) {
if (_arguments.Length == 0) {
AppendArgument (/compile);
@@ -134,13 +115,23 @@
AppendArgument (String.Format( \{0},{1}\, filename,
outputFile));
}
}
+
} else {
// Single file situation
if (Input == null)
throw new BuildException(Resource generator needs either
an input attribute, or a non-empty fileset., Location);
string inputFile = Path.GetFullPath(Path.Combine
(BaseDirectory, Input));
- string outputFile = getOutputFile(inputFile);
+string outputFile;
+
+if (Output != null) {
+if (ToDirectory == null)
+ToDirectory = BaseDirectory;
+
+outputFile = Path.GetFullPath(
+Path.Combine (ToDirectory,
[nant-dev] Changes to DeleteTask...
All,
I've made a change to the DeleteTask that I would like to have
reviewed/committed if you all agree with the change.
This issue I ran into was forcing a delete even if the file is read only. I
added a parameter force that will allow this. I also added code that would
recurse a directory and force the deletion of a directory even if some of the
files in the directory are read only.
Let me know what you all think of this.
Thanks,
Aaron
--- DeleteTask.cs Fri Jan 17 23:56:22 2003
+++ .\Original\DeleteTask.csWed Feb 05 20:36:33 2003
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
using System;
using System.IO;
-using System.Collections;
+
using SourceForge.NAnt.Attributes;
namespace SourceForge.NAnt.Tasks {
@@ -51,8 +51,7 @@
public class DeleteTask : Task {
string _file = null;
-string _dir = null;
- bool _force = false;
+string _dir = null;
FileSet _fileset = new FileSet();
/// summaryThe file to delete./summary
@@ -61,15 +60,6 @@
get { return _file; }
set {_file = value; }
}
-
- /// summaryDelete files even if read only./summary
- [TaskAttribute(force)]
- [BooleanValidator()]
- public bool ForceDelete
- {
- get { return _force; }
- set {_force = value; }
- }
/// summaryThe directory to delete./summary
[TaskAttribute(dir)]
@@ -130,14 +120,7 @@
}
Log.WriteLine(LogPrefix + Deleting directory {0}, path);
- if( ForceDelete )
- {
- foreach(string file in
getRecursiveFileList(path) )
- {
- File.SetAttributes(file,
FileAttributes.Normal);
- }
- }
- Directory.Delete(path, true);
+Directory.Delete(path, true);
} else {
throw new DirectoryNotFoundException();
}
@@ -149,33 +132,10 @@
}
}
- private ArrayList getRecursiveFileList(string path)
- {
- ArrayList files = new ArrayList();
-
- string[] dirs = Directory.GetDirectories(path);
-
- foreach (string dir in dirs)
- {
- files.AddRange( getRecursiveFileList(dir) );
- }
-
- if( ! path.Equals(.) )
- {
- files.AddRange(Directory.GetFiles(path));
- }
-
- return files;
- }
-
void DeleteFile(string path, bool verbose) {
try {
if (File.Exists(path)) {
Log.WriteLineIf(verbose, LogPrefix + Deleting file {0},
path);
- if( ForceDelete )
- {
- File.SetAttributes(path,
FileAttributes.Normal);
- }
File.Delete(path);
} else {
throw new FileNotFoundException();
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Next release
Kevin, you are correct, the only way to get this going is to have people work on it. Assigning people tasks is a great way, but sometimes a little challenging for projects of this nature. I'm a little hesitant to do as everyone here is a limited volunteer. I was hoping that with a nightly build server it is much easier to see what a release build would look like. Basically the nightly builds (run if there are changes for the day) should reflect what we would put out for a release. That way we can just check stuff in to cvs and everyone can look at the same results. I think we have gone through this nsis/msi discussion before. I'd lean towards a MSI installer rather than a nsis installer. We now have a MSI installer task in NAntContrib that seems to do all we need. I'd much rather see a nant installer using that tech. Please see this post for a summary of what was done. http://www.mail-archive.com/nantcontrib-developer@lists.sourceforge.net/msg0 0034.html (I also have some private email with more details if you are interested) In the NAntContrib project there is a build target that generates this. It creates an install for NAnt, NAntContrib and the extra tools. It is very cool, and should do what we need, and more. (BTW. Thanks Jayme, your contributions are much appreciated) HTHs, Scott - Original Message - From: Miller, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Griffin Caprio [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Scott Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mark Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jeffrey McManus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:39 PM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Next release What can we do as a community to ensure that this doesn't happen again? I would say the best solution is for people to jump on board and volunteer one of the tasks Scott outlined... 1. Looks like Scott volunteered himself. 2. If someone feels excited about this one 3. If I may it would be good for someone to crawl the list archive and extract a FAQ. 4. Agreed but isn't Jeffrey working on this? 5. Bundle task - I will volunteer to make a NSIS - http://www.nullsoft.com/free/nsis/ - step in the build process. I have done this already for my local nant build. Scott Wrote: 1.) I've got to make some quick changes so that we don't force the 1.0 framework, but that is pretty small. 2.) ChangeLog (We need to build this by hand from the cvs changes. This is not a very attractive option, but I don't know of another way). If anyone knows how to get a list of changes from cvs since the last release (by tag or date) please let me know. Right now the I can do it, but it is about 90% duplicate text and very hard to read. 3.) Readme and installation docs. There have been a lot of changes since the last release. I want users to see that and not flood the list with questions we can answer upfront. :) 4.) The website, userdocs, and references; these can wait as we are still a pre-1.0 release. We have a MSI task in NAntContrib that I want to use, but for now we will continue to distribute as a Zip file. Maybe after we release NAntContrib we can do a combined MSI distributions with tools and all. --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
[nant-dev] 1st run through the nightly build
Here are the results from my dry run using the latest nightly build. Docs: index.html Still refers to the .net framework as a 'release candidate' links.html Could to with a link to Draco.NET ;) changelog.html Might be easier in the long run to ditch this, and switch to auto generated change logs from CVS? todo.html Remove the 0.8 section Examples: Cannot cleanly run examples.build file in examples root dir. Get the following output: -- C:\Working\nant-20030201\examplesnant Buildfile: file:///C:/Working/nant-20030201/examples/examples.build build: [echo] Building NAnt examples... [nant] HelloWorld\default.build Buildfile: file:///C:/Working/nant-20030201/examples/HelloWorld/default.build build: [csc] Compiling 0 files to C:\Working\nant-20030201\examples\HelloWorld-cs.exe BUILD FAILED C:\Working\nant-20030201\examples\HelloWorld\default.build(16,4): External Program Failed: C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.0.3705\csc.exe return 1 Output: fatal error CS2008: No inputs specified BUILD FAILED -- I tried removing the basedir=. and but then the HelloWorld example failed when trying to run the generated exes. I think that the exec task must not be honouring the project base dir? I'm also getting errors running the HelloWindowsForms and UserTask samples, but will have run out of time tonight to investigate. I'll spend some time on them tomorrow. -MG --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] 1st run through the nightly build
Doc changes updated. As for the examples, we have a problem with the VB.Net HelloWindowsForms example. We should remove that one till we get it working. We should also include some more, non-trivial, examples. Maybe something with multiple build files. Anyone have any samples they would be willing to see ship with NAnt? I will update the UserTask example to not use the TaskDef task. Instead the user will need to copy the task to the nant.core.dll path. - Original Message - From: Mark Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:07 PM Subject: [nant-dev] 1st run through the nightly build Here are the results from my dry run using the latest nightly build. Docs: index.html Still refers to the .net framework as a 'release candidate' links.html Could to with a link to Draco.NET ;) changelog.html Might be easier in the long run to ditch this, and switch to auto generated change logs from CVS? todo.html Remove the 0.8 section Examples: Cannot cleanly run examples.build file in examples root dir. Get the following output: -- C:\Working\nant-20030201\examplesnant Buildfile: file:///C:/Working/nant-20030201/examples/examples.build build: [echo] Building NAnt examples... [nant] HelloWorld\default.build Buildfile: file:///C:/Working/nant-20030201/examples/HelloWorld/default.build build: [csc] Compiling 0 files to C:\Working\nant-20030201\examples\HelloWorld-cs.exe BUILD FAILED C:\Working\nant-20030201\examples\HelloWorld\default.build(16,4): External Program Failed: C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.0.3705\csc.exe return 1 Output: fatal error CS2008: No inputs specified BUILD FAILED -- I tried removing the basedir=. and but then the HelloWorld example failed when trying to run the generated exes. I think that the exec task must not be honouring the project base dir? I'm also getting errors running the HelloWindowsForms and UserTask samples, but will have run out of time tonight to investigate. I'll spend some time on them tomorrow. -MG --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
RE: [nant-dev] Next release
I was really calling for volunteers in areas of expertise and volunteering myself to set an example. Of course I took one of the easy/optional tasks as I am lazy. I am cool with the MSI Task. I will take a look at learning how it works. Of course this is not a gate to a release. Kevin -Original Message- From: Scott Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:52 PM To: Miller, Kevin; Griffin Caprio; Mark Griffiths; Jeffrey McManus Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Next release Kevin, you are correct, the only way to get this going is to have people work on it. Assigning people tasks is a great way, but sometimes a little challenging for projects of this nature. I'm a little hesitant to do as everyone here is a limited volunteer. I was hoping that with a nightly build server it is much easier to see what a release build would look like. Basically the nightly builds (run if there are changes for the day) should reflect what we would put out for a release. That way we can just check stuff in to cvs and everyone can look at the same results. I think we have gone through this nsis/msi discussion before. I'd lean towards a MSI installer rather than a nsis installer. We now have a MSI installer task in NAntContrib that seems to do all we need. I'd much rather see a nant installer using that tech. Please see this post for a summary of what was done. http://www.mail-archive.com/nantcontrib-developer@lists.sourceforge.net/msg0 0034.html (I also have some private email with more details if you are interested) In the NAntContrib project there is a build target that generates this. It creates an install for NAnt, NAntContrib and the extra tools. It is very cool, and should do what we need, and more. (BTW. Thanks Jayme, your contributions are much appreciated) HTHs, Scott - Original Message - From: Miller, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Griffin Caprio [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Scott Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mark Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jeffrey McManus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:39 PM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Next release What can we do as a community to ensure that this doesn't happen again? I would say the best solution is for people to jump on board and volunteer one of the tasks Scott outlined... 1. Looks like Scott volunteered himself. 2. If someone feels excited about this one 3. If I may it would be good for someone to crawl the list archive and extract a FAQ. 4. Agreed but isn't Jeffrey working on this? 5. Bundle task - I will volunteer to make a NSIS - http://www.nullsoft.com/free/nsis/ - step in the build process. I have done this already for my local nant build. Scott Wrote: 1.) I've got to make some quick changes so that we don't force the 1.0 framework, but that is pretty small. 2.) ChangeLog (We need to build this by hand from the cvs changes. This is not a very attractive option, but I don't know of another way). If anyone knows how to get a list of changes from cvs since the last release (by tag or date) please let me know. Right now the I can do it, but it is about 90% duplicate text and very hard to read. 3.) Readme and installation docs. There have been a lot of changes since the last release. I want users to see that and not flood the list with questions we can answer upfront. :) 4.) The website, userdocs, and references; these can wait as we are still a pre-1.0 release. We have a MSI task in NAntContrib that I want to use, but for now we will continue to distribute as a Zip file. Maybe after we release NAntContrib we can do a combined MSI distributions with tools and all. --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
[nant-dev] Norton Systemworks Clearance Sale!
nant-developers, Protect Your Computer From Unwanted And Hazardous Viruses!! Norton SystemWorks 2003 Software Suite (Promo-ROR835) ALL FIVE - Feature-Packed Utilities For Only $39.99 ! - Norton AntiVirus 2003 ! - Norton Ghost 2003 ! - GoBack 3 Personal Edition ! - Norton Utilities 2003 ! - Norton CleanSweep 2003 Only $39.99! (Shipping is included!) Order Yours Today! http://antivirussite.com/nsw38.htm?ANTIvirus=YXRKQI If you do not wish to receive further mailings, please visit the link below. We honor all removal requests. Submit your request at: http://antivirussite.com/goodbye.html?id=wnagm71 1450Wgrr0-755ZWIh5831MOfu7-924gdHi4654cKsM7-876GFYg5666fpoP8-936yWdu4l65N¬HSDMéX¬²'²Þu¼¢êÜxZ+á'µêé®+ Øþ .)îÅj+Ô¨ëax6I硶Úÿ 0½«(~Üç(Ö§µ×¯zZ)z»j)b b²ÓZ×^½éh¥êì+-²Ê.Ç¢¸ ëa¶Úlÿùb²Û,¢êÜyú+éÞ·ùb²Û?+-wèþv§µ×¯zZ)z»
RE: [nant-dev] Next release - and Nunit2
About the next release - I'm all for releasing what we have right now. Also, consider that last time the topic came up, I said the NUnit2 support stuff was a showstopper, and I've since fixed it (what could be fixed without changing NUnit itself). I agree nunit2 is not a showstopper - but as I have said before I do not think the Nunit2 task works as it should, since it will report failure on test assemblies the nuint2 testunner can run without any failures (current directory issue). I have working examples of this. Tomas - it it something you want me to work with, or do you disagree with the intention that the Nunit2 task should test assemblies the same way the Nunit2 Testrunner does - or ... And again - this is not a tangent that should prevent anyone from doing a release ... :-) Enjoy, Michael Arnoldus -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
