[NetBehaviour] It's a Jungle in There: Our Brains Are Not As Evolved As We Might Think.

2010-07-15 Thread marc garrett
It's a Jungle in There: Our Brains Are Not As Evolved As We Might Think.

The human brain will probably continue to grow in size and capacities, 
barring the potential catastrophes that this amazing organ can create 
for the world and itself.

Anatomically, modern humans evolved from our chimplike ancestors around 
100,000 years ago, although it took another 50,000 years for our brains 
and culture to evolve sufficiently to make us capable of language, 
planning, and creativity. But this extended, complex history has a 
downside: the more recently emergent aspects of our brains—which give us 
astonishing powers of thought, logic, imagination, empathy, and 
morality—must share skull space with the ancient brain equipment that 
we've inherited from our mammalian and reptilian forebears over the past 
several million years.

So even today, one of the most basic human challenges is integrating and 
coordinating the complex and highly specialized systems that comprise 
our brains.

more...
http://tinyurl.com/2vzaaqy
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


[NetBehaviour] Ricardo Dominguez and the Question of Academic Freedom at UCSD.

2010-07-15 Thread info
Ricardo Dominguez and the Question of Academic Freedom at UCSD.

http://newmediafix.net/daily/?p=2624

On March 4, 2010, Ricardo Dominguez and other members of Bang Lab 
participated in the student protests which took place across University 
of California campuses. The protests were organized to express students’ 
and faculty’s disagreement with the ongoing fee hikes, budget cuts, and 
the apparent privatization of the UC system. Dominguez and his 
collaborators organized a virtual sit-in on the Office of the President 
website, which was interpreted by school officials as a “Denial of 
service attack.”

Since March 4, Dominguez has been under investigation not only for the 
virtual sit-in, but also his research on a mobile phone tool designed to 
provide GPS information on the location of water, and nearby shelters 
and immigration centers for people crossing the U.S./ Mexico border. The 
University of California is considering revoking Dominguez’s tenure, 
which he received in 2009 after the review of the very same actions and 
research for which he is now being investigated.

Dominguez is considered one of the most influential artists in the field 
of new media, and his current situation is important to note because it 
is a testing ground for the future expression of the arts at large.

What follows is a list of newspaper articles and online resources that 
provide a better sense of the developments behind Ricardo Dominguez’s 
investigation. The first two links are videos uploaded to Youtube of a 
rally which took place on April 8, 2010 before and during Dominguez’s 
first meeting with school officials to discuss the allegations.
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


Re: [NetBehaviour] It's a Jungle in There: Our Brains Are Not As Evolved As We Might Think.

2010-07-15 Thread Simon Biggs
Um .. Mark - I think you left a 0 off the period at which we evolved from
our chimp like ancestors. Humans, as an identifiable species in various
forms distinct from other primates, have been identified as existing for at
least three millions years (Rift Valley finds). The most recent find in the
UK places human habitation in Norfolk to around 950,000 years, 250,000 years
earlier than previous finds in Suffolk (clearly there was slow public
transport in those days too).

Best

Simon


Simon Biggs
s.bi...@eca.ac.uk  si...@littlepig.org.uk
Skype: simonbiggsuk
http://www.littlepig.org.uk/

Research Professor  edinburgh college of art
http://www.eca.ac.uk/
Creative Interdisciplinary Research into CoLlaborative Environments
http://www.eca.ac.uk/circle/
Electronic Literature as a Model of Creativity and Innovation in Practice
http://www.elmcip.net/
Centre for Film, Performance and Media Arts
http://www.ed.ac.uk/schools-departments/film-performance-media-arts


 From: marc garrett marc.garr...@furtherfield.org
 Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
 netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:14:21 +0100
 To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
 netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 Subject: [NetBehaviour] It's a Jungle in There: Our Brains Are Not As Evolved
 As We Might Think.
 
 It's a Jungle in There: Our Brains Are Not As Evolved As We Might Think.
 
 The human brain will probably continue to grow in size and capacities,
 barring the potential catastrophes that this amazing organ can create
 for the world and itself.
 
 Anatomically, modern humans evolved from our chimplike ancestors around
 100,000 years ago, although it took another 50,000 years for our brains
 and culture to evolve sufficiently to make us capable of language,
 planning, and creativity. But this extended, complex history has a
 downside: the more recently emergent aspects of our brainswhich give us
 astonishing powers of thought, logic, imagination, empathy, and
 moralitymust share skull space with the ancient brain equipment that
 we've inherited from our mammalian and reptilian forebears over the past
 several million years.
 
 So even today, one of the most basic human challenges is integrating and
 coordinating the complex and highly specialized systems that comprise
 our brains.
 
 more...
 http://tinyurl.com/2vzaaqy
 ___
 NetBehaviour mailing list
 NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour



Edinburgh College of Art (eca) is a charity registered in Scotland, number 
SC009201


___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


Re: [NetBehaviour] It's a Jungle in There: Our Brains Are Not As Evolved As We Might Think.

2010-07-15 Thread martin mitchell
Suggest your time dates are wrong ...

M. 
On 15 Jul 2010, at 11:14, marc garrett wrote:

 It's a Jungle in There: Our Brains Are Not As Evolved As We Might Think.
 
 The human brain will probably continue to grow in size and capacities, 
 barring the potential catastrophes that this amazing organ can create 
 for the world and itself.
 
 Anatomically, modern humans evolved from our chimplike ancestors around 
 100,000 years ago, although it took another 50,000 years for our brains 
 and culture to evolve sufficiently to make us capable of language, 
 planning, and creativity. But this extended, complex history has a 
 downside: the more recently emergent aspects of our brains—which give us 
 astonishing powers of thought, logic, imagination, empathy, and 
 morality—must share skull space with the ancient brain equipment that 
 we've inherited from our mammalian and reptilian forebears over the past 
 several million years.
 
 So even today, one of the most basic human challenges is integrating and 
 coordinating the complex and highly specialized systems that comprise 
 our brains.
 
 more...
 http://tinyurl.com/2vzaaqy
 ___
 NetBehaviour mailing list
 NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] It's a Jungle in There: Our Brains Are Not As Evolved As We Might Think.

2010-07-15 Thread marc garrett
Hi Martin,

You are correct, although it's the article's dates which are wrong - 
although, now I realise I should of read it more thoroughly before 
posting it here.

It's great to know that there are eager eyes reading the info  ready 
highlight any nonsense I may post - thanks!

wishing you well.

marc
 Suggest your time dates are wrong ...

 M. 
 On 15 Jul 2010, at 11:14, marc garrett wrote:

 It's a Jungle in There: Our Brains Are Not As Evolved As We Might Think.

 The human brain will probably continue to grow in size and capacities,
 barring the potential catastrophes that this amazing organ can create
 for the world and itself.

 Anatomically, modern humans evolved from our chimplike ancestors around
 100,000 years ago, although it took another 50,000 years for our brains
 and culture to evolve sufficiently to make us capable of language,
 planning, and creativity. But this extended, complex history has a
 downside: the more recently emergent aspects of our brains—which give us
 astonishing powers of thought, logic, imagination, empathy, and
 morality—must share skull space with the ancient brain equipment that
 we've inherited from our mammalian and reptilian forebears over the past
 several million years.

 So even today, one of the most basic human challenges is integrating and
 coordinating the complex and highly specialized systems that comprise
 our brains.

 more...
 http://tinyurl.com/2vzaaqy
 ___
 NetBehaviour mailing list
 NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

 

 ___
 NetBehaviour mailing list
 NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


Re: [NetBehaviour] It's a Jungle in There: Our Brains Are Not As Evolved As We Might Think.

2010-07-15 Thread James Wallbank
Hi Marc,

Interesting article - but a distinctly flawed thesis. I quote:

And evolution hasn't stopped! The human brain will probably continue to 
grow in size and capacities, barring the potential catastrophes that 
this amazing organ can create for the world and itself, on a scale 
inconceivable to our ancestors even a few hundred years ago.

Nonsense. I would argue that our brains are possibly over-evolved and 
too efficient for optimal survivability. Just because our brains COULD 
be re-structured in such a way as to act more efficiently and 
effectively, this doesn't necessarily follow that they WILL.

The evolutionary pressure on ancient humans to develop bigger brains was 
simple: their direct competitors for resources became other humans. This 
led to a kind of intelligence arms-race - ancient humans that could 
outthink and outplan the opposition were more likely to survive and 
thrive. While it's a marginal survival advantage to be physically tough, 
strong and aggressive, it's a distinctly more useful to be brainy and 
amusing, so you can figure out how not to be there when he turns up for 
a fight, and persuade his friends that he's an asshole and they should 
stick with you. It's also good to be clever enough to move to a new 
region during climate change, an find new food sources and ways of life 
wherever you end up.

However, our modern culture no longer favours high intelligence. 
Remember, this is evolution, and the only score that matters is how 
many kids do you have? In the UK right now it's a distinct evolutionary 
advantage to:

* Not spend too much time thinking.
* Be unaware, or careless of green issues around population growth.
* Have a low level of education and engagement.
* Drink and take drugs sufficiently to suppress responsibility and 
foresight, but not to life-threatening excess.
* For girls: get pregnant while you're still a teenager, and keep 
popping sprogs regularly.
* For boys: shag as many of the chicks on your estate as you can find.

Absurdly old-style strategies such as getting a job and demonstrating 
that you have an income to attract a high value mate are just wasting 
time. Let's face it, graduates and professionals have fewer kids.

The beauty of the just do it strategy is that it doesn't matter 
whether you can look after the kids or not. Statistically, being a bad 
or an absent parent has only marginal impact on your kids' chances of 
survival to reproductive age. As a double bonus, neglect actually 
increases the chances that your kids will follow your irresponsible lead 
and make you a grandparent (and evolutionary success story) by the time 
you're 30.

Now this rant (while possibly amusing) makes for uncomfortable reading. 
Is this fellow a lurking fascist? Of course not.

But if we did actually WANT humanity to evolve bigger brains, what would 
we have to do? Put simply, we'd have to kill genetically stupid people - 
or at least, kill their kids. Or we could make sure clever people have 
more kids.

Ouch! No way! Here are some nightmare proposals:

* Have an intelligence test every year and execute the slowest 1%.
* Reversibly sterilise everyone at birth - then demand people earn back 
their fertility - presumably by demonstrating characteristics that 
society wants to encourage.
* Withdraw all benefits and support for the poor; make sure you starve 
them out.
* Give politicians, professors, chief executives, intellectuals, experts 
and party apparatchiks droit de seigneurs over the children of the hoy 
paloy.
* Change which side of the street we drive on EVERY DAY. If you can't 
keep up, you've been de-selected.
* Breed all future humans by artificial insemination from sperm banks 
taken from the brainiest and best.
* Introduce birth control chemicals into cheap food.
* The Strangelove Option: hide the cleverest and most successful in huge 
bunkers, then nuke everyone else.

The only remotely positive suggestions I can think of are:

* Encourage smart people to have more kids.
* Persuade dumb people that they don't want kids.

Alternatively, we could just muddle on as we do, with our 
superbly-adapted suboptimal brains. Much better.

Super-brains my arse - they're a neo-nazi fantasy!

Best Regards,

James
=

marc garrett wrote:
 Hi Martin,

 You are correct, although it's the article's dates which are wrong - 
 although, now I realise I should of read it more thoroughly before 
 posting it here.

 It's great to know that there are eager eyes reading the info  ready 
 highlight any nonsense I may post - thanks!

 wishing you well.

 marc
   
 Suggest your time dates are wrong ...

 M. 
 On 15 Jul 2010, at 11:14, marc garrett wrote:

 
 It's a Jungle in There: Our Brains Are Not As Evolved As We Might Think.

 The human brain will probably continue to grow in size and capacities,
 barring the potential catastrophes that this amazing organ can create
 for the world and itself.

 Anatomically, modern humans evolved from our chimplike ancestors 

[NetBehaviour] From F.H.A.R. to Fuckhouse.

2010-07-15 Thread info
 From F.H.A.R. to Fuckhouse.

By B.T.F.A.

Guy Hocquenghem's frank, candid and provocative text was one that took 
stock of the desiring-politics of the gay liberation movement. Queer 
cruising zine collective, B.T.F.A, discover that it still has a fresh 
take on sexual possibilities and the normalising power of phallocratic roles

‘The Screwball Asses' - an essay by Guy Hocquenghem - was originally 
published in a special issue of the journal Recherches in March 1973. 
Titled ‘Three Billion Perverts: A Grand Encyclopedia of Homsexualities' 
the publication was seized and destroyed by police. Félix Guattari, 
despite attempts to remove editorial or authorial propriety, was, as the 
director of the journal, held responsible and fined 600 francs.

Hocquenghem's essay is a critique of complacencies, including his own, 
and predicts the gay liberation movement's descent into neoliberal 
identity politics in Western Europe and North America. A frustrated and 
incessantly reflexive text, it was produced in the context of post '68 
Paris,'69 Stonewall and before AIDS.

http://www.metamute.org/en/content/from_f_h_a_r_to_fuckhouse
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


Re: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me

2010-07-15 Thread Olga
This is an exciting experiment!! And I don't feel there is reason
for so much concern.. BUT! If it once becomes threatening to the
list, it will be also exciting to find ways to deal with it together :)

I, neither, witnessed the death of those mailing lists.. wasn't there
any sort of initiative to save them?

But I'm most curious about a post no one picked up on:

the unexpected happened.
the password has been changed.
i cannot login to karenblissett anymore.
i am not me anymore even further than i wasn't me before.

Did someone really close up the open experiment???

-- 
Olga P Massanet
--
www.ungravitational.net
virtualfirefly.wordpress.com
www.vimeo.com/ungravitational
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me

2010-07-15 Thread James Morris
On 15 July 2010 16:03, Olga olga.pana...@gmail.com wrote:
 This is an exciting experiment!! And I don't feel there is reason
 for so much concern.. BUT! If it once becomes threatening to the
 list, it will be also exciting to find ways to deal with it together :)

 I, neither, witnessed the death of those mailing lists.. wasn't there
 any sort of initiative to save them?

 But I'm most curious about a post no one picked up on:

 the unexpected happened.
 the password has been changed.
 i cannot login to karenblissett anymore.
 i am not me anymore even further than i wasn't me before.

 Did someone really close up the open experiment???


Is there  a super-karen? the master-karen? the ok original karen?

The karen with sys-admin permissions?




 --
 Olga P Massanet
 --
 www.ungravitational.net
 virtualfirefly.wordpress.com
 www.vimeo.com/ungravitational

 ___
 NetBehaviour mailing list
 NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


Re: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me

2010-07-15 Thread karen blissett
Hello Olga,

We value your dialogue.

the unexpected happened.
the password has been changed.
i cannot login to karenblissett anymore.
i am not me anymore even further than i wasn't me before.

Did someone really close up the open experiment???

The rest of us, Karens believe this individual made a simple mistake,
we are all still using the same usernames/pwords with same account -
and many different Karens are spreading across the Internet onto
Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, Identica...

We are still hunting for usernames/pwords for Rhizome.org

The Spectre list has not let us Karens into their special realm of
'tight-circling of peers' yet.

But this will change, we are patient wimmin.

Karen.


 This is an exciting experiment!! And I don't feel there is reason
 for so much concern.. BUT! If it once becomes threatening to the
 list, it will be also exciting to find ways to deal with it together :)

 I, neither, witnessed the death of those mailing lists.. wasn't there
 any sort of initiative to save them?

 But I'm most curious about a post no one picked up on:

 the unexpected happened.
 the password has been changed.
 i cannot login to karenblissett anymore.
 i am not me anymore even further than i wasn't me before.

 Did someone really close up the open experiment???

 --
 Olga P Massanet
 --
 www.ungravitational.net
 virtualfirefly.wordpress.com
 www.vimeo.com/ungravitational

 ___
 NetBehaviour mailing list
 NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour




-- 
Open, Free, Public and Distributed at last.
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


Re: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me

2010-07-15 Thread karen blissett
Hello James,

The original Karen is amongst us.

She is indeed Super, the 1st template, origin, genisis of us - copies.

Now Karen is Karens.

Our strength is trust, we are lost without it.

Our strength is vulnerability, we are lost without it.

Karen.


On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:09 PM, James Morris ja...@jwm-art.net wrote:
 On 15 July 2010 16:03, Olga olga.pana...@gmail.com wrote:
 This is an exciting experiment!! And I don't feel there is reason
 for so much concern.. BUT! If it once becomes threatening to the
 list, it will be also exciting to find ways to deal with it together :)

 I, neither, witnessed the death of those mailing lists.. wasn't there
 any sort of initiative to save them?

 But I'm most curious about a post no one picked up on:

 the unexpected happened.
 the password has been changed.
 i cannot login to karenblissett anymore.
 i am not me anymore even further than i wasn't me before.

 Did someone really close up the open experiment???


 Is there  a super-karen? the master-karen? the ok original karen?

 The karen with sys-admin permissions?




 --
 Olga P Massanet
 --
 www.ungravitational.net
 virtualfirefly.wordpress.com
 www.vimeo.com/ungravitational

 ___
 NetBehaviour mailing list
 NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

 ___
 NetBehaviour mailing list
 NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour




-- 
Open, Free, Public and Distributed at last.
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


Re: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me

2010-07-15 Thread karen blissett
If you or others want to become Karen just email us  play with all of
or any of the accounts collected by the Karens.

Karen

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Olga olga.pana...@gmail.com wrote:
 In that case, I must admit I also like the intervention of the individual
 called karen something AT myself!

 On 15 July 2010 16:14, karen blissett karen.bliss...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Hello Olga,

 We value your dialogue.

 the unexpected happened.
 the password has been changed.
 i cannot login to karenblissett anymore.
 i am not me anymore even further than i wasn't me before.

 Did someone really close up the open experiment???

 The rest of us, Karens believe this individual made a simple mistake,
 we are all still using the same usernames/pwords with same account -
 and many different Karens are spreading across the Internet onto
 Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, Identica...

 We are still hunting for usernames/pwords for Rhizome.org

 The Spectre list has not let us Karens into their special realm of
 'tight-circling of peers' yet.

 But this will change, we are patient wimmin.

 Karen.


  This is an exciting experiment!! And I don't feel there is reason
  for so much concern.. BUT! If it once becomes threatening to the
  list, it will be also exciting to find ways to deal with it together :)
 
  I, neither, witnessed the death of those mailing lists.. wasn't there
  any sort of initiative to save them?
 
  But I'm most curious about a post no one picked up on:
 
  the unexpected happened.
  the password has been changed.
  i cannot login to karenblissett anymore.
  i am not me anymore even further than i wasn't me before.
 
  Did someone really close up the open experiment???
 
