[NetBehaviour] radio art or not

[rinus van alebeek]

Hello,

I once read a manifesto.
It was brought into the world by radio people in Vienna, if I remember well.
After a couple of statements it arrived at the final one.
Radio Art is radio made by artists.

I am considered an artist.
I run a radio.
This radio broadcasts shows made by artists.
http://radio-on-berlin.com

I have serious doubts this radio produces radio art.

But I would like to do this experiment.
If you, who reads this,
connects
http://radioon.out.airtime.pro:8000/radioon_a
and after leaves the room, the apartment and even the building,
while the computer continues to send out the sounds of the Radio On
broadcast,
could this action, possibly joined by others, be considered Radio Art?



Thanks for joining,

Rinus

.

web 

radio 

label 

residency 
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] Fwd: Aaron Schwarz and Wikileaks

[marc garrett]

HI Annie,

Thank you very much for sharing this with the list.

It's important that people read it & ponder, perhaps act differently
afterwards.

Wishing you well.

marc

On 6 December 2015 at 09:41, Annie Abrahams  wrote:

> to read
> for those of you who are not an nettime
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: nettime's anonymous source 
> Date: Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 10:27 AM
> Subject:  Aaron Schwarz and Wikileaks
> To: nettim...@mx.kein.org
>
>
>
> http://www.aaronswartzday.org/jacobappelbaum-2015/
>
>
> Lisa: Ladies and Gentlemen, Jacob Appelbaum.
>
> Jacob: First of all, thank you so very much for having me tonight. It’s
> actually really difficult that I can’t be there in person, and I wish
> that I could be. And, when Lisa asked me to speak tonight, I actually
> didn’t feel that I had something to say until I sat down and wrote a
> text. So, I’m just going to read you a text, and as a result I’m going
> to cover my camera because there’s nothing worse than watching someone
> read. So, as you can see there, it’s just a bright white light, and now
> I’m going to read you this text, and I hope that you can still hear me.
>
> [Crowd chanting “We want Jake!”]
>
> Jacob: (Laughing)
>
> Lisa Rein: Jacob, come back on camera, please. Don’t do it, Jake.
>
> Jacob: I’m sorry. It has to be this way. That’s how it has to be, I’m
> sorry, but here we go.
>
> Lisa: It’s okay. No, no, no!
>
> Jacob: You can’t fucking be serious. [laughing] Terrible.
>
> Lisa: Jacob, please. Thank you. (Jesus Christ.)
>
> Jacob: Look, I want to see all of you, too, but we don’t get what we
> want so I’m going to read you this text now.
>
> The first time that I heard Aaron Swartz speak in person was at the
> Creative Commons release party in San Francisco.
>
> Lisa: Jacob, we’re going to turn it [the podium laptop] around.
>
> Jacob: I was working the door as a security guard, if you can believe
> that. I think it was in December of 2002. Meeting people in that
> seemingly weird world mutated life in a good way. Over the years, we
> crossed paths many times, be it discussions relating to CodeCon, to age
> limits, or free software, or the Creative Commons, or about crypto, or
> any other topic. Aaron was an insightful, hilarious, and awesome person.
>
> Aaron and I worked on a few different overlapping projects and I very
> much respected him. Some of the topics that came up were light, but some
> were very heavy and very serious. The topic of WikiLeaks was important
> to both of us. In November of 2009, long before I was public about my
> work with WikiLeaks, I introduced Aaron to someone at WikiLeaks who
> shall remain unnamed. If we had a secure and easy way to communicate, if
> some sort of communication system had existed that had reduced or
> eliminated metadata, I probably could’ve done so without a trace. But we
> didn’t. You’re not the first to know, the FBI and the NSA already know.
>
> Less than a year later, Aaron sent me an email that made it clear how he
> felt. That email in its entirety was straightforward and its lack of
> encryption was intentional. On July 10, 2010, he wrote, “Just FYI, let
> me know if there’s anything, ever, I can do to help WikiLeaks.” Did that
> email cast Aaron as an enemy of the state? Did Aaron worry?
>
> 2010 was an extremely rough year. The US government against everyone.
> The investigation of everyone associated with WikiLeaks stepped up. So
> many people in Boston were targeted that it was effectively impossible
> to find a lawyer without a conflict. Everyone was scared. A cold wave
> passed over everything, and it was followed by hardened hearts from many.
>
> In February of 2011, a few of us were at a party in Boston hosted by
> danah boyd. Aaron and I walked a third person home. A third person who
> still wishes to remain unknown. The sense of paranoia was overwhelming,
> but prudent. The overbearing feeling of coming oppression was crushing
> for all three of us. All of us said that our days were numbered in some
> sense. Grand juries, looming indictments, threats, political
> blacklisting. None of us felt free to speak to one another about
> anything. One of those people, as I said, still wishes to remain
> unnamed. We walked through the city without crossing certain areas,
> because Aaron was worried about being near the properties that MIT owned.
>
> When Aaron took his life, I remember being told by someone in San
> Francisco, and I didn’t understand. I literally did not understand who
> they meant or who it could be. It seemed impossible for me to connect
> the words that were coming out of their mouth with my memories.
>
> Shortly after Aaron was found, WikiLeaks disclosed three facts:
>
>  - Aaron assisted WikiLeaks.
>  - Aaron communicated with Julian and others during 2010 and 2011.
>  - And Aaron may have even been a source.
>
> I do not believe that these issues are unrelated to Aaron’s persecution,
> and it is clear 

