Re: hrprocessorload-returns-incorrect-values-for-processor-s-100

2014-01-27 Thread Niels Baggesen 
Den 13-01-2014 08:25, Jianhai Luan skrev:
 Hi Niels,
The patch is being verified in customer's environment, and the
 customer don't update the issue until now. So sorry for more time to
 wait the result.

As this seems OK for a one or two digit cpu numbers, I have applied it 
to the active branches, and conside this problem closed.

/Nies

-- 
Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - n...@users.sourceforge.net
The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers   ---   R W Hamming

--
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments  Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

hrprocessorload-returns-incorrect-values-for-processor-s-100

2014-01-09 Thread Jianhai Luan 

Hi all,
  I am working the issue such as *SNMP HRPROCESSORLOAD RETURNS 
INCORRECT VALUES FOR PROCESSOR #'S  100 *. I google to find useful 
information, and find the below URL:

http://mailing.unix.net-snmp-users.narkive.com/o21D50GY/hrprocessorload-returns-incorrect-values-for-processor-s-100
  My question is why do the patch  not be merged into latest version? 
and if do the patch have other effect?


Thanks,
Jason
--
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments  Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Re: hrprocessorload-returns-incorrect-values-for-processor-s-100

2014-01-09 Thread Niels Baggesen 

Den 06-01-2014 08:35, Jianhai Luan skrev:

Hi all,
   I am working the issue such as *SNMP HRPROCESSORLOAD RETURNS
INCORRECT VALUES FOR PROCESSOR #'S  100 *. I google to find useful
information, and find the below URL:
http://mailing.unix.net-snmp-users.narkive.com/o21D50GY/hrprocessorload-returns-incorrect-values-for-processor-s-100
   My question is why do the patch  not be merged into latest version?
and if do the patch have other effect?


I am not following net-snmp-users, so I cannot tell what happened to it, 
but if you could verify the attached patch I will make sure it gets into 
5.7.3


/Niels

--
Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - n...@users.sourceforge.net
The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers   ---   R W Hamming
diff --git a/agent/mibgroup/hardware/cpu/cpu_linux.c b/agent/mibgroup/hardware/cpu/cpu_linux.c
index 8a081cd..b1dc308 100644
--- a/agent/mibgroup/hardware/cpu/cpu_linux.c
+++ b/agent/mibgroup/hardware/cpu/cpu_linux.c
@@ -154,7 +154,9 @@ int netsnmp_cpu_arch_load( netsnmp_cache *cache, void *magic ) {
 snmp_log_perror(Missing CPU info entry);
 break;
 }
-b1 = b2+5; /* Skip cpuN  */
+b1 = b2; /* Skip cpuN  */
+while(*b1 != ' ') b1++;
+b1++;
 }
 
 num_cpuline_elem = sscanf(b1, %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu,
--
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments  Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders