Re: bozohttpd: user.domain URL (instead of ~user)
On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 12:22:36PM +, RVP wrote: > $ ln -sf "http://x202e.localdomain/~rvp; .bzabsredirect Thanks for the hint. I tried the following: In /var/www/virtual (passed as -v to httpd) ln -s ~user/public_html user.domain This seemed to work for URL http://user.domain I did not need .bzabsredirect Also moved the main site under /var/www/virtual/domain Hope this is workable. -- Mayuresh
Re: bozohttpd: user.domain URL (instead of ~user)
Is there any way in bozohttpd to redirect a URL of "user.domain" form to a user specific directory - (just like how domain/~user is). Will this do: virtual hosting + .bzabsredirect ? $ tail -n2 /etc/hosts 192.168.68.171 x202e.localdomain x202e 192.168.68.171 rvp.localdomain rvp $ mkdir ~/public_html $ mkdir /tmp/www /tmp/vroot $ cd /tmp/vroot $ mkdir rvp.localdomain; cd rvp.localdomain $ ln -sf "http://x202e.localdomain/~rvp; .bzabsredirect # bozohttpd -f -H -s -u -X -v /tmp/vroot /tmp/www $ curl -s http://rvp.localdomain/ Document Moved Document Moved This document had moved http://x202e.localdomain/~rvp;>here $ -RVP
Questions about NetBSD!
Hello, I am looking for a safe, secure, fast, and reliable *BSD variant that isn't "woke", and will let me talk about "trannies" every so often (I can't help it!). I was considering OpenBSD, but it's extremely slow and bloated, but there's just... something about NetBSD which attracts me to it, despite (probably) sucking even more than OpenBSD in terms of documentation/package management (you could say the same about Devuan/OpenWRT). Here's what I really want to know: 1) Is NetBSD ran by progressive/pro-LGBT (not LGB) people? 2) Does NetBSD have a CoC like FreeBSD's? 3) Can NetBSD be made into the "perfect" one-fits-all OS, like GNU/Linux (Devuan in my case)? Thanks.
bozohttpd: user.domain URL (instead of ~user)
Is there any way in bozohttpd to redirect a URL of "user.domain" form to a user specific directory - (just like how domain/~user is). Best if it generically works for all users, but even if a per user setting is required it would work for me for now. -- Mayuresh