Re: [NetBehaviour] Fwd: Aaron Schwarz and Wikileaks

[dave miller]

I thought this interview was very important. It seems that there was a
clampdown of free speech in 2010 and the internet has been a very different
place since then. MIT's position is very questionable, and the way that
Wikileaks was effectively shut down has been quietly forgotten. Yet Assange
is still effectively under police guard and in a sort of prison without
trial. We've all started using Amazon again, along with visa, master card
and paypal. I feel much more should have been said about their behaviour at
the time.

On 8 December 2015 at 09:52, marc garrett  wrote:

> HI Annie,
>
> Thank you very much for sharing this with the list.
>
> It's important that people read it & ponder, perhaps act differently
> afterwards.
>
> Wishing you well.
>
> marc
>
> On 6 December 2015 at 09:41, Annie Abrahams  wrote:
>
>> to read
>> for those of you who are not an nettime
>>
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: nettime's anonymous source 
>> Date: Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 10:27 AM
>> Subject:  Aaron Schwarz and Wikileaks
>> To: nettim...@mx.kein.org
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.aaronswartzday.org/jacobappelbaum-2015/
>>
>>
>> Lisa: Ladies and Gentlemen, Jacob Appelbaum.
>>
>> Jacob: First of all, thank you so very much for having me tonight. It’s
>> actually really difficult that I can’t be there in person, and I wish
>> that I could be. And, when Lisa asked me to speak tonight, I actually
>> didn’t feel that I had something to say until I sat down and wrote a
>> text. So, I’m just going to read you a text, and as a result I’m going
>> to cover my camera because there’s nothing worse than watching someone
>> read. So, as you can see there, it’s just a bright white light, and now
>> I’m going to read you this text, and I hope that you can still hear me.
>>
>> [Crowd chanting “We want Jake!”]
>>
>> Jacob: (Laughing)
>>
>> Lisa Rein: Jacob, come back on camera, please. Don’t do it, Jake.
>>
>> Jacob: I’m sorry. It has to be this way. That’s how it has to be, I’m
>> sorry, but here we go.
>>
>> Lisa: It’s okay. No, no, no!
>>
>> Jacob: You can’t fucking be serious. [laughing] Terrible.
>>
>> Lisa: Jacob, please. Thank you. (Jesus Christ.)
>>
>> Jacob: Look, I want to see all of you, too, but we don’t get what we
>> want so I’m going to read you this text now.
>>
>> The first time that I heard Aaron Swartz speak in person was at the
>> Creative Commons release party in San Francisco.
>>
>> Lisa: Jacob, we’re going to turn it [the podium laptop] around.
>>
>> Jacob: I was working the door as a security guard, if you can believe
>> that. I think it was in December of 2002. Meeting people in that
>> seemingly weird world mutated life in a good way. Over the years, we
>> crossed paths many times, be it discussions relating to CodeCon, to age
>> limits, or free software, or the Creative Commons, or about crypto, or
>> any other topic. Aaron was an insightful, hilarious, and awesome person.
>>
>> Aaron and I worked on a few different overlapping projects and I very
