Re: Phoronix 8-way-BSD-install - NetBSD bombed
You know, despite all 7.0 has been a HUGE improvement performance-wise on my main laptop (it's the same one since 2010) compared to the 6.x series and whatever was before. I've just upgraded to 7.0.1, let's see how it works. 2016-09-14 18:17 GMT+03:00: > I feel that for home users, -current may be a good choice. > > netbsd 7.0 is entirely unusable on much of my hardware. desktop was > extra bad. no USB3 means USB keyboard interrupts are lost or something, > need to boot with ACPI disabled (disables hyperthreading), cannot install > from USB, lack of graphical acceleration for nvidia cards means when > running old Xorg it took 1 minute to run a command like 'su', new Xorg > can handle until X is shut down once (all fixed in -current). >
Re: Phoronix 8-way-BSD-install - NetBSD bombed
I feel that for home users, -current may be a good choice. netbsd 7.0 is entirely unusable on much of my hardware. desktop was extra bad. no USB3 means USB keyboard interrupts are lost or something, need to boot with ACPI disabled (disables hyperthreading), cannot install from USB, lack of graphical acceleration for nvidia cards means when running old Xorg it took 1 minute to run a command like 'su', new Xorg can handle until X is shut down once (all fixed in -current). on linux drivers are written before a release, or right after. so a typical user which has 2-3 year old hardware can afford to use LTS kernel. in netbsd, drivers only end up written after 2-3 developers get the hardware, and they don't get it on release day. so this is a 2 year delay in itself. after this many users end up picking netbsd 7.0 release, not knowing it is effectively like picking old ubuntu LTS, except with the additional delay until developers (which are normal people and not companies) obtain the hardware and get around to adding support. it's USB3 now, tomorrow it will bbe that legacy boot can't boot NVMe root and we have no UEFI bootloader yet (PR 51279), or no skylake ethernet, etc. the only thing a user with recent can do to bridge this gap is to use -current. it may rarely be broken, thoguh. If your hardware is unsupported, it's worth a try.
Re: Phoronix 8-way-BSD-install - NetBSD bombed
2016-09-13 2:48 GMT+03:00: > No USB3 support on NetBSD-7.0. I had the same. Requires twiddling with > BIOS options to even boot the installer. > Hopefully 7.1 will have merged by release (planned), -current already > does, and it works well. > In my case USB installation (7.0) didn't work either, the system didn't see my HD, only the USB disk. So CD was the only option.
Re: Phoronix 8-way-BSD-install - NetBSD bombed
2016-09-12 1:13 GMT+03:00 Michael van Elst: > lingvofact...@gmail.com ("Andrei M.") writes: > >>> That's why it might be interesting to find out why ahcisata fails for you. > >>Are there any kernel debug facilities on the installation distro? > > Not much. You can boot the kernel with the -x parameter, but capturing > the dmesg output without a serial console is difficult. > OK, I can try to record it on video :) Will try it shortly. Andrei
Re: Phoronix 8-way-BSD-install - NetBSD bombed
No USB3 support on NetBSD-7.0. I had the same. Requires twiddling with BIOS options to even boot the installer. Hopefully 7.1 will have merged by release (planned), -current already does, and it works well.
Re: Phoronix 8-way-BSD-install - NetBSD bombed
On 11 September 2016 at 23:13, Michael van Elstwrote: > lingvofact...@gmail.com ("Andrei M.") writes: > >>> That's why it might be interesting to find out why ahcisata fails for you. > >>Are there any kernel debug facilities on the installation distro? > > Not much. You can boot the kernel with the -x parameter, but capturing > the dmesg output without a serial console is difficult. If the system can probe the USB devices OK then another option might be to boot a USB image, either an install or a full live image. You should be able to exit the installer and then run dmesg into a file, and copy (ftp?) it somewhere. (you could also boot the CD with ahcisata switched to compat and install onto a USB device then switch it back and boot the USB device if you want to get a full install, but probably booting one of the existing USB images would be fine).
Re: Phoronix 8-way-BSD-install - NetBSD bombed
lingvofact...@gmail.com ("Andrei M.") writes: >> That's why it might be interesting to find out why ahcisata fails for you. >Are there any kernel debug facilities on the installation distro? Not much. You can boot the kernel with the -x parameter, but capturing the dmesg output without a serial console is difficult. -- -- Michael van Elst Internet: mlel...@serpens.de "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
Re: Phoronix 8-way-BSD-install - NetBSD bombed
2016-09-11 23:40 GMT+03:00 Michael van Elst: > lingvofact...@gmail.com ("Andrei M.") writes: > >>As I previousy wrote, I switched from SATA to IDE mode in BIOS (after >>which everything started working), so the system no longer recognizes >>ahcisata. Here's the output for my HD and CD: > > That's why it might be interesting to find out why ahcisata fails for you. Are there any kernel debug facilities on the installation distro? > -- > -- > Michael van Elst > Internet: mlel...@serpens.de > "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
Re: Phoronix 8-way-BSD-install - NetBSD bombed
lingvofact...@gmail.com ("Andrei M.") writes: >As I previousy wrote, I switched from SATA to IDE mode in BIOS (after >which everything started working), so the system no longer recognizes >ahcisata. Here's the output for my HD and CD: That's why it might be interesting to find out why ahcisata fails for you. -- -- Michael van Elst Internet: mlel...@serpens.de "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
Re: Phoronix 8-way-BSD-install - NetBSD bombed
As I previousy wrote, I switched from SATA to IDE mode in BIOS (after which everything started working), so the system no longer recognizes ahcisata. Here's the output for my HD and CD: wd0 at atabus0 drive 0 wd0: wd0: drive supports 16-sector PIO transfers, LBA48 addressing wd0: 465 GB, 969021 cyl, 16 head, 63 sec, 512 bytes/sect x 976773168 sectors wd0: drive supports PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2, Ultra-DMA mode 6 (Ultra/133) atapibus0 at atabus1: 2 targets cd0 at atapibus0 drive 0: cdrom removable cd0: drive supports PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2, Ultra-DMA mode 5 (Ultra/100) 2016-09-11 12:33 GMT+03:00 Michael van Elst: > lingvofact...@gmail.com ("Andrei M.") writes: > >>No, this happened when the installation CD was loading. I've had >>exactly the same problem in the installation process last year, see >>attachment. > > The screenshot shows > > two SATA devices that couldn't be recognized. > one USB umass device. > > The information about the CD has either scrolled off, or it's > one of the SATA devices, probably the latter (with only 1.5Gb/s on > the second port). > > Can you identify your ahcisata controller? E.g.: > > ahcisata0 at pci0 dev 31 function 2: vendor 0x8086 product 0x8c02 (rev. 0x04) > ahcisata0: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 19 > ahcisata0: 64-bit DMA > ahcisata0: AHCI revision 1.30, 6 ports, 32 slots, CAP > 0xc730ff45 > > -- > -- > Michael van Elst > Internet: mlel...@serpens.de > "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
Re: Phoronix 8-way-BSD-install - NetBSD bombed
lingvofact...@gmail.com ("Andrei M.") writes: >No, this happened when the installation CD was loading. I've had >exactly the same problem in the installation process last year, see >attachment. The screenshot shows two SATA devices that couldn't be recognized. one USB umass device. The information about the CD has either scrolled off, or it's one of the SATA devices, probably the latter (with only 1.5Gb/s on the second port). Can you identify your ahcisata controller? E.g.: ahcisata0 at pci0 dev 31 function 2: vendor 0x8086 product 0x8c02 (rev. 0x04) ahcisata0: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 19 ahcisata0: 64-bit DMA ahcisata0: AHCI revision 1.30, 6 ports, 32 slots, CAP 0xc730ff45-- -- Michael van Elst Internet: mlel...@serpens.de "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
Re: Phoronix 8-way-BSD-install - NetBSD bombed
2016-09-10 18:05 GMT+03:00 Andrei M.: > No, this happened when the installation CD was loading. I've had > exactly the same problem in the installation process last year, see > attachment. > > > 2016-09-10 2:49 GMT+03:00 Michael van Elst : >> swiftgri...@gmail.com (Swift Griggs) writes: >> >>>I wonder what happened in his case. I can tell he's re-using the same box >>>and drive from his FreeBSD install, but I've done that many times and >>>never had a problem (other than being annoyed at 'dk' devices showing up). >>>I just wipe the disk and start over. >> >> Well, he didn't wipe the disk and either he just didn't recognize >> "root device:" as a prompt for input or, more probable, the keyboard >> driver (USB?) failed. >> >> But neither should happen during installation. My guess is that sysinst >> didn't clean the disk and the screenshot comes from booting the installed >> system. >> >> >> -- >> -- >> Michael van Elst >> Internet: mlel...@serpens.de >> "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
Re: Phoronix 8-way-BSD-install - NetBSD bombed
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 23:49:30 + (UTC) mlel...@serpens.de (Michael van Elst) wrote: > But neither should happen during installation. My guess is that > sysinst didn't clean the disk and the screenshot comes from booting > the installed system. Or at least the original boot blocks which may not play nice with NetBSD. Although I said that I dd(1) the whole disk, it probably just needs the first bit. One MB would probably be way more than needed and would happen pretty fast. Maybe 64KB would be enough. Perhaps sysinst could do that before replacing the bootblocks. That might make more people happy with their first NetBSD installation and help it to not be their last. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cainhttp://www.NetBSD.org/ IM:da...@vex.net
Re: Phoronix 8-way-BSD-install - NetBSD bombed
swiftgri...@gmail.com (Swift Griggs) writes: >I wonder what happened in his case. I can tell he's re-using the same box >and drive from his FreeBSD install, but I've done that many times and >never had a problem (other than being annoyed at 'dk' devices showing up). >I just wipe the disk and start over. Well, he didn't wipe the disk and either he just didn't recognize "root device:" as a prompt for input or, more probable, the keyboard driver (USB?) failed. But neither should happen during installation. My guess is that sysinst didn't clean the disk and the screenshot comes from booting the installed system. -- -- Michael van Elst Internet: mlel...@serpens.de "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
Re: Phoronix 8-way-BSD-install - NetBSD bombed
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > I always dd nulls to a disk that was used for another OS before starting > a new install. Same here. > Specifically I have had issues installing NetBSD to a drive that had > Linux (Red Hat) on it. It's been a while but I think that the behaviour > he saw is what I saw. I ran dd to clean everything off the drive and > then it worked just fine. Hmm. It's one of those ritual-motion things I do now, and I can't even remember what happens when you don't dd-wipe a FreeBSD disk and try to do a fresh install of NetBSD. > In any case I have my doubts about someone who claims to have written > 10,000 articles over the last twelve years. For what it's worth: Well, I'd question the guy's testing methods and his Linux-centric "Phoronix Test Suite". It looks akin to putting gas in a diesel engine and wondering why the engine is such a turd. If he's going to use that script-ware crap on *BSD he might want to do the same level of testing and customization. He writes a lot of one-sentence or one-paragraph articles. The site is more like an RSS feed than a news site. So, I don't doubt the 10,000 number but using the term "article" to apply to all of them is a bit generous. > http://jonimoose.net/2013/moronix-why-amd-wont-take-michael-larabel-seriously-and-you-shouldnt-either/ Well, I have to say, I find this blogger's criticism pretty well placed. -Swift
Re: Phoronix 8-way-BSD-install - NetBSD bombed
Mike Larabel of Phoronix had the same problem with installation of NetBSD 7.0 a year ago: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=BSD-Linux-Late-2015 In fact I experienced it last year myself, but some good guy told me to change the BIOS settings for HD from SATA to legacy/IDE and after that installation process indeed went on. Now it's about time for myself to register at Phoronix forum and give this advice to Larabel, hopefully he well pay more attention to NetBSD from this moment on. Andrei 2016-09-09 19:35 GMT+03:00 D'Arcy J.M. Cain: > On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:00:49 -0600 (MDT) > Swift Griggs wrote: >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article=trying-8-bsds=2 >> >> I wonder what happened in his case. I can tell he's re-using the same >> box and drive from his FreeBSD install, but I've done that many times >> and never had a problem (other than being annoyed at 'dk' devices >> showing up). I just wipe the disk and start over. > > I always dd nulls to a disk that was used for another OS before > starting a new install. > >> Phoronix is a pretty Linux-centric site. I have some suspicions is > > Specifically I have had issues installing NetBSD to a drive that had > Linux (Red Hat) on it. It's been a while but I think that the > behaviour he saw is what I saw. I ran dd to clean everything off the > drive and then it worked just fine. > > In any case I have my doubts about someone who claims to have written > 10,000 articles over the last twelve years. For what it's worth: > > http://jonimoose.net/2013/moronix-why-amd-wont-take-michael-larabel-seriously-and-you-shouldnt-either/ > > > -- > D'Arcy J.M. Cain > http://www.NetBSD.org/ IM:da...@vex.net