Re: failure to build Firefox 54
In Message <2b33a67e-722d-a6df-699f-a46735890...@libero.it>, Riccardo Mottolawrote: =>Hi, => =>Gary Duzan wrote: =>> =>Hi, =>> => =>> =>building Firefox fails for me due to undefined symbol. Error below. this =>> =>is on x86 =>> =>How is it for others? =>> =>> I'm on x86_64, but I get a similar symptom from xenkernel4[68]. =>> It looks like cwrappers is overriding -fno-stack-protection, leading to =>> the errors. => =>do you mean you get a similar error when building xenkernel? Yes. =>I did a complete pkg_rolling-update today, but firefox still fails. => =>Any other has this issue? workarounds? Yes, at least for xenkernel4[68]. Try adding PKGSRC_USE_SSP=no to the package Makefile and rebuilding. Gary Duzan
Re: failure to build Firefox 54
Hi, Gary Duzan wrote: =>Hi, => =>building Firefox fails for me due to undefined symbol. Error below. this =>is on x86 =>How is it for others? I'm on x86_64, but I get a similar symptom from xenkernel4[68]. It looks like cwrappers is overriding -fno-stack-protection, leading to the errors. do you mean you get a similar error when building xenkernel? I did a complete pkg_rolling-update today, but firefox still fails. Any other has this issue? workarounds? Riccardo
Pf, squif-pf, transparent proxy
Hi, I am going to do a proxy server on my lan network, I want to use pf as my firewall, then I remember a long time ago that ipfilter it works with mode transparent, but pf does not work with transparent proxy, by default is no enabled pf in squid, I dont exactly. I use squid -v I see ipf enabled transparent mode, pf does not see I installed using pkgsrc, by default, my question is how can I know that squid-pf and transparent mode is enable and how can I enabled the transparent proxy in NetBSD 7.1, thanks in advice
Re: Can I use NetBSD as a desktop system?
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:03:47PM -0300, SOUL_OF_ROOT 55 wrote: > Can I use NetBSD as a desktop system? I use it as a desktop system. XFCE / Firefox / LibreOffice all run fine. Though ive switched to OpenBox recently, XFCE was just fine if one needs a full desktop environment.
Re: Can I use NetBSD as a desktop system?
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 09:02:57PM +0200, Jan Danielsson wrote: >I do most of my office work on NetBSD, though there are a few issues > I use Macs for (printing, when people insist on sending Microsoft Office > documents, and a few other things). I bit the bullet and added cups to PKG_OPTIONS.libreoffice and PKG_OPTIONS.gtk3, and even that seems to work for me :-) (Tired of "needs Postscript 3 printer" errors given a merely level 2 printer.) Cheers, Patrick (NetBSD on daily desktop and laptop)