  --
  Olga P Massanet
  --
  www.ungravitational.net
  virtualfirefly.wordpress.com
  www.vimeo.com/ungravitational
 
  ___
  NetBehaviour mailing list
  NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
  http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
 



 --
 Open, Free, Public and Distributed at last.
 ___
 NetBehaviour mailing list
 NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour



 --
 Olga P Massanet
 --
 www.ungravitational.net
 virtualfirefly.wordpress.com
 www.vimeo.com/ungravitational

 ___
 NetBehaviour mailing list
 NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour




-- 
Open, Free, Public and Distributed at last.
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


[NetBehaviour] take.music.for.example_004

2010-07-15 Thread don trust
isao.tomita::clair.de.lunemarion.brown::boat.rock©
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

[NetBehaviour] IMPORTANT STATEMENTS CCIX

2010-07-15 Thread manik
KARENDON'T BE SAD...MANIK...JULY...2010...___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me

2010-07-15 Thread manik
...AM I KAREN TOO.../?/...KMAEN...JULY...2010...
- Original Message - 
From: karen blissett karen.bliss...@googlemail.com
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity 
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me


 Hello James,

 The original Karen is amongst us.

 She is indeed Super, the 1st template, origin, genisis of us - copies.

 Now Karen is Karens.

 Our strength is trust, we are lost without it.

 Our strength is vulnerability, we are lost without it.

 Karen.


 On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:09 PM, James Morris ja...@jwm-art.net wrote:
 On 15 July 2010 16:03, Olga olga.pana...@gmail.com wrote:
 This is an exciting experiment!! And I don't feel there is reason
 for so much concern.. BUT! If it once becomes threatening to the
 list, it will be also exciting to find ways to deal with it together :)

 I, neither, witnessed the death of those mailing lists.. wasn't there
 any sort of initiative to save them?

 But I'm most curious about a post no one picked up on:

 the unexpected happened.
 the password has been changed.
 i cannot login to karenblissett anymore.
 i am not me anymore even further than i wasn't me before.

 Did someone really close up the open experiment???


 Is there  a super-karen? the master-karen? the ok original karen?

 The karen with sys-admin permissions?




 --
 Olga P Massanet
 --
 www.ungravitational.net
 virtualfirefly.wordpress.com
 www.vimeo.com/ungravitational

 ___
 NetBehaviour mailing list
 NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

 ___
 NetBehaviour mailing list
 NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour




 -- 
 Open, Free, Public and Distributed at last.
 ___
 NetBehaviour mailing list
 NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

 __ NOD32 4979 (20100328) Information __

 This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
 http://www.eset.com

 

___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


[NetBehaviour] IMPORTANT STATEMENTS CCX

2010-07-15 Thread manik
...I WANT TO BE KAREN WHOLE YOUR LIFE...MANIK...JULY...2010...___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me

2010-07-15 Thread Peter ciccariello
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:36 AM, karen blissett 
karen.bliss...@googlemail.com wrote:

 If you or others want to become Karen just email us  play with all of
 or any of the accounts collected by the Karens.

 Karen

 On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Olga olga.pana...@gmail.com wrote:
  In that case, I must admit I also like the intervention of the individual
  called karen something AT myself!
 
  On 15 July 2010 16:14, karen blissett karen.bliss...@googlemail.com
 wrote:
 
  Hello Olga,
 
  We value your dialogue.
 
  the unexpected happened.
  the password has been changed.
  i cannot login to karenblissett anymore.
  i am not me anymore even further than i wasn't me before.
 
  Did someone really close up the open experiment???
 
  The rest of us, Karens believe this individual made a simple mistake,
  we are all still using the same usernames/pwords with same account -
  and many different Karens are spreading across the Internet onto
  Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, Identica...
 
  We are still hunting for usernames/pwords for Rhizome.org
 
  The Spectre list has not let us Karens into their special realm of
  'tight-circling of peers' yet.
 
  But this will change, we are patient wimmin.
 
  Karen.
 
