Re: Problem using IP_RECVDSTADDR on HPUX.

2013-11-21 Thread Niels Baggesen
Den 19-11-2013 11:03, Jean-Paul VILLETTE skrev:

 The tarballs don't seem to be online. Problems ?

Sorry 'bout that :-(

A filesystem had filled up, but they should be back now

/Niels

-- 
Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - n...@users.sourceforge.net
The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers   ---   R W Hamming

--
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing 
conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders


Re: Show SNMPv3 users

2013-11-21 Thread Mike Krauss
I second this request. I am trying to configure V3 users and its a
real pain. Perhaps this type of function would be nice.

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:32 AM, sarath azad saraths...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
 Hello,

 Could you please tell, in a program, what is the best method to show all the
 SNMPv3 users configured?

 Is it a good, to write a function to read the snmpd.conf file to show all
 the configured SNMPv3 users?
 Or is there any other API to get the list of SNMPv3 users configured?

 Thanks and regards
 S Sarath

 --
 Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
 Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
 Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing
 conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now.
 http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
 ___
 Net-snmp-coders mailing list
 Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders


--
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing 
conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders


Re: net-snmp fails to create entries with a zero in the OID in SnmpTargetParamsEntry

2013-11-21 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 10/16/13 10:31, zhuyj wrote:
 If this patch is used in net-snmp-5.7.2, the following should be used,
 too. If not, snmp-trap could not work well.

Hello Zhu,

Please make yourself familiar with git and start from the V5-7-patches
or master branch when preparing patches. The patch that was attached to
your e-mail doesn't apply on the V5-7-branch:

$ git checkout V5-7-patches
Switched to branch 'V5-7-patches'
Your branch is behind 'origin/V5-7-patches' by 2 commits, and can be
fast-forwarded.
  (use git pull to update your local branch)
$ git rebase origin/V5-7-patches
First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
Fast-forwarded V5-7-patches to origin/V5-7-patches.
$ git apply -p1 ~/net-snmp-5.7.2-fix-param-length.patch
error: patch failed: agent/mibgroup/notification/snmpNotifyTable.c:338
error: agent/mibgroup/notification/snmpNotifyTable.c: patch does not apply

Bart.


--
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing 
conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders


Re: net-snmp fails to create entries with a zero in the OID in SnmpTargetParamsEntry

2013-11-21 Thread zhuyj

On 11/18/2013 07:08 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:

On 11/18/13 11:48, zhuyj wrote:

On 09/10/2013 01:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:

On 09/10/13 04:04, zhuyj wrote:

Please help me to merge this patch into trunk. Thanks a lot.

Hello Zhu,

The code in snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr() and
store_snmpTargetAddrEntry() assumes that targetAddTable_struct.params
is an ASCII string that does *not* contain an ASCII '\0' nor any ASCII
control characters nor any whitespace. I'm afraid that your patch
would break the code for saving and restoring the target address.


If I fixed these problems with snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr() and
store_snmpTargetAddrEntry(). Would you like to merge these patches into
the trunk?

Sorry but I can't promise anything if I haven't seen the patch first.

Bart.


Hi, Bart

I made a patch based on net-snmp-5.7.2. Maybe it can fix the problem 
that you mentioned. Would you like to comment on this patch?

This patch and the above 3 patches can support snmpTarget mib well.
Now the patch is in the attachment. Please check it.
If you have any advice , please let me know. I will follow your advice 
to make this series patches better.
In the end, please merge this series patches to trunk to support zero 
OID in snmpTarget mib.


Thanks a lot.
Zhu Yanjun


diff -urpN ./5.7.2/net-snmp-5.7.2/agent/mibgroup/target/snmpTargetAddrEntry.c ./net-snmp-5.7.2/agent/mibgroup/target/snmpTargetAddrEntry.c
--- ./5.7.2/net-snmp-5.7.2/agent/mibgroup/target/snmpTargetAddrEntry.c
+++ ./net-snmp-5.7.2/agent/mibgroup/target/snmpTargetAddrEntry.c
@@ -612,17 +612,33 @@ snmpTargetAddr_addRowStatus(struct targe
 void
 snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr(const char *token, char *char_ptr)
 {
-char   *cptr = char_ptr, buff[1024];
+char   *cptr = char_ptr, buff[1024], tmp[1024], temp[1024];
 struct targetAddrTable_struct *newEntry;
 int i, j, buff_len;
+size_t  bufl;
 
 newEntry = snmpTargetAddrTable_create();
+cptr = skip_white_const(cptr);
+if (cptr == NULL) {
+DEBUGMSGTL((snmpTargetAddrEntry,
+ERROR snmpTargetAddrEntry: no name in config string\n));
+snmpTargetAddrTable_dispose(newEntry);
+return;
+}
 
