Re: [PATCH] bgmac: add helper checking for BCM4707 / BCM53018 chip id

2016-02-06 Thread David Miller
From: Rafał Miłecki 
Date: Tue,  2 Feb 2016 07:47:14 +0100

> Chipsets with BCM4707 / BCM53018 ID require special handling at a few
> places in the code. It's likely there will be more IDs to check in the
> future. To simplify it add this trivial helper.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki 

Applied.


[PATCH] bgmac: add helper checking for BCM4707 / BCM53018 chip id

2016-02-01 Thread Rafał Miłecki
Chipsets with BCM4707 / BCM53018 ID require special handling at a few
places in the code. It's likely there will be more IDs to check in the
future. To simplify it add this trivial helper.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki 
---
It's the same change as sent few days ago, just resending it in a proper time
(with net-next being open).
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c | 30 --
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
index 06f6cff..230f8e6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
@@ -26,6 +26,17 @@ static const struct bcma_device_id bgmac_bcma_tbl[] = {
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(bcma, bgmac_bcma_tbl);
 
+static inline bool bgmac_is_bcm4707_family(struct bgmac *bgmac)
+{
+   switch (bgmac->core->bus->chipinfo.id) {
+   case BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM4707:
+   case BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM53018:
+   return true;
+   default:
+   return false;
+   }
+}
+
 static bool bgmac_wait_value(struct bcma_device *core, u16 reg, u32 mask,
 u32 value, int timeout)
 {
@@ -987,11 +998,9 @@ static void bgmac_mac_speed(struct bgmac *bgmac)
 static void bgmac_miiconfig(struct bgmac *bgmac)
 {
struct bcma_device *core = bgmac->core;
-   struct bcma_chipinfo *ci = >bus->chipinfo;
u8 imode;
 
-   if (ci->id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM4707 ||
-   ci->id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM53018) {
+   if (bgmac_is_bcm4707_family(bgmac)) {
bcma_awrite32(core, BCMA_IOCTL,
  bcma_aread32(core, BCMA_IOCTL) | 0x40 |
  BGMAC_BCMA_IOCTL_SW_CLKEN);
@@ -1055,9 +1064,7 @@ static void bgmac_chip_reset(struct bgmac *bgmac)
}
 
/* Request Misc PLL for corerev > 2 */
-   if (core->id.rev > 2 &&
-   ci->id != BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM4707 &&
-   ci->id != BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM53018) {
+   if (core->id.rev > 2 && !bgmac_is_bcm4707_family(bgmac)) {
bgmac_set(bgmac, BCMA_CLKCTLST,
  BGMAC_BCMA_CLKCTLST_MISC_PLL_REQ);
bgmac_wait_value(bgmac->core, BCMA_CLKCTLST,
@@ -1193,8 +1200,7 @@ static void bgmac_enable(struct bgmac *bgmac)
break;
}
 
-   if (ci->id != BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM4707 &&
-   ci->id != BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM53018) {
+   if (!bgmac_is_bcm4707_family(bgmac)) {
rxq_ctl = bgmac_read(bgmac, BGMAC_RXQ_CTL);
rxq_ctl &= ~BGMAC_RXQ_CTL_MDP_MASK;
bp_clk = bcma_pmu_get_bus_clock(>core->bus->drv_cc) /
@@ -1472,14 +1478,12 @@ static int bgmac_fixed_phy_register(struct bgmac *bgmac)
 
 static int bgmac_mii_register(struct bgmac *bgmac)
 {
-   struct bcma_chipinfo *ci = >core->bus->chipinfo;
struct mii_bus *mii_bus;
struct phy_device *phy_dev;
char bus_id[MII_BUS_ID_SIZE + 3];
int err = 0;
 
-   if (ci->id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM4707 ||
-   ci->id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM53018)
+   if (bgmac_is_bcm4707_family(bgmac))
return bgmac_fixed_phy_register(bgmac);
 
mii_bus = mdiobus_alloc();
@@ -1539,7 +1543,6 @@ static void bgmac_mii_unregister(struct bgmac *bgmac)
 /* http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/mac-gbit/gmac/chipattach */
 static int bgmac_probe(struct bcma_device *core)
 {
-   struct bcma_chipinfo *ci = >bus->chipinfo;
struct net_device *net_dev;
struct bgmac *bgmac;
struct ssb_sprom *sprom = >bus->sprom;
@@ -1620,8 +1623,7 @@ static int bgmac_probe(struct bcma_device *core)
bgmac_chip_reset(bgmac);
 
/* For Northstar, we have to take all GMAC core out of reset */
-   if (ci->id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM4707 ||
-   ci->id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM53018) {
+   if (bgmac_is_bcm4707_family(bgmac)) {
struct bcma_device *ns_core;
int ns_gmac;
 
-- 
1.8.4.5



Re: [PATCH] bgmac: add helper checking for BCM4707 / BCM53018 chip id

2016-01-30 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 30 January 2016 at 08:03, David Miller  wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki 
> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 00:41:07 +0100
>
>> Chipsets with BCM4707 / BCM53018 ID require special handling at a few
>> places in the code. It's likely there will be more IDs to check in the
>> future. To simplify it add this trivial helper.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki 
>
> The net-next tree is not open, therefore submitting this kind of cleanup
> is not appropriate.

Oops, I got experience from other trees where patches are just queued
(usually with patchwork). I just read about netdev not playing this
way in netdev-FAQ.txt, I didn't expect that. I'll resubmit it later.

-- 
Rafał


[PATCH] bgmac: add helper checking for BCM4707 / BCM53018 chip id

2016-01-29 Thread Rafał Miłecki
Chipsets with BCM4707 / BCM53018 ID require special handling at a few
places in the code. It's likely there will be more IDs to check in the
future. To simplify it add this trivial helper.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki 
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c | 30 --
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
index 06f6cff..230f8e6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
@@ -26,6 +26,17 @@ static const struct bcma_device_id bgmac_bcma_tbl[] = {
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(bcma, bgmac_bcma_tbl);
 
+static inline bool bgmac_is_bcm4707_family(struct bgmac *bgmac)
+{
+   switch (bgmac->core->bus->chipinfo.id) {
+   case BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM4707:
+   case BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM53018:
+   return true;
+   default:
+   return false;
+   }
+}
+
 static bool bgmac_wait_value(struct bcma_device *core, u16 reg, u32 mask,
 u32 value, int timeout)
 {
@@ -987,11 +998,9 @@ static void bgmac_mac_speed(struct bgmac *bgmac)
 static void bgmac_miiconfig(struct bgmac *bgmac)
 {
struct bcma_device *core = bgmac->core;
-   struct bcma_chipinfo *ci = >bus->chipinfo;
u8 imode;
 
-   if (ci->id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM4707 ||
-   ci->id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM53018) {
+   if (bgmac_is_bcm4707_family(bgmac)) {
bcma_awrite32(core, BCMA_IOCTL,
  bcma_aread32(core, BCMA_IOCTL) | 0x40 |
  BGMAC_BCMA_IOCTL_SW_CLKEN);
@@ -1055,9 +1064,7 @@ static void bgmac_chip_reset(struct bgmac *bgmac)
}
 
/* Request Misc PLL for corerev > 2 */
-   if (core->id.rev > 2 &&
-   ci->id != BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM4707 &&
-   ci->id != BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM53018) {
+   if (core->id.rev > 2 && !bgmac_is_bcm4707_family(bgmac)) {
bgmac_set(bgmac, BCMA_CLKCTLST,
  BGMAC_BCMA_CLKCTLST_MISC_PLL_REQ);
bgmac_wait_value(bgmac->core, BCMA_CLKCTLST,
@@ -1193,8 +1200,7 @@ static void bgmac_enable(struct bgmac *bgmac)
break;
}
 
-   if (ci->id != BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM4707 &&
-   ci->id != BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM53018) {
+   if (!bgmac_is_bcm4707_family(bgmac)) {
rxq_ctl = bgmac_read(bgmac, BGMAC_RXQ_CTL);
rxq_ctl &= ~BGMAC_RXQ_CTL_MDP_MASK;
bp_clk = bcma_pmu_get_bus_clock(>core->bus->drv_cc) /
@@ -1472,14 +1478,12 @@ static int bgmac_fixed_phy_register(struct bgmac *bgmac)
 
 static int bgmac_mii_register(struct bgmac *bgmac)
 {
-   struct bcma_chipinfo *ci = >core->bus->chipinfo;
struct mii_bus *mii_bus;
struct phy_device *phy_dev;
char bus_id[MII_BUS_ID_SIZE + 3];
int err = 0;
 
-   if (ci->id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM4707 ||
-   ci->id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM53018)
+   if (bgmac_is_bcm4707_family(bgmac))
return bgmac_fixed_phy_register(bgmac);
 
mii_bus = mdiobus_alloc();
@@ -1539,7 +1543,6 @@ static void bgmac_mii_unregister(struct bgmac *bgmac)
 /* http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/mac-gbit/gmac/chipattach */
 static int bgmac_probe(struct bcma_device *core)
 {
-   struct bcma_chipinfo *ci = >bus->chipinfo;
struct net_device *net_dev;
struct bgmac *bgmac;
struct ssb_sprom *sprom = >bus->sprom;
@@ -1620,8 +1623,7 @@ static int bgmac_probe(struct bcma_device *core)
bgmac_chip_reset(bgmac);
 
/* For Northstar, we have to take all GMAC core out of reset */
-   if (ci->id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM4707 ||
-   ci->id == BCMA_CHIP_ID_BCM53018) {
+   if (bgmac_is_bcm4707_family(bgmac)) {
struct bcma_device *ns_core;
int ns_gmac;
 
-- 
1.8.4.5



Re: [PATCH] bgmac: add helper checking for BCM4707 / BCM53018 chip id

2016-01-29 Thread David Miller
From: Rafał Miłecki 
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 00:41:07 +0100

> Chipsets with BCM4707 / BCM53018 ID require special handling at a few
> places in the code. It's likely there will be more IDs to check in the
> future. To simplify it add this trivial helper.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki 

The net-next tree is not open, therefore submitting this kind of cleanup
is not appropriate.