Re: [PATCH] net/irda: remove pointless assignment/check

2016-08-19 Thread David Miller
From: Vegard Nossum 
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:08:57 +0200

> We've already set sk to sock->sk and dereferenced it, so if it's NULL
> we would have crashed already. Moreover, if it was NULL we would have
> crashed anyway when jumping to 'out' and trying to unlock the sock.
> Furthermore, if we had assigned a different value to 'sk' we would
> have been calling lock_sock() and release_sock() on different sockets.
> 
> My conclusion is that these two lines are complete nonsense and only
> serve to confuse the reader.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum 

Applied.


[PATCH] net/irda: remove pointless assignment/check

2016-08-19 Thread Vegard Nossum
We've already set sk to sock->sk and dereferenced it, so if it's NULL
we would have crashed already. Moreover, if it was NULL we would have
crashed anyway when jumping to 'out' and trying to unlock the sock.
Furthermore, if we had assigned a different value to 'sk' we would
have been calling lock_sock() and release_sock() on different sockets.

My conclusion is that these two lines are complete nonsense and only
serve to confuse the reader.

Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum 
---
 net/irda/af_irda.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/irda/af_irda.c b/net/irda/af_irda.c
index 8d2f7c9..db63969 100644
--- a/net/irda/af_irda.c
+++ b/net/irda/af_irda.c
@@ -845,9 +845,6 @@ static int irda_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket 
*newsock, int flags)
if (sock->state != SS_UNCONNECTED)
goto out;
 
-   if ((sk = sock->sk) == NULL)
-   goto out;
-
err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
if ((sk->sk_type != SOCK_STREAM) && (sk->sk_type != SOCK_SEQPACKET) &&
(sk->sk_type != SOCK_DGRAM))
-- 
2.10.0.rc0.1.g07c9292