Reg ::: Net-snmp Package for Red Hat Linux release 8.0 (Psyche)

2008-06-24 Thread Sandeep Kanamala
Hi Team 

We require net-snmp package for the version of Linux 

# uname -a

Linux   2.4.18-14 #1 Wed Sep 4 13:35:50 EDT 2002 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

and Redhat release ::: Red Hat Linux release 8.0 (Psyche)


Can you please provide us the snmp package of version 5.4.

And also Documentation Please.



Computer Sciences Corporation India Private Limited
Registered Office: Electronics Complex, Software Technology Park, Indore, 
Madhya Pradesh, India
Registered in India No: 10-11210

-
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in 
delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to 
any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement 
or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such 
purpose.
-
image/gif-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders


Re: Reg ::: Net-snmp Package for Red Hat Linux release 8.0 (Psyche)

2008-06-24 Thread Dave Shield
2008/6/24 Sandeep Kanamala [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 We require net-snmp package for the version of Linux
:
 Can you please provide us the snmp package of version 5.4.

We provide the source tarball.
If you need a working setup for a particular O/S distribution,
then we suggest you compile it for yourself.

There is a 'net-snmp.spec' file in the dist/ directory,
so you can construct your own RPMs.


 And also Documentation Please.

See the 'man' directory, the top-level READMEs,
and the project website - www.net-snmp.org

Dave

-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders


Re: questions about ./configure and dlmod

2008-06-24 Thread Tewen Hsieh
Hi,

I have tried hard to find the reason why reduce agent size will make memory 
allocate fail. But I am too new to net-snmp. Is there anyone has ever met 
the same problem?


Thanks,

永鈦鑫   iTAS Corporation
新竹科學園區工業東三路6號
NO. 6, Industry E. Rd. III, Science Park, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan 300, R.O.C.
Tel:03-6662595 Ext.1208
E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - 
From: Magnus Fromreide [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tewen Hsieh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: questions about ./configure and dlmod


 On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 14:14 +0800, Tewen Hsieh wrote:
 Hi,

 Thanks for reply.

 I have checked that my module was loaded.

 I find that my handle_xxx function return SNMP_ERR_GENERR because of
 allocating share memory fail. My handle_xxx function must allocate share
 memory first to store return value from the API.
 So I guess that my configure options lose memory related module.

 Given that you have identified a likely error, how about that you try to
 follow up on that lead? Once that is done you can get back if the error
 persists.

 FYI: Net-SNMP doesn't use any shared memory anywhere.

 /MF

 Following is my output of net-snmp-config --snmpd-module-list:

 /home net-snmp-config --snmpd-module-list
 mibII/snmp_mib mibII/sysORTable mibII/vacm_vars utilities/execute
 ucd-snmp/dlmod snmpv3/snmpEngine snmpv3/snmpMPDStats snmpv3/usmStats
 snmpv3/usmUser util_funcs mibII


 And my configur options is as following:

 /home net-snmp-config --configure-options
 '--disable-debugging' '--enable-mini-agent' '--with-transports=UDP'
 '--with-mib-modules=ucd-snmp/dlmod'
 '--with-out-mib-modules=mibII/system_mib' '--prefix=/not/usr/'
 '--with-install-prefix=/tmp'


 I don't know what option should be included in my configure phase. Which
 option should be included to build in memory related module?


 Thanks,









 永鈦鑫   iTAS Corporation
 新竹科學園區工業東三路6號
 NO. 6, Industry E. Rd. III, Science Park, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan 300, R.O.C.
 Tel:03-6662595 Ext.1208
 E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 - Original Message - 
 From: Magnus Fromreide [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Tewen Hsieh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
 Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:11 PM
 Subject: Re: questions about ./configure and dlmod


  On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 11:35 +0800, Tewen Hsieh wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I have two questions:
 
  Question 1:
 
  If I use following command in ./configure phase, evreythins works
  fine.
  ./configure --prefix=/not/usr/ --with-install-prefix=/tmp
 
  But if I use following command in ./configure phase, scalars of
  myself's dynamic loadable module will response with GENERIC
  ERROR (In mib browser, it also shows error index: 0.).
  ./configure --disable-debugging --enable-mini-agent
  --with-transports=UDP --with-mib-modules=ucd-snmp/dlmod
  --with-out-mib-modules=mibII/system_mib --prefix=/not/usr/
  --with-install-prefix=/tmp
 
  I really have no idea about this condition. Could anyone give me a
  hint to check out what's the problem? Thanks.
 
  No.
 
  You haven't provided sufficient data to make it possible to answer your
  question.
 
  A first guess would be that the variable you are trying to set doesn't
  exist.
 
  What action did you perform?
  What did you expect to happen?
  What did happen?
 
  and finally, since you have been ranting about dlmod before,
 
  Is your module loaded?
 
  Question 2:
 
  If I use following command in ./configure phase, default
  mibII/system_mib should also be included in agent.
  ./configure --prefix=/not/usr/ --with-install-prefix=/tmp
 
  But I implement a new mibII/system_mib module by myself and dynamic
  load it, the agent still works fine.
  When I send a system get request(ex: get sysDescr.0), it will response
  with the correct answer from my new mibII/system_mib module.
  There seems no conflict.  Could anyone tell me why? Why there is no
  conflict? Why duplicate registrations have no bad effect? Thanks.
 
  I'd guess that you, out of sheer luck, register your module with longer
  names than the original module and thus your module get higher 
  priority.
  Note that this is dependant on the net-snmp version you are using.
  You can check this in nsModuleTable.
 
  /MF
 
 
 
  -- 
  This message has been scanned for viruses and
  dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
  believed to be clean.
 


 -
 Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
 It's the best place to buy or sell services for
 just about anything Open Source.
 http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
 ___ Net-snmp-coders mailing 
 list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net 
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders


 -- 
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
 believed to be clean.
 


-- 
This message has been scanned for