[NetBehaviour] What I've learned from the working on the Precedents.txt

2021-07-04 Thread Alan Sondheim




What I've learned from the working on the Precedents.txt

http://www.alansondheim.org/osfish.jpg

1. In the sense of producing a coherent body of work suitable
for gallery exhibitions, I'm not an artist. My work is always
exploratory.

2. My work tends to be physically small and proof-of-concept
rather than 'finished.'

3. It rarely comes in series, but more in accumulations.

4. It's difficult to display.

5. I tend to give my gallery displays away at the end of a show
instead of attempting sales (which would never occur). I've never
had a dealer.

6. I'm more interested in theory, ideas, the world as it is, a
kind of fundamental thinking that problematizes itself, rather
than production.

7. Mind and body are paramount in the work, and both may draw any
theoretically purified aesthetics down into the muck.

9. My work is usually thought and experiment. It's never
"done." It's always philosophical one way or another. It tends
towards a mistaken idea of the ultimate and another mistaken idea
of the grounds.

10. I always approach the world with a sense of wonder, thinking
through debris, desire, structure, immersive and/or definable
structures.

11. I think obsessively about everything and see simultaneity in
everything.

12. Somehow my work has generally but not entirely avoided
critical assessments, articles, discussions, publications,
reviews, recognitions, financing, and descriptions in various
art, electronic literature, music, etc. histories, and
interviews.

13. I have learned more from my students than they have from me.

14. I am too critical, tormented with self-doubt, self-hatred,
and obsession, I'm too much a "difficult person" which I trace
back increasingly to an upbringing that was somewhat harrowing
psychologically.

15. My art "objects" are all trivial in a sense, although the
thought behind them is not.

16. I've never learned anything in depth. I've never been able to
learn anything in depth. I've never mastered anything.

17. I should stop doing assessments like this.


__

___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


Re: [NetBehaviour] brief unlurking

2021-07-04 Thread lucille c via NetBehaviour
re)))
.
l



Le dim. 4 juil. 2021 ร  23:51, abram stern via NetBehaviour <
netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org> a รฉcrit :

> ๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿป
>
> thanks everyone for your contributions here and elsewhere
>
> *relurks*
>
> -a
> ___
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
> https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


[NetBehaviour] brief unlurking

2021-07-04 Thread abram stern via NetBehaviour
๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿป

thanks everyone for your contributions here and elsewhere

*relurks*

-a
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


[NetBehaviour] Netbehaviour list renewal 4/4

2021-07-04 Thread Ruth Catlow via NetBehaviour
Thanks to everyone who already responded to this topic (about 69-ish so far
- including 2 unsubscribed) <3  <3  <3

For those that missed the discussion...

*We are proposing a Netbehaviour renewal process:*

Over a 1 month period starting 14th June 2021

We are inviting all subscribers to do one of 3 things:
1. Make a post on any topic or responding to anyone else's post
2. Send an email with "Happy Lurker"* in the subject header (to the list or
privately to me - if you prefer to remain incognito).**
3. Do nothing.

At the end of this time, moderators will
1. gather a list of everyone who posted
2. update subscribers on a proposal to unsubscribe everyone who hasn't
posted and
3. unsubscribe everyone who we haven't heard from/ or do something else.

In this way, we get to know new people a little, and are better able to see
ourselves collectively.

* It would be embarrassing if this suggested wording were to be taken as a
literal requirement. Feel free to indicate in any way you like that you
would like to continue to participate mainly by reading.
**If you prefer not to say it publicly or privately you can always
resubscribe.

Warmly
Ruth
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org
https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour