Re: [neonixie-l] Re: IC Sockets

2023-02-18 Thread gregebert
Dont use IC sockets; they are not necessary.

If the circuit is properly designed, meaning that all IC datasheet 
parameters are met, you should never see an IC fail. I've built many nixie 
clocks, all of which I designed, and I've never had an IC fail on it's own. 
The first failure I've had was a few weeks ago, caused by ESD (my fault) on 
a Raspberry Pi, so technically not one of my designs.

IC's are actually easy to remove without damaging the PCB, though you will 
likely destroy the IC in the process. For thru-hole IC, flow fresh solder 
into each pin, and while it's still molten, use a vacuum desoldering tool 
like the Edsyn Soldapullt (see below). I've been using mine for ~40 years 
now, and it still works great. Once the pin is sucked-out, wiggle it with 
the soldering iron and it should be free. Once all pins are cleared, you 
should be able to gently wiggle the IC out with your fingers. If not, snip 
the stuck pins off the IC with fine clippers, then use tweezers to remove 
the pin while heating it. After all pins are clear, mop-up with some solder 
wick, then clean with 90% isopropyl alcohol. PCB should be just-like-new.

SMT parts need careful heating with a hot-air reflow tool, and you should 
be able to gently lift it with tweezers, though some pins will get bent and 
most likely the IC has been thermally overstressed, so toss it away. 
Clean-up is same as above.

Lastly, I never breadboard a design. PCBs are easy and cheap to have 
fabbed, and have far superior quality. If you mangle a board with 
debugging, build another. But if you do proper simulation beforehand 
designing the PCB, you wont need to do any debugging.

https://www.edsyn.com/product/DS017.html


On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 4:48:33 PM UTC-8 Charles MacDonald wrote:

> > something in a high vibration environment like a vehicle will give you 
> > more problems. Corrosion is another 'issue'.. but if it's that bad you 
> > should be coating your boards anyway.
>
> back in the 70s I delt with Apple ][ Computers that used socket-ed DIP 
> ICs problems Noted:
>
> bad contact - corrosion.
> loose IC due to vibration.
> they went for Premium AMP brand sockets to get better retention and some 
> of the ICs left the factory with one or more the pins bent under. this 
> worked at first, BUT made for Flaky INTERMITTENT contacts.
>
> Also the socket will have more capacitance then just a plain PC Board, 
> which might round off your signal edges. I think we even had one board 
> where the larger area of the contacts caused a solder bridge, and 
> pulling the socket was more difficult than just pulling an IC would have 
> been.
>
> -- 
> Charles MacDonald VA3CPY Stittsville Ontario
> cm...@zeusprune.ca Just Beyond the Fringe
> No Microsoft Products were used in sending this e-mail.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/a9ef20f3-25c5-4f7b-870b-b49e6389a280n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [neonixie-l] Re: IC Sockets

2023-02-18 Thread Charles MacDonald
something in a high vibration environment like a vehicle will give you 
more problems. Corrosion is another 'issue'.. but if it's that bad you 
should be coating your boards anyway.


back in the 70s I delt with Apple ][ Computers that  used socket-ed DIP 
ICs  problems Noted:


bad contact - corrosion.
loose IC due to vibration.
they went for Premium AMP brand sockets to get better retention and some 
of the ICs left the factory with one or more the pins bent under.  this 
worked at first, BUT made for Flaky INTERMITTENT contacts.


Also the socket will have more capacitance then just a plain PC Board, 
which might round off your signal edges.  I think we even had one board 
where the larger area of the contacts caused a solder bridge, and 
pulling the socket was more difficult than just pulling an IC would have 
been.


--
Charles MacDonald  VA3CPY   Stittsville Ontario
cm...@zeusprune.ca  Just Beyond the Fringe
No Microsoft Products were used in sending this e-mail.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/db32f8fc-fb0e-28e4-533a-79c74bb97b05%40zeusprune.ca.


[neonixie-l] Re: IC Sockets

2023-02-18 Thread Moses
Jim,

I agree with Mac, one downside to sockets is some tend to come loose. It is 
mechanical retention after all, and at times with questionable quality 
sockets. Not usually a problem with stationary electronics, something in a 
high vibration environment like a vehicle will give you more problems. 
Corrosion is another 'issue'.. but if it's that bad you should be coating 
your boards anyway. Vintage stuff tends to be problematic at times, ICs 
that have been sitting in a socket for 40 years may not be making the best 
contact.

Most low frequency signals, KHz, a few MHz for example, should be fine with 
a socket. Sensitive feedback circuits, for example on a DC-DC switching IC, 
I would not put in a socket.

I usually use sockets on a prototype where I think I may need to swap 
parts, or the likelihood of destroying an IC during testing is high. 
Otherwise modern stuff is so reliable these days, if it's a production PCB 
or part that I know I'm not going to mess with, I won't use a socket. 
Modern integrated circuits, if used within their design limits, will last 
decades.