 
   This is an exciting experiment!! And I don't feel there is reason
   for so much concern.. BUT! If it once becomes threatening to the
   list, it will be also exciting to find ways to deal with it together
 :)
  
   I, neither, witnessed the death of those mailing lists.. wasn't there
   any sort of initiative to save them?
  
   But I'm most curious about a post no one picked up on:
  
   the unexpected happened.
   the password has been changed.
   i cannot login to karenblissett anymore.
   i am not me anymore even further than i wasn't me before.
  
   Did someone really close up the open experiment???
  
   --
   Olga P Massanet
   --
   www.ungravitational.net
   virtualfirefly.wordpress.com
   www.vimeo.com/ungravitational
  
   ___
   NetBehaviour mailing list
   NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
   http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
  
 
 
 
  --
  Open, Free, Public and Distributed at last.
  ___
  NetBehaviour mailing list
  NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
  http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
 
 
 
  --
  Olga P Massanet
  --
  www.ungravitational.net
  virtualfirefly.wordpress.com
  www.vimeo.com/ungravitational
 
  ___
  NetBehaviour mailing list
  NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
  http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
 



 --
 Open, Free, Public and Distributed at last.
 ___
 NetBehaviour mailing list
 NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour




-- 
http://invisiblenotes.blogspot.com/
http://uncommonvision.blogspot.com/
http://poemsfromprovidence.blogspot.com/
http://uncommon-vision.blogspot.com/
You can find my art and writing updates on Twitter
https://twitter.com/ciccariello
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me

2010-07-15 Thread don trust
marcy::join.the.gospel.express'..leaving for glory soon..'©


 Original Message 
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me
From: Peter ciccariello ciccarie...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, July 15, 2010 4:12 pm
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:36 AM, karen blissett karen.bliss...@googlemail.com wrote: If you or others want to become Karen just email us  play with all of or any of the accounts collected by the Karens.  Karen  On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Olga olga.pana...@gmail.com wrote:  In that case, I must admit I also like the intervention of the individual  called karen something AT myself!   On 15 July 2010 16:14, karen blissett karen.bliss...@googlemail.com wrote:   Hello Olga,   We value your dialogue.   "the unexpected happened.  the password has been changed.  i cannot login to karenblissett anymore.  i am not me anymore even further than i wasn't me before."   "Did someone really close up the open experiment???"   The rest of us, Karens believe this individual made a simple mistake,  we are all still using the same usernames/pwords with same account -  and many different Karens are spreading across the Internet onto  Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, Identica...   We are still hunting for usernames/pwords for Rhizome.org   The Spectre list has not let us Karens into their special realm of  'tight-circling of peers' yet.   But this will change, we are patient wimmin.   Karen. This is an exciting experiment!! And I don't feel there is reason   for so much concern.. BUT! If it once becomes threatening to the   list, it will be also exciting to find ways to deal with it together :) I, neither, witnessed the death of those mailing lists.. wasn't there   any sort of initiative to save them? But I'm most curious about a post no one picked up on: "the unexpected happened.   the password has been changed.   i cannot login to karenblissett anymore.   i am not me anymore even further than i wasn't me before." Did someone really close up the open experiment??? --   Olga P Massanet   --   www.ungravitational.net   virtualfirefly.wordpress.com   www.vimeo.com/ungravitational ___   NetBehaviour mailing list   NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org   http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour   --  Open, Free, Public and Distributed at last.  ___  NetBehaviour mailing list  NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org  http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour --  Olga P Massanet  --  www.ungravitational.net  virtualfirefly.wordpress.com  www.vimeo.com/ungravitational   ___  NetBehaviour mailing list  NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org  http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour -- Open, Free, Public and Distributed at last. ___ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour -- http://invisiblenotes.blogspot.com/http://uncommonvision.blogspot.com/ http://poemsfromprovidence.blogspot.com/http://uncommon-vision.blogspot.com/You can find my art and writing updates on Twitter https://twitter.com/ciccariello ___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour