Re: tests needing volunteers

2018-10-27 Thread Walter Nyland
 Any of them. All this back and forth also wastes times -- just put my name 
next to a few that are on 0%.
Walt
On Saturday, October 27, 2018, 10:55:22 PM GMT+2, Glenn Holmer 
 wrote:  
 
 On 10/27/2018 02:20 PM, Walter Nyland wrote:
> Happy to do more -- they're not hard and we should easily get to 100%
> done if we work together and assign the remaining ones to those who
> volunteered to participate (and remove all those from people who
> volunteered, especially for multiple assignments, and ended up doing
> none).
I don't think it's the end of the world if we don't get to 100%. Our
coverage is comparable to that of some previous NetCATs that had a lot
more participants.

If anyone would still like to volunteer for a specific test, please
speak up and I'll assign it, but we are supposed to finish this weekend.

Walt, which ones look interesting to you?

-- 
Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
"After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe."

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists

  

Re: tests needing volunteers

2018-10-27 Thread Glenn Holmer
On 10/27/2018 02:20 PM, Walter Nyland wrote:
> Happy to do more -- they're not hard and we should easily get to 100%
> done if we work together and assign the remaining ones to those who
> volunteered to participate (and remove all those from people who
> volunteered, especially for multiple assignments, and ended up doing
> none).
I don't think it's the end of the world if we don't get to 100%. Our
coverage is comparable to that of some previous NetCATs that had a lot
more participants.

If anyone would still like to volunteer for a specific test, please
speak up and I'll assign it, but we are supposed to finish this weekend.

Walt, which ones look interesting to you?

-- 
Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
"After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe."

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists



Re: tests needing volunteers

2018-10-27 Thread Walter Nyland
 Happy to do more -- they're not hard and we should easily get to 100% done if 
we work together and assign the remaining ones to those who volunteered to 
participate (and remove all those from people who volunteered, especially for 
multiple assignments, and ended up doing none).
Walt
On Thursday, October 25, 2018, 3:22:58 AM GMT+2, Walter Nyland 
 wrote:  
 
  Can I be assigned a test spec to do, I've done a few and enjoyed it, learned 
a lot.
Walt

On Tuesday, October 23, 2018, 5:29:05 AM PDT, Walter Nyland 
 wrote:  
 
  I've done quite a few now, they're fun and easy, and I'm learning a lot of 
functionality I never knew about before.
Please sign me up to any that need to be done still.
Thanks!
Walt
On Monday, October 22, 2018, 9:46:27 AM PDT, Glenn Holmer 
 wrote:  
 
 Hello NetCATters,

Looking over the test runs, I think there are a few that really need a
volunteer or two. Who can volunteer to take some of these?

1) Subversion (two testers, both 0%)

2) CVS (any CVS users?)

3) Mercurial (one tester, 9%)

4) Debugger breakpoints (one tester, 0%)

5) Debugger miscellaneous (one tester complete, two at 0%)

6) Debugger Views (one tester, 0%)

7) Form Editor, (several with one tester at 0%)

8) JUnit (one at 0%, one in progress)

9) TestNG (one tester at 0%)

There are others, but these seem to have the most need.

-- 
Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
"After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe."

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists

  

Fwd: NETCAT 10.0

2018-10-27 Thread John Kostaras
I know that the schedule

is tight, but I have two questions:

   1. Why "[API Support] Ant-based NetBeans Suite and Module Projects
   Operations
   "
   Test Suite is not part of full testing
   ?
   2. Need to update SQL Query Profiling
    Test
   Case but it is "Closed for Editing". Who can open it?

Thanks.
John.


Re: NETCAT 10.0

2018-10-27 Thread Glenn Holmer
On 10/27/2018 09:51 AM, John Kostaras wrote:
> I know that the schedule
> 
> is tight, but I have two questions:
> 
>1. Why "[API Support] Ant-based NetBeans Suite and Module Projects
>Operations
>"
>Test Suite is not part of full testing

I don't know, I see there's a test spec for it but it's not included in
the test run. If you'd like to go through the spec anyway and report
your findings, that would be great.

>?
>2. Need to update SQL Query Profiling
> Test
>Case but it is "Closed for Editing". Who can open it?

I wasn't even aware that anyone had written a test spec for this (I
added an empty placeholder for it during the last NetCAT, as I recall).
Since that's part of a larger spec and someone is testing a different
part, it's closed for edits.

The sections still being tested are IDE profiling and Heapwalker, both
by Michal Owsiak. Michal, can you complete these tests to open the spec
for John's edits?

-- 
Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
"After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe."

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists



Re: blocking issues

2018-10-27 Thread Holman Zsolt
Hi,

I faced runtime exceptions while testing various functions of "Java
Navigation" (1511, 1515, 1517, 1468). I rated them as Major issue, however,
I feel that they might be caused by the failure of environmental settings
(eg JDK).

Zsolt

Peter Hull  ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 27., Szo,
0:20):

> Hi Sven
> I am away at the moment but I filed details as NETBEANS-1428
> Let me know if you need more information
>
> Pete
>
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 18:09, Sven Reimers  wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > crash of the IDE vm or the profiled application? Which jvm versions are
> > you using? Any other specialties?
> >
> > Thanks for detailing..
> >
> > Sven
> >
> > Am 26.10.2018 15:00 schrieb "Peter Hull" :
> >
> > I got a repeatable JVM crash when profiling on Windows which I would
> > consider a major issue.
> >
> > Pete
> >
> > On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 17:51, Rodrigo Teixeira Andreotti <
> > ro.andrio...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Me too!
> > > __
> > >
> > > [image: http://www.eximiaweb.com.br/_images/Assinatura.png]
> > >
> > >
> > > Em sex, 26 de out de 2018 às 18:40, Josh Juneau 
> > > escreveu:
> > >
> > > > I do not believe I found any blocking issues with JUnit or Profiler
> > > > testing.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Josh Juneau
> > > > http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> > > > https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Oct 26, 2018, at 2:00 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I found an issue during NetCAT but it was really minor, not a
> blocker
> > > at
> > > > > all.
> > > > >
> > > > > Gj
> > > > >
> > > > > On Friday, October 26, 2018, Glenn Holmer
>  > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> This is probably the time to ask: for those of you who encountered
> > > > >> issues when testing, what do you consider to be the most serious
> > > issues?
> > > > >> Which issues do you feel need to be addressed before being
> > comfortable
> > > > >> about 10.0 going out the door?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
> > > > >> "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe."
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > -
> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org
> > > > >>
> > > > >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> > > > >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>


Re: NetBeans 10 vs NetBeans 10.0

2018-10-27 Thread Neil C Smith
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 12:14, Christian Lenz  wrote:
>
> Hey, I would like to bring this Topic up, Maybe it is a minor but yeah still 
> discussable.

Well, yes, it's a minor! ;-)

In the (recent) past the main number made sense in the context of
alignment with the JDK.  And therefore the minor number was something
major.

With our new release schedule, I personally think it's better branded
as NetBeans 10, and we use 10.0, 10.1, etc. in case we decide for some
reason we need to roll a bug fix release during the NetBeans 10
window.  ie.  NetBeans 10.0 internally, NetBeans 10 to the world.

Best wishes,

Neil

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-h...@netbeans.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists



NetBeans 10 vs NetBeans 10.0

2018-10-27 Thread Christian Lenz
Hey, I would like to bring this Topic up, Maybe it is a minor but yeah still 
discussable.
Often People Talking About NetBeans 10 or NetBeans 10.0. Often we are using 
both as you can see inside of the Jira tickets and Mailing List and public 
Chanels, etc. Our Branch is called nb100 which Points to 10.0 not to 10. Like 
the history of NetBeans it is Always that we use *.0. 6.0, 7.0, 8.0 and last 
but not least 9.0. (Branding, Splashscreen, etc.) Why did we stopped here?

We should be consistent. There is no reason to remove the *.0 after we reached 
10. So for me it is clear, #bringbackthezero we already have it, only the 
Splash screen, About Dialog and some titles etc. uses 10, instead of 100 or 
10.0. It is not for me to be for or against 10.0 or, but we should be 
consistent in using 10 OR 10.0 over the rest.
My 2 cents.


Cheers

Chris