>> much respected him. Some of the topics that came up were light, but some
>> were very heavy and very serious. The topic of WikiLeaks was important
>> to both of us. In November of 2009, long before I was public about my
>> work with WikiLeaks, I introduced Aaron to someone at WikiLeaks who
>> shall remain unnamed. If we had a secure and easy way to communicate, if
>> some sort of communication system had existed that had reduced or
>> eliminated metadata, I probably could’ve done so without a trace. But we
>> didn’t. You’re not the first to know, the FBI and the NSA already know.
>>
>> Less than a year later, Aaron sent me an email that made it clear how he
>> felt. That email in its entirety was straightforward and its lack of
>> encryption was intentional. On July 10, 2010, he wrote, “Just FYI, let
>> me know if there’s anything, ever, I can do to help WikiLeaks.” Did that
>> email cast Aaron as an enemy of the state? Did Aaron worry?
>>
>> 2010 was an extremely rough year. The US government against everyone.
>> The investigation of everyone associated with WikiLeaks stepped up. So
>> many people in Boston were targeted that it was effectively impossible
>> to find a lawyer without a conflict. Everyone was scared. A cold wave
>> passed over everything, and it was followed by hardened hearts from many.
>>
>> In February of 2011, a few of us were at a party in Boston hosted by
>> danah boyd. Aaron and I walked a third person home. A third person who
>> still wishes to remain unknown. The sense of paranoia was overwhelming,
>> but prudent. The overbearing feeling of coming oppression was crushing
>> for all three of us. All of us said that our days were numbered in some
>> sense. Grand juries, looming indictments, threats, political
>> blacklisting. None of us felt free to speak to one another about
>> anything. One of those people, as I said, still wishes to remain
>> unnamed. We walked 

[NetBehaviour] About a bot: Interview with Katie Rose Pipkin

[furtherfield]

​
About a bot: Interview with Katie Rose Pipkin

Taina Bucher interviews artist and bot maker Katie Rose Pipkin about her
most popular Twitter bots, how they work and what they mean. Indeed, what
are bots, who else is engaged in artistic bot making, and how will social
media bots evolve?

http://bit.ly/1lLxFfF
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

[NetBehaviour] STUNTS: Distributed, Playful and Disruptive.

[furtherfield]

STUNTS: Distributed, Playful and Disruptive.

http://www.disruptionlab.org/stunts

The 6th event of the Disruption Network Lab at Kunstquartier Bethanien,
Studio 1, Mariannenplatz 2, 10997 Berlin. Directed by Tatiana Bazzichelli.

Event funded by Hauptstadtkulturfonds Berlin.
In cooperation with Kunstraum Kreuzberg /Bethanien. With the support of the
Free Chelsea Manning Initiative Berlin. In collaboration with SPEKTRUM and
Aksioma - Institute for Contemporary Art.

After Conference at SPEKTRUM, Bürknerstraße 12, Berlin-Kreuzberg.

Entrance 5€

Artists, hackers, mythmakers and disrupters present and discuss political
stunts, interventions, pranks and viralities.

STUNTS concludes the series of conference events of the Disruption Network
Lab in 2015. Political stunts as an artistic and activist practice generate
criticism by creating distributed, playful and disruptive interventions.
Artists, hackers, mythmakers, hoaxers, critical thinkers and disrupters
present practices of mixing the codes, creating disturbance, subliminal
interventions, giving raise to paradoxes, fakes and pranks. Subversion,
disruption and disorder have been performed as a critique of the status quo
by many underground projects in the course of the past decades. How can
subversive actions happen today, in the context of increasingly invasive
corporations and government agencies, after the NSA scandal?
Programme · Saturday December 12 · 2015
16:30-18:00 · KEYNOTE

John Law (original member, The Suicide Club, Cacophony Society; co-founder,
Billboard Liberation Front and Burning Man Festival, USA). Moderated by
Marie Lechner (journalist and researcher, FR).
18:30-20:30 · PANEL

Mustafa Al-Bassam (alias Tflow, former core member, LulzSec, UK), Jean
Peters (co-founder, Peng! collective, DE), M. C. McGrath (founder,
Transparency Toolkit, USA/DE), Andrea Natella (former Luther Blissett
conspirator and creative director of guerrigliamarketing.it and KOOK
Artgency, IT). Moderated by Ruth Catlow (co-founder, Furtherfield, UK).
20:30-20:45 · CLOSING STATEMENT

Tatiana Bazzichelli (Artistic Director of Disruption Network Lab, IT/DE).
>From 22:00: After Conference at SPEKTRUM

SPEKTRUM, Bürknerstraße 12, Berlin-Kreuzberg (U Schönleinstraße)
STUNTS: Distributed, Playful & Disruptive

A stunt is an unconventional act requiring particular skills, often
performed by people in extreme or difficult situations. The idea of
political stunts as an artistic and activist practice means to generate
criticism by "perfoming the machine" which we want to fight - a strategy
adopted by many hackers and artists in the past decades of network
development. Today, in the era of big data and in the context of
increasingly surveillance of corporations and government agencies,
asymmetries in society become even more evident. How to respond in a
proactive and constructive way to the threat of being tracked during our
online (and offline) moves? And most of all, which kind or artistic
responses can we imagine, if we want to maintain a playful and disruptive
approach? Artists, hackers, hoaxers, mythmakers, storytellers and
disrupters meet to discuss how to challenge powerful systems from within,
turning around the idea of “opposition” into the one of creating
distributed, playful and disruptive interventions.

In the artistic and activist contexts, the concept of “political stunts”
goes along with the act of exposing control mechanisms that can affect
institutions and media corporations. To reveal social injustices or
misconducts by corporations and governments from within becomes an artistic
strategy. This event proposes both to expose and to dissipate this tension
through a network of multiple, distributed, playful and disruptive tactics
to intrude into the inaccessible world of corporations and government
agencies. The goal is to make people aware of such mechanisms, opening up a
critical perspective and a common debate by generating unpredictable
feedback and unexpected reactions.

With the support of the Free Chelsea Manning Initiative Berlin.
16:30-18:00: December 12, 2015
KEYNOTE: FIND OUT WHAT YOU ARE ‘SUPPOSED TO DO’ - THEN DO SOMETHING ELSE.

John Law (original member of the Suicide Club and the Cacophony Society;
co-founder of the Billboard Liberation Front and of the Burning Man
Festival, USA). Moderated by Marie Lechner (journalist and researcher, FR).

How everything started in San Francisco.

Rumors of pie wielding assassins and a cryptic invitation to explore the
miasmal underbelly of the urban landscape seen in a hippy free university
calendar in 1977, was enough to enflame the curiosity of seventeen-year old
John Law. A subsequent initiation into the secretive Suicide Club propelled
Law into a thirty-eight year “career” amidst the hidden world of pranks,
urban exploration, counter culture, ‘Culture Jamming’ and creative mayhem.

Fight Club, Burning Man, SantaCon, media hacking, urban exploration, street
art, flash mobs and more - these are some of the 

[NetBehaviour] Fwd: Renegade Inc. - Thinking Differently | Issue 14 with Darren Coffield

[dave miller]

Interesting discussion about artists, arts, gentrification, galleries,
auctions, fake prices, dealers, YBA's, originality ...




Darren Coffield is an artist and writer who feels the art world has become
so commercialised that it now exists only to serve the collector, the
speculator and the market.

In this episode of Meet the Renegades, Darren lifts the lid on how
contemporary artists actually become famous and how ‘the market’ has
created the art ‘industry.’

*"The idea of originality which was a great point of modernism, of modern
design; the idea of being original, of being true to yourself that's
completely gone out the window because you're now into commodification of
things.”*

He explains that authenticity and originality have been stifled and extreme
gentrification has pushed many artists to survive on margin of society.

Airing on Free Speech TV
 this week as well
as on our YouTube Channel
and RengadeInc.com




**










*Meet a Renegade...*


We were delighted to have Martin Sandbu on last week's *Meet The Renegades*.

His recent book, *Europe’s Orphan* attacks the current thinking of what
politicians and policy makers in Brussels and Frankfurt consider to be
self-evident.

Martin gives us some unconventional and fresh insight into the eurocrisis
and argues that the Euro has been the scapegoat for all of Europe’s current
economic problems.

Has the real problem been the fact that the real issue lays within our
leaders’ inability to think differently?

Watch here > 




*Podcast*



*The Dirty Little Debt Secret*

Ross Ashcroft speaks with Richard Vague - author of *The Next Economic
Disaster* - about his insights into private debt and why this seems to be
forbidden knowledge.

Listen here > 




*Latest Blog *



*In Change We Trust*

As the lifespan of every company shortens, paying lip service to change is
dangerous and following the herd can be fatal.

As the behavioural economist Richard Thaler wryly notes, “*Worldly wisdom
teaches us that it is better for reputation to fail conventionally then to
succeed unconventionally.”*

Will Kemble-Clarkson shares his insights on how mature companies can
survive and thrive in an age of digitally-driven disruption - even when the
initial response is often that the “disruptive-age” sounds a bit far off in
the future.

Read here > 


*Can Central Banks Bail Out The Economy Next Time Around?
 *- Both
governments and big banks are keeping zombie companies on life support and
deepening their risk exposure. As governments borrow more the contagion
risk of sovereign debt, financial sector debt and real economy debt deepens.
Daniel Thurley

___
*Exclusion and its consequences
* - Make no
mistake, the purposeful exclusion of growing numbers from economic activity
is an integral aspect of the economic system. The argument that there is
'no alternative' to current arrangements carries with it an explicit
acceptance that economic ‘realities’ make full employment impossible. This
is utter nonsense, yet without fundamental change, exclusion will only get
worse.
An extract from The Survival Manual

___
*Robert McNamara’s 11 lessons from Vietnam*
 - Note No. 6 - We
failed to draw Congress and the American people into a full and frank
discussion and debate of the pros and cons of a large-scale military
involvement … before we initiated the action.
As heard through Ian Gilbert



*"The cream rises until it sours."*
Dr. Laurence J. Peter

Many times we have worked with people who are out of their depth. Often
they slow things up so much you wonder how they were appointed. The Peter
Principle  can
give some insight. It is a management practice where anything that works
will be used in progressively more challenging applications until it fails.
Including employees. It’s worth knowing about - especially now.





About Renegade Inc.

Renegade Inc. is a new mainstream media platform which creates and
broadcasts content aimed at those who think differently.  Its mission is to
inform, illuminate and inspire, focusing on three sectors: Rethinking

[NetBehaviour] The Wrong -- Encontres e-rregulars#1 -- HANGAR (BCN)

[JOANA]

(sorry for crossposting...)

Dear Spectres,

On Friday 11th of December HANGAR (Barcelona) will host the first
session of  “Encontres e-rregulars”. The “Encontres e-rregulars unfold
as a space for debate and ecounter aimed at exploring tactics capable of
reflexively react to the urgencies opened by the current digital
paradigm from the artistic practices.

The first session of Encontres e-rregulars is dedicated to the latest
edition of "The Wrong, New digital Digital Art Biennale", a
fundamentally digital event that brings together hundreds of artists and
curators from dozens of countries. The event intends to open a space to
share and reflect on the works, codes and convergent practices in "The
Wrong", which suggest and point out practices that escape from the
orthodox channels of contemporary art.

This activity takes place within the framework of the European project
IMAGIT.

Guest lecturers: David Quiles Guillo, Roc Herms, Joana Moll, Andreu
Belsunces and Mario Santamaría & Cesar Escudero Andaluz.


Detailed information of the event //

https://hangar.org/es/news/encontres-e-rregulars-the-wrong/

Facebook //

https://www.facebook.com/events/1642090296052332/

All the best,
Joana
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] #rojava

[Ana Valdés]

I was as many of you know at the conference of Women in Black in India.
Women from Afghanistan Congo Bosnia and Armenia shared with us dark stories
of rape forced marriages and impunity we need to strengthen the civil
societies the question is how to achieve it? If the changes are made with
weapons and soldiers (female or male), we are always prisoners of the
weapons and wars as metaphors...
Ana
Den 6 dec 2015 08:11 skrev "AGF poemproducer" :

> hi,
>
> I spent last days reading and studying the kurdish female fighters and
> their efforts to built an independent equal and just state in north east
> syria… i am a pacifist in my deepest structure but have been challanged and
> confused by what is happening there… if you need to read up look for
> hashtags #Rojava
>
> any thoughts ?
>
> (i find this article a good sum up)
>
>
> http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2015/11/25/rojava_is_a_radical_experiment_in_democracy_in_northern_syria_american_leftists.html
>
> "I recently spoke to someone from the Kurdish women’s movement in Rojava
> and asked what they need most. She said they need a massive international
> solidarity campaign, beginning with political education about the evolution
> of the PKK and its politics, including its emphasis on democratic
> governance, anti-sectarianism, secularism, ecology, and women’s liberation.
> In practical terms, they need all possible international pressure to be put
> on Turkey and the KRG to end the embargo and let supplies through. They
> need the terrorist designation to be lifted so they can travel and raise
> money and do public speaking."
>
> some more…
>
> http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/12/02/remembering-murray-bookchin/<
> http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/12/02/remembering-murray-bookchin/>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Protection_Units<
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People's_Protection_Units
>
> maybe this is also a good thing/ althought americans all over this, but
> maybe for the right reasons for a change
>
> https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/Presidents_Obama_and_Hollande_Prime_Ministers_Cameron_and_Turnbull_Help_the_Kurds_cut_off_ISILs_route_to_Europe/?wTXkYjb
>
> http://thelionsofrojava.com/index.php/join/
>
> ___
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] #rojava

[John Hopkins]

On 08/Dec/15 16:59, Ana Valdés wrote:

Women from Afghanistan Congo Bosnia and Armenia shared with us dark stories
of rape forced marriages and impunity we need to strengthen the civil
societies the question is how to achieve it? If the changes are made with


Certainly fixing these problems is not compatible with any fundamentalist 
religious system -- good luck changing that -- here in the US, the idiots on the 
'christian' fundamentalist right have been and are actively tearing down what 
seems to be a thin veneer that represents all the gains of civil society of the 
last 50 years. I can't imagine that this is going to be 'easier' in the context 
of radical Islamic situations, or even 'normal' Islamic societies. When the 
religious system has already in place a rigid mapping of civil relation and law, 
I don't believe an 'evolution' or 'change' is possible. This would apply to all 
Abrahamic religions at least, and many others as well. I don't see any 
possibility of evolution when 'the Law' is 'the Law'. Is it possible to change 
such social systems? If someone says 'yes', I'd like to hear the plan...


jh



--
++
Dr. John Hopkins, BSc, MFA, PhD
grounded on a granite batholith
twitter: @neoscenes
http://tech-no-mad.net/blog/
++

___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

[NetBehaviour] New Object of Art: Objects in Motion III: Square with content flipping on two axes

[Pall Thayer]

I started this one a while ago. Finally found time to finish it...

http://pallthayer.dyndns.org/objectsofart/index.php?id=11
-- 
P Thayer, Artist
http://pallthayer.dyndns.org
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] New Object of Art: Objects in Motion III: Square with content flipping on two axes

[Pall Thayer]

Life is a big chunk of cheese that goes up and down, backwards and
forwards. A big chunk of cheese.

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:27 PM Alan Sondheim  wrote:

>
> I love the subtlety of this and the obdurate quality as one tries
> heroically to turn it into something else. The twitches...fantastic!
>
> - Alan
>
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, Pall Thayer wrote:
>
> > I started this one a while ago. Finally found time to finish it...
> > http://pallthayer.dyndns.org/objectsofart/index.php?id=11
> > --
> > P Thayer, Artist
> > http://pallthayer.dyndns.org
> >
> >
>
> ==
> email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
> web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285
> music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
> current text http://www.alansondheim.org/to.txt
> ==
> ___
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
-- 
P Thayer, Artist
http://pallthayer.dyndns.org
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] New Object of Art: Objects in Motion III: Square with content flipping on two axes

[Alan Sondheim]

I love the subtlety of this and the obdurate quality as one tries 
heroically to turn it into something else. The twitches...fantastic!


- Alan

On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, Pall Thayer wrote:


I started this one a while ago. Finally found time to finish it...
http://pallthayer.dyndns.org/objectsofart/index.php?id=11
--
P Thayer, Artist
http://pallthayer.dyndns.org




==
email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285
music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
current text http://www.alansondheim.org/to.txt
==
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Re: [NetBehaviour] #rojava

[helen varley jamieson]

thanks for these links, antje; i have heard about the female kurdish
fighters before but not much so it's very interesting to learn more
about it.

On 6/12/15 11:11 34AM, AGF poemproducer wrote:
> hi,
>
> I spent last days reading and studying the kurdish female fighters and
> their efforts to built an independent equal and just state in north
> east syria… i am a pacifist in my deepest structure but have been
> challanged and confused by what is happening there… if you need to
> read up look for hashtags #Rojava
>
> any thoughts ?
>
> (i find this article a good sum up)
>
> http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2015/11/25/rojava_is_a_radical_experiment_in_democracy_in_northern_syria_american_leftists.html
>
> "I recently spoke to someone from the Kurdish women’s movement in
> Rojava and asked what they need most. She said they need a massive
> international solidarity campaign, beginning with political education
> about the evolution of the PKK and its politics, including its
> emphasis on democratic governance, anti-sectarianism, secularism,
> ecology, and women’s liberation. In practical terms, they need all
> possible international pressure to be put on Turkey and the KRG to end
> the embargo and let supplies through. They need the terrorist
> designation to be lifted so they can travel and raise money and do
> public speaking."
>
> some more…
>
> http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/12/02/remembering-murray-bookchin/
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Protection_Units 
>
> maybe this is also a good thing/ althought americans all over this,
> but maybe for the right reasons for a change
> https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/Presidents_Obama_and_Hollande_Prime_Ministers_Cameron_and_Turnbull_Help_the_Kurds_cut_off_ISILs_route_to_Europe/?wTXkYjb
>
>
> http://thelionsofrojava.com/index.php/join/
>
>
> ___
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

-- 
helen varley jamieson
he...@creative-catalyst.com 
http://www.creative-catalyst.com
http://www.upstage.org.nz

 

/Unaussprechnbarlich/, München, November-Dezember 2015



___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour