Hi Markus
I understand - you're not copyrighting the idea. It would help if you
made this clear on your site, as it gives the impression that your
project is your original idea, and this is what you're copyrighting.
I think your idea is very similar to mine from a couple of years back,
in my newscartoon project:
http://davemiller.org/index.php?nav_item=Gallerygallery_nav=newscartoon_v2
Sorry to sound so picky, but I've nothing against people taking ideas
so long as they give credit. And after all this is what you ask for in
your CC license.
thanks,
Dave
2008/7/16 Markus Kison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is complety correct the CC licencse is meant for the documentation
material. Thanks Pall!
dave miller schrieb:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pall Thayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/7/15
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] pulsating emotion organism.
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
If the CC license is meant to apply to the work itself, then it's a
flawed application of it. The only thing that it can really apply to
in this case is the documentation of the work. He doesn't give you any
materials that allow you to alter, transform or build upon the work
which would apply if there was source-code or schematics provided.
Oh, and then there's the fact that we could both take the time to
actually read what it says on the website, like the part where he
states that what's copyrighted are pictures, text, video... :-)
Pall
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:28 PM, dave miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This project reminds me of something I did a couple of years ago:
http://davemiller.org/index.php?nav_item=Gallerygallery_nav=newscartoon_v2
This version without a doubt is far nicer and much more refined. In
fact I think it looks stunning. But I think it's essentially it's the
same concept - basically - taking words and phrases from live feeds
-blogs - then converting into values and then representing those
values. I'm sure I wasn't the first to have tried it either.
Why the CC copyright, and is it possible to CC something that others
have explored beforehand? Under the terms of the CC copyright we are
allowed to share and remix the work but we must attribute the work to
markus kison. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
markus - from my perspective this doesn't seem fair. You claim the
idea for yourself as officially yours and yours alone, then insist
that anyone else who's inspired by it must attribute you.
Dave
2008/7/14 marc garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
pulsating emotion organism.
A fascinating live visualisation of recent emotional expressions written
on the private weblogs published on blogger.com. emotional expressions
are parsed according to a list of synonyms, which then physically
transform an abstract shape-shifting object.
textual expressions are assigned to 1 of 8 basic human emotions, which
are represented as a 3D cone consisting of 24 distinct areas. this
abstract diagram forms the basic shape of pulse, a physical object
that is able to enlarge in 24 different directions. each time a specific
expressionistic emotion is found in a blog entry written during the last
minute, the shapeshifting object transforms itself, so that that the new
physical volume represents a piece of the world's current emotional
condition.
more...
http://www.markuskison.de/pulse/
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
--
*
Pall Thayer
artist
http://www.this.is/pallit
*
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
--
Markus Kison
mobil: +49 (0)176 20439260
web: http://www.markuskison.de
skype: eye-of-baisen
___
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