-cptr = copy_nword(cptr, buff, sizeof(buff));
-if (snmpTargetAddr_addName(newEntry, buff) == 0) {
+bufl = 0;
+cptr = read_config_read_octet_string_const(cptr,
+   (u_char**)newEntry-nameData,
+   bufl);
+if (bufl  1 || bufl  32) {
+DEBUGMSGTL((snmpTargetAddrEntry,
+ERROR snmpTargetAddrEntry: name out of range in config 
+string\n));
 snmpTargetAddrTable_dispose(newEntry);
 return;
 }
+newEntry-nameLen = bufl;
+
 cptr = copy_nword(cptr, buff, sizeof(buff));
 if (snmpTargetAddr_addTDomain(newEntry, buff) == 0) {
 snmpTargetAddrTable_dispose(newEntry);
@@ -653,11 +669,18 @@ snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr(const char
 snmpTargetAddrTable_dispose(newEntry);
 return;
 }
-cptr = copy_nword(cptr, buff, sizeof(buff));
-if (snmpTargetAddr_addParams(newEntry, buff) == 0) {
+cptr =
+read_config_read_octet_string_const(cptr,
+  (u_char **) newEntry-params,
+  bufl);
+if (bufl  1 || bufl  32) {
+DEBUGMSGTL((snmpTargetAddrEntry,
+ERROR snmpTargetAddrEntry: params out of range in config string\n));
 snmpTargetAddrTable_dispose(newEntry);
 return;
 }
+newEntry-paramsLen = bufl;
+
 cptr = copy_nword(cptr, buff, sizeof(buff));
 if (snmpTargetAddr_addStorageType(newEntry, buff) == 0) {
 snmpTargetAddrTable_dispose(newEntry);
@@ -668,8 +691,8 @@ snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr(const char
 snmpTargetAddrTable_dispose(newEntry);
 return;
 }
-//snprintf(buff, sizeof(buff), snmp_parse_config_targetAddr, read: %s\n,
-//newEntry-nameData);
+snprintf(buff, sizeof(buff), snmp_parse_config_targetAddr, read: %s\n,
+newEntry-nameData);
 memset(buff, 0, sizeof(buff));
 snprintf(buff, sizeof(buff), snmp_parse_config_targetAddr, read: );
 buff_len = strlen(buff);
@@ -681,18 +704,19 @@ snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr(const char
 
 buff[ sizeof(buff)-1 ] = 0;
 for (i = 0; i  newEntry-tDomainLen; i++) {
-//snprintf(buff[strlen(buff)], sizeof(buff)-strlen(buff)-1,
-// .%d, (int) newEntry-tDomain[i]);
-char tmp[1024]={0};
-snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), .%d, (int) newEntry-tDomain[i]);
-strncpy(buff[buff_len], tmp, strlen(tmp));
-buff_len += strlen(tmp);
+snprintf(buff[strlen(buff)], sizeof(buff)-strlen(buff)-1,
+ .%d, (int) newEntry-tDomain[i]);
 buff[ sizeof(buff)-1 ] = 0;
 }
+
+memset(tmp, 0, sizeof(tmp));
+

Re: Show SNMPv3 users

2013-11-21 Thread sarath azad
Hi Giuseppe,

Thanks for the reply.
For getting the user details from a remote system, we may do SNMPWALK on this 
OID. 

But if on the same device where snmp agent is running (where we are doing the 
SNMPv3 configuration), if we want to get the user details, do we need to do 
snmpwalk on localhost for this OID or is there any other method also.

Currently I am doing the SNMPv3 configuration using snmpd.conf file and so 
thinking to implement the show user details functions by reading the 
snmpd.conf file. But is it the correct method which will work in all cases, or 
is there any other better methods.

thanks and regards
S Sarath 


On Thursday, November 21, 2013 3:08 PM, giuseppe de vito giusepp...@gmail.com 
wrote:
 
Hello,
SNMPv3 users are stored in the usmUserTable (OID=.1.3.6.1.6.3.15.1.2.2).
This table has the following entries

usmUserTable
  +usmUserEntry(1)
    +-usmUserEngineID(1)
    +-usmUserName (2)
    +-usmUserSecurityName (3)
    +- . (see 
http://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php/TUT:SNMPv3_Options for details

You are looking for the usmUserSecurityName and, for a complete list of such 
items, you can walk the usmUserTable over
the same field; for example you can execute

snmpwalk .1.3.6.1.6.3.15.1.2.2.1.3

to obtain all configured users in the usmUserTable.

I hope this will help.




2013/11/21 sarath azad saraths...@yahoo.co.in

Hello,


Could you please tell, in a program, what is the best method to show all the 
SNMPv3 users configured?


Is it a good, to write a function to read the snmpd.conf file to show all the 
configured SNMPv3 users?
Or is there any other API to get the list of SNMPv3 users configured?


Thanks and regards
S Sarath
--
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing
conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Net-snmp-users mailing list
net-snmp-us...@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

--
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing 
conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders


Re: net-snmp fails to create entries with a zero in the OID in SnmpTargetParamsEntry

2013-11-21 Thread zhuyj

On 11/21/2013 10:41 PM, zhuyj wrote:

On 11/18/2013 07:08 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:

On 11/18/13 11:48, zhuyj wrote:

On 09/10/2013 01:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:

On 09/10/13 04:04, zhuyj wrote:

Please help me to merge this patch into trunk. Thanks a lot.

Hello Zhu,

The code in snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr() and
store_snmpTargetAddrEntry() assumes that targetAddTable_struct.params
is an ASCII string that does *not* contain an ASCII '\0' nor any ASCII
control characters nor any whitespace. I'm afraid that your patch
would break the code for saving and restoring the target address.


If I fixed these problems with snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr() and
store_snmpTargetAddrEntry(). Would you like to merge these patches into
the trunk?

Sorry but I can't promise anything if I haven't seen the patch first.

Bart.


Hi, Bart

I made a patch based on net-snmp-5.7.2. Maybe it can fix the problem 
that you mentioned. Would you like to comment on this patch?

This patch and the above 3 patches can support snmpTarget mib well.
Now the patch is in the attachment. Please check it.
If you have any advice , please let me know. I will follow your advice 
to make this series patches better.
In the end, please merge this series patches to trunk to support zero 
OID in snmpTarget mib.


Thanks a lot.
Zhu Yanjun


Hi, Bart

There is something wrong in the last patch. Now I made a new patch. 
Please comment on this patch.


Thanks a lot.
Zhu Yanjun

diff -urpN ./5.7.2/net-snmp-5.7.2/agent/mibgroup/target/snmpTargetAddrEntry.c ./net-snmp-5.7.2/agent/mibgroup/target/snmpTargetAddrEntry.c
--- ./5.7.2/net-snmp-5.7.2/agent/mibgroup/target/snmpTargetAddrEntry.c	2013-11-21 18:47:43.031554976 +0800
+++ ./net-snmp-5.7.2/agent/mibgroup/target/snmpTargetAddrEntry.c	2013-11-21 22:52:56.540101065 +0800
@@ -612,17 +612,33 @@ snmpTargetAddr_addRowStatus(struct targe
 void
 snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr(const char *token, char *char_ptr)
 {
-char   *cptr = char_ptr, buff[1024];
+char   *cptr = char_ptr, buff[1024], tmp[1024], temp[1024];
 struct targetAddrTable_struct *newEntry;
 int i, j, buff_len;
+size_t  bufl;
 
 newEntry = snmpTargetAddrTable_create();
+cptr = skip_white_const(cptr);
+if (cptr == NULL) {
+DEBUGMSGTL((snmpTargetAddrEntry,
+ERROR snmpTargetAddrEntry: no name in config string\n));
+snmpTargetAddrTable_dispose(newEntry);
+return;
+}
 
-cptr = copy_nword(cptr, buff, sizeof(buff));
-if (snmpTargetAddr_addName(newEntry, buff) == 0) {
+bufl = 0;
+cptr = read_config_read_octet_string_const(cptr,
+   (u_char**)newEntry-nameData,
+   bufl);
+if (bufl  1 || bufl  32) {
+DEBUGMSGTL((snmpTargetAddrEntry,
+ERROR snmpTargetAddrEntry: name out of range in config 
+string\n));
 snmpTargetAddrTable_dispose(newEntry);
 return;
 }
+newEntry-nameLen = bufl;
+
 cptr = copy_nword(cptr, buff, sizeof(buff));
 if (snmpTargetAddr_addTDomain(newEntry, buff) == 0) {
 snmpTargetAddrTable_dispose(newEntry);
@@ -653,11 +669,18 @@ snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr(const char
 snmpTargetAddrTable_dispose(newEntry);
 return;
 }
-cptr = copy_nword(cptr, buff, sizeof(buff));
-if (snmpTargetAddr_addParams(newEntry, buff) == 0) {
+cptr =
+read_config_read_octet_string_const(cptr,
+  (u_char **) newEntry-params,
+  bufl);
+if (bufl  1 || bufl  32) {
+DEBUGMSGTL((snmpTargetAddrEntry,
+ERROR snmpTargetAddrEntry: params out of range in config string\n));
 snmpTargetAddrTable_dispose(newEntry);
 return;
 }
+newEntry-paramsLen = bufl;
+
 cptr = copy_nword(cptr, buff, sizeof(buff));
 if (snmpTargetAddr_addStorageType(newEntry, buff) == 0) {
 snmpTargetAddrTable_dispose(newEntry);
@@ -668,31 +691,24 @@ snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr(const char
 snmpTargetAddrTable_dispose(newEntry);
 return;
 }
-//snprintf(buff, sizeof(buff), snmp_parse_config_targetAddr, read: %s\n,
-//newEntry-nameData);
-memset(buff, 0, sizeof(buff));
-snprintf(buff, sizeof(buff), snmp_parse_config_targetAddr, read: );
-buff_len = strlen(buff);
-for (j=0; jnewEntry-nameLen; j++){
-buff[buff_len+j] = newEntry-nameData[j];
-}
-buff_len += newEntry-nameLen;
-buff[buff_len++] = '\n';
-
+memset(tmp, 0, sizeof(tmp));
+read_config_save_octet_string(tmp, newEntry-nameData, newEntry-nameLen);
+snprintf(buff, sizeof(buff), snmp_parse_config_targetAddr, read: %s\n, tmp);
 buff[ sizeof(buff)-1 ] = 0;
 for (i = 0; i  newEntry-tDomainLen; i++) {
-//snprintf(buff[strlen(buff)], sizeof(buff)-strlen(buff)-1,
-// 

Re: net-snmp fails to create entries with a zero in the OID in SnmpTargetParamsEntry

2013-11-21 Thread zhuyj
On 11/22/2013 02:45 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
 On 10/16/13 10:31, zhuyj wrote:
 If this patch is used in net-snmp-5.7.2, the following should be used,
 too. If not, snmp-trap could not work well.
 Hello Zhu,

 Please make yourself familiar with git and start from the V5-7-patches
 or master branch when preparing patches. The patch that was attached to
 your e-mail doesn't apply on the V5-7-branch:

 $ git checkout V5-7-patches
 Switched to branch 'V5-7-patches'
 Your branch is behind 'origin/V5-7-patches' by 2 commits, and can be
 fast-forwarded.
(use git pull to update your local branch)
 $ git rebase origin/V5-7-patches
 First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
 Fast-forwarded V5-7-patches to origin/V5-7-patches.
 $ git apply -p1 ~/net-snmp-5.7.2-fix-param-length.patch
 error: patch failed: agent/mibgroup/notification/snmpNotifyTable.c:338
 error: agent/mibgroup/notification/snmpNotifyTable.c: patch does not apply

 Bart.


Hi, Bart

Sorry. I prepared these patches based on net-snmp-5.7.2 release. I will 
prepare these patches based on V5-7-branch.

Best Regards!
Zhu Yanjun

--
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing 
conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders


Re: net-snmp fails to create entries with a zero in the OID in SnmpTargetParamsEntry

2013-11-21 Thread zhuyj

On 11/22/2013 10:54 AM, zhuyj wrote:

On 11/22/2013 02:45 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:

On 10/16/13 10:31, zhuyj wrote:

If this patch is used in net-snmp-5.7.2, the following should be used,
too. If not, snmp-trap could not work well.

Hello Zhu,

Please make yourself familiar with git and start from the V5-7-patches
or master branch when preparing patches. The patch that was attached to
your e-mail doesn't apply on the V5-7-branch:

$ git checkout V5-7-patches
Switched to branch 'V5-7-patches'
Your branch is behind 'origin/V5-7-patches' by 2 commits, and can be
fast-forwarded.
   (use git pull to update your local branch)
$ git rebase origin/V5-7-patches
First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
Fast-forwarded V5-7-patches to origin/V5-7-patches.
$ git apply -p1 ~/net-snmp-5.7.2-fix-param-length.patch
error: patch failed: agent/mibgroup/notification/snmpNotifyTable.c:338
error: agent/mibgroup/notification/snmpNotifyTable.c: patch does not 
apply


Bart.



Hi, Bart

Sorry. I prepared these patches based on net-snmp-5.7.2 release. I 
will prepare these patches based on V5-7-branch.


Best Regards!
Zhu Yanjun


Hi, Bart

I prepared 3 patches based on V5-7-branch.
I made tests following these steps. It can apply well.

1.git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/net-snmp/code

2.git checkout V5-7-patches

3.git pull

4.patch -p1  V5-7-patches-snmpTargetParam_support_zero_OID.patch
   patch -p1  V5-7-patches-fix-param-length.patch
   patch -p1  V5-7-patches-conf-support.patch

5../configure --enable-developer --disable-embeded-perl

6.sudo make  sudo make install

The three patches are in the attachment. Please make tests.

If any problem, please let me know.

Best Regards!
Zhu Yanjun
diff --git a/agent/mibgroup/target/snmpTargetAddrEntry.c b/agent/mibgroup/target/snmpTargetAddrEntry.c
index f2cb2ab..b3b2340 100644
--- a/agent/mibgroup/target/snmpTargetAddrEntry.c
+++ b/agent/mibgroup/target/snmpTargetAddrEntry.c
@@ -483,32 +483,6 @@ snmpTargetAddr_addTagList(struct targetAddrTable_struct *entry, char *cptr)
 return (1);
 }   /* snmpTargetAddr_addTagList */
 
-
-int
-snmpTargetAddr_addParams(struct targetAddrTable_struct *entry, char *cptr)
-{
-size_t  len;
-if (cptr == NULL) {
-DEBUGMSGTL((snmpTargetAddrEntry,
-ERROR snmpTargetAddrEntry: no params in config string\n));
-return (0);
-} else {
-len = strlen(cptr);
-/*
- * spec check for string 1-32 
- */
-if (len  1 || len  32) {
-DEBUGMSGTL((snmpTargetAddrEntry,
-ERROR snmpTargetAddrEntry: params out of range in config string\n));
-return (0);
-}
-entry-params = strdup(cptr);
-entry-paramsLen = len;
-}
-return (1);
-}   /* snmpTargetAddr_addParams */
-
-
 int
 snmpTargetAddr_addStorageType(struct targetAddrTable_struct *entry,
   char *cptr)
@@ -583,7 +557,7 @@ void
 snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr(const char *token, char *char_ptr)
 {
 const char *cptr = char_ptr;
-charbuff[1024], *bptr;
+charbuff[1024], *bptr, tmp[1024], temp[1024];
 struct targetAddrTable_struct *newEntry;
 int i;
 size_t  bufl;
@@ -641,11 +615,17 @@ snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr(const char *token, char *char_ptr)
 snmpTargetAddrTable_dispose(newEntry);
 return;
 }
-cptr = copy_nword_const(cptr, buff, sizeof(buff));
-if (snmpTargetAddr_addParams(newEntry, buff) == 0) {
-snmpTargetAddrTable_dispose(newEntry);
-return;
-}
+cptr =
+read_config_read_octet_string_const(cptr,
+  (u_char **) newEntry-params,
+  bufl);
+if (bufl  1 || bufl  32) {
+DEBUGMSGTL((snmpTargetAddrEntry,
+ERROR snmpTargetAddrEntry: params out of range in config string\n));
+ snmpTargetAddrTable_dispose(newEntry);
+ return;
+ }
+newEntry-paramsLen = bufl;
 cptr = copy_nword_const(cptr, buff, sizeof(buff));
 if (snmpTargetAddr_addStorageType(newEntry, buff) == 0) {
 snmpTargetAddrTable_dispose(newEntry);
@@ -665,11 +645,15 @@ snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr(const char *token, char *char_ptr)
 bptr += snprintf(bptr, buff + sizeof(buff) - bptr,
  .%d, (int) newEntry-tDomain[i]);
 }
+memset(tmp, 0, sizeof(tmp));
+memset(temp, 0, sizeof(temp));
+read_config_save_octet_string(tmp, newEntry-tAddress, newEntry-tAddressLen);
+read_config_save_octet_string(temp, newEntry-params, newEntry-paramsLen);
 bptr += snprintf(bptr, buff + sizeof(buff) - bptr,
   %s %d %d %s %s %d %d\n,
- newEntry-tAddress, newEntry-timeout,
+ tmp, newEntry-timeout,
  newEntry-retryCount,