I've been doing this for a while, and some stuff is just difficult to 
desolder without damage, that's how you learn PCB trace repair! :)

Regards,
-Moses

On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 3:26:06 PM UTC-8 Jim KO5V wrote:

> I've built many electronics projects over the years, and most of them have 
> actually worked. However, I am an ME, so my actual knowledge of electronics 
> is a bit spotty, and most of my ham radio experience is not with TTL level 
> stuff.
>
> I would like to use IC sockets on my current clock project, but this 
> design does not call for using them everywhere. I've had to unsolder a few 
> ICs in the past, and the PC boards have almost always suffered, sometimes 
> requiring some really ugly repairs.
>
> So, is there a reason other than saving a few parts for not using the IC 
> sockets - like added paths for noise, or??
>
> Thanks in advance. I hope this isn't too stupid a question!  Jim
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/fb1baff9-1bfb-43b2-8d94-db0ad4c95cf7n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [neonixie-l] IC Sockets

2023-02-18 Thread Mac Doktor

> On Feb 18, 2023, at 6:26 PM, Jim KO5V  wrote:
> 
> So, is there a reason other than saving a few parts for not using the IC 
> sockets - like added paths for noise, or??

If you're going to use sockets you want reliable retention. Chips can work 
loose over time especially with lots of thermal cycling. Double-wipe sockets 
are the best if you want something to be as disaster-proof as possible. I've 
never used anything else.

Machined collect sockets have weaker retention but are desirable if you're 
going to be swapping ICs in and out during the development phase or installing 
updates in the field. In the old days this would have been something like an 
EPROM with firmware on it.


Terry Bowman, KA4HJH
"The Mac Doctor"

https://www.astarcloseup.com

Q: Should car stereo speakers be pointed to the rear for more thrust or up for 
more traction?

A. On long trips, the 20- to 30% improvement in gas mileage you might get with 
speakers pointing to the rear is certainly worthwhile. On the other hand, if 
you drive on snow or ice, the extra traction of speakers pointing upward gives 
you added control.

Don Lancaster

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/E1E92CE6-EDDE-4181-B146-94BFBEE41902%40gmail.com.


[neonixie-l] IC Sockets

2023-02-18 Thread Jim KO5V
I've built many electronics projects over the years, and most of them have 
actually worked. However, I am an ME, so my actual knowledge of electronics 
is a bit spotty, and most of my ham radio experience is not with TTL level 
stuff.

I would like to use IC sockets on my current clock project, but this design 
does not call for using them everywhere. I've had to unsolder a few ICs in 
the past, and the PC boards have almost always suffered, sometimes 
requiring some really ugly repairs.

So, is there a reason other than saving a few parts for not using the IC 
sockets - like added paths for noise, or??

Thanks in advance. I hope this isn't too stupid a question!  Jim

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/b9045894-00b1-4a00-907c-c83ac02af702n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [neonixie-l] New Nixie Tubes?

2023-02-18 Thread Yohan Park
$120 each and they look like IN-18 tubes.
I'd rather pay $9 more on a huge Millclock ZIN-70 tube.

On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 1:32:47 PM UTC+1 Dekatron42 wrote:

> Now, there's a proper Nixie tube with a proper socket, I love it!
>
> Now I just hope that they will work just as well as Dalibor's and come 
> with an identical, or better, warranty and sold cheap! :)
>
> /Martin
>
> On Saturday, 18 February 2023 at 02:40:39 UTC+1 Mac Doktor wrote:
>
>> On Feb 17, 2023, at 6:15 PM, Audrey  wrote:
>>
>> https://youtu.be/pv01SKiYJz4
>>
>> https://twitter.com/LCLR29380401/status/1623875027685834753
>>
>> https://twitter.com/SaduduH/status/1568858119891197952
>>
>>
>>
>> Excellent choice of avatar.
>>
>>
>> Terry Bowman, KA4HJH
>> "The Mac Doctor"
>>
>> https://www.astarcloseup.com
>>
>> "If only you could see what I've seen with your eyes."—Roy Batty, *Blade 
>> Runner*
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/4d20bc72-6d1c-43d2-aaa8-b1e3365bb978n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [neonixie-l] New Nixie Tubes?

2023-02-18 Thread Dekatron42
Now, there's a proper Nixie tube with a proper socket, I love it!

Now I just hope that they will work just as well as Dalibor's and come with 
an identical, or better, warranty and sold cheap! :)

/Martin

On Saturday, 18 February 2023 at 02:40:39 UTC+1 Mac Doktor wrote:

> On Feb 17, 2023, at 6:15 PM, Audrey  wrote:
>
> https://youtu.be/pv01SKiYJz4
>
> https://twitter.com/LCLR29380401/status/1623875027685834753
>
> https://twitter.com/SaduduH/status/1568858119891197952
>
>
>
> Excellent choice of avatar.
>
>
> Terry Bowman, KA4HJH
> "The Mac Doctor"
>
> https://www.astarcloseup.com
>
> "If only you could see what I've seen with your eyes."—Roy Batty, *Blade 
> Runner*
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/ffbfbfab-78b3-4eb7-af6b-fb769ce5d2e1n%40googlegroups.com.