On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:53:56AM +0000, James Chapman wrote:
...
> The lockups still happen, but I think they are now due to a different
> problem, as you say.
...
I hope, this patch should help to remove some possibly false lockdep
warnings during this current testing.
Regards,
Jarek P.
------------------->
Subject: [NET] sock.c: sk_dst_lock lockdep keys and names per af_family
Initialize sk_dst_lock lockdep keys and names per af_family.
Additionally some reorder is done in lockdep related code to keep
it in one place and to use static key tables only when needed.
Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[not tested]
---
net/core/sock.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 433715f..18c33d2 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -131,14 +131,17 @@
#include <net/tcp.h>
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+
/*
- * Each address family might have different locking rules, so we have
- * one slock key per address family:
+ * Each address family might have different locking rules, so we have one:
+ * sk_lock, slock, sk_callback_lock and sk_dst_lock key per address family:
*/
static struct lock_class_key af_family_keys[AF_MAX];
static struct lock_class_key af_family_slock_keys[AF_MAX];
+static struct lock_class_key af_family_callback_keys[AF_MAX];
+static struct lock_class_key af_family_dst_keys[AF_MAX];
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
/*
* Make lock validator output more readable. (we pre-construct these
* strings build-time, so that runtime initialization of socket
@@ -186,13 +189,52 @@ static const char *af_family_clock_key_strings[AF_MAX+1]
= {
"clock-AF_TIPC" , "clock-AF_BLUETOOTH", "clock-AF_IUCV" ,
"clock-AF_RXRPC" , "clock-AF_MAX"
};
-#endif
+static const char *af_family_dst_key_strings[AF_MAX+1] = {
+ "sk_dst-AF_UNSPEC", "sk_dst-AF_UNIX" , "sk_dst-AF_INET" ,
+ "sk_dst-AF_AX25" , "sk_dst-AF_IPX" , "sk_dst-AF_APPLETALK",
+ "sk_dst-AF_NETROM", "sk_dst-AF_BRIDGE" , "sk_dst-AF_ATMPVC" ,
+ "sk_dst-AF_X25" , "sk_dst-AF_INET6" , "sk_dst-AF_ROSE" ,
+ "sk_dst-AF_DECnet", "sk_dst-AF_NETBEUI" , "sk_dst-AF_SECURITY" ,
+ "sk_dst-AF_KEY" , "sk_dst-AF_NETLINK" , "sk_dst-AF_PACKET" ,
+ "sk_dst-AF_ASH" , "sk_dst-AF_ECONET" , "sk_dst-AF_ATMSVC" ,
+ "sk_dst-21" , "sk_dst-AF_SNA" , "sk_dst-AF_IRDA" ,
+ "sk_dst-AF_PPPOX" , "sk_dst-AF_WANPIPE" , "sk_dst-AF_LLC" ,
+ "sk_dst-27" , "sk_dst-28" , "sk_dst-29" ,
+ "sk_dst-AF_TIPC" , "sk_dst-AF_BLUETOOTH", "sk_dst-AF_IUCV" ,
+ "sk_dst-AF_RXRPC" , "sk_dst-AF_MAX"
+};
-/*
- * sk_callback_lock locking rules are per-address-family,
- * so split the lock classes by using a per-AF key:
- */
-static struct lock_class_key af_callback_keys[AF_MAX];
+
+static inline void sock_lock_init(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ sock_lock_init_class_and_name(sk,
+ af_family_slock_key_strings[sk->sk_family],
+ af_family_slock_keys + sk->sk_family,
+ af_family_key_strings[sk->sk_family],
+ af_family_keys + sk->sk_family);
+}
+
+#define lockdep_set_sk_callback_lock(lock, family) \
+ lockdep_set_class_and_name(lock, \
+ af_family_callback_keys + (family), \
+ af_family_clock_key_strings[(family)])
+
+#define lockdep_set_sk_dst_lock(lock, family) \
+ lockdep_set_class_and_name(lock, \
+ af_family_dst_keys + (family), \
+ af_family_dst_key_strings[(family)])
+
+#else
+
+static inline void sock_lock_init(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ sock_lock_init_class_and_name(sk, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+}
+
+#define lockdep_set_sk_callback_lock(lock, family) do {} while (0)
+#define lockdep_set_sk_dst_lock(lock, family) do {} while (0)
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
/* Take into consideration the size of the struct sk_buff overhead in the
* determination of these values, since that is non-constant across
@@ -866,14 +908,6 @@ lenout:
*
* (We also register the sk_lock with the lock validator.)
*/
-static inline void sock_lock_init(struct sock *sk)
-{
- sock_lock_init_class_and_name(sk,
- af_family_slock_key_strings[sk->sk_family],
- af_family_slock_keys + sk->sk_family,
- af_family_key_strings[sk->sk_family],
- af_family_keys + sk->sk_family);
-}
static void sock_copy(struct sock *nsk, const struct sock *osk)
{
@@ -1014,10 +1048,10 @@ struct sock *sk_clone(const struct sock *sk, const
gfp_t priority)
#endif
rwlock_init(&newsk->sk_dst_lock);
+ lockdep_set_sk_dst_lock(&newsk->sk_dst_lock, newsk->sk_family);
rwlock_init(&newsk->sk_callback_lock);
- lockdep_set_class_and_name(&newsk->sk_callback_lock,
- af_callback_keys + newsk->sk_family,
- af_family_clock_key_strings[newsk->sk_family]);
+ lockdep_set_sk_callback_lock(&newsk->sk_callback_lock,
+ newsk->sk_family);
newsk->sk_dst_cache = NULL;
newsk->sk_wmem_queued = 0;
@@ -1703,10 +1737,9 @@ void sock_init_data(struct socket *sock, struct sock *sk)
sk->sk_sleep = NULL;
rwlock_init(&sk->sk_dst_lock);
+ lockdep_set_sk_dst_lock(&sk->sk_dst_lock, sk->sk_family);
rwlock_init(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
- lockdep_set_class_and_name(&sk->sk_callback_lock,
- af_callback_keys + sk->sk_family,
- af_family_clock_key_strings[sk->sk_family]);
+ lockdep_set_sk_callback_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock, sk->sk_family);
sk->sk_state_change = sock_def_wakeup;
sk->sk_data_ready = sock_def_readable;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
